Former NYC Mayor Giuliani remembers best friend Bernie Kerik as 'true patriot': 'Much better for knowing him'
Kerik died at 69 years old "after a private battle with illness," according to FBI Director Kash Patel.
Kerik and Giuliani were prominent figures during and after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York City due to their leadership roles in the city, and they quickly became close friends.
"On September 11th, Bernie Kerik and I saved each other's lives. If we weren't already friends, that bound us together forever. He was my best friend, a true Patriot, and one of the bravest men I've ever known," Giuliani wrote in a statement.
Bernard Kerik, Former New York Police Commissioner And 9/11 Figure, Dies At 69
Giuliani said Kerik was at his side "within 20 minutes of the attack" on 9/11 and "never left."
Read On The Fox News App
The first collapse trapped both of them in a building for what Giuliani thinks was 20 to 30 minutes, but they were able to escape safely with "substantial additional assistance" and "extraordinary bravery" – an attitude that Giuliani said "permeated the way" for recovery over the next four months.
"Bernie's leadership helped guide the people of a very frightened city to draw from their inherent individual strength as Americans and children of God," Giuliani said on Thursday.
He also praised Kerik's career in law enforcement, specifically pointing out his role as Commissioner of Rikers Island, where he was able to reduce violence in the prison by 90%, and his role as NYPD commissioner, where he reduced crime in the city.
"He was driven by an unwavering love of this country and a commitment to serving others. He was one of the most decorated New York City police officers of his time," he said.
Former Nypd Commissioner Calls On Political Leaders To 'Get Out There' And 'Deescalate' Violence
Kerik's 35-year career has been recognized with more than 100 awards for meritorious and heroic service, including a presidential commendation for heroism by President Ronald Reagan and two Distinguished Service Awards from the Department of Homeland Security.
He was considered for the role of Homeland Security chief in 2004, but lied to the White House during vetting, which ultimately led to him pleading guilty to eight felonies, including tax fraud, in 2009. He spent about three years in prison, then moved to home confinement and, later, supervised release.
President Donald Trump pardoned him of the convictions in 2020.
Kerik worked with Giuliani again to investigate claims of election fraud following the 2020 presidential election.
Giuliani expressed his condolences to Kerik's wife, his two daughters and his son – who is also a police officer – and said he believes all of Kerik's friends and admirers are "much better for knowing him."
Fox News Digital's Sarah Rumpf-Whitten and Andrea Margolis contributed to this report.Original article source: Former NYC Mayor Giuliani remembers best friend Bernie Kerik as 'true patriot': 'Much better for knowing him'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate megabill marks biggest Medicaid cuts in history
Senate Republicans on Tuesday passed the largest cuts to Medicaid since the program began in the 1960s, a move that would erode the social safety net and cause a spike in the number of uninsured Americans over the next decade. The tax and spending bill is projected to cost more than $3 trillion during that time, but would be partially paid for with about $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid. Almost 12 million lower-income Americans would lose their health insurance by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. It still needs to pass the House again, where some moderate Republicans have expressed concerns about the cuts. The CBO was still analyzing the bill after it was released late Friday, and many last-minute changes meant a more exact forecast on coverage losses wasn't possible before the Senate rushed to vote on it. President Trump and most congressional Republicans say the reductions aren't true cuts. They argue nobody who should be on Medicaid will lose benefits. 'We're cutting $1.7 trillion in this bill, and you're not going to feel any of it,' President Trump said at the White House last week. Still, experts and health advocates say the CBO analysis confirms that despite Trump's repeated pledges to only cut waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid, the legislation would enact an unprecedented reduction in the program currently used by more than 70 million low-income Americans. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) made an impassioned speech on the Senate floor Sunday night warning that Trump was breaking his promise not to cut Medicaid. 'The people in the White House advising the president, they're not telling him that the effect of this bill is to break a promise,' Tillis said the day after announcing he would not seek re-election. 'I'm telling the president, you have been misinformed. You supporting the Senate mark will hurt people who are eligible and qualified for Medicaid.' Over time, the losses will blunt the significant coverage gains made under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), signed by then-President Obama in 2010. 'This bill isn't being crafted to improve health care in America, or to improve the Medicaid program, or to improve the [ACA]. The purpose of these cuts in the bill is to try to find savings to pay for tax cuts,' said Andrea Ducas, vice president of health policy at the Democratic-aligned Center for American Progress. 'It's treating these health care programs as a [piggy bank]. It's just, how do we extract as much from these programs as humanly possible so that we can find the savings to pay for tax cuts,' Ducas said. The effects of the cut could be devastating, beyond coverage losses. People who lose their Medicaid would have to pay more out of pocket, driving up medical debt and leading to them likely delaying needed treatment or medication. Hospitals would see a spike in uncompensated care and overcrowding of emergency rooms. Even people who still have insurance may not have anywhere to go for care. Hospitals, nursing homes and other providers operating on thin margins warn they could close. 'Seniors will struggle to afford long-term care. People with disabilities will lose critical healthcare coverage that allows them to work and live independently. Rural communities across America will be decimated from hospital closures, and people will lose their lives,' Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in a statement. 'It is unfathomable to see policymakers intentionally inflict so much damage on the people they represent.' Experts said it's nearly impossible to take almost $1 trillion out of Medicaid without impacting the entire health system, not just the people who lose insurance. By design, the group that would be hit the hardest are people who gained insurance when their states expanded Medicaid under ObamaCare. 'The bill particularly attempts to undermine the Medicaid expansion,' said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the Uninsured at health policy research organization KFF. 'It doesn't exactly repeal it, but many of the provisions target both expansion states and the expansion population.' The bill would achieve its savings in various ways, but the bulk of the cuts come from a strict national work requirement and new restrictions on state-levied taxes on health providers. The provider taxes were the second-largest Medicaid cut in the House bill, after the work requirements. The cuts are even larger under the Senate design. Those changes would reduce spending by nearly $191 billion over a decade, according to the CBO estimate. States impose taxes on providers to boost their federal Medicaid contributions, which they then redirect to hospitals in the form of higher reimbursements. Limiting provider taxes is a long-held conservative goal, as they argue states are gaming the current system and driving up federal Medicaid spending. But senators representing states with poorer, rural populations have objected to the scale of the provider tax cuts, including Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Tillis. The House bill would freeze the tax rate for most states, but the Senate version would require many states to lower their existing rates. As an incentive for senators uncomfortable with the provision, the bill includes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals. Overnight Monday, senators voted down an amendment from Collins to double the size of the fund and increase taxes on the ultra-wealthy. Hospitals said the relief fund isn't enough to make up for the impacts of the bill, and urged lawmakers to reject it in favor of the House version — which also would have enacted unprecedented Medicaid cuts, but was less damaging to rural providers. Even some Republicans sounded the alarm. Tillis focused his ire on the provider taxes and state-directed payments, arguing they were simply too harmful to his constituents. He warned his fellow Republicans that their support for the bill could boomerang and cost them politically. Hawley condemned the provider tax cuts and other Medicaid changes, but voted for the bill anyway. Part of his reasoning, he said, was that the bill was changed to delay implementation of the cuts for another year. He also touted 'tax cuts for working families' and an extension of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA). Hawley in a statement after the vote urged the House to pass the bill quickly, while sounding a warning on Medicaid. 'Let me be clear, I will continue to do everything in my power to reverse future cuts to Medicaid. If Republicans want to be the party of the working class, we cannot cut health isnurance for working people.' The other major Medicaid change in the bill is work requirements. For the first time in the history of the Medicaid program, the bill would require beneficiaries to prove they are working or in school at least 80 hours a month to keep their health insurance starting December 31, 2026. The Senate version extends the requirement to low-income parents of children older than 14, in addition to childless adults without disabilities. States can apply for a 'good faith' exemption to delay the start until 2029, but it's up to the discretion of the Trump administration to grant it. Advocates said giving the administration power to delay coverage losses has the potential to politicize the work requirements, as the White House could grant waivers to important states Republicans need to win. The work requirements are projected to save about $325 billion over a decade, because millions of people would be moved off Medicaid rolls. Nearly six million people would eventually lose Medicaid for not meeting the House bill's work requirements, according to CBO. Work requirements 'are only money savers if people lose coverage. Otherwise they wouldn't be in this bill,' Ducas said. 'I think that's pretty clearly the intent.'
American Military News
20 minutes ago
- American Military News
Senate passes Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' was passed by the U.S. Senate on Tuesday following a tie-breaking vote by Vice President J.D. Vance. This is breaking news that will be updated as more information becomes available. Keep reading below. According to Fox News, the president's 'big, beautiful bill' was passed with a 50-50 vote on Tuesday and a tie-breaking vote cast by Vance. The outlet noted that all of the Republican senators voted in favor of the bill except Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). The outlet noted that all of the Democrat senators voted against the bill on Tuesday. Following the vice president's tie-breaking vote in the Senate, Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' will now head back for a vote in the U.S. House of Representatives.
USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump at 'Alligator Alcatraz': What recent polls show about his immigration approval rating
President Donald Trump is visiting the new "Alligator Alcatraz" migrant detention facility in the Florida Everglades on Tuesday, July 1, as the administration plays up the center's harsh environs and doubles down on hardline immigration rhetoric popular with the president's base. "There is only one road leading in, and the only way out is a one-way flight; it is isolated and surrounded by dangerous wildlife and unforgiving terrain," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said June 30. "This is an efficient and low-cost way to help carry out the largest mass deportation campaign in American history." Trump also mentioned the wildlife found near the facility before leaving the White House on July 1, suggesting anyone who escapes the center not to "run in a straight line," as snakes and alligators are "fast." Trump visiting 'Alligator Alcatraz': Here's what to know Since taking office in January, the president has plunged ahead with hardline immigration policies, following through with many elements of his campaign messaging. It has become a central issue for the president and his Republican party after playing a critical role in the 2024 election. One in eight voters said immigration was the most important issue, according to Reuters. What do polls show about Trump's immigration policies? While the Republican base has long favored Trump's hardline immigration policies, opinions among Americans have wavered over the past few months, in the face of an escalating effort to deport undocumented immigrants and anti-ICE protests in June. Yet in a pair of polls released last week, in which overall approval of the president's job performance sank to 41%, views on his immigration policies have also dipped. In a Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday, June 26, 41% approved of Trump's immigration policies, with 57% disapproving. And on the topic of deportations, opinion was even lower, at a 39% approval and 59% disapproval. A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted June 21-23 revealed 49% of respondents said the country was headed in the wrong direction on immigration, with a 43% overall approval of the president's policies on the subject. In both polls, positive opinions of the president were dramatically split across party lines, with nearly 85% of Republicans surveyed by Reuters/Ipsos approving of his performance, and 87% of GOP members in the Quinnipiac poll. That also extended to respondents' views on immigration and deportations, with Republicans consistently more supportive than Democrats and independents. Trump approval rating: Poll released after US strikes on Iran Recent polls show that Americans who helped elect Trump to his second term overwhelmingly like what they see so far. In a June 16 Ipsos-Reuters poll, 9 out of 10 respondents who said they voted for Trump in November also said they approved of his performance in office so far. 'Alligator Alcatraz' the latest symbol of Trump's immigration policies With immigration a clear source of energy among Trump supporters, the administration and Florida GOP officials have leaned hard into "Alligator Alcatraz" as a symbol of this massive crackdown on immigrants in America. The number of people in federal immigration detention have risen sharply to 56,000 by June 15, from 39,000 when Trump took office, a Reuters analysis of government data shows, and his administration has pushed to find more space. The complex in southern Florida at the Dade Collier Training and Transition Airport is estimated to cost $450 million annually and could house some 5,000 people, officials estimate. Contributing: Reuters. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
