
Raisina Hill: What Existed Before Rashtrapati Bhavan And Who Owned The Land?
Long before the stately domes and manicured gardens of Rashtrapati Bhavan began to dominate the skyline of New Delhi, the land it stands on had a much humbler identity. Known then as Raisina Hill, it was little more than a modest village where about 300 families led simple lives, relying on agriculture and cattle rearing. But the tide of history was about to sweep through this quiet enclave in a way no one could have imagined.
The transformation began in 1911 when the British Empire, during the Delhi Durbar of that year, declared that the national capital would be shifted from Kolkata to Delhi. This strategic move was rooted in both historical resonance and geographical convenience. In the aftermath of that decision, Raisina Hill was chosen as the epicentre of the new capital. Its elevated terrain made it a prime candidate for housing the most important buildings of the British Raj, including what was then envisioned as the residence of the Viceroy.
The land, however, was not empty. A report from DNA suggests that prior to the British taking ownership of the land, the area was under the ownership of Jaipur's Maharaja Sawai Madho Singh who, at that time, gifted the Jaipur Column, a towering structure in front of Rashtrapati Bhavan which stands as a tribute to the royal association.
However, in recent years, some people have came forward claiming that they are the original owners of Lutyens' Delhi, which includes the land where the magnificent Rashtrapati Bhavan, Parliament, North Block, and South Block are located.
As reported by The New Indian Express, residents of the erstwhile Malcha village, now known as Raisina Hill, have accused the Centre of failing to provide compensation for ancestral land appropriated nearly 103 years ago. According to a few reports, the British government, in 1912, had acquired about 1,700 acres of the land from farmers residing in 150 villages. Some of the descendants of those farmers, now relocated in Haryana, are asking for compensation for the acquired land at the current market rate.
As per a petition filed at the Delhi High Court, the petitioners, Sajjan Singh and Kadam Singh, claimed lineage to original residents of Malcha village and currently reside in Sonepat, Haryana. Their plea challenged what they call an unjust land grab executed under the Land Acquisition Act of 1894.
Construction of the grand Viceroy's House, renamed Rashtrapati Bhavan after independence, began in 1912 and took 17 long years to complete, wrapping up in 1929. It was a massive undertaking in every sense. Originally expected to be finished in four years, the project ballooned in both time and cost, eventually consuming over Rs 1.38 crore.
Two architects, Sir Edwin Lutyens and Sir Herbert Baker, were entrusted with the design. Lutyens in particular left a lasting mark on the city; the surrounding area, known today as Lutyens' Delhi, still bears his name and architectural legacy. A blend of Indian motifs and Western classical styles, the building is a harmonious fusion of domes, columns, and intricate carvings, a testament to imperial ambition and architectural grandeur.
The construction process itself was a monumental feat. Raisina Hill had to be flattened significantly to accommodate the sprawling structure. This meant extensive use of explosives and the transportation of massive quantities of soil and stone. A special railway line was laid to facilitate the movement of heavy building materials, including sandstone and marble sourced from Rajasthan and other parts of the country.
Rashtrapati Bhavan today boasts 340 rooms, including the majestic Durbar Hall and sprawling Mughal Gardens that draw thousands of visitors annually. Yet, beneath its polished floors and gilded ceilings lies a story of displacement, royal patronage, colonial ambition, and architectural marvel, a story rooted in a once-quiet hill that rose to become the most powerful address in the country.
News18's viral page features trending stories, videos, and memes, covering quirky incidents, social media buzz, and global sensations. From heartwarming reunions to bizarre events, it keeps you updated on what's capturing the internet's attention
First Published:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
21 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
‘At least a year' before India-UK trade deal is operational
New Delhi: The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between India and the UK, signed in London on Thursday, will take at least a year to become operational, as it requires approval from the British Parliament, Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal said on Friday.'In the UK, it will take almost a year or so before it is ratified in Parliament,' Barthwal stated at a media said that the agreement must be approved by both houses of Parliament — the House of Commons and the House of Lords. There is also likely to be a select committee discussion on the issue. In India, the deal has already been approved by the Union Cabinet. No parliamentary approval is required here for free trade agreements to be to discussions with his British counterpart, Barthwal said the UK has expressed willingness to ratify the agreement in Parliament at the said that the British government, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, is keen on the early implementation of the to Barthwal, the Indian government would utilise the time for capacity building of exporters and other claimed that the deal would bring significant benefits to several labour-intensive sectors, including textiles, leather, footwear and gems & will India's auto, farm sectors benefit from UK trade deal?.'Four times concessions'On the auto sector, Barthwal said, 'India has secured market access to the tune of four times the concessions given to the UK on electric vehicles in the British market.'The Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM), which represents major vehicle and vehicular engine manufacturers in the country, welcomed the agreement, saying that it would open new trade opportunities across industries.'The commitments made by the Government of India on automobile sector tariffs strike a thoughtful balance — addressing consumer interests while supporting the broader goals of Indian industry,' said Shailesh Chandra, SIAM who is also the Managing Director of Tata Passenger Vehicles, added, 'We view this agreement as part of a wider strategic engagement and believe it opens new avenues for collaboration and opportunity with a key global partner.'Commerce Secretary Barthwal clarified that no concessions would be given to the UK in the import of electric, hybrid and hydrogen-powered vehicles in the first five years of the implementation of the deal.'Market access in EV is given mostly in the high price segment of vehicles priced above 80,000 British pounds,' he said.


Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Epstein's ex-girlfriend answers questions on '100 different people' tied to him
The Department of Justice has finished questioning Ghislaine Maxwell, sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's ex-girlfriend. She was asked questions on "100 different people" linked to the late financier, her lawyer said on Saturday. British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and US financier Jeffrey Epstein.(AFP) In the interrogation by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Maxwell was asked "every possible thing you could imagine", David Oscar Markus was quoted as saying by the New York Post. The attorney said Maxwell answered all questions "honestly, truthfully, to the best of her ability", and never refused to respond to anything. Ghislaine Maxwell was British socialite and Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend. She is currently serving a 20-year-sentence at a prison in Tallahassee, Florida, after being convicted of lending support to her boyfriend in sexually abusing underage girls. She was interviewed over the course of two days at a courthouse in Tallahassee. Maxwell's questioning comes as focus returns to the Jeffrey Epstein case and a growing demand for a release of documents that could reveal more on the sex trafficking probe. When asked about Maxwell's questioning, US President Donald Trump said he doesn't "know anything about the conversation". He also said that while he had the ability to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, he hasn't thought about it. 'I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about,' Trump said Friday at the White House before departing for a trip to Scotland. The US President also said it was "no time to be talking about pardons". Trump is also facing questions on his ties with Epstein. The two shared a friendship in the 1990s but had a falling out in 2004. While some reports have claimed that Trump is among those named in the Epstein Files, there is no evidence linking the President to the pedophile's crimes. A Wall Street Journal report recently claimed that Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump about being mentioned in the file "multiple times", but the White House rejected the claims.


Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- Indian Express
NCERT panel head defends ‘broad survey' approach in new social science textbooks
The new NCERT social science textbooks for classes 6 to 8 provide a 'broad survey' of Indian civilisation from prehistoric times to Independence, and an 'in-depth, detailed treatment of any period of India's history is not only impossible, but undesirable,' according to Michel Danino, chairperson of the NCERT's curricular area group for the new social science textbooks. 'Were it to be attempted, we would be falling back into the old pitfall of burdening students with loads of data that they simply cannot digest or relate to, and end up resenting,' Danino, a guest professor at IIT Gandhinagar, wrote in a note that responds to the recent criticism of the new social science books. Last week, NCERT released part 1 of the social science textbook for class 8. Pointing out that his note represents his personal opinion, Danino wrote that the rationale for these books providing only a broad survey is that 'a number of school students drop out at the end of class 8, and should be exposed to such an overview before leaving school.' However, he added that a 'survey' need not be superficial and 'it has been our attempt to touch upon key figures, events, concepts, developments etc., which we would like students to remember all their lives.' Referring to a new approach to the syllabus and textbooks in the context of the National Education Policy (NEP 2020), and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education 2023, Danino wrote that this new foundation for school education has formulated new pedagogical approaches, new classroom transactions and a reduced syllabus. The new approach focuses on essential principles, concepts, events, and developments, 'moving away from data-heavy, supposedly 'comprehensive' textbooks that only promoted rote-learning,' he wrote. On recent references to 'omissions' from these textbooks, including that of the Paika rebellion of Odisha's Khurda region against British rule in the 19th century, Danino wrote that no chapters have been 'added' or 'omitted' since 'the whole basis is different.' The new social science textbooks cover history, geography, political science, and economics in one book, unlike in earlier years when there were different books for these themes. '…each new textbook has combined in a single volume what was earlier dealt with in four. This alone testifies to our concern for content reduction, as mandated by the NEP 2020,' Danino wrote. Listing 23 rebellions against British colonial rule, relevant to the period that the class 8 textbook's chapter covers, Danino pointed out that only six of these rebellions figure in part 1 of the textbook. 'Keeping the student in mind, we selected them as sufficiently representative, in our view, of the growing discontent among Indian populations against colonial rule. We must now ask our critics the following questions: who is to decide which of these uprisings and rebellions are major and which are minor? Should people of the states or clans mentioned in the 17 rebellions (and many more) not covered in this chapter start protesting that they are hurt by the 'omission' of those particular rebellions?' Danino wrote.