&w=3840&q=100)
FM Sitharaman flays tax officials, says OGE issuance delays 'unpardonable'
'After all the decisions are taken, the delay in OGE issuance is just not explainable. But we have a category—would you believe it? You have a category of OGE issuance delay. Why pray? The decisions are all done. You just have to issue the OGE. Unpardonable,' she said, addressing senior officials.
Reinforcing the need for accountability, she said that good policies alone are not enough. What matters, actually, is timely execution. Referring to the progress made in redrafting the Income Tax Act, she added, 'For a group or the CBDT, which is able to reduce five lakh words of the 1961 Act within a matter of three months to give me a draft bill which is half the size of that earlier 1961 Act… you're able to do that, but you can't issue OGEs? What's going on?'
Recalling the key action points from the June 2025 review, Sitharaman said: 'I would recall five of them (including the issue of OGE), which I would think are important for all of us to re-look at—not because things have changed from then to now, June 2025 to now, but to refresh ourselves that these were things which all of us spoke about together.'
The first, she said, is to 'accelerate disposal of disputed tax demands pending before the faceless appellate authorities and ensure timely resolution of litigation backlog.' Second, departments must 'identify and withdraw departmental appeals falling below the revised monetary threshold announced during the Union Budget 2024–2025 within the next three months.' The Union Budget 2024–25 raised the monetary thresholds for filing departmental appeals in tax-related cases, setting the new limits at ₹60 lakh for tribunals, ₹2 crore for High Courts, and ₹5 crore for the Supreme Court. These enhanced limits apply to disputes under Direct Taxes, as well as legacy cases in Excise and Service Tax.
The third priority is to 'ensure timely processing of tax refunds and proactive and timely resolution of taxpayer grievances,' said the Minister. Fourth, departments must 'analyse the grievances and devise strategies not only to resolve the existing pendency but also to address the challenges that are causing the grievances in the first place.' And fifth, Sitharaman said, is to 'undertake region-wise performance reviews to help identify factors hindering performance and streamline operations through indicators such as grievance disposal and orders giving effect issuance.'
Calling the Income Tax Day 'the moment when we reaffirm the unsaid social contract between the state and the taxpayer,' Sitharaman said this contract must not be allowed to 'fray at the edges' or 'become loose, become diluted.' She urged officials to raise the benchmark and ensure that the reform process is matched by efficient delivery on the ground.
In addition, the Finance Minister lauded the drafting of the new Income Tax Bill as the first-ever comprehensive review of the Income Tax Act since 1961. She said that several members of the select committee of the Lok Sabha had informally appreciated the drafting of the IT Bill 2025. She expressed hope that 'Parliament actually looks at the good work done… we will welcome the suggestions by honourable members and… expect with enough engagement, discussion, and debate in the House… this bill… passes through Parliament's scrutiny.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

New Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Kerala govt moves SC seeking rejection of Presidential reference, calls it 'misuse of power'
"A reference under Article 143 cannot be used to overrule findings of law and fact in earlier judgments," the Kerala government stated. It further pointed out that the Union government has not filed any review or curative petition against the April 8 ruling, making it binding under Article 141. "The President and the council of ministers must act in aid of the Supreme Court under Article 144," the plea added. The state also accused the reference of misinterpreting Article 200 by falsely claiming that no timeline exists for governors to act on Bills. "The foundational issues in queries 1 to 11 have already been settled in the Tamil Nadu, Punjab, and Telangana cases," Kerala argued, urging the court to reject the reference as "misleading." The Supreme Court, meanwhile, has agreed to examine the Presidential reference and has sought responses from the Centre and all states by July 29. A five-judge Constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai, will hear the matter on August 29, with the assistance of Attorney General R Venkataramani. The court will determine whether judicially enforceable timelines can be imposed on Governors and the President regarding pending Bills. The controversy stems from the April 8 ruling by a two-judge bench, which held that Governors must act within three months if withholding assent to a bill and within one month if a bill is re-enacted. The court had invoked Article 142 to declare Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi's inaction as "illegal" and deemed 10 pending Bills as approved. President Murmu's reference challenges this verdict, raising questions on whether Governors are bound by ministerial advice and if their discretion under Article 200 is subject to judicial review. With Kerala now accusing the reference of being a "backdoor attempt" to undo settled law, the Supreme Court's upcoming decision could have far-reaching implications on Centre-state relations and the powers of constitutional authorities. Out of 14 crucial questions, the majority and important were as follows: 1) What are the constitutional options before a Governor when a Bill is presented under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 2) Is the Governor bound by the aid & advice tendered by the Council of Ministers while exercising all options available with him when a Bill is presented before him under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 3) Is the exercise of constitutional discretion by the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India justiciable? 4) Is Article 361 of the Constitution of India an absolute bar to the judicial review in relation to the actions of a Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution of India? 5) In the absence of a constitutionally prescribed time limit, and the manner of exercise of powers by the Governor, can timelines be imposed and the manner of exercise be prescribed through judicial orders for the exercise of all powers under Article 200 of the Constitution of India by the Governor?

New Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC order on West Bengal OBC list
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the Calcutta High Court's decision that had stalled the implementation of a revised list of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) notified by the West Bengal government. "Prima facie, the high court order seems to be erroneous," said a bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria while hearing the appeal of the state government. On June 17, the Calcutta High Court ordered an interim stay on notifications issued by the state government with regard to reservations to 140 subsections under OBC-A and OBC-B categories made by it. At the outset, the bench took note of the submissions of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the state government, and said, "This is surprising. How can the High Court pass such an order? Reservation is part of the executive function." The state had prepared the new list after the high court, in May 2024, quashed the inclusion of as many as 77 communities in the OBC list.


United News of India
33 minutes ago
- United News of India
CJI Gavai, SC judges call for Bar-Bench unity, women-led legal future
Srinagar, Jul 27 (UNI) In a powerful show of judicial unity and commitment to inclusive legal reform, Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai and several Supreme Court judges converged in Srinagar for the North Zone Regional Conference organised by the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) in collaboration with the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh. Held at the Sher-i-Kashmir International Conference Centre (SKICC), the conference titled 'In Conversation with the Bar: A Shared Vision for Legal Transformation' aimed to strengthen collaboration between the Bar and Bench in delivering justice to the most vulnerable sections of society, particularly in frontier regions. 'Presiding over the conference, Chief Justice Gavai, who also serves as Patron-in-Chief of NALSA, emphasised the judiciary's constitutional mandate to ensure last-mile access to justice, especially for marginalised and underprivileged communities. 'NALSA, under the leadership of Justice Surya Kant and in future, Justice Vikram Nath, will continue to pave the way for a stronger, more inclusive justice delivery system,' CJI Gavai said. 'Women empowerment remains a cornerstone of this vision,' he added. He concluded his address with a stirring call for national integration, quoting the iconic lyric, 'Chhodo kal ki baatein, kal ki baat purani, aao milkar likhein nayi kahani, hum hain Hindustani.' Delivering the keynote address, Justice Surya Kant, Executive Chairman of NALSA, highlighted the growing presence of women in the legal profession in Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh. 'The future of the justice delivery system in this region will largely be led by women, whether from the Bar or on the Bench,' he declared, celebrating the emerging generation of women advocates and judges as torchbearers of reform. The conference also featured insights from several other Supreme Court judges, each of whom focused on key structural and regional concerns: Justice N. Kotiswar Singh advocated for a dedicated High Court bench in Ladakh and enhanced infrastructure for women advocates, including exclusive chambers. Justice Rajesh Bindal called for upgrading technological infrastructure across the district courts of J&K and Ladakh. Justice P.S. Narasimha emphasised that 'the Bar and Bench are two wheels of the same chariot,' lauding the adaptability and dedication of the legal community. Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha also addressed the gathering, reinforcing NALSA's vision of inclusive justice rooted in grassroots engagement. Chief Justice Arun Palli of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh welcomed the dignitaries and acknowledged the enthusiasm and intellectual depth of the region's young legal professionals. 'Our young lawyers possess clarity of thought and a strong command over law, while our senior advocates continue to uphold the highest standards of professionalism,' he said. The conference marked a significant milestone in NALSA's ongoing efforts to democratise access to justice in remote and underserved areas. With the presence of the Chief Justice of India, multiple Supreme Court judges, and regional judicial leadership, the event sent a clear message: that the Bar and Bench are united in their mission to strengthen legal empowerment, promote gender inclusion, and modernise judicial infrastructure in Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh. UNI SNG SSP