Major Satellite Suddenly Disappears
Dubbed MethaneSAT, the $88 million spacecraft was launched into orbit aboard a SpaceX rocket in March 2024 and was expected to collect data on the potent greenhouse gas for at least five years.
But for the past two weeks, the satellite's operators, the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund, have been unable to establish contact.
Now, in a final blow, mission control says that MethaneSAT has lost power, crushing almost all hope of bringing it back online.
"It is likely not recoverable," the EDF said in a statement Tuesday.
The cause, at this time, isn't known, and an investigation into why communications were lost is ongoing.
It's an agonizing loss, especially as the mission — which was backed by Google and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos — had proven that its advanced spectrometer instruments could pick out emissions from space and trace them back to their source with remarkable precision.
The just under a year's worth of data it managed to collect was "magnificent," Steven Hamburg, chief scientist at the EDF, told the New York Times.
"We set out in this first year to demonstrate what was possible, that we could think about direct measurement of greenhouse gases in a way that we had never been able to do before," Hamburg added. "And I think we demonstrated that."
Methane traps 28 times more heat than carbon dioxide and is considered to be the second biggest contributor to global warming.
Many scientists fear, however, that we're actually underestimating its impact. That's because methane is a very leaky greenhouse gas, meaning that a lot of it escapes as it's stored, transported, and drilled without being accounted for. Research suggests that gas companies are drastically underreporting their real methane emissions as a result, with it being in their best interests to turn a blind eye.
To hold polluters accountable, numerous organizations including NASA have been monitoring methane from space. But MethaneSAT purported to do it with enough accuracy to single out the specific facilities responsible, as the NYT explained.
Data gathered by the satellite — which is publicly available — implicated oil and gas sites in North America and Central Asia as emitting far higher amounts of methane than predicted, per the NYT.
It's not how it would've wanted things to end, but with its satellite making a convincing case for itself before going out, the EDF is choosing to look on the bright side.
"The mission has been a remarkable success in terms of scientific and technological accomplishment, and for its lasting influence on both industry and regulators worldwide," the EDF said in the statement. "We will continue to process data that we have retrieved from the satellite and will be releasing additional scenes of global oil and gas production region-scale emissions over the coming months."
More on spacecraft: Alert: There's a Lost Spaceship in the Ocean
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Experts Sound the Alarm on New Invasion Threatening Christmas Tree Farms
Invasive insects that resemble tiny wasps are quietly spreading across the United States, threatening pine trees, and experts say Christmas tree farms could be next. The Cool Down reported that European pine sawflies (Neodiprion sertifer) have been actively feeding on pine needles in Washington's Pierce County, and their slow but steady spread could pose a real risk to ornamental and plantation pines this summer. Sawfly larvae, which hatch from eggs laid in pine needles in the spring, can feed together in groups of dozens, stripping older needles clean, even if younger foliage remains safe. While they don't typically kill large trees, repeated feeding can stunt growth and create unsightly bald patches, which is a significant concern for growers and homeowners alike. These insects were first spotted in Washington in 2008, but their spread has been gradual since adult sawflies are poor fliers. Instead, they hitch rides on infested nursery stock, mulch, or soil, making nurseries and Christmas tree farms particularly vulnerable. The aesthetic damage is more than just cosmetic. 'It's the most common sawfly found infesting landscapes and Christmas tree plantations,' according to the University of Wisconsin, which notes these sawflies thrive in pines like Scots, red, Jack, and Mugo—common species in holiday tree lots. If you spot pine needles stripped bare like a bottle brush, you may have a sawfly infestation. These larvae can consume huge patches of older needles before moving on. While trees usually survive, the lasting effects can take a toll on growth and appearance. Experts recommend regular monitoring from spring through early summer. For light infestations, simply knocking larvae off or pruning affected branches may do the trick. Horticultural oils and insecticidal soaps can help against young larvae, while more persistent outbreaks may require targeted insecticides like acephate or spinosad. Natural predators, including certain birds, wasps, and small mammals, also feed on sawflies and their cocoons, offering a built-in defense mechanism. For Christmas tree farmers and homeowners who value healthy pines, early detection and control are key. Combined with native plantings that support wildlife, these steps can help prevent sawfly damage and protect future holiday trees. So, before you hang that ornament or wreath, take a close look at your pine branches. A handful of hungry sawflies now could mean a thinner, weaker tree come Sound the Alarm on New Invasion Threatening Christmas Tree Farms first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 3, 2025
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Surprising Truth About the Scorpions Creeping Into Your Home
As temperatures soar across much of the U.S., one creature is crawling into the spotlight, and sometimes, into homes. Scorpions, the desert-dwelling arachnids armed with pincers and venomous tails, are showing up more frequently in residential areas. But experts say the fear might be overblown. While they look like something straight out of a horror movie, most scorpions in the U.S. aren't dangerous to humans. According to Jacob Gorneau, a researcher at the California Academy of Sciences, these creatures are shy predators that typically sting only when threatened, usually by accident, USA Today reported. 'They're very unwilling to strike unless they feel like their life is in danger,' Gorneau said. Scorpions are most often associated with the desert Southwest—Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Texas—but they've also been spotted as far north as Virginia on the East Coast and southern Canada on the West. And while some scorpions can handle hot, tropical environments, Gorneau explained that many are surprisingly adaptable. 'Even in places where it snows, they'll burrow deep enough to create a microenvironment that suits them,' he said. What's driving them into homes? Heat. Extreme temperatures push scorpions to seek cooler, shaded spaces, like basements, bathrooms, or anywhere they can sneak in through pipes, cracks, or under doors. They're also on the hunt for food and moisture, which makes homes an accidental oasis. Though there are nearly 3,000 known species of scorpions, only one in the U.S., the Arizona bark scorpion, is considered truly dangerous. The rest? Their stings usually hurt about as much as a bee sting, if that. Still, it's not exactly comforting to find one in your shoe. Prevention tips include sealing entry points, clearing clutter, and keeping your yard trimmed. And if you do come face to face with a scorpion, know that it's probably more afraid of you. 'They've been around for hundreds of millions of years,' Gorneau said. 'They haven't changed much because they haven't had to. Their bodies and habits just work.' So before you reach for the nearest shoe, remember: the surprising truth is that these creepy crawlers are more Goldilocks than Truth About the Scorpions Creeping Into Your Home first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 5, 2025
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Air Pollution 'Strongly Associated' With DNA Mutations Tied to Lung Cancer
Lung cancer cases are on the rise in non-smokers around the world, and air pollution could be an insidious, contributing factor. A genome study has now found that outdoor smog and soot are strongly associated with DNA mutations related to lung cancer – including known drivers seen in smokers, and new ones unique to non-smokers. The more pollution someone was exposed to, the more mutations scientists found in their lung tumors. The findings don't mean that air pollution is directly causing lung cancer, but they do contribute to evidence suggesting that possibility. Related: "We're seeing this problematic trend that never-smokers are increasingly getting lung cancer, but we haven't understood why," explains biomolecular scientist Ludmil Alexandrov from the University of California San Diego (UCSD). "Our research shows that air pollution is strongly associated with the same types of DNA mutations we typically associate with smoking." The extensive international analysis examined the cancer genomes of 871 individuals from four continents, all of whom had lung cancer despite never having smoked and who had not yet received cancer treatment. Those who lived in regions with high levels of air pollution were significantly more likely to have TP53 mutations, EGFR mutations, and shorter telomeres. Abnormal TP53 and EGFR genes are hallmarks of lung cancers, especially those driven by the SBS4 DNA mutation, and shorter telomeres are linked to accelerated aging. In the current study, non-smokers who lived in areas with higher air pollution were nearly four times more likely to exhibit SBS4 signatures as those who lived in regions with cleaner air. By contrast, exposure to secondhand smoke, which is a known cancer risk, showed only a slight increase in genetic mutations. "If there is a mutagenic effect of secondhand smoke, it may be too weak for our current tools to detect," says geneticist Tongwu Zhang from the US National Cancer Institute (NCI). Not so for air pollution or tobacco smoking: both were strongly linked to DNA mutations. Today in the United States, people who have never smoked or who have smoked fewer than 100 cigarettes in their lives make up about 10 to 20 percent of lung cancer cases. Scientists have long suspected that air pollution could be a contributing factor, but exactly how fine particulate matter in the air compares to tobacco smoking or secondhand smoke exposure remains unclear. Some studies suggest that breathing polluted air is on par with smoking a pack a day, and yet these conclusions are mostly based on observational analyses. The current study digs further by looking at some of the molecular mechanisms that may be at play. It compared the lung cancer genomes of the 871 non-smokers with tumors from 345 smokers, to find similarities and differences. The majority of non-smokers with lung cancer had adenocarcinomas (the most common type of lung cancer), and nearly 5 percent of those tumors showed the SBS4 mutational signature. In addition, 28 percent of non-smokers showed a new signature called SBS40a, which wasn't found in tobacco smokers. Strangely, the cause of this particular mutational driver was unknown, but doesn't seem to be environmental in nature. "We see it in a majority of cases in this study, but we don't yet know what's driving it," says Alexandrov. "This is something entirely different, and it opens up a whole new area of investigation." The current research relied only on regional air pollution levels, which means it can't say how much any one individual was directly exposed to fine particulate matter in the air. Participants who said they had never smoked may have also smoked more than reported. These limitations notwithstanding, the overall findings align with other evidence indicating that soot or smog may trigger tumor growth in a similar way to cigarette chemicals. "This is an urgent and growing global problem that we are working to understand regarding never-smokers," says epidemiologist Maria Teresa Landi from the NCI. The team now hopes to expand their study to include cancer genomes from a more diverse, global cohort. The study was published in Nature. FDA Issues Warning Over Dangerous 'Gas Station Heroin' Substance Mysterious Leprosy Pathogen Has Lurked in The Americas For 4,000 Years Massive Review Finds No 'Safe' Level of Processed Meat Consumption
