logo
Porn sites still accessible in Virginia despite age verification law

Porn sites still accessible in Virginia despite age verification law

Axios4 days ago
Many porn sites are still unrestricted years after Virginia passed a law limiting access to them.
Why it matters: Virginia was among the first states to require age verification for adult sites, but an Axios review found progress has been slow.
By the numbers: Of the top 57 active "porn tube" sites listed on toppornsites.com, as of Tuesday:
Only four asked Virginians for age verification with a government-issued ID, as the 2023 law mandates.
16 were blocked entirely, and 3 just required a click of a button to access.
The rest (nearly 65%) were wide open.
Flashback: When the Virginia Mercury did the same review a month after the law went into effect in 2023, far more sites were available without restrictions.
The big picture: It could signal the uphill battle for other states — like Georgia, South Dakota and Wyoming — after similar legislation went into effect last week.
The Supreme Court ruled last month that a Texas law mandating age verification on adult sites doesn't violate the First Amendment.
Major adult sites like PornHub and Youporn are choosing to block access in age-verification states instead of complying, saying the law "will put children and your privacy at risk."
That's led to people seeking workarounds like virtual private networks (VPNs).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Justice Dept. fires more prosecutors, support staff involved in Trump prosecutions, sources say
Justice Dept. fires more prosecutors, support staff involved in Trump prosecutions, sources say

Los Angeles Times

time2 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Justice Dept. fires more prosecutors, support staff involved in Trump prosecutions, sources say

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department has fired additional lawyers and support staff who worked on special counsel Jack Smith's prosecutions of President Trump, according to two people familiar with the matter. The overall number of terminations was not immediately clear but they cut across both the classified documents and election interference prosecutions brought by Smith, and included a handful of prosecutors who were detailed to the probes as well as Justice Department support staff and other non-lawyer personnel who aided them, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss personnel moves that have not been publicly announced. The firings are part of a broader wave of terminations that have roiled the department for months and that have targeted staff who worked on cases involving Trump and his supporters. In January, the Justice Department said that it had fired more than a dozen prosecutors who worked on prosecutions of Trump, and last month fired at least three prosecutors involved in U.S. Capitol riot criminal cases. Days ago, Patty Hartman, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's office in Washington, whose prosecutors handled the cases against the Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol, said in a social media post that she had been handed a letter signed by Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi informing her that she had been fired. Smith's team in 2023 brought separate indictments accusing Trump of hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida as well as conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in the run-up to the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol. Neither case reached trial. The Supreme Court significantly narrowed the election interference case in a ruling that said former presidents enjoyed broad immunity from prosecution for their official acts, and a Trump-appointed judge dismissed the classified documents case by holding that Smith's appointment as special counsel was illegal. Smith ultimately withdrew both cases in November 2024 after Trump's victory, citing a Justice Department legal opinion that protects sitting presidents from federal prosecution. Tucker and Richer write for the Associated Press.

Justice Dept. fires more prosecutors, support staff involved in Trump prosecutions, AP sources say
Justice Dept. fires more prosecutors, support staff involved in Trump prosecutions, AP sources say

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Justice Dept. fires more prosecutors, support staff involved in Trump prosecutions, AP sources say

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department has fired additional lawyers and support staff who worked on special counsel Jack Smith's prosecutions of President Donald Trump, according to two people familiar with the matter. The overall number of terminations was not immediately clear but they cut across both the classified documents and election interference prosecutions brought by Smith, and included a handful of prosecutors who were detailed to the probes as well as Justice Department support staff and other non-lawyer personnel who aided them, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss personnel moves that have not been publicly announced. The firings are part of a broader wave of terminations that have roiled the department for months and that have targeted staff who worked on cases involving Trump and his supporters. In January, the Justice Department said that it had fired more than a dozen prosecutors who worked on prosecutions of Trump, and last month fired at least three prosecutors involved in U.S. Capitol riot criminal cases. Days ago, Patty Hartman, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's office in Washington, whose prosecutors handled the cases against the Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol, said in a social media post that she had been handed a letter signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi informing her that she had been fired. Smith's team in 2023 brought separate indictments accusing Trump of hoarding classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida as well as conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in the run-up to the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol. Neither case reached trial. The Supreme Court significantly narrowed the election interference case in a ruling that said former presidents enjoyed broad immunity from prosecution for their official acts, and a Trump-appointed judge dismissed the classified documents case by holding that Smith's appointment as special counsel was illegal. Smith ultimately withdrew both cases in November 2024 after Trump's victory, citing a Justice Department legal opinion that protects sitting presidents from federal prosecution.

ICE memo outlines plan to deport migrants to countries where they are not citizens
ICE memo outlines plan to deport migrants to countries where they are not citizens

Washington Post

time4 hours ago

  • Washington Post

ICE memo outlines plan to deport migrants to countries where they are not citizens

Federal immigration officers may deport immigrants with as little as six hours notice to countries other than their own even if officials have not provided any assurances that the new arrivals will be safe from persecution or torture, a top official said in a memo this week. Todd M. Lyons, the acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, wrote in a memo to the ICE workforce Wednesday that a Supreme Court ruling last month had cleared the way for officers to 'immediately' start sending immigrants to 'alternative' countries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store