
Keir Starmer cuts to push 150,000 people into poverty
Modelling published by the Department for Work and Pensions said the estimate does not include any 'potential positive impact' from extra funding and measures to support people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into work.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced last week that changes to the personal independence payment (Pip) will only apply to new claimants from November 2026, and ministers also rowed back on plans to cut the health-related element of Universal Credit after 126 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the Government's Bill.
Read More:
The changes will reduce the amount of money the reforms will save, adding to Chancellor Rachel Reeves' headaches as she seeks to balance the books for day-to-day spending.
Ms Kendall will update MPs on the changes later on Monday, with the Labour leadership still braced for a substantial revolt despite the changes aimed at averting a Government defeat in the Commons on Tuesday.
A No 10 spokesman said: 'The broken welfare system we inherited is failing people every single day.
'It traps millions, it tells them the only way to get help is to declare they'll never work again and then abandons them.
'No help, no opportunity, no dignity and we can't accept that.
'For too long, meaningful reform to a failing system has been ducked.'
Government whips are expected to continue talking to would-be rebels in the lead-up to Tuesday's vote, when the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Bill faces its first Commons test.
The No 10 spokesman said the poverty modelling was 'subject to uncertainty' and showed 'the effect of these measures on poverty in isolation in 2029-30, it doesn't reflect the full picture'.
He added: 'You have to look at the record levels of investment in the health and care system, £29 billion more day-to-day funding in real terms, than in 2023-24, to help people get the treatment they need on time to return to work.'
An additional £1 billion a year by the end of the decade to help people with disabilities and long-term health conditions into jobs 'will directly help people move into work and become financially independent'.
Downing Street would not be drawn on whether any Labour rebels will face losing the party whip.
Baroness Jacqui Smith – who served as a chief whip under Sir Tony Blair – said it was not 'constructive' to talk about potential punishments for rebels.
The education minister said it was important to keep talking to Labour MPs about the legislation.
She told Sky News: 'I don't think talking about punishments, even as a former chief whip, is the constructive way forward here.'
The Labour revolt has centred around support for a 'reasoned amendment', which would have halted the Bill, tabled by Dame Meg Hillier.
But she has welcomed last week's concessions and the threat of a revolt on a scale big enough to defeat the Government appears to have receded.
However, experts believe the Government still faces a 'non-trivial rebellion', an extraordinary situation as Sir Keir prepares to mark a year in No 10.
According to analysis by Professor Philip Cowley of Queen Mary University of London, the largest revolt so far under Sir Keir has been 16, on the Planning and Infrastructure Bill.
The largest rebellion in the first year of the Blair administration was 47, and in the course of his first parliament, it was 67 – both on welfare reform issues.
The largest rebellion by Labour MPs at second reading of a Bill is 72 – shared by votes in 1947 on national service and 2004 on university fees.
If the 126 Labour MPs signed up to Dame Meg's amendment did vote against the Government on Tuesday, the revolt would have been of a scale similar to the 139 who voted against the Iraq War.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
DAN HODGES: The most cack-handed, incompetent welfare Bill in living memory
You don't need to listen to the rebels who queued up in the House of Commons yesterday to eviscerate Liz Kendall's welfare Bill. Or her Tory opponents, who could scarcely conceal their glee at the spectacle of a Labour ship of state running aground on the rocks of benefit reform.


Sky News
39 minutes ago
- Sky News
PM faces threat of major Labour rebellion as key vote on welfare reforms looms
Why you can trust Sky News Sir Keir Starmer continues to face the threat of a major rebellion during a key vote on welfare reforms later - despite making last-minute concessions to disgruntled Labour MPs. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has confirmed that all existing claimants of the personal independence payment (PIP), the main disability benefit, will be protected from changes to eligibility. The combined value of the standard Universal Credit allowance and the health top-up will rise "at least in line with inflation" every year of this parliament. And an additional £300m for employment support for sick and disabled people in 2026 has been announced, which will rise every year after. 10:54 Ms Kendall has also promised that a consultation into PIP - "co-produced" with disabled people - will be published next autumn. She said the U-turn on welfare cuts will cost taxpayers about £2.5bn by 2030 - less than half the £4.8bn the government had expected to save with its initial proposals. Modelling by Ms Kendall's own department, released yesterday, suggested the proposals would push 150,000 more people into poverty by 2030, down from the 250,000 estimated under the original plan. But after announcing the U-turns, Labour MPs were still publicly saying they could not back the plans as they do not go far enough to allay their concerns. Disabilities minister Stephen Timms would not say he was "confident" the proposals would pass the Commons when asked on Sky News' Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge. "We've got a very strong package, I certainly hope it passes," he replied. 1:49 A total of 86 charities united yesterday to call on MPs to reject the reforms, saying they will harm disabled people and calling it "a political choice". The likes of Oxfam, Child Action Poverty Group, Mind and Shelter said the bill has been brought to a vote without consulting disabled people and without any assessment "of its impact on health and employment outcomes". When asked to name "a single" disability organisation in favour of the reforms, Ms Kendall declined to do so. Several Labour MPs indicated they would still vote against the changes, leaving the government in the dark over how big a rebellion it still may face. Ms Kendall tried to allay their fears, telling MPs: "I believe we have a fair package, a package that protects existing claimants because they've come to rely on that support." Richard Burgon presented a petition to parliament yesterday evening against the cuts, signed by more than 77,000 people. Several Labour MPs questioned why the vote was going ahead before the review into PIP is published - including Rachael Maskell, who said she could not "countenance sick and disabled people being denied support" and added: "It is a matter of conscience." Connor Naismith said the concessions "undoubtedly improve efforts to secure welfare reform which is fair", but added: "Unfortunately, I do not believe these concessions yet go far enough." Nadia Whittome accused the government of "ignoring" disabled people and urged ministers to go "back to the drawing board". Ian Byrne told the Commons he will vote against the "cruel cuts" to disability benefits because the "so-called concessions go nowhere near far enough".


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Welfare rebellion looms for Starmer despite concessions to Labour rebels
Ministers hope a partial U-turn will be enough to win over Labour rebels when MPs vote on welfare changes on Tuesday. The concessions included protecting people claiming personal independence payment (Pip) from changes due to come into effect in November 2026, and rowing back plans to cut the health-related element of universal credit. But backbench anger has continued to simmer, with a statement from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall laying out the concessions on Monday receiving a negative response. Asked whether he was 'confident' that the concessions had done enough to secure passage of the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms would only tell Sky News: 'I certainly hope it passes.' Some 126 Labour MPs had previously signed a 'reasoned amendment' proposed by Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier that would have stopped the legislation if approved. That rebellion appeared to have been averted after Dame Meg described concessions agreed on Friday as a 'workable compromise'. But in the Commons on Monday, she was one of several senior Labour figures to raise concerns about the Government's revised proposals, while another MP involved in negotiations, Debbie Abrahams, suggested ministers had rowed back on what had been agreed. A second amendment rejecting the Bill has been put forward by York Central MP Rachael Maskell with the backing of 138 disability groups, saying disabled people had 'yet to have agency in this process'. Ms Maskell's amendment is reported to have been signed by only around 35 Labour MPs – far fewer than the 83 needed to overturn Sir Keir's majority, but enough to deliver the largest rebellion of his premiership just before the first anniversary of Labour's election victory. Other sceptical MPs are expected to abstain on Tuesday, but could vote against the Bill next week if there are no further concessions. One of the chief concerns revolves around a review of Pip to be carried out by Sir Stephen and 'co-produced' with disabled people. His review is not expected to report until autumn next year, making it difficult to incorporate his findings into the Pip changes due to take place at the same time. Ms Abrahams suggested the timing meant the outcome of the review was 'pre-determined', while Sarah Owen, another select committee chairwoman, warned it could create a 'three-tier' benefit system. Groups including Disability Rights UK and Disabled People Against Cuts criticised the Government's claim that Sir Stephen's review would be 'co-produced' with them and urged Labour rebels to stand firm. They said: 'The Government have made it very clear that they are intent on slashing the support that so many disabled people rely on to work and live independently, no matter how many disabled people tell them what a harmful policy this will be.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said her party's MPs would vote against the proposals, describing them as 'not serious welfare reform' and saying ministers had 'watered down the small savings Labour were making'. The original proposals were expected to save £4.8 billion by 2030, but Ms Kendall revealed on Monday that the revised proposals were likely to save less than half that figure.