‘False fuel saving claim': CCP imposes Rs40mn penalty on Al-Ghazi Tractors
In January 2022, AGTL ran a front-page ad in an Urdu newspaper, claiming its new Holland tractor models offered 'up to 30% extra diesel savings compared to any competitor's tractors.' The ad cited a report by the Agricultural Mechanisation Research Institute (AMRI), Multan as basis of its claim.
CCP says recovered Rs10mn penalty from PIA for 'abusing dominant position'
'Farmers across Pakistan, especially small landholders often make purchasing decisions based on savings and efficiency. For them, a claim like 'up to 30% extra diesel savings' can mean the difference between affordability and hardship.
'But this claim, made by Al-Ghazi Tractors Limited in a newspaper ad, has now been declared false and misleading by the Competition Commission of Pakistan. The bench comprising Dr Kabir Ahmed, the Chairman CCP and Mr Salman Amin (Member) has imposed a penalty of PKR 40 million on AGTL for violating competition law and misguiding consumers,' the CCP statement read.
According to the CCP, it found that AMRI had not issued any report supporting the claim.
'In fact, AMRI had warned AGTL to stop using its name for false claim and to retract the advertisement.'
The AMRI report, which AGTL selectively quoted, only tested tractors from two manufacturers—AGTL and one competitor, the CCP said. 'It did not provide market-wide fuel efficiency comparisons. AMRI also emphasised that its report contained general energy-saving tips, not certification of any tractor model's performance.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
12 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Remittances: govt set to withdraw some incentives
ISLAMABAD: The federal government is all set to do away with some incentives extended to overseas Pakistanis to remit money through legal channels, sources told Business Recorder. On June 27, 2205, Finance Division briefed the ECC that the government of Pakistan has five Remittance Incentive Initiatives being executed by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) and Pakistan Remittance Initiative (PRI). The TT Charges Scheme is the flagship remittance incentive initiative of the government that provides zero cost/ free send model for sender and receiver on eligible remittance transactions. The current incentive model of the scheme approved by the ECC in August 2024 offers reimbursement/ incentive of Saudi Riyal (SAR) 20 for every transaction of $100 and above; an additional, per transaction incentive of SAR 8 for up to 10 percent or $100 million growth over the previous year (whichever is lower); and further per transaction additional incentive of SAR 7 for growth exceeding 10 percent or $100 million over the previous year. Exchange cos welcome their inclusion in PRI SBP apprised that the volume of home remittances received during CFY (July- May) has touched the level of USD 34.9 billion, exhibiting an increase of 28.8% or around $ 7.8 billion compared to the same period of FY 24. With this momentum SBP expects home remittances to touch an unprecedented level of $38 billion by end June 2025. However, with this increased inflow, the corresponding cost/ budgetary requirement also increased exponentially. In FY 2025, the total cost of remittance incentive initiatives, exceeded Rs.200 billion, incurring a cost of approximately PKR 50 billion to the GoP/ quarter. Out of this, around 85% of the expense; i.e., PKR 170 billion (Rs.42.5 billion per quarter) was incurred under the IT Charges scheme. To rationalise the cost, SBP has proposed changes in contours of TT Charges Scheme which includes revising the minimum eligible transaction threshold from the existing $ 100 to USD 200 and the corresponding rebate from the existing variable rates to a flat rate of SAR 20 per eligible transactions. In addition, SBP has proposed that the Exchange Companies (ECs) Incentive Scheme may be merged with the TT Charges Scheme whereas the Marketing Incentive Scheme (MIS) may be discontinued from FY 2026. The SBP, while highlighting risk of some deceleration in remittances, is of the view that their proposal is likely to result in a significant cost cut down to Rs 88 billion in FY 26 as compared to Rs 206 billion in FY 25. Further, it is imperative that to ensure the cost cut, the revisions become effective from July 1, 2025; otherwise, the market may assume continuation of existing rates and features of the Schemes. Foregoing in view, approval of the ECC was solicited for the following proposals by the SBP: (i) The minimum size of eligible transaction under the TT Charges Scheme may be revised from the existing $100 to $200 from July J01,2025 and the corresponding rebate may be revised from the existing variable rates to a flat rate of SAR 20 pet eligible transactions; (ii) Exchange Companies Incentive Scheme (ECIS) may be merged in IT Charges Incentive Scheme and the existing ECIS may be discontinued from July 1, 2025; (iii) Marketing Incentive Scheme may be discontinued from July 1, 2025; (iv) to meet the expenditure of such payments to Banks/ aggregators/ Exchange Companies, Finance Division may chalk out a mechanism in consultation with SBP; and (ii) a mechanism for gradual phasing out of Remittance Incentive Schemes may be chalked out. SBP is tasked to propose and present an evidence-based plan factoring in cost- benefit analysis of the existing schemes- Raast integration with Buna and SAMA gateways and strengthening of controls vis-à-vis transfer of remittances through formal channels. During the ensuing discussion, it was pointed out that there is a need to rationalise the incentives being given on remittances as these could create distortion. It was also observed that the proper analysis of discontinuation of the incentives schemes needs to be made before any final decision can be made to discontinue such schemes. ECC was of the consensus view that proper transition plan needs to be made in case it is decided that such incentive schemes for remittances are to be gradually phased out since there is a behavioural change involved in it. After detailed discussed, the ECC approved the proposal with the direction that Finance Division and State Bank of Pakistan will conduct a thorough impact and sensitivity analysis regarding the proposed scheme and to present to the ECC a comprehensive transition plan for the gradual phasing out of such incentive schemes. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Two firms found guilty of Rs1.13bn anti-competitive pact in pharmaceutical sector
The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has found two companies, United Distributors Pakistan Limited (UDPL) and International Brands (Private) Limited (IBL), guilty of Rs1.13 billion anti-competitive agreement, according to a CCP statement released on Wednesday. The CCP imposed a total penalty of Rs42 million on UDPL and IBL for entering into and giving effect to the non-compete agreement that the commission said had violated Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010. 'In a detailed order, the commission found both companies guilty of entering into a restrictive agreement that prevented UDPL from entering the distribution market of human pharmaceutical products in Pakistan for three years. CCP clears 40.63% share acquisition of Mitchell's Fruit Farms by CCL Holding In return, IBL paid Rs1.131 billion to UDPL as compensation—an arrangement disclosed by UDPL to the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) without prior regulatory approval,' the CCP statement read. The CCP said the agreement had constituted an illegal market-sharing arrangement that foreclosed competition and had been executed in clear contravention of the law. 'The intention was to establish a protective barrier around IBL's operations, secured through a compensation of Rs1.131 billion, in exchange for UDPL to abstain from market participation,' the order noted, adding that such conduct undermined competitive dynamics and harms consumers. While the agreement included a clause stating that regulatory exemption would be sought from CCP, the parties 'failed to do so until after the show-cause notices were issued in June 2024'. 'The commission found this post-facto action insufficient to cure the violation.' As a result, the CCP imposed a penalty of Rs20 million each on UDPL and IBL for violating Section 4(1) and 4(2)(b) of the Act. An additional penalty of Rs1 million was levied on UDPL under Section 38 for making disclosures to PSX without regulatory clearance. CCP grants exemptions to logistics and transport sector The order also directed the companies to submit a compliance report within 30 days and warns of additional daily penalties for continued non-compliance. Furthermore, the CCP referred the matter to the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) and the PSX for any further action deemed necessary under their respective legal frameworks.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Crowding out development for debt: Pakistan's fiscal dilemma
Over the past fifteen years, Pakistan's federal budget has ballooned in size, but not necessarily in wisdom. From 2009-10 to the upcoming fiscal year 2025-26, the national budget has grown nearly sevenfold in nominal terms. At first glance, that sounds like a sign of progress. But look under the hood, and a troubling story unfolds - one where the lion's share of that growth is being swallowed by interest payments on debt, leaving little room for investments that actually move the needle on development. Let's put the headline numbers into perspective. In 2009-10, Pakistan spent about 28% of its federal budget servicing debt. In 2025-26, that figure is projected to reach a staggering 46.7%, with PKR 8.21 trillion earmarked for debt servicing. That means more than half of every rupee in the national budget will go toward paying interest - mostly on domestic borrowing (in outgoing fiscal year, it was actually around 52%). Budget FY26: Aurangzeb announces major tax relief for salaried class, solar sector In contrast, spending on the federal development program (PSDP) has plunged from around 27.5% of the budget to just 5.69%. That's not just a fiscal shift; it's a strategic retreat from the future. The numbers don't lie. Since 2009–10, interest payments have increased from under PKR 700 billion to PKR 8.2 trillion - an increase of over 1000% - while development spending has only marginally risen from approximately PKR 421 billion to PKR 1.287 trillion, a far more modest growth of 205%. Even after accounting for inflation and rising - in favor of meeting mounting debt obligations. Although defence spending is often a political lightning rod in budgetary debates, its share of the national budget declined in recent years - from 14.6% to 11.6% - despite substantial growth in absolute terms. However, it has risen again to 14.5% in the 2025–26 budget. The above-mentioned situation is not just a budgeting issue; it's a symptom of a much deeper problem in Pakistan's fiscal architecture. The government is caught in a debt spiral, where borrowing begets more borrowing, and interest costs cannibalize public finances. And this isn't just some abstract macroeconomic concern. When the government spends over 8.21 trillion PKR on interest payments but only 1 trillion on development (PSDP), the effects are visible in potholes that don't get fixed, schools that don't get built, and hospitals that remain understaffed and under-resourced. What makes this fiscal scenario particularly pernicious is how it affects the future. Development spending is not just about concrete and contracts, it's about human capital, infrastructure, innovation, and resilience. It's the bridge between today's challenges and tomorrow's opportunities. When development is consistently underfunded, it isn't just growth that slows; it's hope that erodes. Let's take education as an example. Without adequate public investment, education outcomes stagnate or deteriorate. A population that isn't skilled or productive becomes less competitive globally and more vulnerable domestically. Add healthcare to the mix - where public sector hospitals are already struggling - and you see the real cost of fiscal mismanagement: a weaker, sicker, and more unequal society. And here's the twist: even if you doubled development spending tomorrow, the impact would be limited unless the structural drivers of this debt crisis are addressed. Domestic borrowing dominates Pakistan's debt profile, and it's an expensive habit - particularly when the central bank keeps interest rates high to tame inflation. That, in turn, jacks up the cost of debt servicing even further, creating a vicious cycle. And let's not forget the crowding-out effect: when government borrowing soaks up capital in the domestic financial markets, there's less credit available for the private sector. That means fewer investments, fewer jobs, and slower economic dynamism overall. It's a policy maze, but not an unsolvable one. The first step is to acknowledge the elephant in the room: Pakistan needs a serious debt management strategy. Not just another patchwork rescheduling or a short-term IMF fix, but a comprehensive roadmap that involves restructuring terms, limiting non-productive borrowing, and - crucially - ensuring that new debt is used to finance investments with real economic returns. At the same time, there's a desperate need for tax reform. Pakistan's tax-to-GDP ratio remains dismally low, and the burden is disproportionately borne by those already in the formal economy. Broadening the tax base - by bringing informal sectors and elite exemptions into the fold - is politically tough but economically indispensable. Without more robust and equitable revenue generation, the development squeeze will only tighten. Rationalizing expenditures is another part of the puzzle. While subsidies may be politically expedient, they're often poorly targeted and fiscally toxic. The FY2025-26 subsidy bill is expected to hit Rs1.18 trillion, slightly higher than the entire PSDP allocation. If even a portion of that could be redirected towards health, education, and infrastructure, the impact could be transformative. But perhaps the most sobering takeaway from this analysis is the intergenerational unfairness built into our current fiscal structure. We're borrowing today to pay for yesterday's spending, while leaving today's citizens - and tomorrow's workforce - with decaying infrastructure, low-quality public services, and limited economic mobility. In many ways, it's a quiet betrayal of the country's youth. This is why Pakistan's budget crisis is not just about numbers. It's about national priorities and the values they reflect. When more than half of public funds are spent on interest payments, it signals a government that is stuck servicing the past rather than building the future. When development gets only 5.7% of the pie, it signals a political economy that is risk-averse, reactive, and inward-looking. So, what's the way forward? We need a paradigm shift - a fundamental rethinking of what public finance is for. It's not enough to balance books. We need to balance our opportunity. That means aligning fiscal policy with development objectives. It means investing in projects that boost productivity, generate employment, and reduce long-term fiscal pressure. And it means building the kind of institutional capacity that ensures public money is not just spent but spent wisely. Pakistan's economic destiny will not be decided by how much we borrow, but by how we invest. We still have a chance to change course, but the window is narrowing. For too long, we've accepted a fiscal model that prioritizes survival over progress. It's time to flip the script. Because development isn't just another budget line item. It's the story we write for our future. The article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Business Recorder or its owners
