
Britain 'is secretly preparing for an attack by Russia' - and updating decades-old emergency plans
The Cabinet Office is reviewing whether to update Britain's 20-year-old 'homeland defence plan' that sets out how the Government responds to a declaration of war, according to The Telegraph.
The move comes after a series of chilling threats from Russia and mounting concerns in Whitehall over the nation's civil and military readiness.
Security officials have warned that Britain would be 'outgunned' by the Kremlin and its allies in a full-scale conflict.
Chancellor Philip Hammond recently declared the country is 'massively under-strength' and said more needed to be done to prepare civilians, who he feared were woefully unprepared, for the potential risk of conflict.
Not only would Britain be the weaker side on the battlefield, but it is also vulnerable to an attack on its critical national infrastructure, including gas terminals, undersea cables, nuclear power plants, and transport hubs, experts say.
The updated strategy is expected to detail how the Government would respond to a full-scale attack by a hostile state, including missile strikes, large-scale cyber disruption, and even the use of nuclear weapons.
It will also include contingency plans for safeguarding ministers, evacuating the Royal Family, and coordinating emergency services during a national security crisis.
A senior government source told The Telegraph that the plan would update the dormant War Book to account for the 'new realities of warfare'.
That includes cyber attacks, satellite sabotage, and hypersonic missile strikes that could evade existing defences.
An update to the classified 'homeland defence plan' will set out a strategy for the days immediately after a strike on the UK mainland by a hostile foreign state.
The plan, by the Cabinet Office's Resilience Directorate, will direct the Prime Minister and Cabinet on how to run a wartime government and when they should seek shelter in the Downing Street bunker or outside London.
The war strategies for the rail and road networks, courts, postal system and phone lines are all expected to be reviewed.
A risk assessment published in January warned that such a successful attack was 'likely to result in civilian fatalities as well as members of the emergency services,' while also causing serious economic damage and disruption to essential services.
Last month a simulation run in the wake of Vladimir Putin 's full-scale invasion of Ukraine showed Britain could not prevent all strikes getting through.
The scenario from 2022 was revealed by Air Commodore Blythe Crawford, the former head of the RAF Air and Space Warfare Centre.
The simulation - part of the RAF's £36million Gladiator programme - looked at how 'day one' of the conflict would unfold.
The UK faced 'hundreds of different types of munitions' attacking from various directions.
Air Commodore Crawford said the outcome was 'not a pretty picture', with some missiles making it through.
He stressed that significant work had been done since then to bolster the defences.
'We [loaded] night one of Ukraine into that synthetic environment and played it out against the UK and, as you can imagine, it was not a pretty picture,' he said.
'It reinforced the fact that we really need to get after this.'
Kremlin officials have repeatedly threatened to attack the UK over its support for Ukraine and last month Putin's propagandists declared British blood 'must be spilled' after they accused Britain of supplying the explosives that killed a top general in a Moscow car bomb.
Lieutenant General Yaroslav Moskalik died in Moscow near his home in the eastern suburb of Balashikha after a Volkswagen Gold filled with explosives was detonated in his presence.
The dead military man was a deputy head of the main operational department in the General Staff of the Russian army.
While the Kremlin previously blamed Ukraine for the attack, Putin's propagandists have now turned their ire on Britain.
So-called military expert Andrei Klintsevich told Russia 1 that Britain's security service handed explosives to the perpetrators 'by the ton.'
Propagandist Vladimir Solovyov angrily added: 'We do realise that someone is creative a network of planted explosives and [transporting] these explosives.
'When we say that British security services are behind every terrorist attack, it means that the blood of the British who authorised the killings on Russian soil must be spilled.
'They must realise that they will pay personally. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
30 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.

Western Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. The act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer X statement This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became involved in a row with the Reform UK leader (Jonathan Brady/PA) The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
3 people die in overnight Ukrainian drone strikes on Russia
Ukrainian drone attacks overnight into Saturday killed three people, Russian officials said Saturday. Russia's Defense Ministry said air defenses intercepted or destroyed 112 drones across eight Russian regions and the Russian-occupied Crimean Peninsula. A drone attack on the Rostov region, on the border with Ukraine, killed one person, acting governor Yuri Slyusar said. Further from the front line, a woman was killed and two other people wounded in a drone strike on business premises in the Penza region, according to regional governor Oleg Melnichenko. In the Samara region, falling drone debris sparked a fire that killed an elderly resident, regional Gov. Vyacheslav Fedorishchev said. According to the Ukrainian air force, Russia launched 53 drones and decoys at Ukraine overnight into Saturday. It said that air defenses shot down or jammed 45 drones. Eleven people were wounded in an overnight drone strike on the Kharkiv region, Gov. Oleh Syniehubov said Saturday. The reciprocal drone strikes followed a day of mourning in the Ukrainian capital Kyiv on Friday, after a Russian drone and missile attack killed 31 people, including five children, and wounded over 150. The continued attacks come after U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday gave Russian President Vladimir Putin a shorter deadline — Aug. 8 — for peace efforts to make progress. Trump said Thursday that special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Russia to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. ___