
'Too soon to panic': Funding sought for New London early childhood center
Yet.
'It's too soon to panic, but it would break my heart if we had to close this preschool program, which is not mandated for us to offer,' she said.
The funding issue revolves around the estimated $2.3 million the district says it will take to continue running preschool and other programming at the Early Childhood Center at B.P. Mission on Shaw Street. The expenditure is one of the big increases in Superintendent Cynthia Ritchie's $56 million 2025-26 budget proposal.
Maynard-Adams said she and Ritchie have had several conversations with state legislators and department leaders on possible funding relief options.
'That's included things like revamping early childhood program financing,' she said, noting Gov. Ned Lamont has suggested offering more state funding for preschools, but not until next year.
Lamont this month touted a proposal to deposit a portion of the state's anticipated surpluses over the next several years into a new 'Universal Preschool Endowment' fund. The endowment would be seeded by $300 million from the 2024-2025 surplus, and in the following years any unappropriated surpluses from the state's general fund will continue to be transferred into it.
Lamont said the endowment would make preschool available for free to families earning up to $100,000 per year and create 20,000 new preschool slots by 2032.
Seeking sustainable funding
The center got an 11th-hour reprieve last year after state lawmakers, including state Sen. Martha Marx, D-New London, lobbied for the use of $2 million in federal COVID-19 relief monies to close the funding gap.
'But we knew that just a Band-Aid and not a long-term answer,' Marx said on Thursday. 'That is one of my main priorities, to try and find more state funding to keep B.P. open. There's a lot of people at the table talking about this and I haven't given up.'
The city and school district in the 2021-22 school year used $1.5 million in federal coronavirus relief funding to buy the B.P. Learned Mission building and transform it into a space for early childhood classes during the day and community programming at night.
The center's magnet preschool program recently earned national accreditation through the National Association for the Education of Young Children. Such recognitions are based on criteria that grades curriculum, teacher approaches, community relationships and student progress.
The center currently has 80 pre-K students with a waiting list of about another 80 families. As a magnet school, the center receives approximately $9,200 in state grant money for each of the seven out-of-district students it enrolls, but nothing for its 73 students from New London.
'The center offers high-quality educational programming, taught by certified teachers and professional staff, and is free of charge for families,' Ritchie said in a Thursday email. 'Nutritious meals (breakfast and lunch) are served daily. Transportation is also provided.'
Maynard-Adams said there have also been expansion conversations.
'If we had more space we could enroll more students and that means more state resources,' Maynard-Adams said. 'We've also had conversations about transitioning 4-year-old students into elementary school classrooms to free-up space at B.P.'
Maynard-Adams said preschool programming has been shown to pay big student dividends, especially for those with special needs.
'Those students who take part in early childhood classes outperform those who don't,' she said. 'And it also enables those students with language or speech issues to get help early on and help quickly address those issues.'
Maynard-Adams, who noted the state legislature's budget is still being crafted, said she's not sure the district budget can bear the cost of the center alone.
'I don't know if we can justify that cost — one that's not mandated — at the expense of something else,' she said.
The center is accepting enrollment applications.
j.penney@theday.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
White House officials defend Trump's firing of BLS chief
White House officials on Sunday defended President Trump's decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) following a weak jobs report, a move that has sparked broad criticism. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable,' Kevin Hassett, chair of the National Economic Council, said on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Hassett said in another interview on 'Fox News Sunday' that the BLS commissioner has a responsibility to explain major revisions such as the one seen in Friday's jobs report, which showed 258,000 fewer jobs for prior months than initially reported. 'The big downward revision is something of a puzzle. I don't think it was explained very well. And I think that markets might be as much unsettled by the fact that the data are so noisy,' Hassett said. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, one of Trump's top tariff negotiators, said in an interview that aired on CBS's 'Face the Nation' Sunday that the president has 'real concerns' about the jobs numbers reported by the Labor Department. 'Even last year during the campaign, there were enormous swings in the jobs numbers, and so sounds to me like the president has real concerns. You know, not just based on today's, but everything we saw last year,' Greer said in the interview taped on Friday. 'You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers,' he added. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways. And it's, you know, the president is the president. He can choose who works in the executive branch.' Trump on Friday directed his team to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the latest jobs report showed the country only adding 73,000 jobs in July, and major revisions for jobs added in May and June. The move prompted immediate outcry from Democrats and a handful of Republicans, with some calling for an investigation. McEntarfer was nominated by former President Biden and overwhelmingly confirmed by the GOP-led Senate early last year in an 86-8 vote. Trump's advisers underscored the president's concerns about revisions to the labor data while defending McEntarfer's firing. Hassett noted that jobs data reported by the government has seen major swings since the COVID-19 pandemic. 'What we've seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers. In fact, they were extremely reliable, the kind of numbers that you want to guide policy decisions and markets, through COVID. And then when COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed. So the typical monthly revision often was bigger than the number itself,' Hassett said on NBC. Trump, in axing the BLS chief, claimed without evidence that McEntarfer 'faked the Jobs Numbers' before the 2024 election in order to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris's White House bid, citing labor statistics revisions during the Biden administration that boosted job numbers ahead of the election. The president accused her of manipulating data to make him and Republicans look bad, writing on Truth Social on Friday, 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' McEntarfer reacted to Trump's firing of her in a social media post over the weekend, saying it was the 'honor of my life' to serve in the role and hailing the 'vital and important work' carried out by civil servants at the agency.


New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
Media still undercounting return-to-office phenomenon
The media continues to absurdly undercount, downplay or misunderstand the return-to-office phenomenon, although the surge should be obvious from the current leasing frenzy and from crowds on the street. For example, Crain's last week questioned whether the 345 Park Ave. murders would 'impact the city's already stagnant return-to-office rates.' The story based its 'stagnant' claim partly on the Partnership for New York City's supposed finding that only '57% of Manhattan office workers had returned on the average workday.' 3 The Midtown shooting happened at 345 Park Ave. AFP via Getty Images 3 An NYPD police officer stands at the shattered glass entrance to 345 Park Avenue after the shooting. John Angelillo/UPI/Shutterstock 3 NYC office capacity was never full — even during pre-COVID times. Tierney – That — like many similar off-base readings of data — made it sound as if Manhattan offices that were full before 2020 are now barely more than half full. What the Partnership actually said in March was that 57% of workers in offices at the time 'equates to 76% of respondents' pre-pandemic attendance.' In other words, pre-pandemic offices were not 100% occupied — they never were — but 75% occupied. That's because 57 is 76% of 75. The 19% difference between 76% and 57% is much less than an alleged 43% gap between 100% and 57%. And with so many CEO's calling their staffs back, the 19% gap can only continue to shrink further.

Business Insider
15 hours ago
- Business Insider
Target salaries revealed: How much the retailer pays software engineers and other tech workers
Target is continuing to invest in its tech workforce as it tries to recapture the success it saw a few years ago. EVP and operating chief Michael Fiddelke told investors in May that harnessing tech and AI would be critical to his work in the company's newly formed office that aims to accelerate its growth plan. The Bullseye retailer has long brought a tech-savviness to its business that has set it apart from most other retailers: it first launched its e-commerce website in 1999, and its early engagement with mobile pickup and delivery services gave Target a massive lift during the COVID-19 pandemic. Today, the company employs a large tech team behind its increasingly complex business of physical stores, e-commerce business, retail media, and more. And it pays well, salary data suggests. Company filings with the US Department of Labor show Target sought to hire around 94 workers through the US H-1B visa program in the first half of this reporting year, largely in software development, information systems, and data science. That number is up substantially from about 49 for the same period the years before, but roughly in line with the 98 records from two years ago. By comparison, big-box rival Walmart has about four times as many US employees and requested visas for 1,750 workers. Companies are required to submit this work visa data, which includes salary information, to the US Department of Labor for all foreign hires. However, the compensation figures don't include equity or other benefits that employees can receive in addition to their base pay. The filings also include industry average pay rates for US workers. Business Insider analyzed how much money companies from Apple to Walmart are paying for tech jobs and other roles. Explore salary data from America's biggest employers. Target has about 440,000 full-time, part-time, and seasonal employees. Its starting wage for US hourly workers is $15 to $24. A Target spokesperson told Business Insider the company also offers retirement fund matching and a range of other benefits such as employee discounts. The vast majority of the 10,777 jobs listed on Target's careers website at the time of this writing were for positions in the company's fleet of 1,978 stores. Within the 230 corporate openings, 139 were for the company's offices in India, and the rest were based in the US headquarters in Minnesota. The job listings included salary ranges. Here's a deeper look at some of the roles Target disclosed for tech workers: Software engineers can earn up to $353,000 Senior Engineer: $103,605 to $184,700 Principal Engineer: $122,741 to $353,000 Data scientists can make more than $122,000 Senior Data Scientist: $122,637 to $184,700 Lead Data Analyst: $139,298 to $200,200 Principal Data Scientist: $211,536 to $347,600 Director-level roles can bring in over $206,000 Director Engineering: $206,398 to $289,700 Director Tech: $206,398 to $289,700 Principal Technical Program Manager: $251,576 to $311,900