logo
‘A time of great anxiety': renters fear surge in no-grounds evictions before NSW ban comes into force

‘A time of great anxiety': renters fear surge in no-grounds evictions before NSW ban comes into force

The Guardian10-04-2025
Renters and advocates are worried there could be a surge in no-grounds evictions in New South Wales over the coming month as landlords act ahead of the law changing in mid-May.
The Tenants' Union of NSW says it's a 'real risk' and the Minns government has dropped the ball by not putting interim measures in place to protect renters.
Luke Fennell and his family in 2023 faced a massive 40% increase in the rent of their Sydney home. Fennell knew challenging the rise was risky but fought for a 25% jump instead. Two months later, the engineer was served a no-grounds eviction notice.
'You feel like a mug,' Fennell said. 'The whole system is set up to ensure that, as a tenant, you have no power at all.'
Fennell, his partner and their two adult children packed their lives into boxes and relocated to a neighbouring suburb. The move cost $3,000.
'I couldn't take a 40% increase on the chin. That was just ridiculous. But I paid the price for not doing that,' he said.
The NSW government last year changed the law to make it harder for renters to be evicted, and easier to rent with a pet. Labor also capped rent increases to once a year.
In late March, the state government announced the ban on no-grounds evictions would start on 19 May. Landlords and agents will have to give renters a reason to end their tenancy and provide evidence that those grounds are genuine – such as a change of property use, selling the home or the landlord is moving in.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
Housing organisations have welcomed the 2024 legislation but are bracing for a spike in no-grounds evictions before the change takes effect. They are questioning why the government did not try to prevent 11th-hour rental terminations.
Camilla Pandolfini, the chief executive of Redfern Legal Centre, which runs the Inner Sydney Tenants' Advice and Advocacy Service, said her team was preparing to assist an influx of tenants served no-grounds termination notices before the reforms commence.
Pandolfini said there was an increase in inquiries from tenants evicted without cause – typically after challenging a rent increase – when the reforms were announced in July 2024.
'We can reasonably expect a similar spike, which may continue until 18 May, as landlords are still able to evict tenants under the old rules until that date,' she said.
Leo Patterson Ross, the CEO of the Tenants' Union of NSW, said his organisation was 'preparing for a surge' in no-grounds evictions. 'It's a real risk that people are right to be concerned about,' he said.
When no-grounds evictions were banned in 2021 in Victoria – except at the end of the first fixed term – there was a 5-10% spike in bonds being released from the bonds board in the three months before the law change, Patterson Ross said.
'That doesn't necessarily say that they were evictions, but there wasn't really an explanation about why tenants would be moving voluntarily,' he said.
After the NSW reforms were announced, the union saw some landlords, particularly social housing providers, serving no-grounds evictions with six months' notice – a move that Patterson Ross suspected was to get ahead of the changes.
Yumi Lee of the Older Women's Network NSW said she expected to 'see some unscrupulous landlords trying to get rid of people' before 19 May. She said she had spoken to women who had been evicted since the law change was announced.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'On anecdotal evidence, we know that the lead-up to [the law change] is a time of great anxiety, and for the older women who have been evicted, it has just resulted in a deterioration of their mental and financial health,' Lee said.
The tenants' union did not see a change in the number of no-grounds evictions in the three months before rental reforms came into effect in Queensland last year – probably because those changes were less significant than in Victoria, Patterson Ross said.
The union did not have data from the ACT and South Australia which introduced comprehensive no-cause reforms in 2023 and 2024, respectively.
Patterson Ross said the union had advised the NSW government to put in place measures to prevent a surge in evictions – such as reducing the time between the date the law was passed and its commencement or extending the powers of the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal to police pre-emptive evictions. But the Minns government did not heed the advice.
In the ACT, which was the first Australian jurisdiction to ban all forms of tenancy termination without a legitimate cause, legislation came into effect a week after it passed parliament.
Lee said transitional protections would have 'softened the blow a little bit' for older tenants who 'face the absolute terror of having to find another rental within their budget'.
Anoulack Chanthivong, the NSW minister for better regulation and fair trading, said the state government understood the advocacy groups' concerns.
'The government has considered whether additional protections are required for renters however, banning the use of no-grounds terminations for a transitional period is not practical or sensible as this would ignore other legitimate reasons for a lease to be ended – for example, where the landlord needs to move into the property and for other reasons that these reforms have recognised as valid reasons to end a tenancy,' he said.
Renters nearing the end of a fixed-term tenancy between the end of March and mid-May were most at risk and the state's rental taskforce was charged with enforcing existing rules.
'We strongly encourage all owners to act in good faith before the new laws take effect, but at the end of the day, the risk of owners evicting tenants without any reasonable grounds is the reason why we have introduced these new laws – to ensure no-grounds evictions can no longer happen,' Chanthivong said.
For Fennell – who has since bought his own home – the new laws address what he said was the 'number one problem' with tenancy laws in NSW.
'You really felt if you complained about something, or if you stood your ground, you would just get thrown out,' he said.
'So you were always cautious about asking for repairs or pushing back on rent increases, because you just knew that the penalty for inflaming the anger of the landlord was just not worth it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Albanese's warm welcome in Beijing shows icy tensions are a thing of the past – at least for now
Albanese's warm welcome in Beijing shows icy tensions are a thing of the past – at least for now

The Guardian

time16 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Albanese's warm welcome in Beijing shows icy tensions are a thing of the past – at least for now

Anthony Albanese may be humming Paul Kelly and Powderfinger when his plane lands back in Australia from China on Friday. After more than two hours of talks with the country's president, Xi Jinping, a series of successful business events, and a retracing of Gough Whitlam's steps at the Great Wall, the prime minister is likely to view his six-day visit as a diplomatic home run. A trip designed to capitalise on the increasingly warm relations between Beijing and Canberra showed all signs of success, with a special lunch organised to fete Albanese and his fiancee, Jodie Haydon, and even a band playing Australian hits such as Kelly's To Her Door and Midnight Oil's Power and the Passion for a music-mad PM. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Though carefully stage-managed, the good vibes are a long way from a low point hit just a few years ago, when China put trade bans on $20bn of Australian exports and ministers in Scott Morrison's government could not get calls returned. China's envoy in Canberra even took the extraordinary step of issuing a list of 14 grievances with Australia. Labor's efforts in its first term to calm tensions and foster cooperation are clearly paying dividends. Speaking at the start of his talks with Albanese in the Great Hall of the People, Xi praised an ongoing common understanding, even as US President Donald Trump wreaks havoc with the international trade system and senior Pentagon figures push Australia to explain how we would respond to a conflict between China and Taiwan. 'No matter how the international landscape may evolve, we should uphold this overall direction unswervingly,' Xi told Albanese, who responded that close ties had already produced 'very positive benefits' for both sides. Local state-controlled media buzzed about the visit, praising the 'turnaround' and suggesting China-Australia relations were on track to 'cruise steadily in the 'stratosphere''. Greater numbers of Chinese tourists are expected and the chair of the National People's Congress will lead a delegation to Australia soon. Albanese managed to walk a tightrope of expectations in the meeting at the Great Hall of the People, raising the case of detained Chinese-Australian academic Yang Hengjun, while avoiding frustrations about Australia's foreign investment controls and the government's determination to bring the Port of Darwin back into Australian control. We learned on Wednesday that these more difficult issues were raised after Albanese met Xi, during his lengthy talks with China's premier, Li Qiang. Li complained Chinese businesses were facing unfair scrutiny under Labor's changes to Foreign Investment Review Board approval rules, and that there was no reason for Chinese-owned infrastructure operator Landbridge to be stripped of its 99-year lease to control the Darwin port. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We hope that the Australian side can provide a fair, open, and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises in Australia,' Li said. Media mouthpiece the Global Times used its coverage to warn against 'third-party interference' in the relationship – code for the White House leaning on allies to step up defence spending and detail plans for any conflict in the region. Albanese and foreign minister, Penny Wong, have a successful framework for handling the ups and downs of Australia's biggest trading relationship. They say Australia and China will cooperate where we can, and disagree where we must. The formula could be put to the test when the prime minister does finally sit down with Trump, or if Xi follows through with long-held plans to retake Taiwan by force by 2027. Even a less significant flare-up could set back closer ties. But for now at least, Albanese can bask in the kind of glow won by Whitlam's historic 1971 visit, humming Powderfinger and celebrating a successful rapprochement. Tom McIlroy is Guardian Australia's chief political correspondent

US producer prices unchanged in June
US producer prices unchanged in June

Reuters

time18 hours ago

  • Reuters

US producer prices unchanged in June

WASHINGTON, July 16 (Reuters) - U.S. producer prices were unexpectedly unchanged in June as an increase in the cost of goods because of tariffs on imports was offset by weakness in services. The unchanged reading in the producer price index for final demand last month followed an upwardly revised 0.3% rise in May, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said on Wednesday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the PPI rising 0.2% after a previously reported 0.1% gain in May. In the 12 months through June, the PPI increased 2.3% after advancing 2.7% in May. Data on Tuesday showed consumer prices picking up in June, with solid gains in tariff-exposed goods like household furnishings and supplies, appliances, sporting goods and toys as well as windows, floor coverings and linens. Economists said June's Consumer Price Index report was likely the start of the tariff-induced increase in inflation from the import duties announced in April. But some expected slower services price growth because of softening demand for travel and hotel accommodation to partially offset the boost to inflation from tariffs. President Donald Trump last week announced higher duties would come into effect on August 1 for imports from a range of countries, including Mexico, Japan, Canada and Brazil, and the European Union. Economists expected these tariffs would keep goods prices elevated through the end of the year. The Federal Reserve is expected to leave its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range at a policy meeting later this month. Minutes of the central bank's June 17-18 meeting, which were published last week, showed only "a couple" of officials said they felt rates could fall as soon as the July 29-30 meeting. Prior to the PPI report, economists estimated that the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, excluding the volatile food and energy components, increased 0.3% in June after rising 0.2% in May. The so-called core PCE inflation was forecast to have advanced 2.8% on a year-over-year basis last month after climbing 2.7% in May. The core PCE price index is one of the inflation measures tracked by the U.S. central bank for its 2% target.

DNC chair Ken Martin says ‘re-earning trust' is key to unifying party before midterms
DNC chair Ken Martin says ‘re-earning trust' is key to unifying party before midterms

The Guardian

time20 hours ago

  • The Guardian

DNC chair Ken Martin says ‘re-earning trust' is key to unifying party before midterms

As Democrats reckon with a deep inter-party divide that threatens their ability to repair the party's image and win back voters, Ken Martin said he not focused on 'internal bullshit' because 'most people could care less about the internal drama and soap opera of the Democratic party.' Martin, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, told the Guardian that he knows Democrats have to earn back trust from communities across the country before the midterms. But, as part of his job leading the party, he has to manage dissenting voices who are trying to chart a way forward for the Democrats after the bruising 2024 loss to Donald Trump. So far, the left is unified in its opposition to Trump – but not on their vision for their own party. Trump's spending plan will serve as the uniting force behind the Democratic Party's push toward the midterms. To that end, the DNC launched an effort to organize at events like book clubs and county fairs to ring the alarm about Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' and tell voters what Democrats stand for, well ahead of the next elections. Dubbed 'organizing summer', the party is engaging volunteers well before the midterms for on-the-ground meetups with voters. It has sent more money to local and state parties to use in key 2025-26 battlegrounds and is recruiting new leaders in these areas. The party will also restart its partisan voter registration programs, which have been done by third-party nonpartisan groups in recent years. Martin said one reason voters have lost trust is because the party has only been showing up in the months before an election to ask for a vote, Martin said. Democrats have to put in the work and the face time to re-earn that trust. 'The first conversation that you should have with voters is just listening to them and hearing their hopes and aspirations, and eventually building a relationship of trust around shared values,' he said. 'One of the ways we re-earn it is by actually showing them that we give a damn about their community, about their family, being present and having conversations when it's not a transaction, where we're asking them to do something for me.' Martin ran for the DNC spot after leading the Minnesota Democrat-Farmer-Labor party for more than a decade, amassing Democratic wins in the midwestern state. Since he has taken over, a slew of negative headlines have plagued his tenure, over the party's shaky finances and a battle over primaries. Martin, as the leader of the party during a rough time for Democrats, takes a lot of hits. He told the Bulwark that the role was the 'political equivalent of being a fire hydrant. You get pissed on by everyone.' He has said 'a few disgruntled people' were responsible for the internal squabbling, but also acknowledges the party has work to do with voters. Much of the party's messaging until the midterms will focus on the destruction of the Trump administration, from the spending bill to aggressive deportations. In Virginia, which holds statewide elections later this year, the party will spend 'at least seven figures' and will be 'exclusively focused on an economic message that gives people a sense that their better days are ahead of them', Martin told local media. As the left navigates how to rebuild itself after 2024 losses, Democrats have searched for answers – did their immigration stances misalign with the general public, or did an embrace of trans rights go too far left? There is not one set theory on why the Democrats lost. Democrats believe in border security and having 'sensible' immigration policies, Martin said, and they believe in protecting trans people from discrimination. Trump's deportation regime, though, is chaotic and callous, Martin said. 'They're going around – these thugs, essentially, these armed thugs – rounding up anyone they want off the streets and, without question or due process, essentially bringing them into detention centers and then shipping them off to countries without, again, due process. We still are a country of laws.' The Trump spending bill provides fodder for Democrats to highlight their values – or, most pointedly, for showing voters why they shouldn't side with Trump's party again in 2026. Some of the bill's deepest cuts won't go into effect until after the midterms, but Martin says its impacts were already visible in some communities. A Nebraska medical center, for instance, announced it would close because of 'anticipated federal budget cuts to Medicaid'. Food banks are worried about their ability to provide for people, while businesses face uncertainty and could start laying people off, Martin said. In the wake of their 2024 losses, Democrats have said they need to better inform voters on what they stand for, not just oppose Trump. On the spending bill , they can make the case for providing rural communities with access to healthcare, keeping children fed, and creating jobs in the renewable energy sector, Martin said. 'Everything we're for is exactly what the American people are for,' Martin said. 'This very unpopular bill, it's not just unpopular with Democrats or independent voters, it's unpopular with Republicans as well. It's going to devastate the lives of so many people in so many communities throughout this country.' David Hogg, the anti-gun violence activist and Parkland shooting survivor who leads a political action committee called Leaders We Deserve and was a vice-chair at the DNC, clashed with Martin earlier this year over endorsing and financing candidates in primary elections. In an internal call that was leaked to Politico in June, Martin said he was unsure if he wanted to continue with his role and said that Hogg had 'essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to'. Hogg eventually left his role after he would have needed to run again for vice-chair. Martin said primaries are 'an important part of democracy'. They hold elected officials accountable, bring in new ideas and perspectives, and allow for new voices, including younger leaders, to emerge. He and Hogg don't differ on this, he said. Their dispute wasn't about 'personal animus' but an inability to reconcile Martin and the DNC's pledge of neutrality in primaries with Hogg's plan to engage directly in primaries while holding a party officer position. Martin ran on this neutrality pledge; he said it stemmed from the 2016 presidential primary, when some saw the party as tilted in favor of Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders. Many of Sanders's supporters left the party and haven't come back, Martin said, because 'they were really pissed off that party leaders were going to make the decision' instead of the voters. He instituted a neutrality pledge in the state party in Minnesota. 'I believe that no party leader should ever put their thumb on the scale and pick winners or losers in a primary,' Martin said. 'It's very hard to unify a party when you're involved in telling people who support other Democrats that their voice doesn't matter, that they don't have a say, and that the party bosses are going to make the decision and not them,' Martin said. And unifying the party – so it can win elections – is Martin's goal. He frequently cites the need for a 'big tent party' that contains the Democrats' multitudes, including its disagreements. His job is to get the disparate Democratic factions 'into the same boat, rowing in the same direction towards the same goal, which is winning, and that's what I'm doing here at the DNC. 'Get everyone to understand what we need to do to win elections again, so we can actually move on from this national nightmare, which is Donald Trump.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store