Officials are tracking an earthquake swarm at Mount Rainier but say there is no cause for concern
The swarm has consisted of hundreds of small earthquakes–the largest of which so far has been a magnitude 2.3–and has surpassed a 2009 swarm in terms of magnitude event rate, total events, and energy release, the agency said in a statement Thursday.
The cause of the current swarm is consistent with the circulation of fluids along preexisting faults beneath the volcano and considered background activity at Mount Rainier, the agency said. The volcano alert level remained at normal, and the earthquakes have been too small to be felt at the surface, the agency said. Swarms can occur once or twice a year at Mount Rainier, though the number of quakes involved are usually smaller, the volcano observatory said. Mount Rainier, about 60 miles (97 kilometers) southeast of Seattle, is the most glaciated peak in the Lower 48 states.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
a day ago
- Arab News
What We Are Reading Today: ‘An Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology'
Author: Steven A. Balbus General relativity has entered a new phase of its development as technical advances have led to the direct detection of gravitational radiation from the merging of single pairs of stellar-sized black holes. The exquisite sensitivity of pulsar signal timing measurements has also been exploited to reveal the presence of a background of gravitational waves, most likely arising from the mergers of supermassive black holes thought to be present at the center of most galaxies. This book demonstrates how general relativity is central to understanding these and other observations.
Al Arabiya
2 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Grand Canyon blaze shows how managing a fire can go suddenly sideways
US land managers are racing against time as hotter, drier weather increases wildfire risk in overgrown forests. They're using flames from lightning-sparked wildfires when possible, and planning controlled burns to clear vegetation and limit future dangers. Grand Canyon National Park in Arizona has been a leader in using fire to enhance ecosystem resilience. A fire started by lightning on July 4 along the North Rim presented such an opportunity. However, after a week, conditions worsened, and wind-driven flames damaged the Grand Canyon Lodge and historic cabins. Despite this setback, experts argue that fire remains a crucial land management tool. Scott Stephens, a fire science professor at the University of California Berkeley, noted that most fires do great work. He emphasized that unless forests are made more resilient and fire hazards are lowered, the cycle of chasing fires will continue. Following the Dragon Bravo Fire on the North Rim, managers reported that crews had established containment lines, but unexpectedly strong winds pushed flames past these lines, leading to evacuations. Similarly, in New Mexico, crews battling a blaze in the Santa Fe National Forest had to change their strategy after a spot fire crossed containment lines. Ranchers criticized officials for not extinguishing the flames sooner, sharing images of dead cattle. Experts agree that there's room for improvement in wildfire management and controlled burn planning, especially with advancing technology. Derek Mallia, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Utah, is developing new forecasting tools and tracking fires in Utah and Arizona for a project focusing on pyrocumulonimbus clouds. He noted that fire forecasting hasn't progressed as much as tools for events like tornados and hurricanes, partly because fires occur on a smaller scale. Managers also need to consider built-up fuels and climate change, which is causing fires to burn hotter at night. Researchers are also working to understand how fires affect weather patterns. Mallia explained that fires are part of a complex feedback loop that complicates forecasting. However, Stephens and Andi Thode, a fire ecology professor at Northern Arizona University, emphasized that the biggest problem is the condition of the forests. Thode described the decision to use lightning-sparked fires or planned burns as a matter of deferred risk, asking whether managers want to take the risk now or later. For Native Americans, fire has long been essential for forest health. This perspective shifted policymaker attitudes, leading to the establishment of the first wilderness fire management program in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks over a half-century ago. Other parks followed suit, allowing thousands of lightning-sparked fires to burn under monitored conditions across the US. However, there have been costly lessons, such as the Cerro Grande Fire at Bandelier National Monument in New Mexico in 2000, which destroyed homes and forced the closure of Los Alamos National Laboratory due to strong winds and insufficient resources. The circumstances are now more dire due to a drier landscape across much of the US West. In 2022, the US Forest Service proceeded with prescribed burns in New Mexico's Sangre de Cristo Mountains, which resulted in the largest blaze in New Mexico's recorded history. The Hermits Peak/Calf Canyon Fire wasn't contained for four months, leading to evacuations and billions in recovery dollars. A 2024 report by the US Government Accountability Office noted that out of 50,000 prescribed fire projects between 2012 and 2021, 43 had escaped. The Forest Service ignites about 4,500 prescribed fires annually, with most being successful, but support decreases when fires escape. Thode stated that fire managers consider many variables when making decisions, emphasizing the extensive science behind managing these ecosystems.
Al Arabiya
4 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump administration says it won't publish major climate change report on NASA website as promised
The Trump administration on Monday took another step to make it harder to find major legally mandated scientific assessments of how climate change is endangering the nation and its people. Earlier this month, the official government websites that hosted the authoritative peer-reviewed national climate assessments went dark. Such sites tell state and local governments and the public what to expect in their backyards from a warming world and how best to adapt to it. At the time, the White House said NASA would house the reports to comply with a 1990 law that requires the reports, which the space agency said it planned to do. But on Monday, NASA announced that it aborted those plans. The USGCRP (the government agency that oversees and used to host the report) met its statutory requirements by presenting its reports to Congress. NASA has no legal obligations to host data,' NASA Press Secretary Bethany Stevens said in an email. That means no data from the assessment or the government science office that coordinated the work will be on NASA, she said. On July 3, NASA put out a statement that said: 'All preexisting reports will be hosted on the NASA website ensuring continuity of reporting.' 'This document was written for the American people, paid for by the taxpayers, and it contains vital information we need to keep ourselves safe in a changing climate, as the disasters that continue to mount demonstrate so tragically and clearly,' said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe. She is chief scientist at The Nature Conservancy and co-author of several past national climate assessments. Copies of past reports are still squirreled away in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's library, and the latest report and its interactive atlas can be seen here. Former Obama White House science adviser and climate scientist John Holdren accused the administration of outright lying and long intended to censor or bury the reports. 'The new stance is classic Trump administration misdirection,' Holdren said. 'In this instance, the administration offers a modest consolation to quell initial outrage over the closure of the site and the disappearance of the National Climate Assessments. Then two weeks later, they snatch away the consolation with no apology. They simply don't want the public to see the meticulously assembled and scientifically validated information about what climate change is already doing to our farms, forests, and fisheries, as well as to storms, floods, wildfires, and coast property–and about how all those damages will grow in the absence of concerted remedial action,' Holdren said in an email. 'That's why it's important that state and local governments and every day people see these reports,' Holdren said. He said they are written in a way that is useful to people who need to understand what climate change is doing and will do to THEM, their loved ones, their property, and their environment. Trump doesn't want people to know,' Holdren wrote. The most recent report, issued in 2023, found that climate change is affecting people's security, health, and livelihoods in every corner of the country in different ways, with minority communities, particularly Native Americans, often disproportionately at risk. ___ The Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters, and funded coverage areas at
