Aussie cafe owner's 'pressure' of impending $124,000 superannuation change: 'Everyone's struggling'
From July 1 next year, superannuation will be paid to employees at the same time as their salary and wages, rather than quarterly.
First announced in May 2023, the reform is aimed at tackling unpaid super and increasing the retirement savings of Aussies. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) estimates that $5.2 billion worth of superannuation went unpaid in 2021-22, while the government found a 25-year-old whose super was switched from quarterly to fortnightly could be $6,000 better off at retirement.
Daniel McGowan runs the Lucky Cat Cafe in Ipswich and employs three part-time staff members. The 37-year-old told Yahoo Finance he was speaking with his accountant about how he can meet the upcoming superannuation requirements. He may have to reduce the hours of his staff and work behind the counter more himself to make sure he can juggle the added "pressure" on cashflow.
RELATED
$500,000 superannuation 'crisis' exposed as Aussie mum reveals retirement shortfall
$1,130 ATO bill 'shock' after Aussie makes common tax return mistake
Centrelink alert for 240,000 Aussie families as some see popular payment stopped
'I need to have that cashflow right here and now to put into the business to go straight into superannuation,' he said.
'I don't think this is going to hurt staff in that they're going to get less hours. But it is a consideration now, and I've spoken to them about it."
McGowan said he generally doesn't pay himself a wage from his business, or pay himself superannuation, as he also works in digital marketing and teaches at a university.
McGowan recently closed his Annerley cafe and has now shifted operations over to his Ipswich store and is in the process of building it back up.
'The way it is now is every single week is a new experience of, 'Where am I going to get this money? How am I going to pay this? How am I going to pay that?' It is a big struggle,' he said.
McGowan said rent was his biggest expense, eating into between 60 to 70 per cent of revenue. This was followed by wages, with wages increasing on July 1 in line with minimum wage requirements and the super guarantee increasing to 12 per cent.
The cost of goods has also been rising, with coffee bean prices 'going up every single month". On top of that, McGowan said he had to close the shop for a week due to Cyclone Alfred earlier this year, and the shop experienced a break-in.
'I just think everyone's struggling, so a week of revenue is actually a really big thing in the scheme of things,' he said.
'Anyone who wants to give you credit or a loan, these small business loan companies, they want to give you very short-term loans.
'So you're getting in this cycle of having to get a 20-week turnaround loan, which is high interest, to cover the fall, and it's a lot of juggling.'
McGowan said he doesn't want to put up prices for customers at the cafe and cat lounge. He has been trying to keep prices steady for customers and absorb some of the small costs like alternative milk and EFTPOS fees.
Employment Hero, who runs payroll for more than 300,000 businesses, surveyed its customers and found 65 per cent of small and medium businesses thought payday super would have a 'moderate' to 'huge impact' on the day-to-day running of their businesses.
About a third said they would have to build up larger cash reserves to prepare for the change, while 15 per cent were not aware of the changes at all.
Employment Hero CEO Ben Thompson said he supported the intent of payday super and thought it presented a 'huge opportunity' for all Australians, but there were risks for businesses at play.
The company's modelling found businesses would need an extra $124,000 in working capital on average to meet the new rules. This is based on the average employer size and the average employee salary on its platform being paid 12 per cent of their salary in superannuation under the new timing requirements.
'That reduction in working capital could really push businesses to the edge of insolvency and put jobs at risk,' Thompson told Yahoo Finance.
'I think the problem here is more frequent payment of super is beneficial, but if it ultimately costs jobs, is it worth it?'
As part of the payday super change, employers will have a seven-calendar-day deadline from the payment of wages to pay employees' superannuation.
If they miss this deadline, they will be liable for an updated super guarantee charge, which will include the shortfall, daily interest (currently 10.78 per cent), and an extra enforcement charge of up to 60 per cent of the shortfall.
The Council of Small Business Organisations of Australia (COSBOA) said it supports the principle of payday super but has argued businesses need more time before enforcing a strict seven-day rule.
It called for a phased approach to payday super, moving to monthly payments from July 1, 2026, to allow time for system upgrades.
'Super payments move through multiple banking and clearing house stages before reaching super funds,' COSBOA Chair Matthew Addison said.
'At present, payments can take several business days to clear, and many transactions require additional time to reconcile.'
Thompson has called for the payment deadline to be extended to 10 days to accommodate the likelihood of bouncebacks. The company is also in the process of building superannuation payments into a payroll solution.
Other groups, like the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia, have noted employers have known about the changes since 2023 and have had time to prepare.
McGowan said he feels like he should have started preparing for the July 1 deadline earlier, but ultimately understands why the hard headline is in place.
'We're just gonna have to get it done,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investing in Cedar Woods Properties (ASX:CWP) three years ago would have delivered you a 108% gain
By buying an index fund, you can roughly match the market return with ease. But if you choose individual stocks with prowess, you can make superior returns. Just take a look at Cedar Woods Properties Limited (ASX:CWP), which is up 80%, over three years, soundly beating the market return of 22% (not including dividends). On the other hand, the returns haven't been quite so good recently, with shareholders up just 62%, including dividends. Let's take a look at the underlying fundamentals over the longer term, and see if they've been consistent with shareholders returns. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. Cedar Woods Properties was able to grow its EPS at 29% per year over three years, sending the share price higher. This EPS growth is higher than the 22% average annual increase in the share price. So one could reasonably conclude that the market has cooled on the stock. We'd venture the lowish P/E ratio of 11.71 also reflects the negative sentiment around the stock. You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). We know that Cedar Woods Properties has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? You could check out this free report showing analyst revenue forecasts. What About Dividends? When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for Cedar Woods Properties the TSR over the last 3 years was 108%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective We're pleased to report that Cedar Woods Properties shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 62% over one year. And that does include the dividend. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 13% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Cedar Woods Properties , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Of course Cedar Woods Properties may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Australian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investing in Cedar Woods Properties (ASX:CWP) three years ago would have delivered you a 108% gain
By buying an index fund, you can roughly match the market return with ease. But if you choose individual stocks with prowess, you can make superior returns. Just take a look at Cedar Woods Properties Limited (ASX:CWP), which is up 80%, over three years, soundly beating the market return of 22% (not including dividends). On the other hand, the returns haven't been quite so good recently, with shareholders up just 62%, including dividends. Let's take a look at the underlying fundamentals over the longer term, and see if they've been consistent with shareholders returns. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. Cedar Woods Properties was able to grow its EPS at 29% per year over three years, sending the share price higher. This EPS growth is higher than the 22% average annual increase in the share price. So one could reasonably conclude that the market has cooled on the stock. We'd venture the lowish P/E ratio of 11.71 also reflects the negative sentiment around the stock. You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image). We know that Cedar Woods Properties has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? You could check out this free report showing analyst revenue forecasts. What About Dividends? When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. We note that for Cedar Woods Properties the TSR over the last 3 years was 108%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective We're pleased to report that Cedar Woods Properties shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 62% over one year. And that does include the dividend. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 13% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Cedar Woods Properties , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Of course Cedar Woods Properties may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Australian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kmart, Bunnings warning over $15 purchase causing bill shock for shoppers: 'Can add hundreds'
Australians have been sounding the alarm about cheap heaters from retailers like Kmart to keep warm this winter. Parts of Australia have shivered through some of the coldest mornings of the year recently, and many wouldn't think twice about chucking on their heater to beat the chill. But you need to be careful about the heater or radiator you purchase, as it can cost you dearly. CHOICE has reviewed certain models in the past, and a spokesperson for the consumer group told Yahoo Finance Aussies get a huge shock each year when they pick the wrong one. "This doesn't just apply to Kmart heaters, though. Electric heaters are cheap to buy and easy to install, but they can also be one of the least efficient ways to heat your home," they said. RELATED Bunnings, Kmart items and other hacks that can shave $470 off winter power bills Major warning after Aussie receives random $350 payment in her bank account Major ATO deadline hits thousands of Aussies today "If you buy an inefficient model, it can add hundreds of dollars to your energy bill over the winter." Numerous videos have been posted to TikTok from Aussies who bought cheap heaters in the past few months to stave off the effects of winter. Many remarked how their electricity bill spiked massively, some by as much as $1,000, and they suspected it was because they were running these heaters for a few hours a worked out that she used her $15 heater for four to five full days in one month, and her energy bill was $176 more expensive than the previous month. Many pointed the finger at Kmart's heaters, because they are dirt cheap compared to other retailers. You can pick up a desktop heater from Kmart for just $12, a 5-fin oil heater for $39, and a mock fireplace, which is one of its most expensive heaters, for $65. Bunnings also sells cheap heaters for between $15 to $99. But many shoppers weren't aware that these short-term cheap buys end up costing them much more in the long run. Why do some cheap heaters spike your electricity bill? It all comes down to how much energy they use to operate. When you're shopping for heaters or radiators, it's worth looking at the wattage required for them to run, as that will allow you to work out how much electricity they'll use over a certain time frame. Sarah Aubrey noticed this when she was perusing the aisles of Bunnings last year to find a heater. "I'm just so shocked by how energy-hungry they are," she said. "[They're] proudly displaying 2,000 watts, that is so expensive to run. So you run that for one hour, that's 2 kilowatt hours." Some Kmart and Bunnings heaters require around 1,800 to 2,000 watts to run; however, others, still in the cheap zone, only require as little as 550 watts. A 2,000-watt fan heater would cost around $408 to run over the three months of winter, according to CHOICE. Comparatively, an 800-watt heater would only cost you around $83 to run for four hours every day during winter. People can often spike their electricity bills unnecessarily by using the wrong heater for the required room. Picking the right heater for the right purpose Different heaters have different purposes. If you had a small bedroom with not much window space, you could use a tiny, fan-based heater to stave off the chill. You would only need to run it for less than an hour to heat up the room. "If you are heating a room that's about 20 square metres or smaller, a less powerful heater with a capacity of around 1,000–1,500 watts is all you need," CHOICE said. The consumer group said if you wanted to leave the heater on all night but didn't want to take up too much electricity, then a convection heater, such as an oil column heater or panel heater, would be a better option. Some of these also work on a timer so that they turn off after you've fallen asleep and turn on just before you wake up. An oil column heater typically uses 1,620 watts per hour, and would cost $324 to run during winter. A panel heater is closer to 2,000 watts per hour and costs roughly $398 to operate for three months. But if the room was much bigger, like a kitchen, living or dining room, you would need something more substantial. "For a large living area, you'll need a high-wattage heater (ideally 2400W) with a good fan to distribute the hot air," CHOICE home heating expert Chris Barnes said. "A convection heater such as a panel or oil column heater with a fan, or a tower fan, is usually the best option here." You could also get a reverse-cycle split-system, but that might not be in everyone's budget or living arrangements. CHOICE added that just because a fan, heater, or radiator might be expensive, it doesn't necessarily mean it will be cheap to run or effective at warming a room. Cheaper ways to stay warm in winter this year There are plenty of methods to beat the chill this winter without seeing your energy bill go up massively. CHOICE suggested looking at sealing draughts in your home to ensure the heat isn't escaping under doors or through windows. Buying a door snake can help address that issue. You can also switch your ceiling fan into reverse so that the blades push the warm air back towards the floor. Electric blankets can also help during winter as they cost around $20 per season to run for a single bed. You could also use a hot water bottle when you go to sleep or to have on your lap if you're working from home. You can check out other methods that could shave off $470 from your bill in to access your portfolio