First Solana staking ETF hits $12M in ‘healthy' first trading day
The REX-Osprey Solana Staking ETF debuted on the Cboe BZX Exchange on Wednesday, recording $33 million in trading volume and $12 million in inflows, according to Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas.
The fund, trading under SSK, gives investors direct exposure to spot Solana along with staking yields, making it the first crypto staking ETF to be approved in America.
It was a 'healthy start to trading,' said Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart, who observed that it had seen $8 million in trading volume in the first 20 minutes.
Balchunas also commented on the impressive first-day volumes, stating that it 'blows away' the Solana futures ETF and XRP futures ETFs but was much lower than the spot Bitcoin and Ether funds when they launched.
US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a combined $4.6 billion worth of shares traded on their first day in January 2024.
'The launch of crypto staking ETFs is a defining moment for digital assets and a significant step forward in full access to the crypto ecosystem,' said Anchorage Digital co-founder Nathan McCauley, whose firm is the staking and custodian partner for the REX-Osprey ETF.
Regulatory hurdles
The REX-Osprey fund faced regulatory hurdles with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which objected to it in late May after clearing an initial registration.
The issue was whether the product qualified as an 'investment company' under securities laws, but the firm managed to get around this by investing at least 40% of its assets in other ETPs, mostly domiciled outside the US. More eyes on spot Solana ETF, altcoin ETF summer
Unlike spot Solana ETFs that still require approval from the SEC, REX-Osprey's Solana ETF is structured under the Investment Company Act 1940, which sidesteps the standard 19b-4 filing process.
In May, NovaDius Wealth Management president Nate Geraci described it as 'regulatory end-around.' However, some have debated whether the fund should be considered a traditional spot Solana ETF.
Meanwhile, the ETF's recent performance could shed light on institutional demand for a spot Solana ETF, which may launch this year.
Seyffart and Balchunas recently pegged a 95% chance that spot Solana ETFs would be approved by the end of the year.
'We expect a wave of new ETFs in the second half of 2025,' Seyffart said earlier this week, predicting that spot XRP, Solana, and Litecoin products would be greenlit by the SEC before the end of the year.
On Tuesday, the regulator approved a Grayscale application to convert its Digital Large-Cap Fund into an ETF. The fund comprises a basket of the top five digital assets by market capitalization. Minor reaction for SOL prices
There was no major reaction in Solana prices, which have gained 3.6% over the past 24 hours, lower than most of the other high-cap altcoins.
The asset was trading around $153 at the time of writing and was up around 5% over the past week, but still down 48% from its January peak.
However, Solana CME futures saw 'record demand, signaling rising institutional interest' as open interest hit $167 million following the ETF launch, reported SolanaFloor.
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/first-solana-staking-etf-hits-12m-on-debut-trading-day
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
20 hours ago
- The National
'Genius' move: What are the goals of the three US crypto bills?
US President Donald Trump has signed the Genius Act into law, setting the stage for greater cryptocurrency supervision in line with America's aim to be the global leader in digital asset s. The bipartisan bill is one of three that had both Capitol Hill and crypto enthusiasts buzzing, as it would set the US up for the future of finance, while also being a legacy move for Mr Trump, who has gone from crypto sceptic to champion. 'The Genius Act could become a defining milestone for stablecoin policy. Moving stablecoins out of regulatory ambiguity won't just enable institutional participation, it will require it,' said Omar Elassar, managing director of venture capital firm Animoca Brands Middle East. The National reported that cryptocurrencies will not become mainstream unless the acts enforce strong regulations. We take a look at the three acts and how they would redefine cryptocurrency regulation and its future. Genius Act: 'Long overdue' According to the White House, the Genius Act is meant to make America 'the undisputed leader in digital assets'. The 'long-overdue' law is intended to prioritise consumer protection and strengthen the US dollar's reserve currency status, in addition to improving national security, which is one of the Trump administration's pillars. Also, the Genius Act is aimed at bringing 'massive' investment and innovation to the US, the world's top economy – although the latter is being challenged by others, most notably by rival China. The bill details strict regulations for stablecoins, which aim to address cryptocurrencies' shortcomings by pegging their value to a unit of an underlying asset, are often issued on faster blockchains and backed by state-issued tender such as the dollar, pound, euro and highly liquid reserves including government treasuries or commodities such as precious metals. Also, a stablecoin is different from a central bank digital currency, or CBDC: the former is privately issued, while the latter is government-backed. Both, however, aim to make transactions faster, cheaper and more secure, and would serve emerging markets well. The Genius Act will usher in the creation of the first-federal regulatory system for stablecoins. It also requires 100 per cent reserve backing with liquid assets like the dollar or short-term Treasuries and mandates issuers to make monthly, public disclosures. Should a stablecoin issuer become insolvent, the Genius Act will prioritises stablecoin holders' claims over all other creditors, it added. 'The passage of the Genius Act is a true watershed moment for the US. It is a defining step for responsible crypto policy … giving issuers, builders, and regulators the clear rules they have been asking for,' said Ji-Hun Kim, president of the Washington-based Crypto Council for Innovation. All said, the Genius Act aims to ensure the greenback remains the world's reserve currency, help fight illicit activity in the crypto world and make the US the global leader for digital assets. Clarity Act: Dual supervision The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, or Clarity Act, meanwhile, aims to establish a regulatory framework for digital commodities – namely, the classification, offering, trading and supervision of digital assets. It will also define clear lines of jurisdiction between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, two of the top US asset regulators that have been monitoring the digital asset situation and cracked down on crime – most notably the case involving jailed FTX boss Sam Bankman-Fried. That means it is expected to be a strict law because, 'at its core, it introduces a dual-agency approach to oversight', said Jerry Huang, an associate at Canadian law firm McMillan. The Clarity Act calls for how digital assets may be offered, sold and traded in the US, and the registration of brokers, dealers and trading facilities, who must maintain fair trading and anti-manipulation systems, ensure real-time transparency and adopt anti-money laundering and know-your-customer programmes. These would help reduce 'legal uncertainty for issuers, developers and intermediaries, while strengthening investor protections and market integrity', Mr Huang added. Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act: 'Weapon' control The summary of the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act is to 'amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy and for other purposes'. In other words, a CBDC carries the risk of the government being able to surveil people's financial transactions and 'suppress politically unpopular activity', said Congressman Tom Emmer, the bill's main author, who also noted that a CBDC is 'is government-controlled, programmable money'. 'For years, we have worked to educate our colleagues on the dangers of this insidious technology, which would undermine our values and destroy Americans' right to privacy. Now, we must codify [CBDC] to ensure that the United States' digital currency policy remains in the hands of the American people. The bill aims to prevent future administrations from weaponising CBDC technology against the American people, he said. The American Bankers Association agreed in a letter to Mr Emmer, saying that a CBDC 'is unnecessary in the US and would present unacceptable risks and costs to the financial system'. Are these bills bulletproof? Whether these three legislations work as they are intended to do so remains to be seen, especially as digital assets remain vulnerable to misuse and are being used in illegal activity – a lot. In 2024, more than 99 per cent of stablecoin volume was legitimate – but stablecoins accounted for about 60 per cent of illicit transaction across the crypto ecosystem, according to an analysis from blockchain platform TRM Labs. 'Their speed, liquidity, and perceived stability can make them attractive for ransomware payments, terrorist financing, romance and investment scams, sanctions evasion, over-the-counter fraud and large-scale laundering,' said Ari Redbord, a vice president at San Francisco-based TRM. That corroborates an earlier report from Chainalysis, which found out that 63 per cent of all illicit transaction volumes involve stablecoins. 'The integration of stablecoins into traditional finance creates new systemic risk vectors that extend beyond individual protocols or platforms,' analysts at New York-based Chainalysis said. 'A failure of a major stablecoin could trigger cascading liquidations across interconnected protocols, potentially freezing large portions of the DeFi [decentralised finance] ecosystem.'
The National
a day ago
- The National
Mixed US economic signals dampen Wall Street's record week
Wall Street ended a record-breaking week with a whimper after investors digested mixed signals from US economic data and President Donald Trump's threat to impose higher tariffs on the EU. Both the benchmark S&P 500 and tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite rose to record highs in recent weeks, with the former hitting another new high on Thursday on the back of solid corporate earnings and strong economic reports. On Thursday, the Labour Department reported that jobless claims for the week ended July 12 declined from the previous week, with June retail sales data stronger than forecast and economic sentiment rising in early July. However, expectations for inflation targets continued to drop, as America's consumer price index rose to 2.7 per cent in June, from 2.4 per cent. While inflation levels are below peak levels recorded about three years ago, it is still above the goal of 2 per cent. Lower inflation also makes it easier to lower interest rates – a key sticking point in Mr Trump's frustrations with Federal Reserve boss Jerome Powell. Mr Trump has long and repeatedly criticised and insulted Mr Powell, threatening, then denying, to fire the Fed chairman – which is another episode being closely watched by investors and economists, who widely agree that such a move would have a negative effect on Wall Street. Also, the producer price index retreated to 2.3 per cent in June, from 2.5 per cent a month earlier. In addition, homebuilding, home purchases and residential investment all dropped in June, amid uncertainty in the world's top economy. Mr Trump has also threatened to impose new tariffs of at least 15 per cent to 20 per cent on products from the EU, which is another concern investors have to digest. Mr Trump's comments on Powell "caused some sell-off across major US indices, but the S&P 500 still managed to close with gains. Softer-than-expected PPI data helped cool mounting inflation fears after the previous day's CPI print surprised on the upside", said Ipek Ozkardeskaya, a senior analyst at Swissquote Bank. "We'll see if Mr Trump chickens out – and whether this triggers a market correction." Major markets mostly down On Wall Street, the S&P 500 closed flat, the Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 0.3 per cent and the Nasdaq inched up 0.1 per cent. For the week, the S&P 500 gained 0.6 per cent, the Dow retreated 0.1 per cent and the Nasdaq added 1.5 per cent. Year-to-date, the indices are up 7.1 per cent, 4.2 per cent and 8.2 per cent, respectively. In Europe, London's FTSE 100 settled 0.2 per cent higher, as European shares tracked corporate earnings reports and the situation on US tariffs. Frankfurt's DAX slid 0.3 per cent, while Paris' CAC 40 ended flat. Earlier in Asia, stocks in China and Hong Kong stocks closed higher, after Beijing vowed to rein in Chinese companies' aggressive price cutting in an effort to tackle deflation. The Shanghai Composite settled 0.5 per cent higher and Hong Kong's Hang Seng index jumped 1.3 per cent. Tokyo's Nikkei 225, however, declined 0.2 per cent, as investors await Sunday's upper house elections in Japan, which may give a hint of economic direction moving forward. In commodities, oil prices jumped on Friday but retreated to settle lower as mixed US economic data offset concerns over drone attacks against Opec member Iraq that raised supply concerns and after the EU approved more sanctions against Russia. Brent closed 0.35 per cent lower at $69.28 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate retreated 0.30 per cent to $67.34 a barrel. Intraday gains peaked at about 1.5 per cent. Gold, meanwhile, closed the week higher as economic uncertainty and a weaker dollar boosted the safe-haven asset's appeal. The precious metal, widely viewed as a hedge against inflation, added 0.3 per cent to $3,350.53 an ounce.
The National
2 days ago
- The National
From fraud and bankruptcy to personal nuclear reactors, the unlikely rebirth of Enron
On what was described as Enron's first earnings call in 25 years, the infamous energy company's chief executive acknowledged the accounting scandal that collapsed the company in 2001. Connor Gaydos, the new leader of Enron – the American company that was rocked by the discovery of widespread fraud, leading it to file for bankruptcy – was flanked by the company's famed tilted E logo as he reflected stoically on the past. "This company has a legendary history and some of it is good and some of it is bad," he said in a Zoom call attended by hundreds. "That's fine, Enron's name has always carried weight, and we don't run from that – we embrace it." Some view it as parody, others as performance art. Whatever it is, Mr Gaydos now owns the Texas-based company that had about 20,000 employees and more than $47 billion in assets before it collapsed. The company primarily focused on electricity and natural gas, as well as trading in energy and physical commodities. It also offered financial and risk management services to other businesses. An archived version of Enron's website claimed more than $100 billion in revenue as of 2000. But whistle-blowers revealed rampant fraud, much of it in the form of egregious accounting methods, which destroyed the company and brought an end to a boom rooted in economic and energy deregulation starting in the mid 1990s. As a result of the crisis, Enron's former chief executive, Jeffrey Skilling, served more than a decade in prison. The company's founder and former chairman, Kenneth Lay, probably would have been jailed had he not died before his sentencing. The company's former chief financial officer, Andrew Fastow, also served a prison sentence. Enron was at the heart of one of the biggest US corporate scandals of all time. It now serves as a cautionary tale for companies, investors and consumers. "Enron was always something that I had thought about since I was a child," Mr Gaydos told The National, days after Enron's earnings call. The 29-year-old, originally from Arkansas, reflected on the tainted company's happier and more prosperous days, describing it as the "OpenAI or Nvidia of the mid 1990s". He explained that his decision to restart the notorious company stemmed from viewing a documentary about its fall from grace. He looked up the Enron logo in the US trademark database and noticed that ownership of the symbol – by graphic designer Paul Rand, who also created the logos for IBM, Westinghouse, UPS and ABC – had expired. Mr Gaydos hired a lawyer who helped with the trademark acquisition paperwork. For a few hundred dollars, including legal fees, he became the owner of the Enron brand. "It cost me what I think the price of cup of coffee will cost in a few years," he joked, referring to inflation. In late 2024, Enron announced its comeback through accounts on Instagram, X and TikTok – which did not exist when the company went under in 2001. Now, Enron has about 500,000 followers on those social platforms. "We're here to lead by are Enron," a promotional video for the company said. Since that video came out, Mr Gaydos has done several interviews and the company has heavily promoted a fanciful product it calls the Enron Egg, which it describes as a personal nuclear reactor"made to power your home for up to 10 years". Several people purporting to be board members and high-level staff members took part in the recent earnings call. "I've got 60 people on the payroll right now," Mr Gaydos said. The company also recently promoted a 2025 summer internship programme and a commitment to corporate diversity. Although it is his first time leading a prominent brand, it is not the first time Mr Gaydos has been in the spotlight. He is one of the creators of Birds Aren't Real, the viral, performance art conspiracy theory designed as a critique of the abundance of misinformation pumped out on social media. Mr Gaydos said the main thrust of the project was to show how the internet had been used as a tool to divide people. With the Enron endeavour, however, he wants to do something different. 'I want to unite people using the toolbox that we used with Birds Aren't Real, but do it in a way that can hopefully shine a light on some of the areas that deserve to be exposed with the energy business,' he explained. Mr Gaydos said in the two decades since Enron's financial implosion, energy business consolidation, government subsidies and policies that lack environmental awareness have run amok. Consumers have suffered while energy profits have soared, he added. He said his version of Enron was in the process seeking approval to become a retail energy provider. The Enron brand owner said that, in Texas, 10 'legacy monopoly companies' supply energy to about 60 per cent of the population. Mr Gaydos accused those companies of vague pricing and outsourcing customer service to artificial intelligence. Without going into specifics, Mr Gaydos said Enron wanted to present Texas residents with a straightforward and economical path to provide energy to their homes or businesses. 'The energy monopoly in this country has got so out of hand,' he said, before changing to a more optimistic tone, adding that his goal is to bring back Enron and create a new company that will revolutionise energy. 'If there's a few jokes along the way, and if some people laugh along the way, so be it." Speaking with Mr Gaydos, it is sometimes difficult to tell what is real and what is parody. One of the project's staff members who co-ordinated the interview insisted the push to become a retail energy provider was real. "Stay tuned," they said. "Enron has a lot of interesting stuff coming down the pike."
