CM directs to coordinate with J-K Govt. for safe evacuation of Himachali students
He said that about 103 students were currently pursuing their studies in Jammu and Kashmir, and their families were deeply worried about their well-being and were urged to bring them back home safely, according to a release.
The Chief Minister assured that the State Government would leave no stone unturned in ensuring the safety and well-being of the Himachali students. He immediately asked the Chief Secretary for prompt and coordinated action to bring the students back home safely.
Earlier in the day, the Revenue, Horticulture and Tribal Development Minister of Himachal Pradesh, Jagat Singh Negi, said that the state is fully prepared for internal security and that the current situation along the Indo-China border in Kinnaur and Lahaul-Spiti remains peaceful.
Speaking to the media in Shimla, Negi said the state is ready for internal security. 'Himachal Pradesh is ready for internal security.'
He added that while the state does not share a direct border with Pakistan, some districts like Kinnaur and Lahaul-Spiti border China, and currently, there is no tension in those regions.
'Everything is peaceful. We hope it remains peaceful in the future as well,' he said.
Negi noted that all small hydro power projects in Kinnaur district have security deployed, and arrangements for their protection have been made.
'We do not have many large dams in Himachal. The only major dam is Bhakra. In Kinnaur, there are several small hydro power projects which naturally require protection,' he said.
Pakistan on Thursday night launched a series of coordinated drone and missile attacks along India's western border, targeting regions in Jammu and Kashmir and Rajasthan. According to Indian defence officials, the attacks were largely intercepted by India's air defence systems, including the S-400 missile defence system, preventing significant damage.
This comes after India conducted Operation Sindoor earlier this week, which targeted terrorist camps in Pakistan following a deadly terrorist attack in Kashmir that killed 26 tourists on April 22.
The situation remains volatile, with international calls for restraint and diplomatic engagement to prevent further escalation. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
How to deal with him
Indian public opinion is incensed by Trump's Truth Social post about having reached a deal with Pakistan, to prospect for and develop oil and natural gas in that country. He goes on to say that the search for the right company to undertake this work is ongoing. To add salt to the wound, he writes that perhaps in the future India could purchase oil from Pakistan. This has created a furore in our media, in Parliament and in our public at large. As expected, opposition has labelled this development as the failure of govt's foreign policy. And our people are wondering what Trump is up to, especially how he has got so close to Rawalpindi during this second term. Not only has he feted Field Marshal Asim Munir over lunch at the White House, but now US govt appears to be cozying up again with Islamabad. Read more at TOI+ Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump's 25 per cent tariff on India: An opportunity, and a step too far
US President Donald Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports, along with a penalty for procuring energy and military equipment from Russia, is a shocker at first sight. But, it also presents a moment for India to seize the initiative and do what is right without losing any more time. A free trade agreement that allows greater access for Indian products to the world's largest market and, at the same time, opens up its economy to American goods and services, is a win-win for both sides. India's exports to the US, at $86.5 billion in 2024-25 (April-March), were higher than those to any other country. Imports from the US, at $45.7 billion, were below only those from China ($113.5 billion), Russia ($63.8 billion) and the UAE ($63.4 billion). A no-deal, simply put, is not in India's interest. The effort should be to not just preserve, but enhance the gains from trade. Trump, no doubt, has overturned the predictable rules and principles governing the global trading order that delivered high growth and lifted the fortunes of millions across countries. His latest unilateral measure, subjecting India to a higher tariff than the UK (10 per cent), the European Union, Japan and Korea (15 per cent), Indonesia (19 per cent) or Vietnam (20 per cent), runs counter to the larger story of growing cooperation between the two countries. The last couple of years alone have seen significant movement towards the signing of a new 10-year defence partnership framework, an MoU to expand and diversify critical mineral supply chains and proposed amendments to India's nuclear liability law. For all the jarring notes in Trump's imperious actions and pronouncements, India must not lose sight of the big picture. If anything, it must hasten the process of clinching a long-delayed agreement that will also give a push to much-needed domestic economic reforms. And the approach should be based on export proactiveness rather than import defensiveness — as was evident in the recent India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. While Trump's 25 per cent import levy may be a pressure tactic for forcing India to lower both duties and non-tariff barriers on American products, his threatening to impose an additional 'penalty' for the country buying Russian oil and defence hardware is unacceptable. Just as signing a trade deal with the US is in India's interest, securing the energy needs of its population — including by sourcing oil from any country offering crude at discounted prices — is non-negotiable. It is possible this may entail a cost in the form of secondary sanctions linked to Russian supplies, which India will have to factor in going ahead. Recognising this cost is as important as converting the Trump threat into an opportunity to be seized.
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
To justify dismissal of constable who married Pakistan national, CRPF cites national security: ‘Our security will get compromised…'
The Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) has justified the dismissal from service of constable Munir Ahmed, saying that he married a Pakistani woman despite apprehensions from seniors that it may raise a national security issue and before any decision was made on his applications seeking permission for the marriage. The CRPF opposed Munir's writ petition in the High Court of J&K and Ladakh, challenging his dismissal from service. While the DIG (Adm) had clarified that under the CCS (Conduct) Rules 1964, there is no requirement for an NOC and that a government servant marrying a person who is not of Indian nationality has to just inform the government, the CRPF said that in this case, since the woman is a Pakistani national, it opposed the marriage. In a letter dated July 23, 2024, the Jammu Sector CRPF had resubmitted Munir's file to the J&K Zone CRPF, asking the latter not to grant an NOC to him for the marriage. In the letter, the Jammu Sector CRPF said, 'CCS Conduct Rule 1964 was framed 60 years ago, and at that time, Pakistan was not a hostile country'. 'However, after the eruption of militancy in J&K, the neighbouring country has become a hostile nation and is abetting terrorism in J&K, which has claimed thousands of innocent lives, as well as of police personnel, political activists and paramilitary forces,' it said. 'Besides terrorism, Pakistan has also indulged in various means and efforts to gather intelligence of our strategic locations, campuses, deployment, and our weaponry, and keeps our forces (engaged) in proxy war,' it wrote, adding that the petitioner was employed in the executive staff in the CRPF and had access to confidential information. 'Therefore, there is apprehension that once he gets married to a Pakistani girl, our security will get compromised and… (this) could endanger our national security,' it said. It also claimed that there had been 'some instances of women working as spies to lure such boys into marriage, even though in this case, he states she is a relative'. In a subsequent response to further questions from the J&K Zone CRPF, it was told that Ahmed solemnised nikah with Pakistani national Menal Khan on May 24, 2024, through video conferencing and that he had requested an NOC for the same. It said that it came to know through a newspaper on February 28, 2025, that Menal Khan had entered India through the Wagha Border on a 15-day tourist visa and was residing with the petitioner at his residence. The CRPF on May 3 this year dismissed Ahmed, a resident of Jammu district's Bhalwal tehsil, from service without a formal inquiry, saying that his actions were found to be detrimental to 'national security'. The dismissal came in the aftermath of the attack in Pahalgam, where 26 people were shot dead by terrorists from Pakistan. Ahmed had denied the allegations, claiming he had informed the CRPF Directorate last year of his marriage with Menal Khan and that the latter had acknowledged it in a communication. He also claimed that he had first told the DG of the wedding on December 31, 2022 and had sought an NOC from the organisation. But he had also admitted that his wife's short-term visa had ended earlier this year and the couple was trying to get a long-term one. Meanwhile, with her short-term visa now ended, Minal had been issued a 'Leave India' notice in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack and was taken to Attari, but the deportation was stalled after Ahmed moved the High Court.
