EPA approves Occidental Petroleum CO2 storage in the Basin, stock in the spotlight
This includes three wells that will store about 722,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year at a depth of about 4,400 feet. According to the EPA, Class VI injection wells store carbon dioxide (CO2) deep underground, either captured from an emissions source or the atmosphere.
In a statement from OXY, the company said 'the wells would store CO2 captured from STRATOS, which is the world's largest Direct Air Capture (DAC) facility in Ector County, Texas. Occidental has expressed intentions to build 100 DAC facilities by 2035.'
In a statement from EPA Regional Administrator Scott Mason, 'Oxy Low Carbon Ventures has demonstrated their ability and intention to operate these wells responsibly while creating jobs and supporting the Texas economy.'
Stay with ABC Big 2 news as we continue to follow the latest on this developing story. For your latest Energy Report, tune in Wednesday night's at 6pm for 'Powering the Permian' with Chris Talley.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's EPA Reportedly Wants to Remove Limits on Tailpipe Emissions
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." A new draft plan is reportedly going to unwind the EPA's ruling that greenhouse gases are a public health issue. If passed, the federal agency's ability to enforce restrictions on automakers could be limited in the future. The plan would overturn official EPA policy that has been in place since 2009. A newly drafted plan from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), said to be days away from going public, aims to strip the agency's ability to limit greenhouse gases. According to reporting from the New York Times, the draft proposal rescinds a 2009 declaration that carbon dioxide and methane emissions are hazardous to public health. If verified and passed, such a proposal presents further headwinds to EV adoption and also removes limits on tailpipe emissions. The ruling would also affect industrial pollution, but as far as the automotive industry is concerned, it would remove carbon emission limitations as a target for automakers. With fines for CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) violations largely eliminated and federal rebates for EV purchases gone, this new change could continue to change the course of domestic car manufacturing. Long-term, such a change would limit the EPA's authority to enforce rules aimed at limiting climate change. The proposed draft is said not to argue with the science regarding greenhouse gas emissions, but rather it states that the EPA has legally overstepped its authority. It seeks to limit the EPA's ability to legislate except in specific circumstances. There are several steps to be taken before such a change occurs, not least of which are various legal hurdles. If enacted, the new plan would almost certainly face challenges from various sources. It also has to weather some form of public review. It took two years for the EPA to officially label greenhouse gases as a public health issue after a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that they were pollutants under the Clean Air Act. Unwinding this finding may take a similarly long timeline. If you are in the automaking business, however, it's fairly straightforward to see which way the winds are blowing. For the near future, investing in combustion-powered transportation is likely to be the safe bet. You Might Also Like Car and Driver's 10 Best Cars through the Decades How to Buy or Lease a New Car Lightning Lap Legends: Chevrolet Camaro vs. Ford Mustang!
Politico
14 hours ago
- Politico
Congress can't decide how much more to cut on climate
The House left Washington this week for its August recess, setting the stage for fall showdowns with the Senate and White House on deeper cuts to climate and environment spending. If the sides can't work out their differences, or agree on how to kick the can past Oct. 1, a partial government shutdown could hit in a little more than nine weeks. Three distinct visions of the future are at play: — President Donald Trump's budget request in May asked lawmakers for massive reductions for programs that aim to fight climate change, and agencies including the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Park Service. — The Senate has put forth largely bipartisan proposals, eyeing a small cut to EPA and an increase for the Interior Department. In some cases, senators are pushing back at how Trump is handling government funding. — The House, on the other hand, is aiming to take a sledgehammer to those agencies and more, with double-digit percentage cuts that would have to advance with only Republican votes. Its cuts still wouldn't bite as deeply as what Trump proposed. A MOUNTAIN OF DIFFERENCES: Take the spending bill for the Energy Department and water development programs, which advanced through the House Appropriations Committee last week on a party-line vote. It would fund the agencies in its purview at $57.3 billion, or $766 million less than current levels. The Energy Department would get $48.8 billion, a cut of $1.4 billion. Its Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy is targeted for a 46 percent decrease, while the Office of Grid Deployment's funding would fall by more than half. Trump's budget request eyed even bigger cuts, seeking to reduce the Energy Department's budget by $4.7 billion, slash about 70 percent of the renewable energy office's funding and mostly eliminate money from the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law. Things are even messier on the Senate side. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), who chairs the subcommittee overseeing the energy and water legislation, says he wants the bill to spend less than the $59.9 billion that Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) and ranking member Patty Murray (D-Wash.) had agreed to, creating an impasse that has blocked the legislation from moving forward, our Andres Picon reported. A COLLISION OVER EPA: House and Senate appropriators have also shown stark differences in how they're handling Interior and EPA — including which programs they want to cut. The House Appropriations Committee advanced its bill along party lines this week, including a proposed 23 percent cut for the EPA. The bill's total spending for the agencies it covers, $38 billion, is $9.2 billion higher than what Trump requested. But the Senate version, advanced the following day by a subcommittee chaired by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), would cut EPA just 5 percent. The Senate bill also takes aim at the Trump administration and its priorities. It would cut EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin's office, provide no funding for EPA's planned closure of its research office, and require the administration to change the name of Alaska's Mount McKinley back to Denali, reversing Trump's January renaming. It's Friday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Timothy Cama. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to tcama@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Zack Colman breaks down how the Trump administration is planning to back off from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Power Centers Extreme storms producing even more rain than some scientists expected Heavy rainfall events like the one that created deadly flooding in the Texas Hill Country are a symptom of climate change, Chelsea Harvey writes. 'The biggest, baddest, rarest extreme precipitation events are precisely those which are going to increase the most in a warming climate,' Daniel Swain, a climate scientist at the California Institute for Water Resources, said not long after the Texas floods. This is because a warmer atmosphere can hold more water. But scientists say recent flash floods have produced more rainfall than their equations hold. Trade deals take gas along for the ride Some nations are currying favor with the Trump administration ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline for tariffs by buying liquefied natural gas from the U.S., Brian Dabbs and Carlos Anchondo write. The president announced new trade deals this week with Indonesia and Japan, the latter of which he said will include a 'major expansion of U.S. energy exports.' 'LNG is playing a significant role in the bilateral trade talks,' said Mark Menezes, president of the U.S. Energy Association trade group and a former Department of Energy official in Trump's first term. China, EU agree and disagree on climate European Union leaders agreed to a joint effort with China to fight climate change this week after leaving Beijing without a wider trade deal, Karl Mathiesen, Koen Verhelst and Jordyn Dahl write. The friction over trade stems from China's dominance in clean technology and its associated supply chains. European leaders see China's exports as a threat to their own manufacturing. Chinese President Xi Jinping called on EU leaders to see that 'convergent interests are not a threat,' in remarks reported by the state-run Xinhua News Agency. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called the agreement a 'big step forward … our cooperation can set a global benchmark.' In Other News Pumped up: Massachusetts regulators are considering cutting electricity rates in the winter for households that use heat pumps. Dried up: Louisiana canceled a $3 billion coastal restoration project meant to protect the state from rising seas and extreme weather. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. The CEO of Exelon and chair of the Edison Electric Institute says he's ready to meet the Trump administration's goals but calls for an 'all of the above' energy approach. The Securities and Exchange Commission wants an appeals court to continue hearing a challenge to a Biden-era climate rule even though it is not defending it in court. That's it for today, folks. Thanks for reading, and have a great weekend!
E&E News
16 hours ago
- E&E News
Virginia state government alum takes policy role at EPA
A former Virginia state government appointee has joined EPA's Office of Air and Radiation as a senior policy adviser, according to his LinkedIn profile. Harris Schwab started in the position last month, the profile indicates. Before that, he spent almost three years as an assistant secretary at Virginia's Office of the Secretary of Natural and Historic Resources, an umbrella organization that encompasses the state's Department of Environmental Quality and four other agencies. The scope of his portfolio at EPA is unclear. Schwab did not reply to a message sent Thursday through LinkedIn. In response to emailed questions, spokesperson Brigit Hirsch said, 'We are excited to have Harry Schwab join EPA's Office and Air and Radiation. ' Advertisement 'His experience, including his time as Assistant Secretary of Natural and Historic Resources of Virginia, will be a boon to EPA as we work to advance our core mission of protecting human health and the environment while Powering the Great American Comeback,' Hirsch continued.
