I'm a 28-year-old AI engineer in Big Tech. Here's my advice for others who want to break into this growing field.
She pitched projects internally during her internship that were adopted to help secure a full-time offer.
Higher education aids in tech careers, but networking and skills can also open doors.
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Kriti Goyal, a 28-year-old AI machine learning engineer based in Seattle, about her journey into her current role and her daily schedule. It's been edited for length and clarity.
I was mostly raised in the small town of Bikaner, Rajasthan, in India, and I always thought I would study medicine until my cousin showed me a video that changed my life.
It was a Code.org video with Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, and other tech rockstars, about how coding is the quickest way to convert an idea into a product. That video was a very big turning point in my life and career.
I'm now part of the Foundation Model main framework team for a major Big Tech company in the US. I recently completed five years with them, during which time I've held four different roles.
I used my master's to move to the US and further my career. But whether or not a higher degree is necessary today is complicated.
There are many roles on machine learning teams
There are multiple rungs on the ladder of Machine Learning teams.
The different roles include researchers, engineers calling on the machine learning models and building applications on top, and the core machine learning people who are developing the actual model itself. Finally, you have the infrastructure stack barrier, doing the product center toolkits to help machine learning teams.
I work on building the foundation of machine learning models, which means I build code that trains software to recognize unseen data and create patterns.
I started my tech career as an intern in India, but knew I had to come to the US to advance
I originally interned at my current company in India. I enjoyed working in India; the work was great, but the core business decisions and figuring out the strategy of the next project were happening at the company headquarters here in the US.
I had no intention of moving to the US earlier. I was quite happy in my country. But overall, I kept feeling like I wasn't doing the best I could in my career because of living so far from the core business decisions, and I decided I wanted to make the move.
I used my internship and master's to get further in AI engineering
I had two ways to go about moving to the US: one was to try to move from within my company, or get a master's. There were two reasons I chose the master's path: the knowledge and extra specialty you can develop through projects and the connections you make.
The biggest thing I took away from my master's program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison was definitely the people.
When I got to the US, I knew a few people at my former company already from my time in India, so I reached out to a bunch of managers directly instead of applying on the job board. I got the interview for the Machine Learning engineering internship quite easily because they were aware of me and my work from before.
Pitching my products internally helped me land a full-time AI engineering role
When I started as an intern again, this time in the US, I did a few things that helped me land this job. I pitched my product to other teams internally to get it adopted. My manager kept telling me that, when they were fighting to get me into the company full time, that was a major thing they used.
Now, as an engineer on the machine learning team, I like to segment my day into three parts. It sort of depends on the project life cycle, but usually, I start by researching. The second part is upstream and downstream check-ins with other team members and clients. I speak with people on other teams, saying, "Hey, this is what we can do, and does this work for you?"
Everyone's favorite part is the third, which is basically hands-on building and coding. I'm lucky enough to spend most of my time being an individual contributor and focusing on coding.
Higher education in tech still matters, but there are other ways
I think it's possible now to skip that education stage. But I have seen a bias in hiring for specific teams, and it's not unbreakable yet.
I was changing countries and cultures, and university was a great way to get through the immigration system and understand the culture. I needed it.
If you want to be in academia and teaching, the higher education path makes sense. But if you want to build something fast, learning and networking can be done in many places. In a city like San Francisco or New York, you could hustle and get the networking benefits of a university and a structured system.
You essentially just need the ability to prove that you can be good at the job. That doesn't really come from a degree. But I find there is usually some bias against applicants without a degree higher than a bachelor's.
Do you have a story to share about AI or higher education bias in tech? Contact this reporter, Agnes Applegate, at aapplegate@insider.com.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
WIRED
3 hours ago
- WIRED
Mark Zuckerberg Is Expanding His Secretive Hawaii Compound. Part of It Sits Atop a Burial Ground
Jul 21, 2025 7:00 AM Meta's CEO has become one of the biggest landowners in Hawaii, growing his property's footprint and erecting new mysterious buildings. Photo-illustration: Jacqui VanLiew; Getty Images As a child, Julian Ako would visit his maternal great-grandfather's home near Pilaa Beach in Kauai, Hawaii, where he and his family would gather edible fungi that grow on kukui trees and collect seaweed and fish from the reef. For about a decade, that land has belonged to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who is constructing a massive compound at an estimated cost that exceeds $300 million. WIRED can now reveal that Zuckerberg's property is atop a burial site: Ako's great-grandmother and her brother were buried on the land. After months of discussions with a Zuckerberg representative, Ako was successfully able to gain access to the property and identify and register the graves with the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, though he was not able to locate remains of other ancestors, who he believes could be buried on the property. In a report shared with WIRED, the state agency also confirmed 'the probability (based on oral testimony) of additional burial sites.' Visits to Ako's family's graves are coordinated by the team at the Zuckerberg ranch. Ako, who sits on the Oahu Island Burial Council, worries about what might happen if further burial sites are discovered, because of the extreme secrecy surrounding the compound. While NDAs are not unusual on billionaire construction projects, the scale of Zuckerberg's compound has resulted in scores of local workers being forbidden from sharing what they're doing and who they're working for. 'If all of the workers have signed these nondisclosure agreements, then basically they're sworn to silence,' Ako says. 'If they uncover iwi —or bones—it's going to be a challenge for that to ever become public knowledge, because they're putting their jobs in jeopardy.' Asked about these burials, Zuckerberg representative Brandi Hoffine Barr acknowledged that the estate had been made aware of the family burial plot in 2015, which Hoffine Barr says they fenced off and maintained. She adds that their workers are bound by regulations that require reporting of inadvertent discoveries of iwi. Meanwhile, Zuckerberg has quietly expanded his footprint on the island with a massive new land purchase, WIRED can reveal. Earlier this year, Zuckerberg purchased 962 acres of prime ranchland under a Hawaiian-sounding LLC across the road from the existing compound, which one person close to the sale estimated cost more than $65 million. This purchase, previously unreported, will increase his Kauai holdings from about 1,400 to more than 2,300 acres—placing him among the largest landowners in the state. Development inside the ranch continues, as Zuckerberg has spent millions adding several new strange buildings to an already massive far from Ako's fishing spot, Zuckerberg has commissioned another three major buildings on previously purchased land. According to planning documents released to WIRED under a new public records request, they range in size from 7,820 to 11,152 square feet—nearly 10 times larger than the average home in Hawaii—and two are projected to cost between $3.5 and $4 million each. These new buildings differ from the opulent mansions on the other side of the ranch, with few fun amenities and only one dedicated common space, a lanai larger than 1,300 square feet. Two of them seem designed to accommodate as many bedrooms and bathrooms as possible, and feature 16 of each between them, lined up like a motel or boarding house. As always, security is tight — with each new property featuring cameras, keypad locks, and motion detection devices. Hoffine Barr described these new buildings as short-term guest housing for family, friends, and staff. This goes along with previous development across the ranch: two mansions with a total floor area comparable to the size of a football field, a gym, a tennis court, several guest houses, ranch operations buildings, a set of saucer-shaped treehouses, an elaborate water system, and a tunnel that branches off into an underground shelter about the size of an NBA basketball court, outfitted with blast-resistant doors and an escape hatch. Recent documents also show plans for a new water pump building, to go along with two existing pump buildings and an 18-foot-tall water tank. Satellite images of the property also show dozens of buildings that have not yet appeared in public records requests. Based on counting bedrooms in the planning documents we've seen alone, WIRED estimates that, when complete, the property could comfortably house more than 100 people. The Meta CEO's Kauai activities attracted international attention following a December 2023 WIRED investigation, based on planning documents and interviews with workers, that estimated the total cost of his compound development as at least $270 million, detailed strict enforcement of nondisclosure agreements, and described doomsday bunker-ish qualities of the project. According to some prepping companies, the report sparked an increase in bunker sales. Since then, Zuckerberg's presence on the island has only continued to grow. Last January, Zuckerberg announced his intention to raise premier cattle on beer and macadamia nuts on the ranch, but it seems likely that he has bigger plans. For locals, the question remains—what the hell is this guy up to? Zuckerberg first bought into Kauai—the oldest and smallest of the four major Hawaiian islands—in 2014, when he grabbed 700 acres in a quiet oceanside stretch near the small town of Kilauea for roughly $100 million. The purchase was incomplete however, as hundreds of locals maintained kuleana rights to four parcels within Zuckerberg's property. These rights, afforded to descendants of previous landowners, would have allowed them to cross Zuckerberg's land. In 2016, Zuckerberg moved to consolidate his holdings by filing 'quiet title and partition' lawsuits against these kuleana descendants in order to clarify ownership of the land. He later abandoned these suits under public pressure, but the legal process continued under a kuleana descendant Carlos Andrade, whom Zuckerberg supported in an op-ed in the local newspaper. Andrade eventually won sole ownership of the land at auction, during which some believed he was backed financially by Zuckerberg. (In that 2017 op-ed, Zuckerberg wrote that Andrade, who died in 2022, could continue his quiet title action and pass down the kuleana rights because he had 'lived on and cared for these lands for more than forty years.') By spring 2021 his compound had expanded further, with the addition of more than 560 acres of ranchland in total, some of it abutting Larsen's, a nudist beach. Later that year, he added another 110 acres which contain the Kaloko Dam, an infamous earthen dam and reservoir that collapsed in 2006, killing seven people. The 2025 land buy is Zuckerberg's largest thus far in total acreage, situated on the mauka , or inland, side of the road across from his initial purchase. Public records list the Mary Lucas Trust Estate as the seller, descendants of an early British adviser to King Kamehameha I. The trust had leased its lands to sugar plantations before they were restored as pasture land for cattle in the 1970s by cousins and former trustees Jimmy Pflueger and Paul Cassiday. In recent years, the trust has been selling off significant chunks of its lands. Though the total purchase price is not listed, a source close to the sale estimated it was at least $65 million, and property records place the land's market value at around $75 million. Hoffine Barr confirmed that the billionaire had purchased additional ranch land, but did not comment on the size or price. It's unclear what the CEO intends to do with his new acquisition, but the source also described the parcel as 'great cattle grass,' so it seems likely that Zuckerberg's husky, beer-filled cows may soon be roaming its 962 acres. 'Mark and Priscilla continue to make a home for their family and grow their ranching, farming, and conservation efforts at Ko'olau Ranch,' says Hoffine Barr. 'The vast majority of the land is dedicated to agriculture—including cattle ranching, organic ginger, macadamia nut, and turmeric farming, native plant restoration, and endangered species protection. After purchasing the ranch, they canceled the previous owner's plans for 80 luxury homes.' With the new buildings and new land, Zuckerberg's total investment in his compound now exceeds the entirety of the $311 million fiscal year 2024 Kauai operating expenses budget. This dramatic influx of wealth has led to inevitable changes in the community. On one hand, Zuckerberg has given millions to local nonprofits, including recent donations to build a charter school and an affordable housing nonprofit near the compound. His construction projects provide good-paying jobs. But there remains a lot of skepticism toward the recent trend of billionaires buying up Hawaiian lands. As more of the defunct sugarcane plantations that own huge slices of Hawaiian land begin offloading their assets, more new-money billionaires have been buying in. In 2012, then Oracle CEO Larry Ellison bought almost the entirety of the smaller island of Lanai for $300 million, which he has been developing into a luxury resort destination. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and former TV presenter and businesswoman Oprah Winfrey both have outposts on Maui. And Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff has been secretly buying up large swaths of the Big Island for unclear purposes. Billionaires pay top dollar, driving up property values. Driven partially by an influx of wealthy mainlanders during the Covid-19 pandemic, Hawaii housing prices have skyrocketed, leaving home ownership out of reach for local renters. 'If our island has any hope of remaining Hawaii, this kind of activity has got to stop,' professor of Native Hawaiian studies at the Kauai Community College Puali'i Rossi tells me, when I mention the new Zuckerberg land buy. 'Eventually Hawaii isn't going to look like Hawaii anymore—it's going to be a resort community. Are we really thinking about 100 years from now, what this island is going to look like?' On a damp Sunday afternoon during the February wet season, a few pickup trucks pass through the main gated entrance outside Zuckerberg's compound on the Hawaiian island of Kauai. Backhoes and bulldozers rest in the red mud outside the tall stone walls, constructed in 2016 to keep out prying eyes. It's a relatively quiet day, but security is still alert. As I take a picture of the guard shack from the road, a woman's head pops out. 'Hoi, don't do that,' she says. 'They don't like that. They're very private.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta investors settlement with Zuckerberg takes heat off Delaware
By Tom Hals WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -A last-minute settlement between Meta Platforms shareholders and the company's leadership last week ended an $8 billion trial and spared Mark Zuckerberg from testifying about alleged violations of Facebook users' data. It also took the heat off the state of Delaware, which has been plagued by criticism from technology and business leaders. The second day of the eight-day trial in Delaware's Court of Chancery was about to start on Thursday when the legal team for the shareholder plaintiffs announced they had reached a deal to resolve the case. The terms are still being hammered out, but the agreement ends a case that had the potential to fuel a trend of companies abandoning the state as their legal home. Since last year, Elon Musk and other business leaders have attacked the state's courts, once the key reason companies incorporated in Delaware, for rulings that they say made it easier for shareholders to sue directors. Musk encouraged companies to leave the state and in the past year Dropbox, Trump Media & Technology, Roblox and Simon Property Group were among the large public companies that reincorporated outside Delaware, a trend dubbed "Dexit." Critics claim the state's courts are biased against company founders -- an uncomfortable backdrop for the Meta case, whose 11 defendants included the billionaires Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Marc Andreessen, Palantir Technologies co-founder Peter Thiel and Reed Hastings, who co-founded Netflix. A ruling that spared the defendants might have given the impression the court caved to pressure to let them off the hook, while one that favored the plaintiffs could have led to further calls for companies to leave Delaware. "It was going to be really awkward for the court," said Ann Lipton, a professor at Colorado Law School. Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, and lawyers for Meta investors and the defendants did not respond to requests for comment. Meta shareholders alleged current and former officers and directors of Facebook were liable for failing to protect users' data. The shareholder plaintiffs wanted the court to order the defendants to use their personal fortune to reimburse the company for the $8 billion in legal costs that Facebook had shelled out for violating user privacy, including a $5 billion fine paid to the Federal Trade Commission in 2019. The case put a spotlight on Delaware courts and the judge handling the case, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick, who gained prominence last year for rescinding Musk's $56 billion pay package from Tesla. That ruling is on appeal. Adding to the high stakes, Andreessen's venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz, said earlier this month it was moving its incorporation to Nevada from Delaware and encouraged other companies to follow. "In particular, Delaware courts can at times appear biased against technology startup founders and their boards," said a blog post on the firm's website, citing McCormick's Musk pay ruling. The firm did not respond to a request for comment. Earlier this year, representatives from Meta met with Delaware's governor and soon after the state changed its widely used corporate law to make it harder for shareholders to sue corporate boards over deals with controlling shareholders like Zuckerberg. Delaware's political leaders said the changes were meant to keep Meta and other companies from fleeing the state. Delaware gets more than a quarter of its budget revenue from fees associated with chartering businesses. Despite the new law, some companies, like Affirm Holdings, still opted to leave, saying it was unclear how it would be interpreted by Delaware courts. Lawrence Cunningham, director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance in Delaware, said the Meta shareholder settlement highlighted the strengths of the Delaware court in handling a complicated case and guiding it to a resolution, which might be hard to replicate elsewhere. "It was a very desired judicial outcome," he said of the case.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta investors settlement with Zuckerberg takes heat off Delaware
By Tom Hals WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -A last-minute settlement between Meta Platforms shareholders and the company's leadership last week ended an $8 billion trial and spared Mark Zuckerberg from testifying about alleged violations of Facebook users' data. It also took the heat off the state of Delaware, which has been plagued by criticism from technology and business leaders. The second day of the eight-day trial in Delaware's Court of Chancery was about to start on Thursday when the legal team for the shareholder plaintiffs announced they had reached a deal to resolve the case. The terms are still being hammered out, but the agreement ends a case that had the potential to fuel a trend of companies abandoning the state as their legal home. Since last year, Elon Musk and other business leaders have attacked the state's courts, once the key reason companies incorporated in Delaware, for rulings that they say made it easier for shareholders to sue directors. Musk encouraged companies to leave the state and in the past year Dropbox, Trump Media & Technology, Roblox and Simon Property Group were among the large public companies that reincorporated outside Delaware, a trend dubbed "Dexit." Critics claim the state's courts are biased against company founders -- an uncomfortable backdrop for the Meta case, whose 11 defendants included the billionaires Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Marc Andreessen, Palantir Technologies co-founder Peter Thiel and Reed Hastings, who co-founded Netflix. A ruling that spared the defendants might have given the impression the court caved to pressure to let them off the hook, while one that favored the plaintiffs could have led to further calls for companies to leave Delaware. "It was going to be really awkward for the court," said Ann Lipton, a professor at Colorado Law School. Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, and lawyers for Meta investors and the defendants did not respond to requests for comment. Meta shareholders alleged current and former officers and directors of Facebook were liable for failing to protect users' data. The shareholder plaintiffs wanted the court to order the defendants to use their personal fortune to reimburse the company for the $8 billion in legal costs that Facebook had shelled out for violating user privacy, including a $5 billion fine paid to the Federal Trade Commission in 2019. The case put a spotlight on Delaware courts and the judge handling the case, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick, who gained prominence last year for rescinding Musk's $56 billion pay package from Tesla. That ruling is on appeal. Adding to the high stakes, Andreessen's venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz, said earlier this month it was moving its incorporation to Nevada from Delaware and encouraged other companies to follow. "In particular, Delaware courts can at times appear biased against technology startup founders and their boards," said a blog post on the firm's website, citing McCormick's Musk pay ruling. The firm did not respond to a request for comment. Earlier this year, representatives from Meta met with Delaware's governor and soon after the state changed its widely used corporate law to make it harder for shareholders to sue corporate boards over deals with controlling shareholders like Zuckerberg. Delaware's political leaders said the changes were meant to keep Meta and other companies from fleeing the state. Delaware gets more than a quarter of its budget revenue from fees associated with chartering businesses. Despite the new law, some companies, like Affirm Holdings, still opted to leave, saying it was unclear how it would be interpreted by Delaware courts. Lawrence Cunningham, director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance in Delaware, said the Meta shareholder settlement highlighted the strengths of the Delaware court in handling a complicated case and guiding it to a resolution, which might be hard to replicate elsewhere. "It was a very desired judicial outcome," he said of the case.
