logo
The Tiny Border Town Getting Battered by Trump's Tariffs on Canada

The Tiny Border Town Getting Battered by Trump's Tariffs on Canada

Yahoo10-06-2025

Nick Kiniski is selling.
After four decades running Kiniski's Reef—one of only three restaurants still operating in the tiny peninsula town of Point Roberts, Washington—the former professional wrestler has landed in a choke hold he can't break.
'It's very hard to do business in Point Roberts,' Kiniski told me. 'This is the first time in 38 years that I actually bartended by myself.' On weekdays, he has taken to cooking and serving alone, the only staff member in what was once a bustling social hub.
Kiniski used to own Breakers, a bar right across the street, in addition to Reef. On weekends, they would get as many as 4,000 customers—needing 28 doormen and four sheriffs working overtime just to maintain order. At one point, he had 120 employees—'kind of a zoo,' he said.
But it's Saturday night in early May, and the Reef is dead. The line for karaoke is a girls-night-out septet taking turns murdering Stevie Nicks. Two waitstaff work an area that used to require a dozen. The spacious beachfront patio offers the softer sounds of Jimmy Buffett piped over outdoor speakers, but there isn't a soul to hear it.
Point Roberts's economy isn't just dependent on tourists—it's almost entirely dependent on Canadian tourists, making this five-square-mile spit of land a unique barometer of the U.S.-Canada relationship. When Canada closed its border at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, the town's economy shrunk by 80 percent more or less overnight. Point Roberts spent the next 19 months cut off from mainland Canada and the rest of the United States. It had only just begun to find its legs when, in January, its economy collapsed again—this time, maybe for good. Surviving a global pandemic is one thing. Surviving Donald Trump is another.On January 7, less than 24 hours after Congress certified the presidential election results, President-elect Donald Trump suggested that he would use 'economic force' to coerce Canada into becoming the fifty-first state. He soon followed with threats of tariffs and personal jabs at then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
The Canadian response was quick, and it was not polite. Almost immediately border towns felt the squeeze.
With water on three sides, Point Roberts is a geographical oddity, sharing no physical connection to the United States of America. Its only land border is a two-and-a-half-mile stretch along Canada; from there, it's a 25-mile drive through Canuck farmland to the Washington line. The elementary school reaches only the second grade, after which children take a daily bus to the mainland, crossing two international borders on the way. With only 1,200 year-round residents, it is quaintly regarded as the safest gated community in America.
But Point Roberts can't survive without Canadian visitors—and the Canadians aren't coming. The thousands that would normally pop in over the weekend for some cheap gas and a burger by the ocean have answered the call for 'Elbows Up'—the Canadian equivalent of 'Don't Tread on Me'—and are keeping their dollars at home.
'It's rough times,' Kiniski said. 'There's not a whole lot I can do. It's out of my control and I don't know what's gonna happen. I just wanna sell the bar [and] move on.'
Point Roberts is shrinking, shuttering, exhausted. The quirky little exclave has become an early victim of Donald Trump's trade war, and a potent metaphor for the fraying relationship between the United States and Canada.
Addressing the Canadian Parliament in June 2016, President Barack Obama delivered a simple message: 'The world needs more Canada.' Now America is getting less.
All along the 5,525-mile stretch of the U.S.-Canada boundary—the largest international border in the world—traffic is down, and businesses are suffering. In Blaine, Washington, the closest mainland U.S. town to Point Roberts, the number of visitors from the north has dropped by nearly half compared to the previous spring.
In the outlets and shopping malls that pepper the Niagara Falls area some 2,700 miles east, sales tax receipts have slipped 7 percent. The Peace Bridge duty-free shop on the Ontario/New York border has gone into receivership after a dramatic loss in traffic. At the Haskell Free Library and Opera House—where the front door is in Vermont and the stage is in Quebec—a rude late-January visit from Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem ended a 120-year-old tradition of unfettered cross-border access by Canadians looking to read a book and catch a show.
Even hundreds of miles from the border, popular tourist destinations like Palm Springs, Phoenix, and Fort Lauderdale are feeling the pinch, as flight bookings from Canada to the United States have dropped 70 percent.
At Kora's Corner—a literal mom-and-pop shop named for its precocious three-year-old general manager, Koraline—Neil and Krystal King are up to their asses in ducks. As proprietors of the Rubber Duck Museum that takes up the back half of their store, they're being forced to close shop and move 15 minutes north to Tsawwassen Mills, British Columbia. They will continue to live in Point Roberts, but the drop in Canadian customers—their February business was down more than 75 percent from last year—and the unpredictability of Trump's tariffs have literally driven their museum out of the country.
'We're operating in a zero profit margin,' Neil explained. 'It's an unsustainable business model. We don't know how to plan for our future months not knowing if we're gonna be charged 145 percent more on our ducks or 20 percent more on our ducks.'
Directly or indirectly, all of the rubber ducks they sell originate in China, which controls nearly 80 percent of the global toy market. Without warehouses and capital to store a year's worth of inventory, small businesses like the Kings' are subject to the whims of the administration and the tariff of the month. Trump's initial 145 percent tariff on all goods from China, for instance, would raise the $1.99 toys to $5. Adjusting for the currency exchange rate, Canadians would be shelling out about $6.75 per duck.
Once they relocate to Canada, the store can order its product from domestic distributors, pay nothing in tariffs, and keep its prices fair and its business predictable.The Canadian backlash started on uneven footing. It was like looking out your window and seeing your neighbor peeing on your lawn. The country took a pause to rub its eyes and process the moment.
But when uber-Canadian Mike Myers spoofed Elon Musk on Saturday Night Live on March 1, he put a name to it, mouthing 'Elbows Up' in the curtain call. A hockey term popularized by legendary winger Gordie Howe, the phrase was soon plastered across the Great White North, on stickers, T-shirts, and flags. The message was unmistakable: This is a fight you do not want to pick.
But not every Canadian was ready to scrap. 'I'm seeing that in Vancouver people are getting carried away with the anti-Trump sentiment, Trump Derangement Syndrome,' said Gary Morrison, a Vancouver resident originally from the U.K. 'That is a road to nowhere. All this tension can't last.'
Morrison frequently crosses the border to visit his weekend cottage in Point Roberts. Though not overtly a Trump fan, he supported Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre in the recent Canadian election. Poilievre Conservatives had been heavy favorites for months, only to see their fortunes evaporate when Trump turned his attention to his northern neighbor. On April 28, Canada's Liberal Party won a decisive victory that would have been shocking a few months earlier, fueled by Poilievre fanboy adulation of Trump and Poilievre's half-cocked response to the attack on Canadian sovereignty.
Eager to convince his fellow Canadians to return to Point Roberts, open their cottages, and support local businesses, Morrison created an event called 'Elbows Down, Sunglasses On,' inviting his neighbors to reconnect in person on the south side of the border.
'We went to Kiniski's Reef about two months ago, right in the height of the tension between the communities,' Morrison recounted. 'It was a Saturday night, and it was dead, like seriously dead. That for me was panic mode, because if we lose the places where we can socially hang out, Point Roberts wouldn't be the same.'
The first event brought about 50 customers to the Reef and no doubt had the intended ripple effect of adding much-needed coin to the tills of other local merchants. Three weeks later, a second event brought two dozen warm bodies to the struggling Pier Restaurant at the Point Roberts Marina.
As well-intentioned—and briefly helpful—as these events have been, they aren't the sea change Point Roberts needs to stay alive. Many businesses are operating at a loss and deeply concerned about surviving the summer if things don't turn around. Some—like Point to Point Parcel, a family-run mail-forwarding company in business for 24 years—have already closed their doors.
Tamra Hansen, owner of the Pier Restaurant and the Saltwater Cafe—Point Roberts's remaining eateries that aren't attached to a gas station or a deli aisle—is losing money every day. 'It's a seasonal town,' she said. 'We go into a deficit in the winter and pull out of it in the spring and make our profits in the summer. I have little spurts of busyness, but not enough to pull me out of this deficit.'
Hansen's restaurants are earning about half of what they made in March and April of last year. Two of the three festivals she had planned for the summer have been canceled—both American and Canadian bands are wary of crossing the border.
'Had I known what I know now, I would have never opened that restaurant,' she said of the Pier. 'I am in a lot of debt, and it doesn't look like I'm getting out of it.'
Larry's Liquor Locker—a hole-in-the-wall booze outlet that rents space from Kiniski next door to the Reef—has seen its profits drop by a third over this time last year. Owner Larry Musselwhite, a Tennessee native who commutes to his store from the U.S. mainland, is not shy about who's to blame.
'When you have rhetoric coming out of the White House like that, I don't blame Canadians for being upset and wanting to boycott the United States,' said Musselwhite, who has a different FUCK MAGA hat for every day of the week. 'I don't see anything that he's gonna do to help mend these fences. It's just not in his nature. He's never one to say, oh gee whiz, I'm sorry. That just doesn't happen. People are gonna lose their jobs, and businesses are gonna close.'Around the pushed-together tables on the patio of the Pier, two dozen neighbors share plates from the buffet, catching up from the previous summer and talking about current events. It's round two of 'Elbows Down,' and the topic isn't sunglasses—it's fear.
'Number one concern, take a guess,' said Morrison. 'Hassle at the border.'
Although the lone station that eases cars in and out of Point Roberts is currently a ghost booth, crossing into the mainland is a different tale. The stories range from having cars searched to being asked unusual questions to dogs sniffing glove compartments. The Border Patrol has even begun pulling over vehicles on the highway instead of at the crossing—which usually only happens during an amber alert or a criminal pursuit. Some complain that they are targeting only Canadian license plates. And even though the border traffic has been partially cut in half, the waits are longer than they were a year ago.
These aren't the people you usually think of when you're talking about fearing the U.S. authorities. Many of them are dual citizens. All of them are white, over 50, and financially comfortable enough to own a summer cottage in this oasis of towering firs and constant ocean breeze.
What started as an economic boycott has turned into a simmering brew of confusion and concern. 'We've really shifted into a place of fear,' Neil King told me. 'We've talked to a lot of people in Canada who just refused to go over the border because they are afraid of what's gonna happen. There are too many stories coming out where people are getting stopped or being detained for unknown reasons.
'We have had conversations as a family where, if we have to go to the mainland for anything—doctor's appointments, dentist, whatever—do we go separately? Do we go together? What happens if all three of us with Koraline get detained for whatever reason? What do we do next? And if it's happening with us, who are U.S. citizens, I couldn't even imagine being a Canadian who wants to come over here, or go anywhere in the U.S. at this point.'
'Because of the rhetoric, the tension, people were afraid of the reaction of the border guards,' said Morrison. 'Once that chatter starts, people don't want to cross, especially seniors. Don't wanna deal with it.'On May 6, as he prepared to meet with newly minted Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Donald Trump took a moment to reflect on America's relationship with its neighbor to the north.
'I very much want to work with him, but cannot understand one simple TRUTH,' Trump wrote on social media. 'Why is America subsidizing Canada by $200 Billion Dollars a year, in addition to giving them free Military Protection, and many other things? We don't need their Cars, we don't need their Energy, we don't need their Lumber, we don't need ANYTHING they have, other than their friendship, which hopefully we will always maintain. They, on the other hand, need EVERYTHING from us!'
This is, of course, pure fiction. To say America doesn't need Canada is like saying a bakery doesn't need flour. Canadian exports power American homes, fertilize American crops, and build American cars. The United States relies on Canada for 60 percent of its crude oil imports, 60 percent of its aluminum imports, and 23 percent of its steel imports. Without Canadian potash (85 percent), American crops would be devastated. Without Canadian nickel (46 percent), the American tech industry would slow to a crawl.
All of these critical imports, once duty-free, now face tariffs of 10–25 percent. Trump's childlike grasp of economics and his thirst for chaos have thrown U.S. businesses, big and small, into turmoil, threatening every corner of industry and pulling the rug out from under our very infrastructure. Moreover, he's endangered the largely symbiotic relationship with America's continental BFF, sending Canada overseas to seek trade deals with more loyal friends, which will only further isolate the United States—and border towns like Point Roberts—until America eventually returns to the international community a lonelier, weaker, and diminished nation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Tax Bill Hits Senate With GOP Torn by Competing Demands
Trump Tax Bill Hits Senate With GOP Torn by Competing Demands

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Tax Bill Hits Senate With GOP Torn by Competing Demands

(Bloomberg) -- Senate Majority Leader John Thune is rushing to meet President Donald Trump's July 4 deadline for pushing through his massive tax and spending bill, but first he has to work through a list of approximately eight Republican senators who have expressed opposition to portions of it. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Within the next two days, he needs to find a way to appease most of them. The South Dakota Republican has one of the least enviable jobs in Washington in the coming hours — trying to knit a compromise between factions of his party: one side pushing for more spending cuts in the legislation and senators who are threatening to withhold their support unless there is more funding for health benefits, renewable energy subsidies and other priorities. Thune can afford to lose only three his 53 members in the chamber, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie. Trump is closely watching the talks, quick to issue a harsh social media broadside to anyone who criticize his signature tax-cut legislation. Just ask North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, one of two Republicans who voted against a late-night Saturday procedural vote to begin debate on the legislation. Trump unleashed a series of scathing posts, threatening to primary Tillis. The president took personal swipes, calling him a 'talker and complainer, NOT A DOER!' before also getting in a jab at Rand Paul, the other GOP senator to oppose the vote to advance the bill. Tillis on Sunday announced he wouldn't be running for reelection, a decision that unshackles him from any need to show fidelity to Trump to preserve his political career. He's indicated he's likely to oppose the bill. Paul has said he is also likely to vote 'no' on the legislation based on the price tag and the inclusion of a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase. If both Tillis and Paul remain in opposition, Thune can only lose one more. Polls show that Americans are wary of the bill. A recent Pew Research survey found that 49% of Americans oppose the bill, while 29% supported it. Some 21% weren't sure what to think. Republicans in Congress broadly support the $4.5 trillion worth of tax cuts in the package, which extend the 2017 tax cuts and create new breaks for tipped and hourly workers, along with seniors and car buyers. But the $1.2 trillion worth of spending cuts have created numerous problems. Moderates including Tillis, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska are pushing to scale back cuts to Medicaid benefits, warning that those reductions could come at a great political cost if millions of Americans lose health coverage as a result of the bill. Some 11.8 million people could lose access to insurance benefits over the course of a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office's most recent estimate. Murkowski and Tillis have also called to slow down planned phaseouts of solar, wind and other renewable energy credits that have spurred job creation in their states. Those asks are in direct opposition to demands from Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and others to bake in more Medicaid cuts in a bid to shrink the overall price tag of the bill. He says Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming will join with him to back an amendment to include faster health coverage cuts during an a marathon voting session slated to start late Sunday or early Monday. Trump has not delved into the details of the legislation. Instead, the president has pushed for speed, demanding that Congress deliver the bill to him by July 4. The House will also need to vote on the Senate-passed version before it can go the president's desk to be signed into law. Meeting the July 4 deadline is ambitious — but possible if Republican leaders can successfully navigate thorny fights. Senators are expected to remain in the Capitol Sunday into Monday for an overnight voting session. Final passage of the bill could come sometime Monday if Thune is able to cut deals with enough senators for passage. The House then will need to vote on the Senate package. That likely means Speaker Mike Johnson will have to wrangle House Republicans to support the Senate package. Several members have already signaled they aren't satisfied with aspects of the bill, but any further changes likely mean missing Trump's July 4 deadline and risking his ire. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

US Senate pushes ahead on Trump tax cuts as nonpartisan analysis raises price tag
US Senate pushes ahead on Trump tax cuts as nonpartisan analysis raises price tag

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Senate pushes ahead on Trump tax cuts as nonpartisan analysis raises price tag

By Bo Erickson and Phil Stewart WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Senate version of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill will add $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt, about $800 billion more than the version passed last month by the House of Representatives, a nonpartisan forecaster said on Sunday. The Congressional Budget Office issued its estimate of the bill's hit to the $36.2 trillion federal debt as Senate Republicans sought to push the bill forward in a marathon weekend session. Republicans, who have long voiced concern about growing U.S. deficits and debt, have rejected the CBO's longstanding methodology to calculate the cost of legislation. But Democrats hope the latest, eye-widening figure could stoke enough anxiety among fiscally-minded conservatives to get them to buck their party, which controls both chambers of Congress. The Senate only narrowly advanced the tax-cut, immigration, border and military spending bill in a procedural vote late on Saturday, voting 51-49 to open debate on the 940-page megabill. Trump on social media hailed Saturday's vote as a "great victory" for his "great, big, beautiful bill." In an illustration of the depths of the divide within the Republican Party over the bill, Senator Thom Tillis said he would not seek re-election next year, after Trump threatened to back a primary challenger in retribution for Tillis' Saturday night vote against the bill. Tillis' North Carolina seat is one of the few Republican Senate seats seen as vulnerable in next year's midterm elections. He was one of just two Republicans to vote no on Saturday. Trump wants the bill passed before the July 4 Independence Day holiday. While that deadline is one of choice, lawmakers will face a far more serious deadline later this summer when they must raise the nation's self-imposed debt ceiling or risk a devastating default on $36.2 trillion in debt. 'We are going to make sure hardworking people can keep more of their money,' Senator Katie Britt, an Alabama Republican, told CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. HITS TO BENEFITS Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, said this legislation would come to haunt Republicans if it gets approved, predicting 16 million Americans would lose their health insurance. "Many of my Republican friends know ... they're walking the plank on this and we'll see if those who've expressed quiet consternation will actually have the courage of their convictions," Warner told CBS News' "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." The legislation has been the sole focus of a marathon weekend congressional session marked by political drama, division and lengthy delays as Democrats seek to slow the legislation's path to passage. Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer called for the entire text of the bill to be read on the Senate floor, a process that began before midnight Saturday and ran well into Sunday afternoon. Following that lawmakers will begin up to 20 hours of debate on the legislation. That will be followed by an amendment session, known as a "vote-a-rama," before the Senate votes on passage. Lawmakers said they hoped to complete work on the bill on Monday. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, the other Republican "no" vote, opposed the legislation because it would raise the federal borrowing limit by an additional $5 trillion. "Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???" Trump said on social media. The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. Representative Michael McCaul, however, warned that fellow Republicans who do not back Trump on the bill could face payback from voters. "They know that their jobs are at risk. Not just from the president, but from the voting -- the American people. Our base back home will not reelect us to office if we vote no on this," McCaul also told CBS News. Senate Republicans, who reject the CBO's estimates on the cost of the legislation, are set on using an alternative calculation method that does not factor in costs from extending the 2017 tax cuts. Outside tax experts, like Andrew Lautz from the nonpartisan think tank Bipartisan Policy Center, call it a "magic trick." Using this calculation method, the Senate Republicans' budget bill appears to cost substantially less and seems to save $500 billion, according to the BPC analysis. If the Senate passes the bill, it will then return to the House of Representatives for final passage before Trump can sign it into law. The House passed its version of the bill last month. (Writing by Phil Stewart; Editing by Scott Malone and Chris Reese)

Senate rushes to pass Trump's tax bill, as cost tops $3 trillion
Senate rushes to pass Trump's tax bill, as cost tops $3 trillion

Washington Post

time34 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Senate rushes to pass Trump's tax bill, as cost tops $3 trillion

The Senate was plowing ahead on President Donald Trump's massive tax and immigration agenda Sunday as Republicans tried to swat away Democratic policy challenges and contend with its rising impact on the ballooning national debt. Trump's budget bill would extend tax cuts passed in 2017, enact campaign promises such as no tax on tips, spend hundreds of billions of dollars on immigration and defense and slash social benefit programs. The multitrillion-dollar legislation survived a brief GOP revolt Saturday night to allow the chamber to move forward with debate on the measure. Senators will likely work overnight to get the bill moving through the chamber. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) said he hopes to pass the legislation as soon as Monday so it can be sent back to the House for final approval in time to beat Trump's self-imposed Independence Day deadline. The House passed a version of Trump's agenda in May. But the Congressional Budget Office, lawmakers' nonpartisan bookkeeper, reported Sunday that the measure would raise the national debt by $3.3 trillion over 10 years. That estimate does not include increased borrowing costs, which would be substantial because the measure, even with spending cuts, is largely deficit-financed. The legislation has also grown increasingly unpopular among voters. A Washington Post-Ipsos poll conducted this month found Americans oppose the bill by an almost 2-to-1 margin, and 63 percent said the measure's debt impact was 'unacceptable.' The bill would extend expiring tax cuts from Trump's first term and include new deductions the White House hopes will spur economic growth. It includes a trio of Trump's populist campaign promises — no taxes on tips, overtime wages or auto loan interest — and adds $6,000 to the standard deduction for seniors. During the 2024 campaign, Trump pitched ending taxes on Social Security benefits, but the idea was not included in the bill. For the private sector, the legislation would give corporations larger deductions for research and development, depreciating assets and interest on large purchases. To offset the cost, Republicans have proposed steep cuts to Medicaid, the state and federal health insurance program for low-income individuals and disabled people, as well as SNAP, the anti-hunger Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program formerly known as food stamps. 'We don't pay people in this country to be lazy,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma) said Sunday on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' 'We want to give them an opportunity, and when they're going through a hard time, we want to give them a helping hand. That's what Medicaid was designed for, and it's, unfortunately, it's been abused.' The largest budget cuts would come from provider taxes, which are duties that states charge medical providers as a roundabout way of collecting more federal Medicaid dollars. Some in the GOP wish to use that policy to force states to jettison some immigrants from benefits rolls, leaving other lawmakers concerned about the finances of rural hospitals, which rely heavily on Medicaid patients. That's become a sticking point among Republicans, both within the Senate and between senators and House members. The House's version of the bill was far less expensive and far less punitive on Medicaid. The Senate overhauled that legislation in ways that some House members now find unrecognizable, and the measure could have trouble securing support when it returns to the lower chamber. In the Senate, though, lawmakers who represent states that use provider taxes or have a large number of rural health care facilities have warned the provision is fatal to the success of the bill. 'Let's watch and be careful that we don't cut into bone, don't hurt our rural hospitals,' Sen. Jim Justice (R-West Virginia) said late last week. 'If we do that, it's going to be a bad day.' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) voted with Democrats on Saturday night to block moving forward on the measure. Tillis announced Sunday that he would not seek reelection next year. Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) have expressed similar concerns, though they voted to clear the bill's procedural hurdle. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) is steadfastly opposed to the bill over deficit concerns, meaning the GOP can lose only two more votes to keep the measure afloat. If that happens, Vice President JD Vance would be forced to break the Senate's tie.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store