Record-breaking heat wave causes numerous road closures
There were at least 53 pavement buckles across Wisconsin over the weekend, the Department of Transportation wrote in an email.
Pavement buckling — which can occur when the weather quickly changes from cool to very hot — is when slabs of pavement expand and push against one another so much it can create unexpected bumps or dips.
Milwaukee County Department of Transportation Director of Public Affairs and Marketing Nicole Armendariz said that while Milwaukee County has addressed all reported concrete-buckling in the county, roads will still be at risk while the extreme heat persists through Monday.
"In some cases, Milwaukee County DOT crews may perform temporary repairs to smooth the road and allow for heat expansion, then come back at a later time to complete a more permanent repair," Armendariz said.
"We urge the public to drive with caution and reduce your speed if you suspect an uneven surface ahead, regardless of the age of the road, as this condition could happen even on new roads. Our crews will continue to monitor conditions through these extreme temps."
The Wisconsin Department of Transportation issued a release ahead of the weekend, warning motorists to be on high alert for the issue. They offered these tips when coming across the problem:
Slow down, buckle up and focus your full attention on the roadway.
Watch for slowing traffic and be ready to move over for all roadside workers, including highway crews as they repair damaged pavement.
Before your trip, check the 511 Travel Information system (511wi.gov) for the latest on any incidents or delays.
If necessary, report serious pavement issues by calling 911. Be ready to provide specific location information.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Heat wave leads to statewide road closures
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
If a neighbor's water runoff damages your property, are they liable in NY?
Your neighbor decides to blacktop a driveway once covered with grass that acted as a sponge, sopping up rainwater. But after a deluge, water comes rushing into your basement. Can you sue your neighbor? Sure. But you may not win. What are NY's laws on water runoff? New York State law on the topic has evolved through the years. In the old days, under English common law, water was once viewed as a common enemy. And as with any enemy, homeowners had the right to defend themselves by, for instance, digging ditches to redirect the natural flow of water away from their property even if water might flow onto someone else's property. Stay safe Tips for motorists to stay safe during flooding. Watch the video. But development creates more conflicts and courts were increasingly being asked to act as a referee. Here's how Darrell W. Harp, the former chief counsel to the state Department of Transportation, described it in a 2015 report for the Cornell Local Roads Program, New York State Local Technical Assistance Program Center: 'The 'common-enemy rule' was generally modified so that a lower landowner was not normally entitled to cast back surface waters by damming a natural watercourse, and an upland owner was not entitled to artificially collect surface waters and discharge them in a mass upon the land below to its damage (e.g., by piping or draining into ditches so that surface waters released on lower land caused erosion or flooding).' Simply put, the law changed through the years to consider the damage that altering the natural flow of water could have on a neighbor's property. A 'reasonable' standard on where you're sending water 'The courts pretty much said let's be reasonable about this,' said David Orr, who heads the Cornell Local Roads Program and fields these sorts of questions from highway departments and homeowners. That led to the "reasonable use" standard. Basically, you should not knowingly make decisions on your property that'll cause water to flow onto your neighbor's property. Here's Orr's take on what's reasonable and what's not: 'If I've got a piece of property and I want to put a road to go up to the back half of it, do I have a right to do that. Well, yeah, you do. Do I have a right to cross a stream? Yeah, but I might need to put a culvert in. In fact, there may be a requirement from an environmental standpoint… If I create a gulley that washes into somebody's property, no. If I back water up onto somebody else's property or keep the water down? No, that's not good either. That's the reasonableness factor.' DIY: Check out deals from Home Depot for home improvement, repairs, and everything else by clicking here Groundbreaking decision in water runoff dispute The leading New York case on the topic — Kossoff v. Rathgeb-Walsh — came out of the village of Pelham in Westchester County in 1958. In that case a landowner put a gas station on his property, causing water to seep into a neighbor's basement. The lot was raised and blacktopped, which sped the flow of water onto a neighbor's property, damaging property in the basement, according to the decision. The gas station owner did not install pipes, drains or ditches and acted in good faith to improve his property. The lawsuit was tossed. As Harp writes: 'The thing to remember is that reasonable blacktopping, paving, grading, improvements, or construction done in good faith that disturbs the natural flow of surface water drainage to the damage of a lower owner is not actionable unless the drainage is artificially caused to be collected in a mass, as in a pipe, ditch or drain.' Of course, facts matter. Some cases are closer calls than others. Best to consult an attorney. Thomas C. Zambito covers energy, transportation and economic growth for the USA Today Network's New York State team. He's won dozens of state and national writing awards from the Associated Press, Investigative Reporters and Editors, the Deadline Club and others during a decades-long career that's included stops at the New York Daily News, The Star-Ledger of Newark and The Record of Hackensack. He can be reached at tzambito@ This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: 'Common-enemy rule': Can homeowners sue neighbors for water runoff damage? Solve the daily Crossword

Miami Herald
18-07-2025
- Miami Herald
Colorado wildfires: Crews bring largest fire under 34% containment as growth slows
DENVER - Fire crews working across western Colorado made more progress containing and slowing the growth of several wildfires Thursday. The largest fire of the bunch - the Turner Gulch Fire near Gateway - is now 34% contained, a sharp improvement from 9% reported Thursday morning. The wildfire's growth also slowed, increasing by 179 acres to 15,179 acres burned. The South Rim fire, near Montrose, increased only slightly, though it remains at 0% containment. The Sowbelly fire near Delta remained at 2,274 acres burned as of Friday morning, though a fire map of the blaze hasn't been updated since Thursday evening. Containment is also unchanged, at 16%. Crews also made progress containing the Utah side of the Deer Creek fire. Collectively, the fires have burned more than 23,000 acres in Colorado since they ignited last week. Another brush fire - the Cottonwood Flat fire - was reported Thursday afternoon, prompting evacuation orders for residents with a mile of 1800 County Road 309. The fire was burning on that county road, south of I-70 between Rulison and Parachute. The nearby Highway 6 was reopened late Thursday night, the Garfield County Sheriff's Office said. Turner Gulch fire and Wright Draw fire near Gateway Firefighters have made more progress in containing the state's largest wildfire, bringing the Turner Gulch blaze to 34% containment as of Friday morning, primarily on the fire's western edge. That's up from 9% Thursday morning. The fire has now burned 15,179 acres, a slower rate of growth than the 1,000 acres reported burned between Wednesday and Thursday. "Today was a good day," fire officials wrote on Facebook on Thursday night, adding that crews would spend the night "removing vegetation along the east side" of the fire. Still, the Mesa County Sheriff's Office on Thursday night issued a pre-evacuation notice for private land within the Uncompahgre National Forest from Forest Road 406 to 409. Officials have also launched an interactive evacuation map for the fires. To the west, the nearby Wright Draw fire held steady at 448 acres for the third consecutive day, albeit with 0% contained. The two fires are still burning around Highway 141, which is still closed between 7.40 Road and 16.10 Road at mile marker 124, according to the state Department of Transportation. Deer Creek fire near Paradox The wildfire burning near the Colorado-Utah border had burned 15,655 acres as of Friday morning, with 11% contained - up from 7% Thursday. The bulk of the blaze has burned in Utah, though more than 1,800 acres of Colorado land has been torched. In a Thursday night update, fire officials said on Facebook that increased cloud cover and humidity, plus light winds, helped calm the fire's behavior and contributed to additional containment on the fire's western edge. Friday's forecast called for "a range of possibilities," the officials wrote, with clouds and rain expected by mid-morning. Fire maps showed Thursday that the Deer Creek fire was burning on a section of Colorado more than 2 miles long and wide. South Rim fire near Montrose The 4,227-acre South Rim fire grew 48 acres Thursday, another day of slow growth for a fire that ignited by lightning strike last weekend. The fire, which is burning the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park, is still at 0% containment as of Friday morning, according to fire maps. The national park remains closed to the public. None of the previously issued evacuation orders have been lifted, and several areas west, south and southeast of the fire - including the Bostwick Park area - remain under evacuation orders, according to the evacuation map. -------------- Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

USA Today
08-07-2025
- USA Today
Almost 5,000 US flights delayed, canceled amid severe weather in Northeast
Severe weather across the Northeast is canceling hundreds of flights Tuesday. The region is set to experience a cold front bringing scattered thunderstorms, heavy rain and strong winds from New York down to Richmond, according to the Weather Channel. Along with the storms, cities like Boston have also been issued heat advisories with temperatures expected to reach up to 100 degrees. Over 4,400 U.S. flights are delayed and more than 500 canceled as of 4:20 p.m. ET Tuesday, according to flight-tracking website FlightAware. New York's LaGuardia Airport and John F. Kennedy International Airport are seeing the most cancellations and delays, followed by Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Washington, D.C. Many U.S. carriers have waived change and cancellation fees for impacted travelers departing on Tuesday or Wednesday from Northeast cities such as Baltimore, Boston, New York, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. Here's what to should know if your flight is delayed or canceled. Which airlines are offering waivers? Weather waivers vary by airline and airport, and only apply to specific time windows, so be sure to check the details for your specific waiver below. What does an airline owe you if your flight is canceled? If your flight is canceled for any reason, you are entitled to a refund if you choose not to travel. When a flight is canceled for reasons within an airline's control, travelers who choose to stick it out are eligible for compensation or accommodations, like rebooking on another flight or airline at no added cost, lodging or meal vouchers, and other benefits. Weather is notably outside an airline's control. The Department of Transportation has created a dashboard for travelers to easily access information about services U.S. airlines provide in the case of controllable cancellations or delays. Click here to access the DOT Cancellation and Delay Dashboard. What is a controllable cancellation or delay? According to the DOT, a controllable cancellation or delay is one caused by the airline itself. Controllable reasons include maintenance or crew problems, cabin cleaning, baggage loading and fueling. Things like weather or air traffic control flow programs do not count against the airline. (Story continues below.) What happens if a flight is delayed? A DOT rule that went into effect in October requires airlines to refund passengers if their flight is significantly delayed for reasons within the carrier's control. It also makes airlines more responsible for following their own customer commitments in those cases. If your flight is delayed significantly for a reason within the airline's control, you are entitled to a refund if you choose not to travel. If you decide to stick it out, you may be entitled to some compensation or accommodation, including rebooking on another flight or airline at no cost, meal and lodging vouchers for qualifying delays, and other benefits if the delay was controllable. No U.S. airlines currently offer cash compensation for delays, but the big four (American, Delta, Southwest and United) all offer hotel and ground transportation vouchers for controllable overnight delays. Airline-specific details can be found on the DOT's dashboard. What is a significant delay? The DOT defines a significant delay as a departure or arrival that is three hours late or more for a domestic flight, or six hours late or more for an international flight. What to do if your flight is canceled or delayed Look up your airline's policies and be your own advocate. Get in touch with the airline however you can, whether it's through the app, through social media, by phone or at the airport help desk if you're already on your way. It's good to have some alternative flights in mind when you speak to an agent, and be sure to ask for any accommodation or refunds you may be entitled to if you plan to take advantage of those policies. Contributing: Josh Rivera, USA TODAY