Germany seeks U.S. guarantee before sending Patriots to Ukraine
In comments to Der Spiegel news magazine, Mr. Pistorius said European NATO members needed 'watertight' guarantees that any American-made Patriot air-defence systems sent to Ukraine would be replaced within about six to eight months.
U.S. President Donald Trump last week announced a deal with NATO chief Mark Rutte for European alliance members to buy U.S. weaponry – particularly Patriot systems – for Kyiv to help it in its war against Russia.
The move marked a pivot for Mr. Trump as his patience has worn thin with Russia's President Vladimir Putin for frustrating efforts to halt the war in Ukraine.
Germany has offered to finance two of the Patriot systems, while several other NATO allies have expressed willingness to pay for three more.
But concern has grown as Washington wants European allies to first send Patriot systems from their own stocks to Ukraine and then wait for replacements from the United States.
Mr. Pistorius told Der Spiegel it was important that 'the countries transferring systems can continue to meet their NATO requirements and that no security gaps arise for NATO'.
Countries including Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands had declared their willingness to finance Patriot systems, but Mr. Pistorius said that 'no decision has been made as to which country could supply Patriot systems to Ukraine'.
Speaking later at a Berlin news conference, he said talks were ongoing on the question of 'which countries in Europe and beyond currently have Patriots, and in what quantities are they willing to hand them over?' 'There is money for these Patriots. Now we just need the Patriots,' he added.
Germany formerly had 12 Patriot systems, but has sent three to Ukraine and two to Poland. Another Patriot battery is dedicated to training, leaving Germany with six active units.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
Watching a Breakdown
Should we be glad that France has finally announced that it will recognise the state of Palestine in September, at the United Nations, after 21 months of steadfastly supporting Israel's carnage in Gaza? That Britain's Parliament has, at last, called for a ceasefire in probably the most brutal one-sided 'war' the modern world has seen? Should we be relieved that India, too, has called for a ceasefire, after studiously abstaining from any such demand in every international forum? I suppose we should, even though it is too little, and almost too late. A great deal has been written about the world having lost its moral compass with regard to Gaza. But what morality are we talking about? The morality of international law? Despite its impeccable intentions it has never been enforceable, and as the eminent Palestinian writer and human rights lawyer Raja Shehadeh says, '...it has never been Palestine's salvation.' The old Christian moral order, based on a clear articulation of good and evil, right and wrong, sin and redemption, ceased to exist a long time ago. A secular morality, whose bedrock is humanism, its creed respect for the other's dignity and, yes, humanity? That seems to have broken down completely. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres's cry from the heart about the international community's 'lack of compassion, lack of truth, lack of humanity' is a painful, helpless acknowledgement of that breakdown. But what we are also seeing is the breakdown of language; both, the cynical distortion of meaning and deliberate subversion of words, as well as the exhaustion of vocabulary to render the unspeakable, to communicate the enormity and wanton cruelty, of what we are witnessing. Most writing on Gaza now is a blur of words, robbed of any real value. Indeed, as the poet Meena Alexander says, when violence becomes so appalling and overwhelming, we enter what she calls 'a zone of radical illiteracy'. And yet, perhaps it's only the poets who can now recount this breakdown of humanity, mourn its death. What words can I offer? What words can explain the Sound of a child's tongue scraping Against rust for a taste of flour? writes a doctor in Gaza, as he looks at children scrabbling for rotten remains in a food truck. Remember those images of the Biafra famine, when the world rushed to send food to children who were more skeleton than flesh? The same images of Israeli-made starvation in Gaza, of ghost-like children, have seen a world mute. Also read: 'Not a Side Effect of War': Israeli Human Rights Groups Say Israel Committing Genocide in Gaza I have read so many reports, so many insightful accounts, so many political analyses of what the last 21 months signify in terms of full-spectrum hegemony and the assertion of control over West Asia, with Gaza as the battlefield. Intent, or should one say, malintent, has never been clearer or so openly stated. There is no doubt that, as the writer Suad Amiry, author of Menopausal Palestine, says, 'The Israelis, they say peace, peace, peace but what they mean is land, land, land.' I have no quarrel with any of the above. But I think what we are witness to is also the ascendance of intrinsically patriarchal states across the world, that are either in conflict or collusion with each other. Hamas is no less patriarchal and attuned to violence than Israel; the US today is no less patriarchal and repressive than Iran. And what of Europe? A long time ago, the Croatian writer Dubravka Ugrésic recounted a western European acquaintance describing her inner map of Europe: 'This is where I am. Around me are Germany, Belgium, France, England, down there is Italy, and, yes, there are Spain and Portugal as well, and here is a line. Beyond that line is nothing, a great blank...' On her inner map, the great blank stretched eastwards from Berlin. Ugrésic gave this great blank an identity: feminine Central Europe as distinct from masculine West Europe, and characterised their relationship as, 'Me Tarzan, you Jane', with Jane forever subordinate and submissive. In a supreme irony, West Europe now is the feminised Other of America, unable to bargain with a patriarchy that is adamant. Rada Ivekovic, (former) Yugoslavian political philosopher, writes from Paris, 'You say Europe has been silent for too long. But Europe's words have no value... Europe is no longer a political subject (meaning the EU, not individual countries)... there is no European position... Europe will not, and cannot, oppose the US or Israel at all. Do not expect anything from Europe.' As a strategic choice, it might opt for what feminists have called 'the convenience of subservience', a choice made in return for concessions, some privileges, and protection. Also read: Gaza Is Starving and Israel's Allies Can do More Than Just Watch But patriarchy's desire for domination and control are predicated on violence, and its stance is hypermasculine, at all times. All these traits and practices are manifest not only with regard to its alleged adversaries and opponents, but with its own (feminised) populations as well – dissenters and protestors, who need to be disciplined and browbeaten into submission. Internal patriarchies within countries do the same – Germany, Britain, France, the Netherlands, Iran, Israel, India... Gaza has blown open the lid on civil liberties everywhere. If violence is the overriding fact and the moral order has collapsed, where does that leave Palestine, a body – and body politic – that has been systematically battered and abused for close to 50 years? If ordinary – and yes, compassionate – people everywhere have risen in its defence in the hundreds of thousands but been beaten down by their own states, how will the phoenix rise from the ashes? And yet, in the ultimate analysis, it is only Palestine's humanity that has the capacity to redeem the world. Ritu Menon is a feminist publisher and writer.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Donald Trump says US will likely set global tariff rate at 15% to 20%
United States President Donald Trump on Monday said he would likely introduce a global baseline tariff between 15% and 20% for countries that have not negotiated separate trade agreements with Washington. 'For the world, I would say it'll be somewhere in the 15% to 20% range,' Trump told reporters alongside United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland. 'Probably one of those two numbers.' He added that Washington would soon notify about 200 countries of their new 'world tariff' rate. The range is a significant increase from the 10% baseline tariff that Trump had announced in April. The announcement comes amid negotiations between the US and countries seeking lower tariffs, including India, ahead of the August 1 deadline set by Trump to conclude trade talks. 'We're going to be setting a tariff for essentially the rest of the world,' the US president said on Monday. 'And that's what they're going to pay if they want to do business in the United States. Because you can't sit down and make 200 deals.' Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs had taken effect on April 9. Hours later, however, he reduced the rates on imports from most countries to 10% for 90 days to provide time for trade negotiations. In February, Washington had already imposed a 25% tariff on a range of products from Canada, Mexico and China. The US president had repeatedly said he intended to impose a reciprocal tax on several nations citing high tariffs the countries impose on foreign goods. The tariff plans led to concerns of a broader trade war that could disrupt the global economy and trigger a recession. Washington had set August 1 as the deadline to conclude trade talks. On Monday, Trump also said that the US had recently finalised trade deals with Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. He added that these countries had previously restricted American imports. 'Japan opened up to our cars, even to rice. That was a big deal,' Trump said. 'The Philippines was very closed now it's open.' He said the US and Japan had agreed on a 15% tariff, and that a similar rate would apply to most goods from the European Union. He also said that Washington was still negotiating with China. 'They're tough, smart negotiators,' the US president told reporters. Earlier this month, Trump had also said that the US was very close to a trade deal with India. Trump had said on June 27 that New Delhi could sign a 'very big' trade deal with Washington soon. On July 2, the White House said that the deal was close to being finalised and would be announced soon. An Indian team led by Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal had visited the US in May to negotiate the agreement. Following this, a team of negotiators from the US was in India for a week in June.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Is Trump opening up a new front against China — in Myanmar for rare earths?
With outreach to Myanmar's military regime and discussions about a similar outreach to rebels, US President Donald Trump appears to be opening up a new front against China with eyes on Myanmar's rare earth reserves. Here are the proposals on the table to divert Myanmar's rare earths away from China. read more US President Donald Trump appears to be eyeing a reset of ties with Myanmar and opening up a new front against China. Myanmar is among the largest producer of rare earths and a key supplier to China. At a time when China has leveraged its control of the rare earth supplies to push Trump on the backfoot in trade talks, he appears to have set eyes on Myanmar's rare earth reserves. In recent days, the Trump administration has heard proposals to develop ties with the various parties in Myanmar —including the junta and rebels— to acquire access to the country's rare earth reserves, according to Reuters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These proposals have suggested that the United States should partner with like-minded countries like India to extract and refine rare earths mined in Myanmar. Rare earths are a collective of 17 minerals that are used in virtually everything in the modern world, ranging from household electronic items to cars and fighter planes and missiles. China controls around 90 per cent of the world's supply of refined rare earths and rare earth magnets. China has leveraged this near-monopoly to bend the countries, including the United States, to its will in bilateral disputes and trade negotiations. If Trump indeed agrees to proposals, that would mark a shift in the US policy on Myanmar. Following the coup in 2021 in which Myanmar's military overthrew the civilian government of the country, the United States has not maintained any contact with the junta. However, in a sign of change, Trump has addressed Myanmar's military leader, Min Aung Hlaing, as the head of state and has withdrawn sanctions on the regime. What proposals are on the table? The main idea behind the proposal is to divert Myanmar's rare earth reserves away from China into the American fold, according to Reuters. The news agency has reported that one proposal has called for talks with Myanmar's junta to get a peace deal with the rebel group Kachin Independence Army (KIA). Another proposal has called for a direct US-KIA deal to access rare earths in areas under KIA's control. In Myanmar, large swathes of the country are under rebel control that produce large quantities of rare earths. China currently buys most of these rare earths. To sweeten the deal, it has been proposed that Trump should reduce the tariff rate of 40 per cent that he has imposed on Myanmar. It has also been suggested that Trump should appoint a special envoy to take up the matter of rare earths in Myanmar and oversee deals in the country. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These suggestions have come from Adam Castillo, a former head of the American Chamber of Commerce in Myanmar who runs a security firm in the country, in a meeting held at the offices of Vice President JD Vance, according to Reuters. Castillo told Reuters that he suggested to US officials that the United States could play the role of a peacemaker in Myanmar and urged the Trump administration to take a page out of China's playbook by first brokering a bilateral self-governance deal between the Myanmar military and the KIA. Castillo described Myanmar's rare earth reserves as China's 'golden goose' and said that he told US officials that rebels, particularly the KIA, were tired of being exploited by China and wanted to work with the United States. Castillo said that he had repeatedly urged US officials to pursue a deal with the KIA that includes cooperation with Quad partners, specifically India, for resource processing and eventual heavy rare earths supply to the United States. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
