US government probes Duke University in latest federal funding threat
The government said that it will probe whether the Duke Law Journal's selection of its editors gives preferences to candidates from minority communities.
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump's administration has initiated a probe into Duke University and the Duke Law Journal over allegations of race-related discrimination, making it the latest American university to face the threat of cuts to federal funding.
The government said on July 28 that it will probe whether the Duke Law Journal's selection of its editors gives preferences to candidates from minority communities.
'This investigation is based on recent reporting alleging that Duke University discriminates on the bases of race, color, and/or national origin by using these factors to select law journal members,' the Education Department said in a statement.
US Education Secretary Linda McMahon and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr sent a letter to the university's leadership alleging what the government called 'the use of race preferences in Duke's hiring, admissions, and scholarship decisions'.
The letter urged the university to review its policies and create a panel 'with delegated authority from Duke's Board of Trustees to enable Duke and the federal government to move quickly toward a mutual resolution of Duke's alleged civil rights violations.' Duke had no immediate comment.
Rights advocates have raised free speech and academic freedom concerns over the Trump administration's attempted crackdown against universities.
The government has threatened federal funding cuts against universities and schools over climate initiatives, transgender policies, pro-Palestinian protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza and diversity, equity and inclusion programmes.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
World Trump says many are starving in Gaza, vows to set up food centres
Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row
World US, China hold new talks on tariff truce, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
Asia Giant algal bloom off South Australia devastates marine life, threatens seafood exports
Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole: Road recovery works progressing steadily, tests under way
Singapore ST Explains: What we know about the Tanjong Katong sinkhole so far
Sport Gan Ching Hwee breaks 2 national records, qualifies for World Aquatics C'ships 1,500m final
Asia Gunman kills 5 near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on grounds of race, colour, and national origin in education programmes receiving federal funding.
The government said in late April it was probing whether Harvard University and the Harvard Law Review violated civil rights laws when the journal's editors fast-tracked consideration of an article written by a member of a racial minority.
Harvard is legally challenging the government to
have its frozen federal funding restored.
Mr Trump has claimed, without evidence, that groups like white people and men face discrimination due to DEI. Rights groups dismiss that, saying DEI addresses historic inequities against marginalised groups like ethnic minorities. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
‘Not chickened out': Trump stakes reputation as dealmaker with tariff policy
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox US President Donald Trump boarding Air Force One on his way to New Jersey on Aug 1. WASHINGTON - Donald Trump is staking his reputation as a tough negotiator and slick dealmaker – that has served him well throughout his life – with his ultra-muscular, protectionist tariffs policy. On Aug 1, the White House released a picture of the US president seen with a smartphone pressed to his ear, with the caption: 'Making calls. Making deals. MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Every trade deal announced by the president, who is convinced that tariffs are both a tool and manifestation of America's economic might, is celebrated by his supporters as a show of his negotiating prowess. This week's flurry of rate changes was no different. On July 31, with the stroke of a black marker, the former real estate developer slapped fresh tariffs on dozens of US trade partners . They will kick in on Aug 7 instead of Aug 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. The Republican leader's backtracking, frequently setting trade deadlines only to rescind or extend them – he most recently granted Mexico a 90-day extension – has given rise to the mocking acronym 'Taco' ('Trump always chickens out'). Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore New vehicular bridge connecting Punggol Central and Seletar Link to open on Aug 3 Singapore Tengah facility with over 40 animal shelters, businesses hit by ticks Singapore 60 years of building Singapore Asia 'Every day, we think about how to upgrade': China's factories see rise in robot adoption Singapore Sheng Siong to open first store in Orchard by end-August Sport Spurs captain Son Heung-min says he is leaving the English Premier League club Life Tastemakers: Burnt-out serial entrepreneur cooks up $16m success with Lau Wang Claypot Delights Asia 'This isn't some concubine selection': Why matchmaking events for rich Chinese have drawn flak The jokes implying Mr Trump is all talk and no action on trade have previously struck a nerve for the president. 'Not chicken' But analysts believe there will be no going back this time. Mr Trump has 'not chickened out,' according to Mr Josh Lipsky, an international economics expert at the Atlantic Council think tank. He told AFP the president is 'following through, if not exceeding' what he vowed during his campaign in respect to tariffs. Mr Matthew Aks, a public policy analyst at Evercore ISI, said he did not anticipate a 'massive shift' on the latest order, aside from some economies like Taiwan or India striking deals during the seven-day buffer. Following crunch negotiations leading up to the tariffs announcement, Mr Trump struck a series of compromises, notably with the European Union, Japan, and South Korea, setting varying tax rates and touting high investments in the United States. The details of these agreements remain vague and leave the door open to key questions: Are exemptions possible? What will become of key sectors like automobiles, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors? And what of China? The US president and leaders of other countries 'have reasons to avoid going into detailed agreements' explained Mr Aks, allowing all sides to present the deals in the most positive, or least negative, way possible to their public. The ability to conclude deals – often with or without crucial detail – is, for the 79-year-old Republican, an integral part of his political signature. 'Art form' In his book The Art Of The Deal, the billionaire wrote: 'Deals are my art form. Other people paint beautifully on canvas or write wonderful poetry. I like making deals, preferably big deals. That's how I get my kicks.' He explained in his book that he always 'protects' himself 'by being flexible'. 'I never get too attached to one deal or one approach.' But despite comments about his trade policy reversals, Mr Trump has hardly budged from his trade strategy, and that could prove politically painful. In a survey conducted by Quinnipiac University published in mid-July, only 40 per cent of respondents said they supported the president's trade policy, while 56 per cent criticised it. The latest employment figures bear the marks of Mr Trump's protectionist offensive, according to experts. Job creation in May and June was revised sharply downward, falling to levels not seen since the Covid-19 pandemic. AFP
AsiaOne
26 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Thailand returns some Cambodian soldiers ahead of key border talks, Asia News
BANGKOK - Thailand's army sent home two Cambodian soldiers from a group of 20 on Friday (Aug 1), ahead of a key meeting in Malaysia next week where defence ministers and military commanders will hold talks aimed at maintaining a ceasefire along their disputed border. Long-simmering tensions on the Thai-Cambodian border exploded into clashes last week, including exchanges of artillery fire and jet fighter sorties, the worst fighting between the Southeast Asian neighbours in over a decade. The clashes claimed at least 43 lives and left over 300,000 people displaced. A truce was achieved on Monday, following a push by Malaysia and phone calls from U.S President Trump who threatened to hold off tariff negotiations with both countries until fighting stopped. Thailand and Cambodia previously faced tariffs of 36 per cent for sending goods to the US, their largest export markets. Following further negotiations, they will now pay a 19 per cent tariff, the White House announced on Friday. In Bangkok, Thai government spokesperson Jirayu Houngsub told reporters on Friday that two Cambodian soldiers had been sent back, and the remaining 18 were being processed for violating immigration law. "The Cambodian soldiers intruded on Thai territory and the army took them into custody, treating them based on humanitarian principles," he said. In a statement, the Cambodian defence ministry asked Thailand to return all the detained soldiers. "Cambodia is actively engaging in negotiations to secure their release, and reiterates its firm call for their immediate and unconditional release in accordance with the international humanitarian law," a ministry spokesperson said. [[nid:720762]] Defence ministers and military leaders from both sides, who were previously scheduled to meet in the Cambodian capital next week, will now hold talks in Malaysia, after Thailand sought a neutral venue for the meeting. The General Border Committee, which coordinates on border security, ceasefires, and troop deployments, will meet between Aug 4-7, Thai Acting Defence Minister Nattaphon Narkphanit told reporters. "Defence attaches from other Asean countries will be invited as well as the defence attaches from the US and China," a Malaysian government spokesperson told reporters, referring to the Southeast Asian regional bloc that the country currently chairs. Thailand and Cambodia have for decades claimed jurisdiction over undemarcated points along their 817-km (508-mile) land border, with ownership of several ancient temples at the centre of disputes. In May, a Cambodian soldier was killed in a skirmish, leading to a troop build-up and a diplomatic crisis, which eventually snowballed into five-days of intense fighting in late July.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Appeals court allows Trump order that ends union protections for federal workers
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A ruling by a federal appeals court on Aug 1 authorises a component of US President Donald Trump's sweeping effort to assert more control over the federal workforce to move forward. WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court on Aug 1 allowed US President Donald Trump to move forward with an order instructing a broad swath of government agencies to end collective bargaining with federal unions. The ruling authorises a component of Mr Trump's sweeping effort to assert more control over the federal workforce to move forward, for now, while the case plays out in court. It is unclear what immediate effect the ruling will have: the appeals court noted that the affected agencies had been directed to refrain from ending any collective bargaining agreement until 'litigation has concluded', but also noted that Mr Trump was now free to follow through with the order at his discretion. Mr Trump had framed his order stripping workers of labour protections as critical to protect national security. But the plaintiffs – a group of affected unions representing over 1 million federal workers – argued in a lawsuit that the order was a form of retaliation against those unions that have participated in a barrage of lawsuits opposing Mr Trump's policies. The unions pointed to statements from the White House justifying the order that said 'certain federal unions have declared war on President Trump's agenda' and that the President 'will not tolerate mass obstruction that jeopardizes his ability to manage agencies with vital national security missions.' But a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a famously liberal jurisdiction, ruled in Mr Trump's favour, writing that 'the government has shown that the president would have taken the same action even in the absence' of the union lawsuits. Even if some of the White House's statements 'reflect a degree of retaliatory animus', they wrote, those statements, taken as a whole, also demonstrate 'the President's focus on national security'. The unions had also argued that the order broadly targeted agencies across the government, some of which had no obvious national security portfolio – including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Environmental Protection Agency – using national security as a pretext to strip the unions of their power. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 60 years of building Singapore World Trump deploys nuclear submarines in row with Russia Singapore Sheng Siong to open first store in Orchard by end August Asia 'This isn't some concubine selection': Why matchmaking events for rich Chinese have drawn flak Life Tastemakers: Burnt-out serial entrepreneur cooks up $16m success with Lau Wang Claypot Delights Sport Spurs captain Son Heung-min says he is leaving the English Premier League club Life The story of you: What might Singapore look like for those born today? Singapore Man in army uniform allegedly vaping on bus released from SAF custody; investigations ongoing The panel sidestepped that claim, writing in the 15-page ruling that 'we question whether we can take up such arguments, which invite us to assess whether the President's stated reasons for exercising national security authority – clearly conferred to him by statute – were pretextual'. The order, they continued, 'conveys the President's determination that the excluded agencies have primary functions implicating national security'. NYTIMES
