Trump boots Wall Street Journal reporter from Scotland trip after Epstein birthday letter story

Time of India

7 days ago

President
Donald Trump
has blocked a
Wall Street Journal
reporter from joining the press pool for his visit to Scotland, following the paper's publication of a birthday message allegedly sent by him to convicted sex offender
Jeffrey Epstein
. The trip, from 25 to 29 July, includes stops at his golf properties in Turnberry and Aberdeen, according to
CBS News
.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the decision on Monday: "Thirteen diverse outlets will participate in the press pool to cover the President's trip to Scotland. Due to The Wall Street Journal's fake and defamatory conduct, they will not be one of the 13 outlets on board," she said, as reported by The Washington Post.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Technology
Project Management
MBA
Cybersecurity
healthcare
Data Analytics
Others
Finance
Healthcare
others
Leadership
Data Science
Operations Management
Public Policy
Digital Marketing
Management
CXO
Degree
Design Thinking
Data Science
Product Management
Artificial Intelligence
PGDM
MCA
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
12 Weeks
MIT xPRO
CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
The reporter, Tarini Parti, had been scheduled to cover the trip. The Wall Street Journal declined to comment on the exclusion.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Treatment That Might Help You Against Knee Pain
Knee pain | search ads
Find Now
Undo
Defamation lawsuit follows Epstein note report
The ban comes just days after the Journal published an article featuring a 2003 note allegedly sent by Trump to Epstein. The note, detailed in The Washington Post, included a drawing of a nude woman and read: "Happy Birthday, and may every day be another wonderful secret." Trump's name was reportedly signed beneath the message.
The White House called the note and drawing fabricated and said it had pressured the Journal not to publish the piece. Following its publication, Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against Dow Jones, News Corp, CEO Robert Thomson, Rupert Murdoch, and two Journal journalists.
Live Events
A spokesperson for Dow Jones said last week: "We have full confidence in the rigour and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit," according to The Washington Post.
WHCA responds: Retaliation against the press
The
White House Correspondents' Association
(WHCA) quickly condemned the decision. In a statement, the organisation said: "This attempt by the White House to punish a media outlet whose coverage it does not like is deeply troubling, and it defies the First Amendment. Government retaliation against news outlets based on the content of their reporting should concern all who value free speech and an independent media."
WHCA president Weijia Jiang added: "We strongly object and find the move unacceptable." She confirmed that she had raised the matter directly with the White House. "As of this writing, that remains unclear. I will share updates as I receive them," she said, referring to whether the exclusion was a one-off or part of a broader policy shift.
Control over press pool tightens
Traditionally, press pool rotation was handled by the WHCA. But under Trump's administration, that responsibility has shifted to the White House itself. This isn't the first time an outlet has been sidelined. Previously, the Associated Press was blocked from pool coverage for refusing to adopt the administration's preferred name for the Gulf of Mexico. That case has since moved to court.
The presidential press pool, a select group of reporters who travel with and observe the president, acts as a stand-in for the broader White House press corps. Excluding a major publication raises concern about both transparency and fairness.
This lawsuit marks Trump's first known defamation case filed while in office. Legal observers say it's a significant step. Free speech attorney Floyd Abrams commented: "There's nothing inherently wrong with a president bringing a libel suit. But this claim certainly seems like nothing more or less than an effort to suppress speech that our president finds discomforting. That's not why we have libel law. It's why we have a First Amendment."
Trump has used litigation against media before. Past suits have targeted CBS News, ABC News, and Meta. In those cases, he won settlements worth millions. However, those companies had business interests beyond news. This time, News Corp and the Journal have news at their core, and they have said they will fight.
Some outlets have distanced themselves from the Epstein letter story altogether. Fox News, for instance, avoided it almost entirely, with host Howard Kurtz later saying on his programme Media Buzz: "The president has drawn extra attention to the Journal's reporting."
Others remain cautious. According to Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, lawsuits like this are often about sending a message. "These are lawsuits that have no hope of actually succeeding as lawsuits, but nevertheless have the potential to chill media organizations from doing what all of us need them to do," he said.
The Wall Street Journal, known for its conservative editorial stance, hasn't shied away from criticising Trump. Its independence sets it apart from other Murdoch-owned media like Fox News and the New York Post, which have remained more aligned with the president.
But Trump's shifting base and unresolved Epstein files have created new friction. Some of his supporters have turned critical, while others push for silence on the topic. Fox News reportedly held back coverage after Trump advised allies not to engage.
Trump's battles with the media extend beyond lawsuits and press pool exclusions. His administration has sought to strip federal support from public broadcasters such as NPR and PBS, citing bias against conservatives. Voice of America has also come under fire.
The broader concern, according to media advocates, is the cumulative impact. Stories might go unwritten. Editors might hesitate. Journalists might self-censor. And when major outlets face punishment for simply doing their job,
press freedom
takes a hit.
For now, the Journal remains defiant. But with the president's trip to Scotland days away, the message from the White House is clear: step out of line, and lose your seat on the plane.