Clashes between Kenyan police and anti-government protesters leave 16 dead, 400 injured
At least 16 people have been killed and 400 injured in Kenya as a nationwide demonstration to honour those killed during last year's antigovernment protests turned chaotic, with police clashing with protesters in different parts of the country.
A joint statement from groups supporting the protests said 83 people were seriously injured and at least eight people were being treated for gunshot wounds.
Most of the 16 dead were killed by police, the local branch of global rights group Amnesty International said.
'We pray for our nation, dialogue and a way forward from the political impasse facing Kenya,' said the statement from the Law Society of Kenya (LSK), the Police Reforms Working Group and the Kenya Medical Association.
READ MORE
Thousands of Kenyans took to the streets early on Wednesday to pay tribute to more than 60 people who died when police opened fire on a crowd that tried to storm parliament while MPs inside passed legislation to raise taxes.
'We face an unfortunate paradox as a country where more lives are being lost as the people seek justice for the lives already lost,' the LSK's president, Faith Odhiambo, said on X. 'Our hearts break for all the victims of the continued trend of police brutality and excesses.'
In Nairobi, police barricaded major roads a few kilometres from the central business district and turned away buses and minibuses farther away from the city centre. They also blocked off access to key buildings, including the parliament and the official residence of the president, William Ruto, with razor wire.
In the city centre, where many businesses were closed, thousands gathered for the march, waving Kenyan flags and placards with images of victims of last year's protests.
Others lit street fires and chanted slogans against Ruto. Later violence ensued, with police firing tear gas and water cannons and hitting protesters with batons, while protesters threw stones and other objects at them.
A source at Kenyatta national hospital in Nairobi told Reuters the facility had received 56 people, most of them with injuries from rubber bullets.
The planned marches also developed into clashes between civilians and police in the cities of Mombasa, Nakuru and Kisumu and other parts of the country. Protesters torched parts of court buildings in Kikuyu town in Kiambu county.
The communications authority of Kenya ordered TV and radio stations to stop live coverage of the protests, threatening those that failed to follow the directive with regulatory action. NTV and KTN, two leading TV stations, were later taken off air.
Lawmakers left parliament buildings in Nairobi, and protests continued to intensify in the city centre. Elsewhere, crowds of people marched along major roads towards the capital.
Outrage has been growing in Kenya over the past few years due to corruption, unemployment, government excesses and rising living costs.
Wednesday's protests come against a backdrop of demonstrations last year prompted by proposed tax increases, in which dozens of people died and many more disappeared.
The street protests reduced over time, but killings, arrests and disappearances continued, triggering more anger towards the authorities.
Two incidents this month – the death of the teacher Albert Ojwang in police custody after reportedly criticising a senior police official on social media, and the police shooting of the vendor Boniface Kariuki at close range during a protest over Ojwang's death – have further inflamed public anger.
Stephanie Marie, a young protester in Nairobi, said she was at Wednesday's march because of Ojwang. 'It could be my brother, it could be my cousin, it could be anyone,' she said. 'These are just normal boys, doing normal things.'
She called for leaders to heed what the they were saying: 'The people voted. You're here for the people. You're working for the people ... We just want you to listen to the people. That's it.'
Another young protester in Nairobi, Innocent, was commemorating the loss of his friend in last year's protests. He said he'd been exposed to a lot of tear gas from police on Wednesday but he was relentless.
'The youth are unstoppable,' he said. 'Because we've come to fight for our rights.' He added: 'We don't want bad leadership'. – The Guardian
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Rwanda and Congo sign peace deal in Washington to end fighting and attract investment
Rwanda and Democratic Republic of Congo signed a US-brokered peace agreement on Friday, raising hopes for an end to fighting that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more this year. The agreement marks a breakthrough in talks held by US president Donald Trump's administration and aims to attract billions of dollars of Western investment to a region rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper, lithium and other minerals. At a ceremony with US secretary of state Marco Rubio in Washington, the two African countries' foreign ministers signed the agreement pledging to implement a 2024 deal that would see Rwandan troops withdraw from eastern Congo within 90 days, according to a version initialled by technical teams last week and seen by Reuters. Kinshasa and Kigali will also launch a regional economic integration framework within 90 days, the agreement said. READ MORE On Friday, ahead of the signing of the deal in Washington, Mr Trump said: 'They were going at it for many years, and with machetes - it is one of the worst, one of the worst wars that anyone has ever seen. And I just happened to have somebody that was able to get it settled.' 'We're getting, for the United States, a lot of the mineral rights from the Congo as part of it. They're so honored to be here. They never thought they'd be coming,' he said. Mr Trump was due to meet the foreign ministers in the Oval Office later on Friday. Rwanda has sent at least 7,000 soldiers over the border, according to analysts and diplomats, in support of the M23 rebels who seized eastern Congo's two largest cities and lucrative mining areas in a lightning advance earlier this year. The gains this year by M23— the latest cycle in a decades-old conflict with roots in the 1994 Rwandan genocide— sparked fears that a wider war could draw in Congo's neighbours. Rwandan foreign minister Olivier Nduhungirehe called the deal a turning point. Congo foreign minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner said the agreement must be followed by disengagement. The US state department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the initialled version of the agreement. —Reuters Massad Boulos, Trump's senior adviser for Africa, told Reuters in May that Washington wanted the peace deal and accompanying minerals deals to be signed simultaneously this summer. Mr Rubio said on Friday that heads of state would be 'here in Washington in a few weeks to finalise the complete protocol and agreement'. However, the agreement signed on Friday gives Congo and Rwanda three months to launch a framework 'to expand foreign trade and investment derived from regional critical mineral supply chains', according to the initialled version seen by Reuters. A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday that another agreement on the framework would be signed by the heads of state at a separate White House event at an unspecified time. There is an understanding that progress in ongoing talks in Doha - a separate but parallel mediation effort with delegations from the Congolese government and M23 - is essential before the signing of the economic framework, the source said. The agreement signed on Friday was set to voice 'full support' for the Qatar-hosted talks, according to the initialled version. It also says Congo and Rwanda will form a joint security coordination mechanism within 30 days and implement a plan agreed last year to monitor and verify the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers within three months. Congolese military operations targeting the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda, a Congo-based armed group that includes remnants of Rwanda's former army and militias that carried out the 1994 genocide, are meant to conclude over the same timeframe. Congo, the United Nations and Western powers say Rwanda is supporting M23 by sending troops and arms. Rwanda has long denied helping M23, saying its forces are acting in self-defence against Congo's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide. —
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Trump hails ‘giant win' as supreme court rules on his birthright citizenship order
The US Supreme Court agreed on Friday to allow president Donald Trump to end birthright citizenship in some parts of the country, even as legal challenges to the constitutionality of the move proceed in other regions. The 6:3 decision, which was written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett and split along ideological lines, is a major victory for Mr Trump, and may allow the reshaping, even temporarily, of how citizenship is granted in the US. The order will not go into effect for 30 days, the justices said in their opinion, allowing its legality to be contested further. Mr Trump has hailed the ruling a 'giant win' and is due to hold a news conference at the White House shortly. READ MORE 'GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court! Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard,' he wrote in a post on Truth Social. The justices also did not address the underlying constitutionality of the president's order to curtail birthright citizenship, potentially leaving that issue for another day. The court's ruling appeared to upend the ability of single federal judges to freeze policies across the country, a powerful tool that has been used frequently in recent years to block policies instituted by Democratic and Republican administrations. Justices across the ideological spectrum had been critical of these so-called nationwide injunctions, arguing they encouraged judge-shopping and improperly circumvented the political process by allowing one judge to halt a policy nationwide. The surprise decision means that an executive order signed by Mr Trump ending the practice of extending citizenship to the children of unauthorised immigrants born in the US would be set to take effect in 30 days in the 28 states that have not challenged the measure. The details of how the policy would be implemented were not immediately clear. The ability of a single federal judge in one part of the country to pause a policy nationwide has been a major stumbling block for Mr Trump. These so-called nationwide injunctions are controversial judicial tools, and have prompted intense debate over their legality. Federal trial judges have consistently ruled against the Trump administration, stymieing efforts to withhold funds from schools with diversity programs, to relocate transgender women in federal prisons and to remove deportation protections from hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan migrants. The case before the justices arose from an executive order signed by Mr Trump on January 20th, the first day of his second term, that appeared to upend the principle known as birthright citizenship, which has been part of the American constitution for more than 150 years. The announcement prompted immediate legal challenges from 22 Democratic-led states, immigrant advocacy organisations and pregnant women concerned their children might not automatically be granted citizenship. Within days, a federal judge in Seattle temporarily blocked the executive order. 'I've been on the bench for four decades. I can't remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one is,' the Seattle judge said, calling Mr Trump's order 'blatantly unconstitutional.' Federal judges in Maryland and Massachusetts also issued orders pausing the policy. All three judges extended their orders to the entire country, even to states that had not brought legal challenges. On March 13th, the Trump administration filed an emergency application asking the justices to weigh whether such nationwide injunctions were legal. The Supreme Court has never issued a ruling that squarely addresses nationwide injunctions. But justices across the ideological spectrum have expressed skepticism over them. In an unusual move, the justices announced that they would hear oral arguments on the emergency application. — The New York Times / Reuters
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Co Tyrone murderer who dismembered victim jailed for minimum of 24 years
A man who murdered, dismembered and dumped another man's body in a reservoir in Co Tyrone has been sentenced to a minimum of 24 years in prison. Stephen McCourt (41), from Riverview in Augher, in Co Tyrone, was found guilty of murdering Damien Heagney following a trial which ended in April this year. Mr Heagney (47), from Cookstown, was last seen alive at the end of December 2021. He was reported missing in July 2022 and his partially dismembered remains were recovered from Cappagh Reservoir the following month. READ MORE Mr Justice Stephen Fowler told Belfast Crown Court that the dismemberment was 'callous in the extreme' and added greatly to his family's distress, in particular the victim's mother. He also said that the disposal of Mr Heagney's body in the reservoir was an additional step taken to 'conceal, destroy evidence, cover the murder and subvert police investigation'. A senior Police Service of Northern Ireland officer said the murder of Damien Heagney was the 'most senseless loss of a life.' Speaking following the sentencing of Stephen McCourt for his murder, Det Supt Rachel Wilson said: 'While the exact cause of Mr Heagney's death has never been determined due to the decomposition of his remains, the postmortem did identify possible stab wounds to his head, neck, arms and legs. 'This was the most senseless loss of a life. 'It was a murder made even more disturbing by the way in which Mr Heagney's body was subsequently dismembered, concealed in a number of packages, and ultimately disposed of in a reservoir. 'These actions were callous, cruel and brutal beyond comprehension. 'Today, working in partnership with the Public Prosecution Service and thanks to the support of NI Water, internal police teams and members of the public, Stephen McCourt has finally been held accountable. 'I know that Damien's loving family have understandably been left broken-hearted, and my thoughts remain with them today. 'They have suffered unimaginably, yet have managed to show remarkable dignity and patience throughout this entire process.' The family of murder victim Damien Heagney said the actions that led to his death were 'depraved'. A family statement said: 'The last few years have been torturous for our family. 'No one should ever have to deal with the heartache of losing a son and a brother, yet we have to wake up every single morning knowing that Damien was murdered. 'Damien's life was taken so cruelly, and the actions that followed were depraved – more than we can ever begin to express. 'It's actually impossible to stop thinking about what happened to Damien. We go over it, again and again, and it haunts us. 'Yet, among the torment, we've each taken comfort from the genuine kindness and support shown by others. 'We would like to thank the jury who put in so much time and effort, listening to all the evidence to bring back a guilty verdict, especially in such a difficult case. We will always be grateful to them.' – PA
