
'Trade-offs' on cards to get productivity back on track
Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood is calling on Australia to adopt a "growth mindset" to prioritise economic outcomes and boost living standards.
That means changing corporate taxes to promote investment, simplifying regulations, speeding up housing and energy approvals and ensuring AI adoption is not undermined by unnecessary regulation, among other suggestions.
It comes as the commission prepares to release a series of reports detailing how Australia can get productivity moving again.
"Australia should be a place where children born today can expect to live better and more prosperous lives than the generations who have come before them,'' Ms Wood said.
"Productivity growth is essential to fulfilling that promise."
But productivity growth has plummeted in recent years.
How much Australia produces with the same amount of workers has grown at just under 0.4 per cent per year since 2015, compared with the 60-year average of 1.6 per cent.
That's been caused in part by governments ignoring or minimising economic growth when making policy choices in recent years, according to a paper released by the commission.
Policymakers have made it harder that it should be to start a business or build essential infrastructure such as housing or renewable energy because they have failed to weigh trade-offs effectively, been too risk-averse or "overly influenced by vocal stakeholder groups".
Governments must balance competing objectives and make choices that improve Australians' overall wellbeing, even if those decisions might negatively affect other goals.
"Bringing a growth mindset to policy decisions means elevating economic growth and its benefits,'' Ms Wood said.
"That doesn't mean policymakers should ignore other objectives, but it does mean being clear-eyed about the trade-offs."
The paper lays the groundwork for five forthcoming reports the commission is preparing to release before an economic roundtable convened by Treasurer Jim Chalmers.
He said the report made clear the productivity problem had been around for decades and almost every comparable country had the same challenge.
"The best way to strengthen our economy and make it more productive is to work through the issues in a methodical and considered way in collaboration with business, unions and the broader community," Dr Chalmers said.
In its submission to the roundtable, a joint group of industry associations including the Business Council of Australia and the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry outlined four priority areas for reform.
They include reforming research and development funding models to boost innovation; cutting the regulatory burden by 25 per cent by 2030; co-ordinating and unifying planning processes to speed up project approvals; and committing to comprehensive tax reform.
"We need to cut unhelpful red tape, streamline planning, fix the tax system and improve incentives for investment," Business Council chief executive Bran Black said.
"These policies can deliver benefits for economic activity across the whole country and importantly ensure future generations aren't worse off."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
21 minutes ago
- ABC News
Bill to criminalise AI child abuse apps to be introduced to parliament
A bill to criminalise the use of AI tools purpose-built to create child sexual abuse material is set to be introduced to parliament. Independent MP Kate Chaney, who will introduce the bill, says the urgent issue cannot wait for the government's wider response to artificial intelligence. While it is an offence to possess or share child abuse material, there is no criminal prohibition on downloading or distributing the wave of emerging AI generators designed to create the illegal material. The tools are becoming easier to access online, with some of the most popular visited millions of times. Their spread is diverting police resources and allowing material to be created offline, where it is harder to track. A roundtable convened last week to address the issue recommended swift action to make the tools illegal, prompting Ms Chaney's bill. "[This] clearly needs to be done urgently and I can't see why we need to wait to respond to this really significant and quite alarming issue," Ms Chaney said. "I recognise the challenges of regulating AI — the technology is changing so fast it's hard to even come up with a workable definition of AI — but while we are working on that holistic approach, there are gaps in our existing legislation we can plug to address the highest-risk-use cases like this, so we can continue to build trust in AI." Ms Chaney said she had met with Attorney-General Michelle Rowland, who she said recognised there was a gap in the law. The MP for Curtin's bill would create a new offence for using a carriage service to download, access, supply or facilitate technologies that are designed to create child abuse material. A new offence for scraping or distributing data with the intention of training or creating those tools would also be created. The offences would carry a maximum 15-year term of imprisonment. A public defence would be available for law enforcement, intelligence agencies and others with express authorisation to be able to investigate child abuse cases. "There are a few reasons we need this," Ms Chaney said. "These tools enable the on-demand, unlimited creation of this type of material, which means perpetrators can train AI tools with images of a particular child, delete the offending material so they can't be detected, and then still be able to generate material with word prompts. "It also makes police work more challenging. It is [getting] harder to identify real children who are victims. "And every AI abuse image starts with photos of a real child, so a child is harmed somewhere in the process." The federal government continues to develop its response to the explosion in the use of AI tools, including by enabling the tools where they are productive and useful. It is yet to respond to a major review of the Online Safety Act handed to the government last year, which also recommended that so-called "nudify" apps be criminalised. Members of last week's roundtable said there was no public benefit to consider in the case of these child abuse generators, and there was no reason to wait for a whole-of-economy response to criminalise them. Former police detective inspector Jon Rouse, who participated in that roundtable, said Ms Chaney's bill addressed an urgent legislative gap. "While existing Australian legislation provides for the prosecution of child sexual abuse material production, it does not yet address the use of AI in generating such material," Professor Rouse said. Colm Gannon, Australian chief of the International Centre for Mission and Exploited Children, said there was a strong consensus that the AI tools had no place in society and Ms Chaney's bill was a "clear and targeted step to close an urgent gap". In a statement, Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said the foremost priority of any government was "to keep our most vulnerable safe". "As Attorney-General, I am fully committed to combating child sexual exploitation and abuse in all settings, including online, and the government has a robust legislative framework in place to support this," Ms Rowland said. "Keeping young people safe from emerging harms is above politics, and the government will carefully consider any proposal that aims to strengthen our responses to child sexual exploitation and abuse." Ms Chaney said regulating AI must become a priority for the government this term. "This is going to have to be an urgent focus for this government, regulating the AI space," she said. "Existing laws do apply to AI, and so we need to plug the gaps in those so they continue to be fit-for-purpose. "We do also need a coordinated approach and a holistic approach so we can balance individual rights with productivity, global governance and trust in information and institutions. "The challenge is the technology moves fast and government does not move fast, so we need to get it right but we also need to plug these gaps as they appear. An inquiry established by former industry minister Ed Husic last year recommended the government take the strongest option in regulating AI by creating standalone laws that could adapt to the rapidly shifting technology.

Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Fight together': Britain warns on China, backs Australia
Healey spoke after being asked by The Telegraph what the UK was doing to help countries like Taiwan prepare for potential escalation from China, but he added that he was speaking in general terms and that the UK wanted to settle any disputes peacefully and through diplomacy. Australians are cautious about the nature of the nation's strategic challenge with China, with 28 per cent of voters saying in March 2023 that it and Russia pose threats that need to be confronted soon. The results, in the Resolve Political Monitor for this masthead, found that 52 per cent thought China and Russia were threats that could be managed carefully over time. Deterrent effect The Resolve Political Monitor found that a clear majority of Australians did not want to side with the US against China, when asked in the days after Donald Trump won the US presidential election last November. The respondents were asked if they believed Australia should avoid taking sides in any conflict between the US and China. The survey found that 57 per cent agreed, 16 per cent disagreed, and the remainder were unsure. The UK has made a significant show of force with its contribution to Talisman Sabre this year, sending 3000 personnel at a time when some in the Trump administration have questioned why it should send forces to the Indo-Pacific. The aircraft carrier was accompanied by an air-defence destroyer and a tanker. Lammy warned on the weekend that China had to be challenged on its conduct with the UK and other countries, as he blamed it for espionage, repression in Hong Kong and helping allies such as Russia, Iran and North Korea. The UK Foreign Secretary echoed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese by saying the goal was to work with China while disagreeing when necessary. 'We wanted a consistent position on China where we would co-operate what we can, but we would absolutely challenge where we must,' he said. Albanese has often said: 'We should co-operate where we can, disagree where we must.' Lammy named China's actions in recent days, when Hong Kong authorities offered cash to anyone who would help them arrest pro-democracy activists in other countries, as an example of 'transnational repression' that should stop. Loading 'We challenge China on their espionage in the UK; we are hugely concerned about the sanctioning of members of parliament. We have big issues with transnational repression,' he said in a question-and-answer session with Lowy Institute executive director Michael Fullilove. 'So we have very tough issues that I have raised continually with [Foreign Minister] Wang Yi and the Chinese.' At the same time, he said, he wanted to co-operate with China on climate change, world health and trade. Lammy said he had presented Chinese leaders with a list of their companies helping Russian leader Vladimir Putin in the war in Ukraine. 'I've been in Kyiv, I've seen the shells that have come from North Korea, killing Europeans,' he said during remarks to the Lowy Institute on Saturday.

The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
‘Fight together': Britain warns on China, backs Australia
Healey spoke after being asked by The Telegraph what the UK was doing to help countries like Taiwan prepare for potential escalation from China, but he added that he was speaking in general terms and that the UK wanted to settle any disputes peacefully and through diplomacy. Australians are cautious about the nature of the nation's strategic challenge with China, with 28 per cent of voters saying in March 2023 that it and Russia pose threats that need to be confronted soon. The results, in the Resolve Political Monitor for this masthead, found that 52 per cent thought China and Russia were threats that could be managed carefully over time. Deterrent effect The Resolve Political Monitor found that a clear majority of Australians did not want to side with the US against China, when asked in the days after Donald Trump won the US presidential election last November. The respondents were asked if they believed Australia should avoid taking sides in any conflict between the US and China. The survey found that 57 per cent agreed, 16 per cent disagreed, and the remainder were unsure. The UK has made a significant show of force with its contribution to Talisman Sabre this year, sending 3000 personnel at a time when some in the Trump administration have questioned why it should send forces to the Indo-Pacific. The aircraft carrier was accompanied by an air-defence destroyer and a tanker. Lammy warned on the weekend that China had to be challenged on its conduct with the UK and other countries, as he blamed it for espionage, repression in Hong Kong and helping allies such as Russia, Iran and North Korea. The UK Foreign Secretary echoed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese by saying the goal was to work with China while disagreeing when necessary. 'We wanted a consistent position on China where we would co-operate what we can, but we would absolutely challenge where we must,' he said. Albanese has often said: 'We should co-operate where we can, disagree where we must.' Lammy named China's actions in recent days, when Hong Kong authorities offered cash to anyone who would help them arrest pro-democracy activists in other countries, as an example of 'transnational repression' that should stop. Loading 'We challenge China on their espionage in the UK; we are hugely concerned about the sanctioning of members of parliament. We have big issues with transnational repression,' he said in a question-and-answer session with Lowy Institute executive director Michael Fullilove. 'So we have very tough issues that I have raised continually with [Foreign Minister] Wang Yi and the Chinese.' At the same time, he said, he wanted to co-operate with China on climate change, world health and trade. Lammy said he had presented Chinese leaders with a list of their companies helping Russian leader Vladimir Putin in the war in Ukraine. 'I've been in Kyiv, I've seen the shells that have come from North Korea, killing Europeans,' he said during remarks to the Lowy Institute on Saturday.