Neurosurgeon loses High Court claim against McLaren branch over snowmobile crash
Andrew Cannestra suffered a brain injury when his snowmobile crashed near Ivalo, northern Finland, on February 2 2020 during a four-night 'Pure McLaren Arctic Experience' arranged by McLaren Automotive Events.
Barristers for the 54-year-old Floridian told a trial in London earlier this month that the company was negligent and in breach of contract, including allegations that a safety briefing given by guides for a 'snowmobile safari' was inadequate.
They also claimed that a guide sped off, causing Mr Cannestra to lose sight of him and speed up in an attempt to keep up, which led to him losing control of the snowmobile on a turn, veering off the track into deep snow, and hitting a tree.
The company defended the legal action, with its lawyers saying there was 'no evidence' the briefing did not meet safety standards and that the 'irreducible risk' of the activity was 'reasonably controlled'.
In a ruling on Friday, Mr Justice Ritchie said the safety briefing complied with relevant standards and that the crash was caused by Mr Cannestra's 'accidental throttle use' when entering the turn.
He said: 'It was not caused by 'out of sight' guiding. It was not caused by the claimant going too fast because he was trying to keep up with a disappeared guide.
'It was caused by accidental throttle use by the claimant due to failing to follow the instructions which he had been given about safe operation during a left turn, with the guide well in sight before both turns one and two.'
Neil Block KC, representing Mr Cannestra, told a seven-day trial in London in written submissions that Mr Cannestra and his former partner, Kaitlin Mealor, spent almost £24,000 before flights on the 'couples package', with activities including driving a McLaren car on ice, and optional events such as snowmobiling.
While Mr Cannestra had experience driving supercars, he and Ms Mealor were 'absolute novices' on snowmobiles, Mr Block said.
The barrister said the pair were given a safety briefing by two guides, Arto Pitkanen and Jouni Satta, which lasted 'approximately five minutes', but alleged it was not 'proper and adequate' as it did not include information on track layout or the positions of potential hazards.
Mr Block said the Lynx Xtrim 900 snowmobiles had three modes – eco, standard and sport – with the tour beginning in eco mode, which had a top speed of 40kph.
Shortly after the activity began, Mr Block said the group stopped, and Mr Pitkanen approached Mr Cannestra and changed the mode, which increased its top speed and was 'not appropriate'.
Mr Pitkanen was alleged to have then set off at speeds of up to 60kph, causing Mr Cannestra to lose sight of him and speed up as he 'did not want to be on his own'.
He suffered a 'very significant' brain injury and 'orthopaedic injuries' as a result of the crash, the court was told.
Giving evidence, Mr Cannestra acknowledged he initially told others following the crash that it was his 'error', but said he was 'not thinking clearly' at that time due to his 'traumatic brain injury'.
He said: 'The guides simply did not guide me through the turns.
'That put my life in danger, and this never would have happened to me if that had occurred.'
Matthew Chapman KC, for the company, said in his written submissions that the turn where Mr Cannestra crashed was 'quite safe if negotiated at an appropriate speed', and that Mr Pitkanen changed the snowmobile's mode as Mr Cannestra was 'eager' for this to happen.
He added that Mr Cannestra's speed was 'wholly within his control', and the claim that Mr Pitkanen had driven too far in front 'cannot sensibly succeed'.
In his judgment, Mr Justice Ritchie ruled that Mr Pitkanen 'did not ride at excessive speed' and that the change of the snowmobile's mode did not have 'any proven causative effect on the accident', adding that Mr Cannestra was 'a mature, supercar and jet-ski aficionado, who had ridden confidently and wanted more speed'.
He continued that Mr Cannestra's evidence was 'illogical and contrived' and that a 'fundamental problem' with it was that it was 'contradictory to what he said after the accident'.
He said: 'For a man with substantial experience of driving super cars, with very high intelligence and a clear understanding of the dangers of driving at speed on corners, he based his case on ignoring those dangers and desperately wanting to keep up with a guide.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
It's as if Lewis Hamilton knows time has sped past him... his sad deterioration began long before he became Ferrari's £60m-a-year vanity project, writes JONATHAN McEVOY
It was one of the saddest sights I have seen at a track, mortal tragedy aside. Here was one of the gods of motor racing holding his gloves over his visor to hide his tangled emotions from scrutiny. A few minutes later, he stood before the television cameras inviting Ferrari to sack him from his £60million-a-year job, after qualifying in 12th place for Sunday's Hungarian Grand Prix. At 40, it was if he knew time had sped past him on the outside. Not quite monosyllabic but brief in his answers, he told Sky: 'I'm useless, absolutely useless. 'The team have no problem. You've seen the car's on pole. 'So we probably need to change driver.' Seeing Lewis Hamilton hide his emotions on Saturday was one of the saddest sights I've seen The seven-time world champion told Ferrari to replace him after qualifying 12th in Hungary He has been consistently outqualified and outpaced by his team-mate Charles Leclerc And he walked off to do his print session, which lasted all of 59 seconds. While he was hiding his visor, Charles Leclerc was putting the identical machinery on pole position, one so unexpected that the Monegasque said he no longer understood sport. How Hamilton can compute what is happening to him is impossible to know. He has been outgunned by Leclerc in qualifying 10 times to four. Now, Leclerc is as fast as a bullet over a single lap as there is. But since when was Hamilton, aka the GOAT, excused by any comparison? Leclerc has scored 30 points more than the Englishman in 13 races, not the most damning statistic actually. But week after week, circuit after circuit, it is Leclerc with the greater speed. You look up and, lo and behold, there is three-tenths between them. And here of all places! Where Hamilton has won a record eight times and taken pole nine times. It has been a shrine of revival in dark seasons. Where he won after a previously podium-free 2009 campaign. That day he climbed out of his troublesome McLaren and asked how far he was off the championship lead. Hamilton was thinking of launching an absurdly impossible title challenge. It's how his mind works. He is hard-wired for winning. Second place kills him as badly as last. But is the flesh still willing? A slight, almost imperceptible, deterioration has set in over the last four years. Little bits fell off the old invincibility. Did his nerve wane, or were his eyes the culprits, when he was no longer threading his silver Mercedes through vanishing holes with the elan of old? His move to Ferrari was a vanity project, rustled up by president John Elkann, a scion of the Agnelli clan, with no appreciable liking of motor racing. But Hamilton's allure lay in his fame, the most recognised driver in the world in the red car of legend. What could be better? Except they failed to notice Hamilton was beaten across two of the three seasons he spent as team-mate of George Russell. He was carted into the confectionery store and back out again in qualifying last year, 19-5 to be luridly exact. Yes, Russell is a very fine driver, but whither the GOAT? He has had so much joy at the Hungaroring down the years with as many as eight race wins The season is not an absolute disaster - he sits sixth in the standings - but he wanted a title Bringing him to Ferrari was a vanity project rustled up by Ferrari president John Elkann That was the question, too, when Hamilton drove so abjectly in rain-soaked Sao Paulo last year that I could scarcely believe what I was seeing. Could this possibly be the same Hamilton who once had webbed feet? At Silverstone in 2008 he won by more than a minute in a pool of danger, building his own monument to sporting greatness. Hamilton needed a new beginning to kickstart him, or so he tried to convince himself, refusing to give in to the truth that his powers were dimming. He shocked Mercedes by terminating his contract, forgoing the status as a Mercedes man for life and the trappings that would come with such loyalty, to fulfil a boyhood dream at the Scuderia. Toto Wolff was dumbfounded at Mercedes. But Elkann and co sounded the trumpets in Maranello. I was there when the bridge over Ferrari's Fiorano test track was crammed a dozen deep and passing lorries hooted their horns in his first outing in a Ferrari. He, his father, mother and stepmother then went out for dinner with Enzo Ferrari's son, Piero, in the back room of the Montana restaurant that Michael Schumacher called his favourite, supping in the genius loci, the magic of the place. But it was typical Ferrari. What about the car? Or the fact Hamilton was three years older than Schumacher when he was pensioned off to make way for Kimi Raikkonen? And so the season started, with Hamilton overwearing the excuse, proffered early, that nothing special should be expected soon. He factored in adjustment to his new environment, to a non-Mercedes engine for the first time and to an unfamiliar car. Fine up to a point, but not knowing where the wet switch was on his steering wheel when he made his debut in Melbourne seemed a touch negligent. He conspicuously failed to hit it off with race engineer Riccardo Adami. They were constantly squabbling over the team radio. Warning signs flashed. In recent weeks, Hamilton has been jotting ideas down for improvements for the car and to the team's operation. But last night he was beyond hope. Asked if rain would be welcome today, he said: 'I don't think anything can help me right now.' Toto Wolff was dumfounded when Hamilton announced that he wantd to leave Mercedes A deterioration has set in over the last four years - his form is not just related to Ferrari It has been a Lewis trait all his career to pick himself up from sloughs of despair. 'Still I Rise,' he is apt to say, citing Maya Angelou. 'It's not how you go down, but how you get up,' is another favourite. Can he still do that? Conversely, might he even quit over the summer break? Will he get to finish his 'masterpiece' on his own terms? Stubborn, resilient, essentially talented, he might. But I fear not. His despondency here, woeful form all season, and his advancing years suggest that we may have witnessed a staging post in Hamilton's journey to the destination he cannot contemplate. Retirement.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘I'm absolutely useless': Lewis Hamilton says Ferrari should replace him after qualifying 12th
Lewis Hamilton berated his performance in qualifying for the Hungarian Grand Prix on Saturday as 'useless' and emphasised it with an entirely uncharacteristic act of self-flagellation, saying Ferrari needed to replace him. Hamilton was knocked out in 12th, while his Ferrari teammate, Charles Leclerc, went on to take pole position for Sunday's race, the first the Scuderia has claimed this year. Hamilton did not have an issue with his car on his final run in Q2 in Budapest nor was he impeded, he was simply not quick enough to go through, more than two-tenths down on Leclerc and took himself to task for his shortcoming. 'It's me every time. I'm useless, absolutely useless,' he said. 'The team have no problem. You've seen the car's on pole. So we probably need to change driver.' He had signalled his own frustration immediately after completing the below-par lap, admonishing himself as he told his team: 'Every time, every time.' When he climbed from the car he walked to the Ferrari motorhome holding his gloves in front of his visor. His exasperation was doubtless compounded by what he called an 'unacceptable' error in qualifying at the last round in Belgium, where he could manage only 16th on the grid. Moreover, the Hungaroring is a circuit where the 40-year-old has a record second to none, eight wins and nine poles. However, this is the fourth time Hamilton failed to make the top 10 in qualifying this season and has been beaten over the single lap by Leclerc in 10 of the 14 meetings and is 30 points behind him in the standings. Expectations for the seven-time champion had been huge when he joined Ferrari this season after 12 years at Mercedes, but the transition has been difficult. Adapting to the new car and team is proving a challenge and although he took a win in the sprint race in China he has yet to make the podium this season, the longest period he has gone without making it into the top three. The championship leader, Oscar Piastri, and his title rival Lando Norris had been expected to fight for pole, but the McLaren men had to settle for second and third respectively. Leclerc saw off Piastri by 0.026 seconds, with Norris 0.015secs behind the Australian. George Russell finished fourth for Mercedes. Leclerc said: 'I don't understand anything in Formula One. Honestly, the whole qualifying was extremely difficult. It was difficult for us to get to Q2, it was difficult for us to get to Q3. In Q3, the conditions changed a little bit. Everything became a lot trickier and I knew I just had to do a clean lap to target third. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion 'It's pole position. I definitely did not expect that. It's probably one of the best pole positions I've ever had. It's the most unexpected, for sure.'
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Dacia Bigster review: not that ugly — and a fuel economy to make Ceausescu proud
Saying 'I've got a Bigster' while swinging your car keys at a party sounds like a cheap gag, but cheap is good when it comes to family cars. This £25,215 Romanian-made SUV with a funny name manages to undercut better-known rivals such as the Nissan Qashqai, Kia Sportage and Ford Kuga. It's cheap to run too. We measured it at 60mpg for the 1.8-litre petrol hybrid (PHEV) version. That's pretty remarkable considering 30mpg was the best you could expect from a big SUV not long ago. • Read more expert reviews, news and insights on cars and motoring More about the fuel-sipping engine technology in a moment, but first here are the reasons you may want to test-drive a Bigster, apart from the fact that it's not another Chinese import. First is that the Bigster manages to feel roomier than rivals thanks to a bigger boot — 677 litres — and low window lines that give it an airy feel inside. The seats neatly split and fold so you can easily load a bike in the back, or lots of suitcases if you're doing the airport run, or even a stubby kayak. Rear-seat passengers — even tall ones — get enough legroom to avoid having their knees up round their chin, budget airline style. And unlike many cut-price SUVs, the Bigster doesn't look like a cheap knock-off. It's chunky enough to pass for a Jeep, albeit a soap rendering of one that's been left in the shower. There are skid plates front and rear to protect the underside, and the bumpers, wheel arches and sideskirts are made from a tough plastic called Starkle. Dacia boasts that Starkle is made from recycled materials possibly plastic dashboards from early Dacias. So far so good, but before signing on the dotted line, prospective customers will be asking themselves a deep and searching question: do they want the automotive equivalent of an 'own brand' supermarket item sitting on their drive? • VW Tayron review: seven seats and 600 miles on a single tank Founded in 1966 in the early days of the Ceausescu regime, the Dacia automobile company was the puppet state's answer to Russia's Lada, assembling cars for the masses under licence and offering slightly more luxurious versions for Communist Party officials. Dacia was successful enough to outlast both the Ceausescus and the Soviets. Renault saw the possibilities of a low-cost manufacturing outpost and bought it in 1999, launching the '5,000 euros car', the Dacia Logan, which attracted buyers in France, Italy and Germany. Other cheap-as-chips models followed, including the Sandero, the Jogger and the Duster. And now we have the Bigster, a cheaply produced SUV that's spacious, economical and not as ugly as some rivals. Unfortunately that's where it runs out of road. Dacia may have pretensions to be a grown-up car company but it's not there yet. The Bigster's interior looks like a leftover from the Soviet bloc era. It's so basic it's spartan, soaking up vibrancy with a joyless blend of grey plastics. The infotainment system bongs relentlessly at the smallest of transgressions and the seats don't pass the comfort test. By the end of a long journey you feel as though you've sat through a drawn-out politburo meeting. • Ford Puma Gen E review — Britain's bestselling car goes electric From the outside the Bigster looks tall but inside it's more like an estate car without the high-up driving position an SUV should have, and hence without the good visibility and feeling of security. It does share some of the characteristics of an SUV, notably soaking up speed humps and potholes and smoothing out ruts and bumps, but cornering and changing lanes aren't its strong points. Neither does it offer the kind of off-road proficiency you'd expect judging from its ruggedised looks. When you stretch the engine in low gear there's a droning sound, as though the car has been surrounded by angry bees. The cleverest bit is the powertrain on the 155 model, a system developed by Renault. That 60mpg figure is achieved by combining a 109bhp four-cylinder petrol engine, two electric motors, a 1.4 kWh battery and an automatic electric gearbox. It sips fuel while cruising and then, when you lift your foot off the throttle, it gets busy harvesting energy and feeding it back into the battery. The result is fewer fill-ups and a low vehicle excise duty band (band F, £390 a year). For a whisker over £25,000 for the Expression trim, you're clearly not going to get the hushed ride and pillowy suppleness of a premium German SUV, but the Bigster still has a way to go before it can match the refinement of, say, Skoda, another eastern European brand that started as the butt of jokes. • Porsche Cayenne review — a family hybrid with oomph The Bigster feels like a work in progress. No doubt Dacia is already developing an improved version. Having overcome the ticklish engineering challenges of building the Bigster's powertrain, it will soon get to grips with the problems of comfort and handling. In the meantime, for a similar price, it's worth checking out a used BMW X5 or a Porsche Cayenne. Neither match the Bigster's laudable fuel economy, but they will get you to your destination with a little more panache —and you'll have a better key fob to show off at parties.
