logo
Tested: 2025 Mercedes-AMG E53 Is a Plug-In Hybrid That Rips

Tested: 2025 Mercedes-AMG E53 Is a Plug-In Hybrid That Rips

Car and Driver11-07-2025
More and more performance variants are turning to electrification as the way forward. Based on Mercedes-AMG's latest E53, it's easy to understand why. Although the mid-size AMG sedan is substantially heavier—891 pounds more than a Mercedes-Benz E450 and 850 heftier than the previous E53 sedan—you sure wouldn't guess it by the test results, which have improved in just about every conceivable way.
The 2025 E53 takes the turbocharged inline-six from the prior model but adds a new twin-scroll turbo that ups the boost from 16.0 to 21.8 psi, bringing the engine's output to 443 horsepower and 413 pound-feet of torque, gains of 14 horses and 29 pound-feet. That uprated six gets additional assistance from a 161-hp, 354-lb-ft electric motor integrated into the nine-speed automatic transmission. Total output rises to 604 ponies—one more than the previous E63, which has yet to return—and 553 pound-feet.
view exterior photos
Marc Urbano
|
Car and Driver
HIGHS: E63-adjacent performance, improved braking and cornering, useful EV range.
The E53 is an absolute ripper in a straight line, lunging to 60 mph in 3.3 seconds and hustling through the quarter-mile before the clock strikes 12 (11.6 seconds at 120 mph). That's only about a half-second behind the last top-dog, V-8-powered E63, as well as the lighter and more powerful C63, and nearly a second quicker than the previous E53. Plus, we prefer the E's smooth six to the C63's high-strung four-cylinder anyway. The E53 doesn't stop pulling until 174 mph, 43 mph higher than the last E53 we tested.
Braking and cornering grip improve as well, stopping from 70 mph in 154 feet and from 100 mph in 307 feet, and its Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires hang on for 0.94 g of skidpad stick. Keen-eyed students of the specifications panel will notice that the E53's 50-to-70 passing time has lengthened by over a second. That's because the engine is off in Comfort mode when nailing the throttle at 50 mph, and there's a delay before it wakes up. Selecting a more aggressive vehicle mode that forces the engine on will improve this stat.
view exterior photos
Marc Urbano
|
Car and Driver
The underlying E-class is already dynamically solid, one of the reasons we voted it on to our 2025 10Best Cars list, and the E53 builds on that excellent foundation. It's balanced and predictable pushing toward the handling limit, thanks to both proper chassis balance and communicative steering. Our biggest complaint is brake-pedal response, which blends regenerative braking before calling on the optional upsized rotors (carbon-ceramic in front) that are part of the $3150 AMG Dynamic Plus package, which also includes an electronically controlled limited-slip differential and active engine mounts. Although the braking performance is excellent, we were never quite sure what left-pedal response we were going to get with light inputs, as the brakes' behavior seemingly changes depending on drive mode and other real-time happenings.
LOWS: Flinty ride with a lot of tire noise, nonlinear brake pedal, way heavier than before.
Ride quality and interior noise are areas where the E53 takes an unfortunate step back from the luxuriously smooth and quiet E350 and E450. Impacts are sharp, and there's quite a bit of tire slap, particularly with the high tire pressures specified on the door-jamb placard (44 psi front, 51 psi rear). Lowering them by 15 psi to the low-load setting made the ride far more tolerable. The tire noise over our not perfectly smooth test surface is probably why our sound-level reading wasn't better than 72 decibels, way louder than the 67 we recorded in the E450. If the roads aren't pristine where you live, consider the standard 20-inch wheels rather than the optional 21s.
view interior Photos
Marc Urbano
|
Car and Driver
Then there's efficiency, something this plug-in hybrid should do better. We averaged a reasonable 24 MPGe overall and got 29 mpg in our 75-mph highway test loop, which beats its EPA highway figure by three mpg (although the previous E53 did even better at 32 mpg). That's after the 21-kWh battery pack is depleted, which takes 44 miles at 75 mph. As with other Mercedes plug-ins, the E53 handily beats its EPA electric range figure in our highway test.
The E53 also has sufficient electric-only thrust in stop-and-go traffic, which prevents us from having to constantly dip into combustion power to keep the pace. We found the E53 to use only second through sixth gears during electric operation, and the shifting is much smoother than in some PHEVs that, like the E53, have a motor upstream of the transmission. Although we appreciate the E53's impressive electric range, we don't quite understand the included DC charging capability, which is rare on PHEVs. We measured 23 minutes to charge the battery from empty to a 90 percent state of charge, which would gain only about 40 miles of EV range. Unless you're already planning to stop for a separate reason, we don't think this is a wise use of anyone's time.
view interior Photos
Marc Urbano
|
Car and Driver
The E53 starts at $89,150, some $17,150 more than the next-step-down E450 model, which gets a less powerful version of this turbocharged inline-six. Then again, Mercedes is not afraid of a lengthy options list, and the last E450 we tested rang in higher than this E53's starting point. There's still lots of room to climb on the E53, as our car had $20,650 in options, including multiple performance add-ons—the aforementioned 21-inch wheels and tires, brake upgrade, and limited-slip diff. Even the AMG-branded fuel cap costs $110 extra. As with the regular E-class, we'd skip the upgraded infotainment and its selfie-camera frivolity.
VERDICT: Inline-six plus electric motor equals massive performance gains.
Electric assist enables an impressive duality: The E53 is an upscale luxury sedan that can run mid-11-second quarter-miles, cover plenty of commuting miles electrically, and, even after the battery runs out, cruise along at nearly 30 mpg on the highway.
view exterior photos
Marc Urbano
|
Car and Driver
Specifications
Specifications
2025 Mercedes-AMG E53
Vehicle Type: front-engine, front-motor, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $89,150/$109,800
Options: Pinnacle trim (head-up display, four-zone climate control, projection adaptive headlights), $4150; AMG Dynamic Plus package (AMG steering wheel, active engine mounts, electronic limited-slip rear differential, front carbon-ceramic brake rotors, 174-mph top speed limiter), $3150; black Nappa leather, $2990; Multicontour Seating package (ventilated and massaging front seats, heated front armrest), $2950; 21-inch forged-aluminum wheels and tires, $2600; Driver Assistance package (lane-keeping assist, steering assist, adaptive cruise), $1950; MBUX Superscreen package (larger center screen, front passenger screen, selfie camera), $1500; sun protection package (rear and rear side sunshades), $800; black microfiber headliner, $450; AMG fuel cap, $110
POWERTRAIN
turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve 3.0-liter inline-6, 443 hp, 413 lb-ft + AC motor, 161 hp, 354 lb-ft (combined output: 604 hp, 553 lb-ft; 21-kWh lithium-ion battery pack; 9.6-kW onboard charger
Transmission: 9-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: multilink/multilink
Brakes, F/R: 15.4-in vented, cross-drilled, carbon-ceramic disc/14.2-in vented, cross-drilled disc
Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
F: 265/35ZR-21 (101Y) MO1A
R: HL295/30ZR-21 (105Y) MO1A
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 116.6 in
Length: 194.9 in
Width: 76.7 in
Height: 57.9 in
Passenger Volume, F/R: 58/47 ft3
Trunk Volume: 13 ft3
Curb Weight: 5357 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.3 sec
100 mph: 7.8 sec
1/4-Mile: 11.6 sec @ 120 mph
130 mph: 13.7 sec
150 mph: 19.1 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 4.1 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.0 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 4.3 sec
Top Speed (gov ltd): 174 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 154 ft
Braking, 100–0 mph: 307 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.94 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 24 MPGe
75-mph Highway Driving, EV/Hybrid Mode: 64 MPGe/29 mpg
75-mph Highway Range, EV/Hybrid mode: 44/500 mi
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 23/21/26 mpg
Combined Gasoline + Electricity: 59 MPGe
EV Range: 42 mi
C/D TESTING EXPLAINED
Tested by
Dave VanderWerp
Director, Vehicle Testing
Dave VanderWerp has spent more than 20 years in the automotive industry, in varied roles from engineering to product consulting, and now leading Car and Driver's vehicle-testing efforts. Dave got his very lucky start at C/D by happening to submit an unsolicited resume at just the right time to land a part-time road warrior job when he was a student at the University of Michigan, where he immediately became enthralled with the world of automotive journalism.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Traton SE (TRATF) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Market Challenges with Strategic ...
Traton SE (TRATF) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Market Challenges with Strategic ...

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Traton SE (TRATF) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Market Challenges with Strategic ...

Deliveries: Increased by 9% over Q1, but only 1% year-over-year. Sales Revenue: Declined by 2% year-over-year. Adjusted Return on Sales: Declined to 6.4% in Q2. Net Cash Flow: Positive development in Q2, slightly better than 2024. Incoming Orders: Up 11% overall, with a 27% increase in Europe year-over-year. Unit Sales in Europe: Up by 3% to 36,600 units in Q2. Order Intake in Europe: Increased by 27% to 31,400 units. Unit Sales in North America: Up by 5% to 18,200 vehicles in Q2. Order Intake in North America: Down by 15% to 9,300 units. Unit Sales in South America: Down 8% to 16,600 vehicles. Order Intake in South America: Down 7% to 16,300 units. Total Group Revenue: EUR11.3 billion, a 2% decline year-over-year. TRATON Financial Services Revenue: Increased by 14%. Scania Margin: 9%, impacted by negative volume and currency effects. MAN Adjusted Return on Sales: 7.9%, 3.3 percentage points higher over Q1. International Margin: 3.3% in Q2. Volkswagen Truck & Bus Adjusted Return on Sales: 12.9% in Q2. TRATON Financial Services Return on Equity: 8.4%. Gross Cash Flow: EUR2.0 billion in the first half of 2025. Net Debt: Increased by EUR1.2 billion. Adjusted Outlook for 2025: Lowered unit sales and revenue outlook, with a decline expected between -10% and 0%. Adjusted Return on Sales Outlook: 6% to 7% for TRATON Group, 7% to 8% for TRATON Operations. Net Cash Flow Guidance: Expected between EUR1 billion and EUR1.5 billion. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with TRATF. Release Date: July 25, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Traton SE (TRATF) saw a 9% increase in deliveries over Q1, indicating some recovery from a slow start to the year. The company reported a strong order intake in Europe, with a 27% year-over-year increase, despite a slowdown in momentum. Traton SE (TRATF) is advancing its electrification strategy, with Scania launching a high-capacity charging solution and MAN starting production of heavy-duty electric trucks. The company completed the rollout of its integrated financial services backbone in 14 strategic markets, enhancing support for commercial operations. Traton SE (TRATF) is making significant strides in its transformation efforts, including the operational start of a unified group research and development organization. Negative Points Traton SE (TRATF) faced a 2% drop in sales revenues year-over-year, reflecting ongoing market challenges and unfavorable mix effects. The company lowered its full-year outlook due to tough market conditions in North America and economic challenges in Brazil. Scania's adjusted return on sales declined to 6.4% in Q2, primarily due to volume effects and currency headwinds. The book-to-bill ratio dropped below 1, indicating a decline in order intake relative to sales. Traton SE (TRATF) is experiencing high dealer stocks and economic challenges in South America, particularly in Brazil, affecting sales performance. Q & A Highlights Q: Could you help us understand the assumptions behind the guidance on sales and revenue, specifically regarding volume and pricing? A: Michael Jackstein, CFO, explained that the volume decrease played a significant role in the first half, along with unfavorable mix effects. He noted that challenging market conditions often come with pricing pressure, but Traton believes in maintaining a solid pricing level due to their strong product offerings. He highlighted regional differences, with Europe seeing a slowdown in order momentum and North America experiencing significant lower intakes due to uncertainties. Q: Could you quantify the headwinds impacting Scania's margins this quarter, and do you expect a similar run rate for the remainder of the year? A: Christian Levin, CEO, stated that the main issues were declining volumes and currency effects, particularly in Latin America. Scania is facing a competitive environment in Brazil and Mexico, with high interest rates affecting customer financing. He noted that while pricing is maintained, mix effects and lower sales in profitable markets are impacting margins. He does not foresee significant changes within the year. Q: What is your outlook for North America, considering some peers are optimistic about a recovery? A: Christian Levin expressed a more cautious outlook, citing high inventory levels and customer hesitancy due to uncertainties like tariffs and EPA regulations. He mentioned that while pro-business policies could help, the expected EPA prebuy will not happen this year, and the tariff discussions are creating further uncertainty. Q: Can you discuss the differences in demand and production between Scania and MAN in Europe? A: Christian Levin explained that MAN is increasing production from a lower base, benefiting from stronger demand in Germany, while Scania is slightly reducing production due to a leveling out of order intake. He noted regional variations, with Central Europe showing some improvement, while the Nordics and Eastern markets are more hesitant. Q: Regarding the Section 232 tariffs, what would be the implications for Traton, and how might you mitigate the impact? A: Michael Jackstein stated that while they are considering various outcomes, they do not want to speculate on potential impacts. He emphasized that Traton is prepared to adjust to different scenarios but did not provide specific mitigation strategies. Q: How is the modular system development progressing, and what should we look for next? A: Christian Levin highlighted the integration of common components like the CD1 engine and the electric drivetrain between Scania and MAN. He mentioned future developments in electrical architecture and software, as well as plans to standardize interfaces for chassis and cabs, which will enhance product differentiation and efficiency. Q: Can you provide insights into the inventory levels in the US and how long the destocking process might last? A: Christian Levin noted that while Traton's industrial inventory is at reasonable levels, dealer inventories across the industry are high. He speculated that the destocking process could last until the end of the year, depending on demand changes. Q: What are your thoughts on the potential for improving demand in North America, given the current challenges? A: Christian Levin suggested that resolving tariff discussions could significantly boost demand, as the underlying US economy is strong, and there is a need for fleet renewal. He also mentioned that a decrease in interest rates could further stimulate investment. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Gentex Corp (GNTX) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Sales Growth Amid China Challenges
Gentex Corp (GNTX) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Sales Growth Amid China Challenges

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gentex Corp (GNTX) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Sales Growth Amid China Challenges

Consolidated Net Sales: $657.9 million, a 15% increase over the previous year. Core Gentex Revenue: $579 million, a 1% growth despite a 2% decline in light vehicle production. VOXX Revenue: $78.8 million for the quarter. Sales into China: Approximately $33 million, below the forecast of $50 million to $60 million. Consolidated Gross Margin: 34.2%, up from 32.9% last year. Core Gentex Gross Margin: 35.3%, a 240-basis-point improvement year-over-year. Operating Expenses: $106.8 million, up from $73.7 million last year, primarily due to the VOXX acquisition. Consolidated Income from Operations: $118.5 million, compared to $114.9 million last year. Core Gentex Operating Income: $123.8 million, an 8% increase year-over-year. Consolidated Net Income: $96 million, up 12% from $86 million last year. Adjusted Net Income: $105.8 million, a 23% increase versus last year. Consolidated Earnings Per Share (EPS): $0.43, up 16% from last year. Adjusted EPS: $0.47, a 27% increase over last year. Automotive Net Sales: $566.5 million, impacted by lower sales in China but offset by increased advanced feature mirror sales. Other Product Lines Sales: $12.5 million, down from $13.6 million last year. Share Repurchases: 5.7 million shares repurchased at an average price of $22.13 per share, totaling $126.2 million. Cash and Cash Equivalents: $119.8 million, down from $233.3 million at year-end. Capital Expenditures: $31.1 million for the quarter, compared to $31.8 million last year. Depreciation and Amortization: $27.4 million for the quarter, including $0.8 million from VOXX. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with GNTX. Release Date: July 25, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Gentex Corp (NASDAQ:GNTX) reported a 15% increase in consolidated net sales for the second quarter of 2025, reaching $657.9 million. Core Gentex revenue grew by 1% despite a 2% decline in light vehicle production in primary markets. The acquisition of VOXX contributed $78.8 million to the quarter's revenue, aiding overall growth. Consolidated gross margin improved to 34.2%, up from 32.9% last year, driven by cost reductions and operational efficiencies. Gentex Corp (NASDAQ:GNTX) announced a new share repurchase authorization for an additional 40 million shares, enhancing shareholder value. Negative Points Sales into China were significantly lower than forecasted, at $33 million compared to the expected $50 million to $60 million, due to tariffs. Operating expenses increased to $106.8 million from $73.7 million last year, primarily due to the VOXX acquisition. The effective tax rate rose to 17.2% from 15.1% last year, impacting net income. Gentex Corp (NASDAQ:GNTX) faced challenges in the China market due to counter-tariffs and reduced demand, affecting revenue. Cash and cash equivalents decreased to $119.8 million from $233.3 million at year-end, impacted by the VOXX acquisition and share repurchases. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you discuss the factors contributing to the improvement in gross margin this quarter? A: Steven Downing, President and CEO, explained that the margin improvement is a result of ongoing efforts over the past two years, despite various headwinds. Key contributors include purchasing cost reductions, labor and overhead savings, and operational efficiencies. These improvements are expected to continue into the second half of the year as commodity pricing remains stable and operational efficiencies are maintained. Q: How is Gentex approaching the challenges in the China market, especially with tariffs and competition? A: Steven Downing noted that the primary challenge in China is the high counter-tariffs on exports from the US, which have led to customers reconsidering their use of Gentex products. Additionally, the profitability challenges faced by OEMs in China have resulted in decontenting. Gentex is exploring ways to grow in this market despite these challenges, but has not yet found a winning formula. Q: What is the outlook for large area devices, and could production be accelerated? A: Neil Boehm, CTO, stated that significant progress has been made in optimizing production lines for large area devices, with improvements in technical aspects like dimming speed and film durability. While the target is to bring this technology to production within 24 months, there is potential for acceleration depending on customer alignment and technical advancements. Q: What are the expectations for VOXX's operating expenses and potential synergies? A: Steven Downing indicated that there are opportunities for synergies and cost savings by integrating VOXX with Gentex, particularly in back-office functions and ERP systems. Over the next 12 to 18 months, the goal is to bring VOXX's operating expenses closer to Gentex's levels on a percentage of sales basis. Q: How is the Full Display Mirror (FDM) product performing, and what is driving the increased shipment expectations? A: Steven Downing highlighted that the increase in FDM shipment expectations is due to a combination of strong launch cadence and positive take rates. The company has gained confidence in meeting these numbers based on the strong performance in the first half of the year and continued commitment from OEMs to their product launch cycles. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Visteon Q2 net income falls amid slowed EV production and decrease in China demand
Visteon Q2 net income falls amid slowed EV production and decrease in China demand

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Visteon Q2 net income falls amid slowed EV production and decrease in China demand

Visteon Corp., a global supplier of electronics and vehicle connectivity parts, said second-quarter net income fell 8.45 percent to $65 million because of lower electric vehicle production and a decrease in demand from China customers. Revenue fell to $969 million, down $45 million from the second quarter of last year. 'Net sales of $969 million came in higher than we had anticipated at the beginning of the quarter, driven by strong demand for our digital content products, particularly in North America and Europe,' CEO Sachin Lawande said during the company's call with analysts July 24. 'Despite the robust sales performance, lower [battery management systems] sales in the U.S. and the ongoing market dynamics in China resulted in sales slightly underperforming customer vehicle production.' Sign up for Automotive News breaking news alerts and be the first to know when big news happens. Lawande said future sales will depend on how automakers react to the elimination of the U.S. EV tax credit, set to take effect Sept. 30. Visteon was able to emerge relatively unscathed by tariff costs that have affected other companies, as the vast majority of its products are compliant with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement currently not subject to tariffs. The company secured $2 billion in new business in the second quarter, bringing the year-to-date total to $3.9 billion. Visteon launched 21 products across eight automakers, with key products including a 25-inch display for the Audi Q3 platform in Europe and SmartCore domain controller programs for the Volvo EX30 electric crossover, Volvo construction vehicles and the Polestar 5. Visteon shares closed up 0.83 percent on July 24. Visteon, of Van Buren Township, Mich., ranks No. 59 on Automotive News' list of top 100 global suppliers, with $3.9 billion in parts sales to automakers in 2024. Send us a letter to the editor Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store