Tested: 2025 Mercedes-AMG E53 Is a Plug-In Hybrid That Rips
The 2025 E53 takes the turbocharged inline-six from the prior model but adds a new twin-scroll turbo that ups the boost from 16.0 to 21.8 psi, bringing the engine's output to 443 horsepower and 413 pound-feet of torque, gains of 14 horses and 29 pound-feet. That uprated six gets additional assistance from a 161-hp, 354-lb-ft electric motor integrated into the nine-speed automatic transmission. Total output rises to 604 ponies—one more than the previous E63, which has yet to return—and 553 pound-feet.
view exterior photos
Marc Urbano
|
Car and Driver
HIGHS: E63-adjacent performance, improved braking and cornering, useful EV range.
The E53 is an absolute ripper in a straight line, lunging to 60 mph in 3.3 seconds and hustling through the quarter-mile before the clock strikes 12 (11.6 seconds at 120 mph). That's only about a half-second behind the last top-dog, V-8-powered E63, as well as the lighter and more powerful C63, and nearly a second quicker than the previous E53. Plus, we prefer the E's smooth six to the C63's high-strung four-cylinder anyway. The E53 doesn't stop pulling until 174 mph, 43 mph higher than the last E53 we tested.
Braking and cornering grip improve as well, stopping from 70 mph in 154 feet and from 100 mph in 307 feet, and its Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires hang on for 0.94 g of skidpad stick. Keen-eyed students of the specifications panel will notice that the E53's 50-to-70 passing time has lengthened by over a second. That's because the engine is off in Comfort mode when nailing the throttle at 50 mph, and there's a delay before it wakes up. Selecting a more aggressive vehicle mode that forces the engine on will improve this stat.
view exterior photos
Marc Urbano
|
Car and Driver
The underlying E-class is already dynamically solid, one of the reasons we voted it on to our 2025 10Best Cars list, and the E53 builds on that excellent foundation. It's balanced and predictable pushing toward the handling limit, thanks to both proper chassis balance and communicative steering. Our biggest complaint is brake-pedal response, which blends regenerative braking before calling on the optional upsized rotors (carbon-ceramic in front) that are part of the $3150 AMG Dynamic Plus package, which also includes an electronically controlled limited-slip differential and active engine mounts. Although the braking performance is excellent, we were never quite sure what left-pedal response we were going to get with light inputs, as the brakes' behavior seemingly changes depending on drive mode and other real-time happenings.
LOWS: Flinty ride with a lot of tire noise, nonlinear brake pedal, way heavier than before.
Ride quality and interior noise are areas where the E53 takes an unfortunate step back from the luxuriously smooth and quiet E350 and E450. Impacts are sharp, and there's quite a bit of tire slap, particularly with the high tire pressures specified on the door-jamb placard (44 psi front, 51 psi rear). Lowering them by 15 psi to the low-load setting made the ride far more tolerable. The tire noise over our not perfectly smooth test surface is probably why our sound-level reading wasn't better than 72 decibels, way louder than the 67 we recorded in the E450. If the roads aren't pristine where you live, consider the standard 20-inch wheels rather than the optional 21s.
view interior Photos
Marc Urbano
|
Car and Driver
Then there's efficiency, something this plug-in hybrid should do better. We averaged a reasonable 24 MPGe overall and got 29 mpg in our 75-mph highway test loop, which beats its EPA highway figure by three mpg (although the previous E53 did even better at 32 mpg). That's after the 21-kWh battery pack is depleted, which takes 44 miles at 75 mph. As with other Mercedes plug-ins, the E53 handily beats its EPA electric range figure in our highway test.
The E53 also has sufficient electric-only thrust in stop-and-go traffic, which prevents us from having to constantly dip into combustion power to keep the pace. We found the E53 to use only second through sixth gears during electric operation, and the shifting is much smoother than in some PHEVs that, like the E53, have a motor upstream of the transmission. Although we appreciate the E53's impressive electric range, we don't quite understand the included DC charging capability, which is rare on PHEVs. We measured 23 minutes to charge the battery from empty to a 90 percent state of charge, which would gain only about 40 miles of EV range. Unless you're already planning to stop for a separate reason, we don't think this is a wise use of anyone's time.
view interior Photos
Marc Urbano
|
Car and Driver
The E53 starts at $89,150, some $17,150 more than the next-step-down E450 model, which gets a less powerful version of this turbocharged inline-six. Then again, Mercedes is not afraid of a lengthy options list, and the last E450 we tested rang in higher than this E53's starting point. There's still lots of room to climb on the E53, as our car had $20,650 in options, including multiple performance add-ons—the aforementioned 21-inch wheels and tires, brake upgrade, and limited-slip diff. Even the AMG-branded fuel cap costs $110 extra. As with the regular E-class, we'd skip the upgraded infotainment and its selfie-camera frivolity.
VERDICT: Inline-six plus electric motor equals massive performance gains.
Electric assist enables an impressive duality: The E53 is an upscale luxury sedan that can run mid-11-second quarter-miles, cover plenty of commuting miles electrically, and, even after the battery runs out, cruise along at nearly 30 mpg on the highway.
view exterior photos
Marc Urbano
|
Car and Driver
Specifications
Specifications
2025 Mercedes-AMG E53
Vehicle Type: front-engine, front-motor, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan
PRICE
Base/As Tested: $89,150/$109,800
Options: Pinnacle trim (head-up display, four-zone climate control, projection adaptive headlights), $4150; AMG Dynamic Plus package (AMG steering wheel, active engine mounts, electronic limited-slip rear differential, front carbon-ceramic brake rotors, 174-mph top speed limiter), $3150; black Nappa leather, $2990; Multicontour Seating package (ventilated and massaging front seats, heated front armrest), $2950; 21-inch forged-aluminum wheels and tires, $2600; Driver Assistance package (lane-keeping assist, steering assist, adaptive cruise), $1950; MBUX Superscreen package (larger center screen, front passenger screen, selfie camera), $1500; sun protection package (rear and rear side sunshades), $800; black microfiber headliner, $450; AMG fuel cap, $110
POWERTRAIN
turbocharged and intercooled DOHC 24-valve 3.0-liter inline-6, 443 hp, 413 lb-ft + AC motor, 161 hp, 354 lb-ft (combined output: 604 hp, 553 lb-ft; 21-kWh lithium-ion battery pack; 9.6-kW onboard charger
Transmission: 9-speed automatic
CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: multilink/multilink
Brakes, F/R: 15.4-in vented, cross-drilled, carbon-ceramic disc/14.2-in vented, cross-drilled disc
Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport 4S
F: 265/35ZR-21 (101Y) MO1A
R: HL295/30ZR-21 (105Y) MO1A
DIMENSIONS
Wheelbase: 116.6 in
Length: 194.9 in
Width: 76.7 in
Height: 57.9 in
Passenger Volume, F/R: 58/47 ft3
Trunk Volume: 13 ft3
Curb Weight: 5357 lb
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.3 sec
100 mph: 7.8 sec
1/4-Mile: 11.6 sec @ 120 mph
130 mph: 13.7 sec
150 mph: 19.1 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 4.1 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 3.0 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 4.3 sec
Top Speed (gov ltd): 174 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 154 ft
Braking, 100–0 mph: 307 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft Skidpad: 0.94 g
C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Observed: 24 MPGe
75-mph Highway Driving, EV/Hybrid Mode: 64 MPGe/29 mpg
75-mph Highway Range, EV/Hybrid mode: 44/500 mi
EPA FUEL ECONOMY
Combined/City/Highway: 23/21/26 mpg
Combined Gasoline + Electricity: 59 MPGe
EV Range: 42 mi
C/D TESTING EXPLAINED
Tested by
Dave VanderWerp
Director, Vehicle Testing
Dave VanderWerp has spent more than 20 years in the automotive industry, in varied roles from engineering to product consulting, and now leading Car and Driver's vehicle-testing efforts. Dave got his very lucky start at C/D by happening to submit an unsolicited resume at just the right time to land a part-time road warrior job when he was a student at the University of Michigan, where he immediately became enthralled with the world of automotive journalism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Verstappen doesn't think Horner's firing 'will matter at all' for his future at Red Bull
SPA-FRANCORCHAMPS, Belgium (AP) — Max Verstappen doesn't think Christian Horner's firing at Red Bull 'will matter at all" amid speculation that he could leave the team after this season. 'Life is unpredictable, but in general I'm very happy where I'm at and I hope — and it was still the target that we set out when we signed the new deal — that I would drive here until the end of my career,' Verstappen said Thursday at the Belgian Grand Prix. Verstappen has won the last four F1 titles while racing under Horner but sits third this year behind McLaren's Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris. 'The relationship between myself and Christian, that doesn't change,' Verstappen said. 'Of course, he's not here now during a race weekend, but he's still like a second family to me.' Verstappen's contract at Red Bull runs through 2028 but there have been indications that a performance-related clause could allow him to exit earlier. The exact details are not public. 'I don't think it will matter at all for my decision in the future, and the only thing that matters is that we work on the car and make it as fast as we can," Verstappen said. "The last one and a half years have not been what we want to be. Now we try and be more competitive this year a little bit, but for sure also with the new regulations.' Laurent Mekies of sister team Racing Bulls replaced Horner as team principal. 'I've had a few meetings with him already,' Verstappen said. 'I cannot say right now within two weeks of not even action on track that suddenly everything is different or better, but we are trying to be better and it's been good.' ___ AP auto racing:
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Verstappen doesn't think Horner's firing 'will matter at all' for his future at Red Bull
SPA-FRANCORCHAMPS, Belgium (AP) — Max Verstappen doesn't think Christian Horner's firing at Red Bull 'will matter at all' amid speculation that he could leave the team after this season. 'Life is unpredictable, but in general I'm very happy where I'm at and I hope — and it was still the target that we set out when we signed the new deal — that I would drive here until the end of my career,' Verstappen said Thursday at the Belgian Grand Prix. Verstappen has won the last four F1 titles while racing under Horner but sits third this year behind McLaren's Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris. 'The relationship between myself and Christian, that doesn't change,' Verstappen said. 'Of course, he's not here now during a race weekend, but he's still like a second family to me.' Verstappen's contract at Red Bull runs through 2028 but there have been indications that a performance-related clause could allow him to exit earlier. The exact details are not public. 'I don't think it will matter at all for my decision in the future, and the only thing that matters is that we work on the car and make it as fast as we can,' Verstappen said. 'The last one and a half years have not been what we want to be. Now we try and be more competitive this year a little bit, but for sure also with the new regulations.' Laurent Mekies of sister team Racing Bulls replaced Horner as team principal. 'I've had a few meetings with him already,' Verstappen said. 'I cannot say right now within two weeks of not even action on track that suddenly everything is different or better, but we are trying to be better and it's been good.' ___ AP auto racing:
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Safety Bodies Urge EU Not To Let US Vehicles Skirt Safety Rules
Independent European road safety bodies are concerned that the U.S. will skirt around the EU's ... More crash-safety regulations as part of any trade deal. Photo: Guido Kirchner/picture alliance via Getty Images. Europe's peak independent transport safety bodies have urged the European Union not to follow Japan's lead and allow U.S.-made vehicles to be sold to European customers without passing European safety regulations. The European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) has insisted that the EU should not allow American companies to sidestep EU safety regulations in the interests of lowered tariffs with the U.S. The Trump administration this week announced a trade deal with Japan, the centerpiece of which is a 15% reciprocal tariff on goods exported from Japan to the U.S. - which has American automakers concerned. But the fine print of the deal showed that American automakers would now be allowed to sell their vehicles into the Japanese market - without passing Japanese domestic crash or emissions regulations. News stories today hinted that the EU was preparing to sign a similar deal, allowing its automakers to export to the U.S. for a 15% tariff rather than building cars there, with the same circumvention of its crash-safety regulations, which are considered the toughest in the world. Autonomous emergency braking, ntelligent speed assistance and pedestrian protection are some ... More features mandated under EU law that are not mandatory in U.S. cars. Photo: Getty. In a statement released today, the ETSC expressed deep concern that the move could undermine years of crash-safety science and improvement and urged the EU to reject any such deal and insisted vehicle-safety standards were public protections, not trade barriers. 'We are deeply concerned by the trade deal reached this week by the governments of Japan and the United States, which reportedly removes domestic Japanese safety testing requirements for American-made vehicles exported to Japan,' the statement read. "This move sets a dangerous precedent - one that could undermine road safety in countries that have led the world in automotive safety regulation. 'Allowing vehicles to bypass proven national safety standards for the sake of trade expediency risks turning back the clock on decades of progress in reducing road deaths and serious injuries.' Signatories to the statement include the the Executive Director of the European Transport Safety Council (Antonio Avenoso), the Acting Director General of the FIA's Region 1 (Diogo Pinto), the Executive Director of Transport & Environment (William Todts) and the President of the International Federation of Pedestrians (Geert van Waeg). Others involved included leaders of the European Consumer Voice in Standardization, Cities and Regions for Transport Innovation and the European Cyclists' Federation. Leading the pushback were Michiel van Ratingen, the Secretary General of Euro NCAP (New Car Assessment Program) and the CEO of Global NCAP, Richard Woods. NCAP programs have been responsible for enormous steps forward in consumer awareness of vehicle crash safety and, more lately, in driver-assistance systems. 'Reports indicate that Japan will now allow U.S. vehicles to enter its market without being subject to Japan's specific crash testing or safety compliance requirements. We urge the European Union not to follow suit,' the statement continued. "Trade talks must not become a backdoor to regulatory weakening. Vehicle safety standards are not trade barriers; they are public protections backed by science and evidence. Weakening or bypassing them would lead to real and measurable harm - particularly to vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists. "The EU has consistently adopted some of the world's most effective vehicle safety regulations, culminating in the General Safety Regulation that is currently in force. These rules mandate technologies such as automated emergency braking, intelligent speed assistance, and pedestrian protection - none of which are currently required for vehicles sold in the U.S. 'We urge EU leaders to maintain this position, and to state clearly that no deal on vehicles will be accepted unless all products placed on the EU market meet existing European regulatory requirements in full.'While the Trump administration has insisted that its tariff war would bring jobs back to America, it was the Toyota Motor Corp whose shares boomed on the Japanese tariff announcement, rising 13% to a seven-month high yesterday. The Big Three U.S. automakers called for caution on the tariffs yesterday, with the head of the American Automotive Policy Council (which represents Ford, GM and Stellantis) insisting they would harm American manufacturers, rather than helping them. 'Any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no U.S. content than the tariff imposed on North American built vehicles with high U.S. content is a bad deal for U.S. industry and U.S. auto workers,' the council's head, Matt Blunt, said in a statement. Auto Drive America, which represents automakers who sell imported vehicles in the U.S., had a different take, and urged Trump to reach similar deals with the EU, Mexico and South Korea. 'We share President Trump's vision to make the U.S. the worldwide center of automotive production, and our member companies need stability in order to create an environment where we can maintain our competitive edge both in the U.S. and on the global stage,' Auto Drive America said in a statement. The Trade War has been a collection of ups and downs that have driven automakers to despair, given that all U.S.-built cars contain at least 15% foreign-made parts. The irony is that American cars have been sold tariff-free in Japan for decades, but have failed to garner interest due to being too large and inefficient for Japanese tastes. Now, they'll be at least 15% more expensive to Japanese buyers.
