
Controversial Gaza aid group vows to keep operating despite mass killings of Palestinians
Israeli and US officials say the new system, operated by American contractors, was set up to stop aid falling into the hands of Hamas militants and have called on the UN and other agencies to cooperate.
But the UN denies widespread diversion of aid from its long-established distribution networks and describes the foundation as a "death trap" that has "weaponised aid" for starving Gazans.
Since the GHF began operating on 27 May, after a 78-day Israeli total blockade on food, water and medicine into Gaza, international organisations estimate more than 600 Palestinians have been killed and more than 4,000 wounded near four GHF-operated aid distribution sites.
On Tuesday, 170 charities and humanitarian organisations, including Oxfam, Save the Children and Amnesty International, called for the GHF to be shut down, citing "routine" shootings and "repeated massacres in blatant disregard for international humanitarian law".
The next day, Swiss authorities moved to close the Geneva office of the foundation.
But Reverend Johnnie Moore, the American evangelical Christian pastor who is chair of the GHF, vowed that the sites would continue operating and indicated that other countries, including European nations, may soon pledge their support publicly.
"There are also European countries that have been involved largely behind the scenes – hopefully that will change in the future," Mr Moore told the BBC.
So far, the US State Department has announced €26m in funding.
But the initial funding came from "two anonymous European countries," Mr Moore said.
Shrouded in the fog of war, the GHF is now at the heart of a battle of narratives where Israeli authorities blame Hamas militants for the shooting of starving civilians and of running a propaganda campaign against the Israeli military.
But eyewitnesses, international NGOs and local rescuers say IDF troops have deployed tanks, machine guns and mortar fire against unarmed men, women and children.
This week, GHF whistleblowers came forward to reveal that US contractors used live bullets and stun grenades against Palestinians queuing for aid. The GHF dismissed the reports as false.
Israel has banned international media organisations from reporting in Gaza.
Last week, the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz published testimony of unnamed IDF soldiers who said they had been given orders to shoot at crowds of Palestinians queuing for aid, despite the civilians posing no threat.
One soldier described the approach routes to a GHF distribution site as a "killing field".
There are no crowd control measures or tear gas, the soldier told the newspaper, and troops dubbed the operation "Salted fish," the Israeli version of the children's game of "red light, green light" – an apparent reference to the Korean television programme Squid Game.
The IDF has admitted to firing "warning shots" on several occasions but denied accounts of deliberate shootings.
Following the Ha'aretz exposé, the Israeli military ordered an internal investigation.
But the report was denounced by the Israeli government.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz accused the paper of publishing a "blood libel".
"These are malicious falsehoods designed to defame the IDF, the most moral military in the world," they said in a joint statement.
However, the accounts given by the Israeli soldiers and GHF whistleblowers appear to corroborate testimony gathered by Budour Hassan, researcher on Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories at Amnesty International.
Eyewitnesses described arrows painted onto the asphalt ground, indicating the direction for people to walk as they approach the aid point, she told RTÉ News.
"We have tens of thousands of people [in these lines]," Ms Hassan said, "and the moment people stray from the line designated for them to pass through, the shooting starts".
People also described low-hovering drones and quadcopters that fire bullets into the crowds.
One case she documented was of a 17-year-old boy who went to look for his father who had previously gone missing near a GHF site.
"The boy was shot in the leg while looking for his father," she said.
Three eyewitnesses in separate interviews described hearing a voice transmitted in Arabic from a quadcopter, telling the crowds there was no aid available that day and to return home, followed by laughter, Ms Hassan said.
The aid hubs usually operate either very late at night or very early in the morning, she said.
"We're talking about from 12am to 2am - sometimes at 5am," she said and "[people] have to walk for more than four or five hours on foot, because there's no fuel, no transportation and roads are destroyed".
Eyewitnesses described scenes of chaos when the gates of the aid distribution sites opened as aid is accessed on a first-come, first-served basis, she said.
"Sometimes it's very dark at night, you can barely see what's next to you and they start chasing whatever scraps they can get," she said,"and then they start shooting".
"We have been talking to several families whose loved ones have been missing for over a month, since attempting to collect food from the GHF, and to this day, they have no idea where they are," she said.
"They never came back."
Had the GHF proved successful in delivering aid to the Palestinians humanely, humanitarian organisations would have been the first to congratulate them, Ms Hassan told RTÉ News.
This organisation has a clear role, she said, and that is to "do the dirty work, unfortunately, of the Israeli military".
But the US acting representative to the United Nations, John Kelley, told a meeting of the UN Security Council on Monday that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation "has committed to delivering aid consistent with humanitarian principles".
"And, contrary to what Hamas wants the world to believe, the GHF continues to provide vital food aid to Palestinian civilians in Gaza, distributing over 50 million meals as of June 29," he told the Security Council.
The head of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation also accused the United Nations and other international aid organisations of "sabotage" and of spreading "lies that originate in Hamas".
Reverend Johnnie Moore took over GHF after its previous boss Jake Wood resigned, citing concerns over the plan's adherence to "humanitarian principles".
"Respectable — I don't even call them respectable anymore — elite organisations that we would assume [have] good intent have just attacked us again and again," Mr Moore told a podcast produced by the Israel-based Misgav Institute for National Security.
"The whole time, we're like 'cooperate with us … teach us, let's find ways of solving problems together,'" to no avail," he said.
Mr Moore said he would have liked to collaborate with the World Food Programme and other UN bodies but that the UN had "been trying to sabotage us from the very beginning".
Asked by RTÉ News for a response to the accusation of sabotage, Stéphane Dujarric, the spokesperson for the UN Secretary General said "no - we've never told people not to go to their sites".
"Who are we that are fed to say to people who are hungry, don't do this?" he said.
"All we're asking is for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to operate within internationally accepted norms," Mr Dujarric told RTÉ News.
The UN does not have and is not asking for a monopoly on humanitarian aid distribution in Gaza, he said.
"There is enough work for everyone," Mr Dujarric said.
"All that we ask is that people operate with the minimum standards, that are globally accepted on humanitarian aid: impartiality, independence, [and] operate in a way that doesn't put the recipients at risk of being shot at," he added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
15 minutes ago
- The Journal
Who are the 8 companies that Ireland invests in that have links to illegal Israeli settlements?
INTERNATIONAL HEADLINES WERE made when Michael McGrath, Ireland's then Minister for Finance, announced the State's divestment from six companies with ties to illegal Israeli settlements. The decision, made in April 2024, was soon followed up by the Irish Strategic Investment Fund (ISIF). Up until that point, Ireland directly invested in 11 companies with ties to settlements in occupied Palestinian territories, and the State's divestment from six of these brought the total down to five. But through involvements in those five companies, the ISIF may still be investing millions in businesses with links to settlements that are considered illegal under international law. It also recently emerged through Parliamentary Questions that the State is also investing in another three more companies with ties to settlements indirectly, through its shares in hedge funds and other similar vehicles. It means that, according to the latest annual report by the fund (which was published at the end of 2023), the ISIF has possible holdings in eight companies linked to illegal Israeli settlements. Who are these companies and why are they linked to settler activity in occupied Palestine territory? Israeli buildings and apartments in the Jewish settlement Tzofim last month Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Investigations like this don't happen without your support… Impactful investigative reporting is powered by people like you. Support The Journal Investigates The UN database The 2024 decision by the ISIF to divest from six companies was informed by one key document: a United Nations database that names businesses and parent companies whose subsidiaries enable the continued existence of Israeli settlements. The UN list was first compiled in 2020 by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, and named 112 (mostly Israeli) companies that it deemed were involved in 'certain specified activities related to the Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem'. Companies on this list are deemed to be involved in any of 10 different activities that are deemed to facilitate the existence of Israeli settlements. This includes things like providing equipment and materials to help build settlements, the supply of equipment to demolish property, farmland and crops belonging to Palestinians, or providing surveillance technology to be used in settlements. The vast majority of companies on the list are listed for three reasons: The provision of services or utilities that support the ongoing existence of settlements, including transport; The provision of banking and financial services to support the development, expansion or maintenance of settlements (such as loans for housing and business); The use of natural resources within the occupied territories for business purposes, especially water and land. The database was updated in 2023 after 15 companies provided sufficient information to the UN to show that they had ceased involvement in the activity that got them on the list in 2020, or had changed their structure so that they were no longer linked to settlements. The database is broken down into four sections comprising: a list of the 15 companies that are no longer deemed to be linked to settlements; a list of 79 companies deemed to directly support Israeli settlements; a list of 17 businesses linked to settlements as parent companies; one company deemed to support settlements through its activity as a licensor or franchisor. Until 2024, Ireland directly invested €4.2 million in 11 of these companies before divesting from six of them, with that divestment comprising a total value of €2.95 million worth of holdings. The divestments were from five Israeli banks (Bank Hapoalim BM; Bank Leumi-le Israel BM; Israel Discount Bank Ltd; Mizrahi Tefahot Bank Ltd; First International Bank Ltd) and an Israeli supermarket chain called Rami Levi Chain Stores Ltd. At the time that the planned divestment was flagged in late 2023, Michael McGrath responded to criticism by Sinn Féin that the Government should divest from all companies with links to settlements by saying that the Government wanted to take a comprehensive approach to examining the issue. He explained that the UN has said its list is not complete, and thus suggested that it would require careful research by the ISIF to ensure that divestments were being made for the right reasons. There have been no divestment announcements regarding any of the other five companies since. Asked to confirm whether the investments in the five are still active, a spokesperson for the ISIF told The Journal Investigates that its 2023 annual report is the most up-to-date list of investments by the fund, and added that the fund's 2024 annual report will be published shortly. In April, it emerged in response to a Parliamentary Question by Sinn Féin's Matt Carthy that the ISIF also indirectly held investments – which are usually made via hedge funds or mutual funds – in three other companies on the UN database in 2023. It brought the overall number of investments held by the fund in companies on the database that year to eight (comprising five companies with direct investments and three with indirect investments only). By the end of 2023, the total value of these investments was more than €10 million. Airbnb – Accommodation Investments: ~€310,000 (direct) One of the few household names on the UN's list, Airbnb is also one of the better-known companies on the ISIF's portfolio. It is one of just eight non-Israeli companies that appear on the UN database for its direct involvement in a listed activity relating to settlements. Five of those businesses are online accommodation companies (more on the others below), all of which are deemed to provide 'services or utilities' because they list properties to rent in occupied Palestinian and Syrian territories. The only one of the five platforms that feature on the UN database which the ISIF did not invest in was the UK-based Opodo. The other four have been criticised by groups including Amnesty Intertnational for facilitating the normalisation of illegal settlements by advertising them as tourist destinations, and allowing settlers – and by extension, the websites themselves – to earn an income from land that was stolen from Palestinians. A sign advertises Israeli tourism near the Jewish settlement Psagot in the West Bank Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Using these websites to find accommodation in illegal settlements is not particularly difficult. The Journal Investigates searched Airbnb and found a number of current listings for properties that are based in settlements in the West Bank, occupied East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. As well as causing the company to feature on the UN's database, these properties – and Airbnb's former attempts to stop featuring them – have prompted a number of legal actions against the company. In Ireland, the pro-Palestine campaign group Sadaka (unsuccessfully) complained to Gardaí that Airbnb Ireland is guilty of money-laundering, because it argued that Israeli settlers are profiting from properties located in settlements that are deemed illegal under international law. Airbnb Ireland denies accusations of money laundering and gardaí made the decision not to investigate the complaint. Sadaka has since launched judicial review proceedings against that decision in the High Court. Advertisement In the US and Israel, Airbnb also found itself at the centre of a different legal challenge over its decision to remove around 200 listings for accommodation in West Bank settlements that it said 'are at the core of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians'. It settled four of those legal challenges and reversed its decision to remove the properties the following year. The company said at the time that it would instead donate all profits from its listings in the occupied West Bank to 'non-profit organisations dedicated to humanitarian aid that serve people in different parts of the world'. The Journal Investigates contacted Airbnb Inc for comment, but no response was received by the time of publication. Recent statements given by the company to other news outlets have pointed to its donation of profits from host activity in the West Bank to an international charity. Alstom SA – Transport Investments: ~€210,000 (direct) & ~€75,000 (indirect) Among the lesser-known names on the list, Alstom is a French multinational that is one of the world's largest rail companies. It manufactures rolling stock and other forms of rail infrastructure, including high-speed trains, metros, monorails and trams, as well as signalling. Among its most famous products are trains for France's high-speed intercity rail service, the TGV. The company previously worked in the energy and shipbuilding sectors, until it was given a €3.4 billion bailout by the French government in 2003 and sold its power and grid divisions to General Electric in 2014. In 2021, the company also acquired Bombardier Transportation, a rolling stock and rail transport manufacturer that was a subsidiary of Canadian aerospace manufacturer Bombardier. As a result of that acquisition, Alstom is listed as a parent company on Section C of the UN database for two reasons: for providing transport infrastructure that supports the existence of Israeli settlements, and because of its use of natural resources in occupied territories for business purposes. A tram on Jerusalem's Red Line Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Through Bombardier Transportation, Alstom became indirectly linked to the supply of rolling stock for the Tel Aviv to Jerusalem train line, which passes through parts of the occupied West Bank . The company told Le Monde in August 2024 that it 'participated in the maintenance of Jerusalem's light rail red line', which connects the city to occupied East Jerusalem, though it says this has ceased. A spokesperson for Alstom told The Journal Investigates that Alstom does not have any activity within or related to occupied Palestinian territories, and that the company has requested removal from the UN database when it is next updated. The government has previously said that the ISIF continues to monitor its holdings, and Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe has told the Dáil that it is unclear how much income companies like Alstom derive from the occupied territories. Altice – Communications Investments: ~€862,000 (indirect) Altice International is another of the less familiar businesses in whom the ISIF has invested. The company was founded by French-Israeli businessman Patrick Drahi in Luxembourg in 2001, and provides internet, phone and television services throughout Europe, the United States, Israel and within occupied Palestinian territories. It is listed on the UN database for the same two reasons as Alstom: providing a service that supports the existence of Israeli settlements, and because of its use of natural resources with the occupied territories. It is specifically listed in Section C because it is the parent company of the Israeli mobile phone and telecoms providers Hot Mobile and Hot Telecommunication Systems. Through both companies, settlers in the occupied West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights can access mobile phone services, cable television, landline phone services and broadband. Both companies are also listed separately in Section B of the UN database, though the ISIF does not invest in them. The Journal Investigates contacted Altice for comment, but no response was received by the time of publication. Last year, it referred similar queries by French newspaper Le Monde to a press release which said that the company 'respects local regulations'. Booking Holdings – Accommodation Investments: ~€920,000 (direct) & €691,768 (indirect) Like Airbnb, Dutch-based is another of the five online accommodation companies that feature on Section B of the database for listing properties to rent in the occupied territories. Its US parent company Booking Holdings, which the Irish government directly invests in, is also listed on Section C of the list for the same reason. As with Airbnb, The Journal Investigates browsed and was easily able to find hundreds of listings for hotels and guesthouses, including with names written in Hebrew, based in settlements in the West Bank, the Golan Heights and occupied East Jerusalem. Above the listings, the website features a notice that urges visitors to 'review any travel advisories provided by your government to make an informed decision about your stay in this area, which may be considered conflict-affected'. A sign points to Israeli tourists sites and activities in the Jewish settlement Shilo in the West Bank Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo However, there is no indication that the properties are based in or near illegal settlements. The company announced in September 2022 that it would start adding safety guidance to any listings in the occupied West Bank and occupied East Jerusalem, including guidance that the reservations are 'occupied'. It subsequently backtracked on this policy the following month after pressure from the Israeli government, and instead opted to use the term 'conflict-affected' in its warnings. In a statement to The Journal Investigates, a spokesperson for said the company believed it was 'not our place to decide where someone can or cannot travel'. They added that there are 'many parts of the world where there are conflicts or disputes' and that the company seeks to inform tourists by adding information or prompts to consult government advice in listings for areas that are 'disputed or impacted by conflict'. Delek Group Ltd – Transport Investments: ~€214,000 (indirect) The only Israeli company on the UN database that the Irish government invests in, energy conglomerate Delek Group is best-known in Israel as the operator of a chain of filling stations and convenience stores. The ISIF's investment in the company is indirect, which means that it did not directly buy shares or provide capital to Delek, but instead invested in it through an intermediary such as a fund or financial institution that handles investment decisions on Ireland's behalf. Sign up The Journal Investigates is dedicated to lifting the lid on how Ireland works. Our newsletter gives you an inside look at how we do this. Sign up here... Sign up .spinner{transform-origin:center;animation:spinner .75s infinite linear}@keyframes spinner{100%{transform:rotate(360deg)}} You are now signed up A search of Google Maps reveals that Delek Group operates at least two petrol stations near a settlement within the West Bank, as well as a handful of others near settlements in the Golan Heights. Delek petrol stations inside the West Bank and Golan Heights The UN database says the company features on the list for providing a service that supports settlements, including transport, as well as the use of natural resources for business purposes. Delek Group is also linked to the activities of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF): under a contract agreed in 2020, the IDF listed Delek as one of two companies whose petrol stations are allowed to be used by military vehicles to refuel. The Journal Investigates contacted Delek Group for comment, but no response was received by the time of publication and no other recent statements on the company's position about its activities in occupied Palestinian territories could be found. A Delek station in Katzrin in the Golan Heights. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Expedia Group – Accommodation Investments: ~€260,000 (direct) & ~€985,200 (indirect) Yet another of the five online accommodation platforms on Section B of the UN list, Expedia Group is the owner of a travel booking site under its own name, as well as a number of others including Trivago and Vrbo. It also features on the database because it lists properties to rent in settlements in occupied territories. The Journal Investigates searched on Expedia for accommodation for July and August and found dozens of listings based in settlements in the West Bank, parts of occupied East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights. Similar listings were also found via and Vrbo, including one in Efrat whose main image featured an Israeli flag hanging from the balcony of a property. None of these listings contained any reference to the fact they are located in illegal settlements. Expedia's only indication that properties may be based in settlements is via its search tool (which is also used on and Vrbo), where location data includes 'Israeli Settlement, Palestinian Territories' when a person specifically looks for properties in a settlement in the West Bank. However, the search function lists the Golan Heights as being part of Israel, and the location tag does not feature for properties based in settlements in occupied East Jerusalem. The Journal Investigates contacted Expedia Group for comment, but no response was received by the time of publication. The company has said that accommodation listings in occupied Palestinian territory have been clearly identified as Israeli settlements, and previously responded to criticism in 2019 saying it would 'continue to assess the type of information' it provided to tourists. Motorola Solutions – Security Investments: ~€700,000 (direct) & ~€3.9 million (indirect) Not to be confused with the telecoms company of the same name, with whom it split in 2011, Motorola Solutions specialises in security products and systems such as video equipment and command centre technology. Both Motorola Solutions Inc and its subsidiary, Motorola Solutions Israel, feature on the UN database for two reasons: providing services to support settlements; and for the supply of security services and equipment to companies that operate in settlements. The two companies are among just six that appear on the list for supplying security, and their systems feature throughout the occupied territories, along the separation wall in the West Bank, and at Israeli military bases. A CCTV camera over the wall separting Israel and the West Bank in Bethlehem Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo In 2012, a report by the UN Special Rapporteur for Palestine Richard Falk said that Motorola Solutions Israel supplied surveillance systems, radar detectors and mobile communications systems to settlements. 'Beyond sustaining the settlements, these security systems further limit the Palestinians' freedom of movement within their territory,' Falk said at the time. Human rights groups have also highlighted how the company's MotoEagle Wide Area Surveillance System – which uses radars and cameras to detect movements - has been used as a 'virtual fence system' in dozens of illegal settlements. The Journal Investigates contacted Motorola Solutions for comment, but no response was received by the time of publication. The company has previously told a number of outlets that it supports 'efforts in the region to find a peaseful resolution to the conflict'. Tripadvisor – Accommodation and tourism Investments: ~€1.07 million (direct) . US travel platform Tripadvisor is another of the five major tourism companies to feature on the UN database for listing accommodation in the occupied territories. Unlike the other tourism websites on this list, Tripadvisor provides a range of services on top of accommodation, including flight bookings, restaurant reservations, and user-generated content such as reviews and travel guides. The Journal Investigates was able to find a number of listings for holiday lettings via Trivago's website in settlements based in the West Bank and the Golan Heights. Once again, there was no indication that these properties are based in illegal settlements, aside from a disclaimer at the top of Tripadvisor's search which reads: 'Due to safety risks in parts of this area, travellers should review the latest guidance and information from government agencies.' Israeli settlers harvesting grapes in the West Bank to produce wine in the Jewish settlement Psagot Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo The website was also found to recommend activities and tours within settlements, including tours, shopping, a shooting range and a craft workshop in the region of Gush Etzion, wineries in Psagot and Shilo, and a farm in Kibutz Almog. Location information on the individual Tripadvisor pages for these activities states they are located in Israeli settlements. The Journal Investigates contacted Tripadvisor for comment, but no response was received by the time of publication. The company has previously said that it does not believe in withholding travel information from users, and aims to provide 'an apolitical, accurate and useful picture of all accommodations, restaurants and attractions'. The Journal Investigates Reporter: Stephen McDermott • Investigation Editor: Sinead O'Carroll • The Journal Investigates Editor: Maria Delane y • Social Media: Cliodhna Travers • Main Image Design: Lorcan O'Reilly Investigations like this don't happen without your support... Impactful investigative reporting is powered by people like you. Over 5,000 readers have already supported our mission with a monthly or one-off payment. Join them here: Support The Journal


Irish Examiner
26 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Fintan Drury: As genocide proceeds, Netanyahu is yet again being feted in Washington
And so it continues. Without so much as a blink of its legislative eye, without pause, be the White House home to a Democratic blue or a Republican red president — and certainly without the United States' political establishment having any interest in the behaviour of Israel — its prime minister will again be feted in Washington today. The risible notion that the US somehow still considers itself the leader of the 'free world' is beyond warped when it is so beholden to a state that has, for approaching two years, engaged in a genocide against the people of Palestine. Then US president Joe Biden with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office on July 25, 2024, the same month as the killing of 11 people at a football pitch in Majdal Shams. Picture: Susan Walsh/AP Almost a year ago, on July 24, 2024, Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the joint houses of the US Congress for the fourth time in his career. Medics' warning letter to Joe Biden That morning, US president Joe Biden and vice president Kamala Harris received a letter from 45 US medical professionals who had just returned from volunteering in Gaza. The letter was explicit. It warned Biden of what the support of his administration was enabling. They detailed how they'd witnessed scenes of unbearable cruelty to women and children, that every day, each of them treated children who'd been shot in the head and that many of their Palestinian peers had been captured by the IDF, were physically and mentally tortured before being dumped naked on the side of a road. The letter continued: Many told us they were subjected to mock executions and other forms of mistreatment and torture. Far too many of our healthcare colleagues told us they were simply waiting to die. That letter did not reveal anything new to the president and his inner circle. Residents rushing to help injured children after a rocket attack hit a football pitch in the Druze town of Majdal Shams in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights on Saturday, July 27, 2024. Picture: Hassan Shams/AP Earlier in July, a group of former and serving US officials had addressed similar concerns directly to him and, two months earlier, in May, Doctors Without Borders had warned that the administration's support of Israel ran counter to US law. Allowing for how much it already knew, the language of that letter from the group of doctors and nurses on the very day Netanyahu addressed Congress should still have shocked the US political establishment. It pulled no punches: Every day we continue supplying weapons and munitions to Israel is another day that women are shredded by our bombs and children are murdered with our bullets. The US political elite was not shocked. There were absentees, but when House Speaker Mike Johnson introduced Netanyahu, the majority of federal legislators competed with each other in whooping and hollering their support of him in a manner more befitting a rodeo than Capitol Hill. The opening of his address was revelatory. The Iran card, a constant throughout his career, was played when Netanyahu referenced the 'crisis' as "a clash between those who glorify death and those who sanctify life". Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu won warm applause from a joint meeting of Congress at the Capitol in Washington, last year. Picture: Julia Nikhinson/AP This man, who was leading a murderous campaign that had already killed tens of thousands of children, women, and men, was lecturing the world on the sanctity of life. They loved it. When he then addressed what he termed the ever-present threat of Iran and how Israel alone could protect the United States from doom, they loved it even more. US just accepts Israel's talking points I was in Lebanon that day. Just days later, 11 people were killed when rockets landed on a football pitch in Majdal Shams, a Druze village in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. Members of the Druze minority at a memorial ceremony on July 29, 2024, for children and teens killed in a rocket strike on a football pitch in the village of Majdal Shams, in the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights. Picture: Leo Correa/AP It was the prompt for Israel to widen its territorial ambition, its prime minister immediately claiming Hezbollah was responsible and warning, while still in the US, that it would 'pay a heavy price, the kind it has thus far not paid". The Biden administration rushed to assure Israel that its support was 'ironclad and unwavering against all Iran-backed threats, including Hezbollah". The US had again taken the Iran-bait. There was evidence that Israel's defence system had caused the missiles to land on Majdal Shams. ICLAD established that, between October 7, 2023, and late summer 2024, 82% of the rockets fired between Israel and Lebanon were fired by Israel. Whatever had caused the horror of Majdal Shams, Israel was the aggressor, not Lebanon. Israel's pretexts for aggression When Netanyahu visited the scene in the days after the incident, he was surrounded by villagers chanting that he was a war criminal. Still, he played America as he'd always done. Within weeks, Israel had declared war on Lebanon on the pretext that Iran was using Hezbollah as its proxy to trigger a regional conflict. 'Irish Examiner' columnist Sarah Harte interviewing Fintan Drury about his book 'Catastrophe: Nakba II' at Dubray Books on St Patrick's Street in Cork recently. Picture: David Creedon Its ground invasion weeks later was the sixth in almost 50 years; as always, Israel was the aggressor, not Lebanon. What followed last autumn was a faux-conflict where Israel successfully killed senior Hezbollah figures, but it also deployed unconventional tactics like exploding pagers that killed 46 Lebanese and put thousands of civilians at high risk. As the evidence of Israel as the aggressor grew, its opposition parties, unenthusiastic about Gaza, supported Netanyahu's targeting of Lebanon. Israeli president Herzog, too, so much so that he toured US and UK networks to applaud his government and, largely unchallenged, claimed the threat of Iran and Israel's determination to save the West from Islamism as due cause for the widening of Israel's territorial ambition. Israel killed 3,500 and and displaced 1.2m Lebanese people When, after a few months, this Israeli-manufactured conflict with Lebanon ended, more than 3,500 Lebanese had been killed, the great majority civilians, and 1.2 million had been displaced, the most significant forced movement of people for decades according to the UN. Israel suffered losses of 56, all of them soldiers. One year on, with a dangerously petulant Republican president in office in place of a dangerously senile Democrat, the bond between the US and Israel is as unbreakable as ever. Only weeks ago, Netanyahu and his Zionist collaborators in government took the region to the brink of all-out war. This time, Israel ignored Iran's proxies and went straight after the Islamic Republic itself. There was to be no elaborate subterfuge; it simply declared Iran a nuclear risk and purported to act in the interest of the West by carrying out raids on targets in Tehran and Istafan. 'Catastrophe: Nakba II' by Fintan Drury is published by Merrion Press at €18.99 There was no provocation, but to gain the approval of the US and most of Europe's 'strongmen', none other than the old trope of Israel as the bulwark against creeping Islamism, was needed. Iran does not have nuclear weapons; Israel does. Tomorrow's White House charade will be as we have come to expect — two oversized male egos fawning over each other and suggesting their alliance can save the world from Islam. Israel is not the West's friend; it is our foe. The state of Israel is the most significant single inhibitor to the United States, the EU, and Britain moving towards a realignment of our interests that would allow us to form relationships with nations and cultures that are dramatically different to our own. We need to acknowledge and respect those differences without feeling threatened to the point where we believe we need protection. It is, to paraphrase Robert Fisk in his last book, Night of Power, the West's craven genuflection to Israel that leaves it exposed. And so it continues. • Catastrophe: Nakba II by Fintan Drury (Merrion Press) is available in all bookshops, priced at €18.99.


RTÉ News
40 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Netanyahu meets Trump at White House amid Gaza ceasefire talks
US President Donald Trump hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for White House talks, while Israeli officials held indirect negotiations with Hamas aimed at securing a US-brokered Gaza ceasefire and hostage-release deal. Mr Netanyahu's visit follows Mr Trump's prediction, on the eve of their meeting, that such an agreement could be reached this week. Before heading to Washington, the Israeli leader said his discussions with Mr Trump could help advance negotiations underway in Qatar between Israel and the Palestinian militant group. It was President Trump's third face-to-face encounter with Mr Netanyahu since returning to office in January, and came just over two weeks after the president ordered the bombing of Iranian nuclear sites in support of Israeli air strikes. Mr Trump then helped arrange a ceasefire in the 12-day Israel-Iran war. He said he also wants to discuss with Mr Netanyahu the prospects for a "permanent deal" with Iran, Israel's regional arch-foe. It comes as Mr Netanyahu said he has nominated Mr Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, presenting the US president with a letter he sent to the prize committee. "He's forging peace as we speak, in one country, in one region after the other," Mr Netanyahu said. The two leaders were scheduled to have a private dinner instead of formal talks in the Oval Office, where the president usually greets visiting dignitaries. It was not immediately clear why Mr Trump was taking a lower-key approach with Mr Netanyahu this time. After arriving overnight in Washington, Mr Netanyahu met earlier with Mr Trump's Middle East special envoy Steve Witkoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in preparation for his talks with the president. He planned to visit the US Capitol today to see congressional leaders. Ahead of the visit, Mr Netanyahu told reporters he would thank Mr Trump for the US air strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, and said Israeli negotiators were driving for a deal on Gaza in Doha, Qatar's capital. Israeli officials also hope the outcome of the conflict with Iran will pave the way for normalisation of relations with more of its neighbours such as Lebanon, Syria and Saudi Arabia, another issue expected to be on the agenda with Mr Trump. Second day of Qatar talks Mr Witkoff, who played a major role in crafting the 60-day ceasefire proposal at the centre of the Qatar negotiations, will travel to Doha this week to join discussions there, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters. In a sign of continued gaps between the two sides, Palestinian sources said Israel's refusal to allow the free and safe entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza remains the main obstacle to progress in the indirect talks. Israel insists it is taking steps to get food into Gaza but seeks to prevent militants from diverting supplies. On the second day of negotiations, mediators hosted one round and talks were expected to resume in the evening, the Palestinian sources told Reuters. The US-backed proposal envisages a phased release of hostages, Israeli troop withdrawals from parts of Gaza and discussions on ending the war entirely. Hamas has long demanded a final end to the war before it would free remaining hostages; Israel has insisted it would not agree to halt fighting until all hostages are released and Hamas dismantled. Mr Trump told reporters last week that he would be "very firm" with Mr Netanyahu on the need for a speedy Gaza deal and that the Israeli leader also wanted to end the war. Some of Mr Netanyahu's hard line coalition partners oppose halting military operations but, with Israelis having become increasingly weary of the Gaza war, his government is expected to back a ceasefire if he can secure acceptable terms. A ceasefire at the start of this year collapsed in March, and talks to revive it have so far been fruitless. Meanwhile, Israel has intensified its military campaign in Gaza and sharply restricted food distribution. Gazans were watching closely for any sign of a breakthrough. "I ask God almighty that the negotiating delegation or the mediators pressure with all their strength to solve this issue, because it has totally become unbearable," said Abu Suleiman Qadoum, a displaced resident of Gaza city. The Gaza war erupted when Hamas attacked southern Israel in October 2023, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages. Some 50 hostages remain in Gaza, with 20 believed to be alive. Israel's retaliatory war in Gaza has killed over 57,000 Palestinians, according to the enclave's health ministry. Most of Gaza's population has been displaced by the war and nearly half a million people are facing famine within months, according to United Nations estimates. Mr Trump has been strongly supportive of Mr Netanyahu, even wading into domestic Israeli politics last month by lashing out at prosecutors over a corruption trial against the Israeli leader on bribery, fraud and breach-of-trust charges that Mr Netanyahu denies.