Diplomatic immunity! Trump appoints loudmouth Aussie ex-local councillor as US envoy to Malaysia
Trump certainly took the Alpha Male seriously, appointing Adams to the board of the Woodrow Wilson Centre during his first term, and making him an official campaign surrogate during the 2024 election.
And now, Adams is off to Kuala Lumpur. How his often lewd online persona is going to fly in Muslim-majority Malaysia is anyone's guess. He might give the concept of diplomatic immunity a workout before long.
Jayne, set match
Jayne Hrdlicka 's treasured time as chair of Tennis Australia will draw to a close at year's end.
But there are still treats to be had – such as an invitation to attend Wimbledon centre court and sit in the Royal Box within the orbit of Queen Camilla. Hrdlicka ascended to that most hallowed hospitality ground on Wednesday.
The All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club's Royal Box is the most exclusive hospitality zone in global tennis, seating about 85 people, as this newspaper has reported.
There are only two ways to get in: a) an invite from the All England club's chair, Debbie Jevans, or b) a royal bloodline.
On Wednesday, Hrdlicka lucked in: Queen Camilla made an unexpected visit to the tournament.
The hospitality enclosure attracted global headlines after cameras filmed actor Hugh Grant, who attended with his wife, Anna, dozing in his seat, mere minutes after speaking with the Queen.
Loading
Another guest was Australia's High Commissioner, His Excellency Professor The Honourable Stephen Smith, who brought along Aled Miles, chief executive of digital company Intellistack, who once had Smith on his podcast as a guest.
Also present were ex-UK prime minister Sir John Major and wife Dame Norma.
We checked in with Tennis Australia who told us that the chairs of the Grand Slam tournaments are 'traditionally' invited to the Royal Box.
It was back in October 2024 when CBD reported Hrdlicka's third term on the board would finish at the end of this year.
In December, at the organisation's annual general meeting, 'senior business leader and strategist' Chris Harrop will become chair and gain the keys to the O lounge.
O, Tennis Australia's prestigious private hospitality suite in Rod Laver Arena that leads directly to the best seats on centre court, is where Hrdlicka held her own court for so many years.
On January 1, Hrdlicka starts as chief executive of Endeavour, owner of Dan Murphy's, BWS and a pub chain, which has more than 30,000 employees.
Hrdlicka will earn annual salary of $2 million, with short-term and long-term incentives totalling $7 million.
'Endeavour Group has much to play for,' Hrdlicka said when her job was announced in April.
As always, tennis was on her mind.
State versus mate
The rugby league State of Origin decider resulted in an all-too-familiar Blues (that's the NSW team) choking at the hands of the Maroons who simply tried harder.
High above the action on the turf, the biggest game in town played out at Accor Stadium's version of the Royal Box, where the King of Sydney Peter V'landys (technically chairman of the Australian Rugby League Commission and Racing NSW chief executive) sat beside Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Or rather, Albanese sat next to V'landys.
Last year, Albo signed a deal to bring an NRL expansion team to Papua New Guinea in an act of footy diplomacy to counter Chinese influence that was the subject of furious lobbying by V'landys. His new Labor mate, NSW Premier Chris Minns, was a notable absence from the box, the devout Doggies fan prioritising family over footy (huh?) and enjoying a holiday in New Zealand.
Meanwhile, Queensland Liberal National man of the people, Premier David Crisafulli, Instagrammed the heck out of the event.
Back in the king's court, federal Opposition Leader Sussan 'I'm here with my tall skinny mate' Ley, mingled with Liberal prime minister emeritus John Howard, still sporting that massive bruise on his eye we first told you about months ago. Ley was fresh from revelations she had once quoted the 'skinny mate' line while waving a gun at a male bushie who had once laid down next to her outback sleeping bag – clearly not with the intent to discuss quota policies for female MPs.
Loading
News Corp boss Michael Miller stepped out with a huge new white beard, serving Castaway and eccentric tech guru vibes.
One jumping for joy spectator was ex-Queensland premier turned Rugby League commissioner Peter Beattie. Stout Queensland loyalist Beattie, along with his wife, Heather, now calls Sydney's Balmain home. Funny old world, sometimes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Matthew McConaughey praised for sweet Kate gesture at Wimbledon
IN LONDON Matthew McConaughey has been praised for his sweet gesture to the Princess of Wales during her arrival at Wimbledon over the weekend. After a video was posted online of Kate and Prince William arriving in the Royal Box for the Men's Singles Final, eagle-eyed fans spotted the Oscar winner jumping up from his seat to give them a standing ovation. The royal couple's two eldest children, Prince George, 11, and Princess Charlotte, 10, joined them to watch the match between Spain's Carlos Alcaraz and Italy's Jannik Sinner on Sunday. McConaughey's act sparked praise among royal watchers, who described him as a 'lovely southern gentleman'. 'Real class,' one wrote in a comment under the clip. Another person added: 'Matthew has always been a class act.' The Wales' and McConaughey were joined by other high-profile figures including Nicole Kidman, Paul Mescal and Anna Wintour in the exclusive Royal Box. Aussie tennis (and TV) royalty Lleyton and Bec Hewitt were also spotted sitting behind Kate and Charlotte. Kate, who is patron of the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, also received a standing ovation when she attended the Women's Singles Final the day before, which saw Poland's Iga Swiatek trump US player Amanda Anisimova. It follows a busy few weeks for the princess, who joined the King, Queen and William in hosting the French president and his wife for a state visit at Windsor Castle last week, which included a lavish state banquet. She also joined other senior royals for the Trooping the Colour parade and Order of the Garter service last month. Back in January, Kate announced she was in remission from cancer, which she had first publicly disclosed last March. She then released an emotional video message in September, featuring personal footage of herself with William and their three children, which explained the challenges they'd all been privately battling – but also revealed she had completed her treatment.

The Age
9 hours ago
- The Age
‘Confected furore', ‘trust-breaker': Readers debate donation from Jillian Segal's husband
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. SPECIAL ENVOY Australia's antisemitism envoy, Jillian Segal, has every right to be appalled by the selective outrage over her husband's donation to the Advance lobby group. Her husband, John Roth, has no capacity in the Australian government. If instead, he had donated money to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), the silence of his critics would be deafening. Apparently, Roth has no right to donate to the ″wrong″ cause. It is besides the point anyway. Does anyone seriously believe that Segal's vital work would be compromised by a donation by her husband? Anyone who believes that is effectively saying women have no capacity to form their own, independent opinions. If nothing else, this confected ″furore″ is an embarrassing insult to women everywhere. Jeremy Browne, Ripponlea Loss of trust in Segal's role Jillian Segal's husband gave $50,000 to help fund the Advance lobby group's vision of Australia that is narrow, brittle, and hostile to dissent. She says she had no involvement in the donation, but her role as Australia's special envoy on antisemitism is not just any role. Segal has been entrusted with leading a national conversation about hate, about how we live together, about where the lines of decency and bigotry are drawn. That task demands moral clarity—and public trust. Even if her husband wrote the cheque alone, the proximity matters. Judgment is shaped by what we accept, what we ignore, and what we quietly let pass. This is not a question of guilt. It is a question of trust. And that trust, I'm afraid, is already broken. Nadia Green, Sunshine North Segal must declare views on Advance Minister for Home Affairs Tony Burke says in relation to Jillian Segal's husband making donations to the far right organisation Advance that 'claims that she should not be held responsible for her husband's actions are outdated' (″ Burke Slams Advance ″ 15/7). However, just claiming she didn't know is not good enough. We need to hear Jillian Segal herself condemn the racism of the Advance agenda. As a special envoy dealing with racism, such a condemnation is long overdue. To have any credibility in her role she must be unequivocal in condemning all forms of racism, not just antisemitism. Bruce Francis, Brunswick Muslim and Jewish communities need own envoy Your correspondent does not have her facts correct, (Letters ″Another envoy needed″ 15/7. Indigenous Australians have a federal minister representing them in cabinet. This minister has a huge budget and a department of 1200 public servants receiving and seeking and providing advice to the government on the needs for the Indigenous community. The Muslim and Jewish communities now have special separate envoys giving recommendations to the government on how to stop hate speech, incitement and terrorist acts against their respective communities. Ian Fayman, Malvern East Israel does not get special treatment All those who oppose antisemitism envoy, Jillian Segal's recommendation to apply the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism claim the definition prevents or unduly restricts criticism of Israel. However, the definition itself specifically states that 'criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic'. Those complaining about the definition want to criticise Israel in a way they wouldn't criticise any other country. Perhaps they should explain why they want to apply such double standards to the Jewish state. Mark Kessel, Caulfield North THE FORUM Trump's war calendar Re Ukraine war: Donald Trump's ″I will have it solved within one day″ has proven to be a seismic miscalculation, notwithstanding his later comment that his promise was made in″jest″. Now, thankfully (after 175 days in office), he appears to be taking the thrust of his promise seriously. His commitment to supply Ukraine with Patriot missiles for Ukraine's defence and his threats of secondary tariffs on Russia are certainly steps in the right direction. They say a week is a long time in politics. Trump is finding ″a day″ is a long time in warfare and peacemaking. Brian Marshall, Ashburton Men of steel Maureen Dowd (″ Why Donald Trump's good-looking cabinet can't stop making him look bad ″, 15/7) relates how White House staff posted a meme of Donald Trump as the 'Man of Steel″. Perhaps the staff got it unintentionally correct; we 85 year-old or more European immigrants, especially those of us from Eastern Europe, know who the Man of Steel was – the USSR dictator Stalin. Richard Crago, Burwood East

Sydney Morning Herald
13 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Segal's report lays a trap for Albanese. How he responds will have profound implications
In December 2024, when the ABC was confronted with the relentless lobbying by some members of a WhatsApp group calling itself Lawyers for Israel and demanding the sacking of its broadcaster, Antoinette Lattouf, it had a clear choice. It could have responded by rejecting their demands to illegally sack Lattouf. Instead, as Justice Darryl Rangiah of the Federal Court of Australia recently found, the ABC capitulated and embarked on a $2 million campaign to defend the indefensible. In its ruling, the court made clear that sacking an employee who expressed criticisms of the Israeli government's treatment of Palestinians was illegal because Australian laws protected our right to express political opinion. Last week, antisemitism envoy Jillian Segal walked into a press conference with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and laid a similar trap for the government. Her 16-page report contained recommendations that undermine the rule of law by seeking to bypass the institutions which protect our democracy: the parliament, the courts, tribunals and the Australian Human Rights Commission. All forms of racism and antisemitism are already unlawful in Australia, and hate speech laws have been toughened in response to an increase in antisemitic incidents in the last year. Loading When the issue has been put to the test, existing laws have worked, too. A court found this month that a Sydney Muslim cleric's lectures were unlawful because they were 'fundamentally racist and antisemitic'. The court also correctly determined that 'political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, is not by its nature, criticism of Jews in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity' and therefore was not antisemitic or unlawful. One of the key recommendations in Segal's report is that all levels of government, institutions and 'regulatory bodies' adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's controversial definition of antisemitism. In part, this definition states that it is antisemitic to target the state of Israel and/or claim the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavour. Adopting the IHRA definition would render the opinions of many protesters in Israel as antisemitic, let alone those here in Australia. It is completely at odds with the Federal Court's recent finding and our existing anti-discrimination laws.