From photos to fitness data, recording our lives is changing how our brains work
Apart from taking up valuable space, experts have another reason why you should think twice before whipping your phone out to capture that special moment.
Taking photos might actually make it harder to recall the very thing you want to remember.
Over the past two decades, researchers have been teasing out how a steep increase in "lifelogging" influences how we think, act and make sense of our past.
Julia Soares, who studies the impact of digital technologies on memory at Mississippi State University, has identified several areas where our digital devices affect how our brain works.
An overstuffed photo app might be just the beginning of a profound cognitive shift.
Lifelogging involves digitally recording aspects of your daily life: things like photos as well as fitness, travel and health metrics.
Dr Soares says such data collection may have benefit — a number of studies have found it can help support memory recall and quality of life — but it depends on how intentional someone is about analysing and reviewing their data.
"I have a couple of studies where we've found that taking photos can impair memory," Dr Soares says.
"So your memory specifically for objects that you photographed compared to objects that you don't photograph."
This phenomenon — called the "photo-taking-impairment effect" — has been demonstrated multiple times in a particular type of experiment.
Imagine two groups of people at the entrance to an art museum, about to wander through. One group is instructed to take photographs of the artworks they see, while the other group is told to take no photographs at all.
Once they're done walking through the museum, the two groups are quizzed about visual details of the artworks they've looked at, like whether the Moon in Vincent Van Gogh's The Starry Night is full or a crescent.
In multiple different versions of this experiment, scientists have observed that people who don't take photos tend to have better recall for what they've seen. They get more questions right about the visual details of the artworks compared to the photo-taking group.
It's not fully clear why those who take more photographs in these experiments tend to remember less, Dr Soares says.
Down the track, when photographs are used as a prompt to help people remember, they can be a "highly effective memory cue".
But it may be that in the moment, the act of taking the photograph distracts somebody from fully capturing the event in their internal memory.
This research has influenced how Dr Soares herself takes photographs.
"I do try to make sure that when I take a photo, I'm in the mindset of thinking, 'How is this going to cue my retrieval later on?' It should be something that I want to remember alongside the photo."
It's not just our visual memories that we're outsourcing by snapping them on our phones.
There are also fitness and biometric tracking, voice memos, emails, travel data and chat logs.
Dr Soares says if all this information isn't used deliberately, people can just end up with pointless piles of data.
"If you're not paying attention to the data, then it just collects up."
But used well, lifelogging can also be a powerful too help us make positive behaviour changes.
"You can come to some really useful insights by collecting all of this data," she says.
Kunal Kalro began recording his health data more than a decade ago after his father died from heart disease.
Kunal started out tracking his daily step count and workouts using a fitness band. Before long he was also collecting heart rate variability, temperature, sleep quality and even macronutrient intake.
"It helps you change your behaviour patterns," says the 38-year-old, who still tracks his health data today.
"If you're having a few nights of poor sleep because you're watching a TV show late at night … you see your daily scores fall.
He says tracking his data has helped him uncover patterns of behaviour he wasn't aware of, like the relationship between his coffee consumption and sleep.
"I can notice and I will see the difference in my heart rate variability overnight when I'm sleeping if I've had caffeine after midday versus before," he says.
"For me anyway, it's less about memory recall, but more about making something a little bit more consciously present. I feel way more in sync with my body."
Lifelogging on our smart devices isn't the only way our seemingly instant access to digital technology is changing our ability to think and recall.
Dr Soares has also looked at what we think we know, which is influenced by search engines such as Google and the ability to save and search up information on our devices.
She says there is evidence to show that people can overestimate what they know after using the internet, and fail to distinguish between the knowledge in their head and the knowledge that they can access with search engines.
In some experiments, researchers found search engine use during a quiz led to an increase in "cognitive self-esteem" — an increased belief in one's own ability to remember information and perform well on future quizzes.
"Even if they ask them really carefully, 'What do you know? What is in your brain?', people can sometimes overestimate what they know as a result of using internet search," Dr Soares says.
Despite the evidence that snapping photos can negatively affect our memories, and that having Google in our pocket is distorting our sense of our own knowledge, Dr Soares doesn't think you should throw your phone away.
"These digital technologies that take off clearly have some type of utility for people," she says.
"But [we need to] inform people about the ways to effectively use these technologies alongside their cognitive system."
Listen to the full episode of Brain Rot about life-logging and its effects, and follow the podcast for more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
8 hours ago
- ABC News
Jurassic World Rebirth uses Jonathan Bailey and Scarlett Johansson to try reinvigorating our dinosaur awe
It's become surprisingly easy to take dinosaurs for granted. After the past decade of overstuffed Jurassic World movies, the thrill of beholding the prehistoric beasts on screen — once considered a revolutionary feat of VFX artistry in the original Jurassic Park — no longer holds the same allure. What: A team of mercenaries travel to an abandoned dinosaur research facility to track down several legendary beasts. Starring: Scarlett Johansson, Jonathan Bailey, Mahershala Ali Directed by: Gareth Edwards Where: In cinemas now Likely to make you feel: Like we could've waited longer to revive this franchise When we meet Dr Henry Loomis (Jonathan Bailey, Wicked) — the latest sexy scientist of the Jurassic Park universe — he's in the middle of closing up his dinosaur exhibit in a New York museum. Ever since dinosaurs were unleashed onto the earth's unsuspecting civilian population in Jurassic World Dominion, the general public has tired of their presence, and his expertise has gone unappreciated. Outside, the presence of a sleeping dino is a mere commuting headache. If the box office success of the Jurassic World trilogy is any indicator, the real world has yet to succumb to dino-fatigue, even as the films' critical reception reached disastrous new lows for the franchise. Dinosaurs roamed the earth for 167 million years, as Dr Loomis is eager to remind us; they've endured worse than bad reviews. Still, fending off extinction is no easy task. Jurassic World Rebirth now faces the task of instilling audiences with a fresh sense of awe after its predecessor maxed out the franchise's high-concept potential. Like the surprise introduction of The New Avengers in Thunderbolts, this rebooted entry is populated by a less-than-reputable cast of B-grade thugs, including Zora (Scarlett Johansson), an ex-Blackwater mercenary looking for a fresh start, and her go-to bootlegger Duncan (Mahershala Ali, Moonlight). Along with Dr Loomis, the crew is enlisted to extract DNA from three legendary dinosaur species (on sea, air and land), whose unique biological makeup may hold the key to curing heart disease — and an unbeatable payday for the unscrupulous Big Pharma exec (Rupert Friend, Companion) who tags along for the ride. (The anti-greed ethos of these films is more than a little amusing, considering just how thoroughly Michael Crichton's source material has been regurgitated over seven instalments.) On the boat ride to its primary destination — an abandoned research facility for the original Jurassic Park, teeming with rejected genetic experiments — the team picks up a family stranded in the middle of the ocean, whose members (a father, two daughters, and a pampered boyfriend) offer up some semblance of humanity in comparison to the glib, generically traumatised operatives of the main team. Screenwriter David Koepp, who penned the original Jurassic Park screenplay (and this year's excellent Black Bag), litters Rebirth's dialogue with listless quips that embarrass an otherwise capable cast. Johansson comes off as surprisingly wooden, possibly exhausted; presumably there are only so many more times one can volley crisp retorts with a nonchalant affect after spending a decade in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. With so much of pop culture now dedicated to imitating Spielberg (and/or stretching his greatest hits well past their sell-by date), it's hard not to yearn for the real thing, especially as Rebirth is seemingly configured more as a love letter to his greatest hits than to Jurassic Park itself. The protracted ocean voyage charts the treacherous waters of Jaws, but with less ingenuity than recent aquatic scenes in Avatar 2 and Godzilla Minus One. A stand-out set-piece in the vein of Indiana Jones sees the crack team scale a precipitous cliff face to infiltrate an ancient temple, with winged dinosaurs circling nearby. If you thought Temple of Doom stretched the limits of what an inflatable dinghy could do, just wait until you see how it fares against the teeth of a T. rex. Director Gareth Edwards (The Creator) at least manages to outstrip most other imitators with his keenness for stripped-back suspense, occasionally harking back to the time when the ripples in a glass of water were just as terrifying as coming face-to-face with a Velociraptor. Jurassic World Rebirth may not evoke the glassy-eyed wonder of its forebears, but it modestly succeeds as a thrill ride through less-than-inspired terrain. It's a shame that more of Edwards' own style doesn't come through. The tactility, momentous scale and severe tone of his previous work (a highlight being his 2014 Godzilla reboot, which finally made the beloved kaiju stick with American audiences) has been glossed over for a generic, crowd-pleasing tone. Credit where it's due, the film still looks appreciably better than the prior Jurassic World films, trading queasy digital excess for a more restrained, analogue approach that flourishes in the forbidding expanse of its tropical locale. Apart from their obsessive recycling of ideas (how many more dilapidated labs must we visit?) the core problem with these movies is that they are far too expensive, and far too respectable. Jurassic World Rebirth teases mutant dinosaur freaks, but its primary deviant — a T. rex hybrid with a couple of extra limbs and a xenomorph-inspired skull — still lacks the enduring fear factor of a pack of beady-eyed raptors. An A-grade schlock director like Larry Cohen would never let this kind of opportunity go to waste. Though it suggests a new beginning, the film itself shares too much of its genetic code with the original Jurassic Park. If that's all this series can offer, then maybe it should let these poor creatures rest — but another meteor will strike before that happens. Jurassic World Rebirth is now showing in cinemas.

News.com.au
8 hours ago
- News.com.au
Break it Down: HyTerra discovers a Kansas helium high
HyTerra has discovered unexpectedly high levels of helium in a well now being converted for appraisal in the US state of Kansas.

News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
Review: Was the newest Jurassic Park sequel really necessary?
With the welcome return of those stomping, chomping dinosaurs and another hitout for AI avenger M3GAN, there's scares aplenty on the big screen this week JURASSIC WORLD REBIRTH (M) Starring: Scarlett Johansson, Mahershala Ali, Rupert Friend. Same fight, with more convincing bite With Jurassic World Rebirth we reach instalment number seven in the lucrative series spawned by Steven Spielberg's 1993 dinos-on-the-rampage classic Jurassic Park. We know enough by now to acknowledge that first blockbuster breakthrough will never be bettered. The formula that keeps serving up humans as possible snacks for prehistoric predators just doesn't allow the wiggle room for expansion or variation. Therefore the filmmakers are compelled to relentlessly double-down on the authenticity of the action scenes. And it is in this one department that Rebirth truly excels. When the stompin' and the chompin' commences, you will be daunted and intimidated in thoroughly convincing fashion. Just bear in mind that aside from an early dino-centric feast – after a scientist ill-advisedly drops a chocolate-bar wrapper in his lab – there is something of a wait to be endured before Rebirth gets busy with the good stuff. Much of the first hour is spent mulching copious amounts of set-up and exposition as we get to know who will be edging towards and running from the gnarly stars of the show. The most prominent players in proceedings are Zora (Scarlett Johansson) and Duncan (Mahershala Ali), two good buddies who have parlayed a past in military special-ops into a shady side-hustle doing the same kind of thing for major corporations. Zora, Duncan and a mixed bag of lesser lights gradually find themselves on a secret assignment to an equatorial zone that (after the ravages posed by climate change) is now the only place on the planet that dinosaurs can feasibly survive. The principal task of this mob is to extract select strains of dino DNA from three different species so that a dodgy pharmaceutical boss (Rupert Friend) can roll out a suite of miracle drugs for billions of bucks. To be frank, the storylines traversed by Rebirth (which are the work of Jurassic Park's original screenwriter David Koepp) lead nowhere in particular, and do not exactly have you rooting for the survival or otherwise of any one character. However, once the fates conspire to have the entire cast stranded on a remote island, director Garth Edwards lets rip with a steady supply of truly exciting set pieces awash with both genuine aggression and vivid atmosphere. On a technical level, the lighting and cinematography standards on display during the special-effects sequences are next-level great, and deserve to be witnessed on the biggest screen available. Jurassic Park Rebirth is in cinemas now M3GAN 2.0 (MA15+) General release The babysitting bot who turned out to be an AI-powered equivalent of Annabelle is back. Only this time – like Arnie In Terminator 2 – the once-dreaded doll M3GAN just might be fighting for a greater good. If you remember the first movie (a major hit a few years ago), you will recall that M3GAN's sinister software was eventually deactivated on account of sustained bad behaviour and a body count that hit triple figures. Now she has been reluctantly switched on once more by her long-suffering programmer Gemma (Alison Williams) to combat the deadly threat posed by the new AI assassin AMELIA (aka Autonomous Military Engagement Logistics and Infiltration Android). Some long-overdue coding modifications for the title character means she can renew her over-protective relationship with Gemma's teenage niece Cady (Violet McGraw). This sequel is at its strongest when playing strictly for ridiculous laughs instead of creepy chills, and for the most part, its desire to jauntily jolt its audience is effectively completed. Not sure they should go to the well a third time, however. RIVIERA REVENGE (PG) Selected cinemas While it is getting continually more difficult getting a Hollywood comedy made and released these days, the love of the French for laughs with a lightness of touch remains undiminished. Yes, most of them are as unsurprising as they are inoffensive. Nevertheless, the better ones pay their way courtesy of good casting chemistry and attractive production. So proves to be the case for Riviera Revenge, a concoction as fluffy as a souffle, but not without its bursts of sweetly addictive flavour. Veteran star Andre Dussolier plays Francois, a retired military general who finds himself waging a whole new battle late in life when he suspects his beloved wife of 40 years (a wonderful Sabine Azema) may once have had an affair with a mutual friend (Thierry Lhermitte). Some decent chuckles are earned the right way here thanks largely to the lively lead performers, and the sun-dappled coastline of the Cote D'Azur looks as stunning as ever.