logo
Philip Green tried to overturn my parliamentary privilege – he has so far failed, and good thing too

Philip Green tried to overturn my parliamentary privilege – he has so far failed, and good thing too

The Guardian10-04-2025
Knight of the Realm and business tycoon Sir Philip Green spends a lot of money on expensive lawyers.
First, he took out an injunction in 2018 to block the media from mentioning him over complaints from his employees at Arcadia Group, overwhelmingly women, about bullying and abusive conduct, behaviour which he categorically denied.
But that failed when I named him as the person making the injunction on 25 October 2018 in the House of Lords, under a form of legal immunity known as parliamentary privilege - whereupon his lawyers tried to get me sanctioned by the parliamentary standards commissioner. That failed too when his complaint was roundly dismissed.
Green's latest action was to instruct lawyers to appeal to the European court of human rights to overturn the concept of parliamentary privilege in Britain, claiming that my comments had circumvented court orders around the injunction, violated his privacy and violated his right to fair trial. That also failed when the Strasbourg court this week sensibly ruled it was not a matter for them. (This was a chamber decision, so there are still three months during which he could ask for the case to be referred to the grand chamber of the court for a final ruling.)
If he were to succeed in overriding parliamentary privilege in this case, that would be seismic for human rights and freedom of speech.
It dates back at least to parliament's finest historic moment in January 1642, when King Charles I and his soldiers invaded the House of Commons to arrest five MPs for treason after their speeches criticising his rule.
The Speaker courageously defied him while MPs chanted 'Privilege! Privilege!' – a cry taken up in the streets by the people of London. In 1689, the right to free speech in parliament was entrenched in the English Bill of Rights.
It means that MPs or peers when speaking in parliament cannot be sued and what they say can be reported in the media without the rich or powerful being able to suppress it with legal injunctions or asset seizures.
Despite outrage from the legal establishment, it was used in 1955 to name for example, the notorious spy Kim Philby. It was vindicated again in 1978 when MPs used it to expose the bogus secrecy of 'Colonel B', wrongly (as judges later found) given anonymity by a court to bolster an oppressive official secrets case against journalists.
When the director of public prosecutions immediately threatened the press with prosecution, newspapers, led by the Times, defied him.
That said, parliamentary privilege should be used very responsibly and sparingly. In my 34 years as a parliamentarian, I had used it just twice before naming Green.
In January 2000, as a Foreign Office minister, and using British intelligence, I named traffickers selling arms for 'blood diamonds' fuelling wars in Africa. They went out of business. Their chief 'merchant of death', Putin crony Victor Bout was subsequently imprisoned.
In 2017 in the Lords, I named British-based global corporations alleged to be complicit in former president Jacob Zuma's corrupt activities in South Africa.
These examples are living proof of parliamentary sovereignty – irrespective of the wishes of the executive, the powerful, and the wealthy, and even rulings by the legal establishment when it prevents the publication of allegations of misconduct – as the courts did initially over the Green case.
I acted for moral reasons and was not second-guessing or criticising the judiciary when I further used parliamentary privilege to name Green and share details of allegations against him in the House of Lords on 23 May 2019 - Green repeated that 'to the extent that it is suggested that I have been guilty of unlawful sexual or racist behaviour, I categorically and wholly deny these allegations'.
I did this partly because Green's employees had signed non-disclosure agreements, when such NDAs are meant to ensure the sanctity of confidential commercial matters, not to hide allegations of abuse.
Film tycoon Harvey Weinstein used NDAs to silence his sexual harassment victims, as did organisers of the Presidents Club dinner in London in January 2018, when 130 women were required to sign agreements in a bid to stop any details of harassment, groping and propositioning going public.
Former Conservative cabinet minister Maria Miller, when chair of the women and equalities committee, said that the case had 'thrown a spotlight on the way NDAs can be used repeatedly to cover up alleged wrongdoing'.
Because of Charles I's attacks, the monarch is still barred from entering the House of Commons. Parliamentary privilege is an absolute free speech right entrenched in the law, a fundamental part of Britain's constitution and a part of the rule of law itself.
It should not be whittled away by allowing judges, at the behest of the powerful or wealthy, to override the sovereignty of parliament.
Peter Hain was the Labour MP for Neath from 1991 to 2015 and secretary of state for Northern Ireland from 2005 to 2007
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Compulsory voting would help reengage Scots who have tuned out from politics
Compulsory voting would help reengage Scots who have tuned out from politics

Daily Record

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Compulsory voting would help reengage Scots who have tuned out from politics

Writing for the Record, Labour peer George Foulkes argues that when over a third of the eligible population is regularly not voting, the system is clearly broken. As a longstanding supporter of democratic reform, I am pleased to see our Labour Government will be implementing long-overdue improvements to our voting system, through the imminent Elections Bill. ‌ Amongst these reforms, I am particularly supportive of their plans to lower the voting age in UK General elections to 16 – a move which has proven to be both popular and successful in Scotland. If you are considered mature enough to serve in our armed forces and pay taxes, you are clearly entitled to a vote. ‌ I am also happy to see movement towards embracing automatic registration. This is a work in progress for the UK Government, with the devolved nations once again leading the charge. ‌ However, setting these reforms aside for a moment, there is an outstanding issue which every party in the United Kingdom is currently failing to fully address – turnout. In elections up and down the country, we consistently struggle to reach a turnout of 65 per cent or higher. In fact, the turnout in 2024 dropped far lower than this already paltry figure, plunging below 60 per cent When over a third of the eligible population is regularly not voting, the system is clearly broken. ‌ Low turnout is a particularly harmful issue because, as numerous academic studies have found, it is self-fulfilling. This means that, as an increasing swathe of the population tunes out of politics, politicians increasingly position themselves in alignment with the voters who do vote, and will continue to turn out. So those who feel left out are increasingly left out and alienated, and those who vote gain more and more sway over policy direction. ‌ As a result our politics is at risk of becoming divided, alienating the poor and favouring the privileged , so it will no longer truly represent the many, catering instead to a diminishing number of politically engaged, privileged elites. That isn't to say that only the rich vote, but the data shows that it is minorities, the young and the under privileged who are increasingly failing to. Lowering the voting age can partially help address this problem, as it will temporarily boost the younger demographic which is currently so under-represented. ‌ However it does not effectively address the issue of disengagement, and I believe only one reform can: compulsory voting. We know it works – Australia introduced compulsory voting back in the 1920s, and their turnout has consistently exceeded 90 per cent ever since. Even more impressively, at their latest election in 2025, youth enrollment was in the 80 per cent plus range, as was indigenous enrolment By comparison, youth (especially 16-24) and ethnic minority groups are significantly underrepresented in our electoral register, with only around 60 per cent of British 20-24 year olds correctly registered, as of 2022. So it seems like a blindingly obvious solution to our looming democratic crisis - however, I know that many are still opposed, or feel uncomfortable with the concept of 'forcing' people to vote. ‌ The reality is that a compulsory system, such as the one that operates in Australia, would not actually compel you to vote. Instead a small (~£20) fine would act as an encouragement to vote and, even then, you would still have the option to cast a spoiled ballot and not be penalised. Furthermore, the idea that government should never compel us or, in this case, gently encourage us to do something, is out of touch with the world in which we live. We are 'forced' to pay our taxes, and to follow the various other laws which have been designed to keep us safe and society functional, like seat belt wearing and smoking in public places. The real issue here is one of perception: voting, in the minds of many, has become a luxury rather than a duty. Of course, there are legitimate obstructions to performing this duty, such as illness, but leniency, under these specific circumstances, can be built into the system. There is really no down-side, which is why I am strongly in favour of introducing compulsory voting to the UK, and have given my full backing to the Constitution Society's new campaign around this very issue. I am pleased to say I am not the only politician who will be supporting them: an increasing number recognise that this is a critical and much-needed reform, including Antonia Bance, Labour MP for Tipton and Wednesbury, Adam Price of Plaid Cymru, former Welsh First Minister Mark Drakeford, Baroness Royall, Lords Hain, and Lord Watson of Wyre Forest, former Labour Deputy Leader. I expect the campaign to grow in strength, as the benefits of compulsory voting become more widely known and understood, and it is our intention to set up an APPG sometime over the next few months to help co-ordinate across both Houses.

ANDREW NEIL: Trump has left Ursula von der Leyen's career hanging by a thread – and shown our Brexit negotiators were truly pathetic
ANDREW NEIL: Trump has left Ursula von der Leyen's career hanging by a thread – and shown our Brexit negotiators were truly pathetic

Daily Mail​

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

ANDREW NEIL: Trump has left Ursula von der Leyen's career hanging by a thread – and shown our Brexit negotiators were truly pathetic

When news first broke on Sunday that the United States and the European Union had agreed a new trade deal, all we had to go on were the broad assurances of President Trump and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, that it was a historic triumph for both sides. 'The greatest deal ever made,' claimed Trump, with characteristic understatement.

Sarina Wiegman urges more investment in women's game at Downing Street reception
Sarina Wiegman urges more investment in women's game at Downing Street reception

South Wales Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Sarina Wiegman urges more investment in women's game at Downing Street reception

After successfully defending their European crown with a penalty shoot-out victory over Spain in the tournament's showpiece in Basel on Sunday evening, the England team flew home to attend a reception hosted by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and sports minister Stephanie Peacock. The team arrived just before 7pm, with Number 10 decorated for the occasion with St George's flags draped over windows and bunting along the railings. As Wiegman rose to speak to those gathered in the Downing Street garden she joked that 'this is different from standing next to a pitch'. She added: 'I have to make my apologies (for giving) you lots of heart attacks. You all made it through and we made it through and that's why we're here now. 'The team is just incredible, we won the Euros but making the final, we're already legendary, what the team has done and the team behind the team. 'Thank you so much for having us here. It's very, very special to be here and to be in this very nice garden with the way you set it up with all these pictures, it makes it more special, it's the first moment it sinks in a little bit because it was surreal what happened last night.' Wiegman, speaking a few hours before the Government announced a new package of measures to boost access to grassroots football, used the moment to call for further investment in the game. 'This incredible team won the Euros and then straightaway sent a letter to you, the Government, asking for attention and asking for access to football for all girls,' Wiegman said. 'Steps have been taken but we're not done yet, we have to keep moving forward and we need a little bit more. 'I heard we need to change some things about taxes…I think we have that confirmation tonight. So let's move forward. 'We need some more investment. We're not there yet. In England we're up there but England needs to stay the trailblazer, it needs to be the big example. The players first but also the FA, the clubs, the Government, the country, the fans – let's keep being the trailblazers.' In her own speech, Rayner congratulated Wiegman's team on defending their title 'with grit, with determination and with skill'. 'You roared, and I know I wasn't the only one roaring with you,' Rayner said. Chloe Kelly scored the decisive penalty for England in the shoot-out after goalkeeper Hannah Hampton made two outstanding saves. The game had gone to extra time and spot-kicks after Alessia Russo cancelled out the opener from Arsenal team-mate Mariona Caldentey as it finished 1-1 following extra time. Welcome home, #Lionesses! 👋 — Lionesses (@Lionesses) July 28, 2025 After almost a month of competition in Switzerland, the team's plane branded with the word 'home' touched down at Southend Airport on Monday afternoon. In a post on X, the team shared a photo of the Euros trophy draped in an England flag on a seat on the plane. Holding the trophy, captain Leah Williamson was first to step off the plane alongside Wiegman. Outside the airport, crowds were lined up to welcome the team and the trophy back home. A homecoming open-top bus parade follows in central London on Tuesday, where there will be a procession along The Mall and the celebration will finish with a staged ceremony at the Queen Victoria Memorial in front of Buckingham Palace. A trip to the Palace or Windsor Castle may be on the cards for the winning squad as it is understood possible plans for a reception in the autumn are being explored by royal aides. Defender Jess Carter has not joined her team-mates for the celebrations in London as she has returned to the United States ahead of Gotham FC's NWSL match against the Chicago Stars on Saturday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store