EU state calls for sanctions on Israelis
The trade relationship between the 27‑member bloc and Israel, worth €68 billion ($73 billion), is set up under an agreement signed in 1995. The EU is Israel's largest commercial partner, accounting for roughly one-third of its international trade.
Speaking to reporters ahead of the EU foreign ministers' meeting with in Brussels on Monday, Albares called for the immediate suspension of the agreement, saying 'this is the time for action' and that continued violations of human rights in Gaza demanded a firm European response.
'If the Association Agreement is based on human rights, it's the most normal thing that we suspend the Association Agreement immediately today,' he stated.
The minister said he would formally request the suspension of the deal, 'an embargo on selling weapons to Israel, and the list of people that are being sanctioned to everyone who wants to be a spoiler of the two-state solution.'
Spain's demands reflect broader unease across Europe. The UK, France, and the Netherlands have also considered slapping trade and arms restrictions on Israel in recent months. In May, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said there was 'a strong majority' among member states in favor of reviewing the agreement.
The pivot from one of the Jewish state's staunchest supporters comes amid a worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza and growing frustration in Brussels over Israel's actions.
According to a leaked document from the EU foreign policy service seen by The Guardian ahead of the Monday meeting, Brussels has found 'indications' that Israel is breaching its human rights obligations under Article 2 of the EU-Israel association agreement.
The internal paper, prepared for EU foreign ministers, references assessments from the International Court of Justice, the UN human rights office, and other UN bodies. It notes that the findings do not represent 'a value judgment' by EU officials.
The review was reportedly requested last month by 17 member states led by the Netherlands amid mounting concern over Israel's actions in Gaza. EU officials were asked to assess whether Israel's conduct aligns with 'respect for human rights and democratic principles.'
The move followed Israel's blockade and military campaign in Gaza, launched in response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack that left 1,200 people dead and resulted in the abduction of over 200 hostages.
Since then, more than 55,600 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in Gaza, according to the enclave's health ministry. Israel has also faced longstanding accusations of war crimes for obstructing humanitarian aid, including a total blockade imposed after the October attacks and ongoing restrictions on food, fuel, and medicine entering the enclave.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia should abolish diaspora organizations
Ethnic diaspora organizations should be banned in Russia, Marina Akhmedova, a member of the presidential human rights сouncil, has said amid a flare-up with neighboring Azerbaijan. Tensions between Moscow and Baku spiked after police raids last week on an alleged organized crime group in the Russian city of Ekaterinburg. The group is composed of Russian nationals of Azerbaijani origin and is accused of a string of gang assassinations and contract killings dating back to the early 2000s. Two elderly male suspects died during the police operation, with the preliminary assessment indicating that at least one of them suffered heart failure. The incident sparked outrage in Baku, which accused Moscow of deliberately targeting people of Azerbaijani descent and claimed that the two men had been murdered while in custody. On Tuesday, the head of the Azerbaijani diaspora in Ekaterinburg, Shakhin Shikhlinski, was detained in relation to the case but was swiftly released after questioning, according to his son. Akhmedova reacted to the development in a post on Telegram on Wednesday, saying 'it is time to abolish diasporas' in Russia. 'These are illegal entities. No government agency should have anything to do with them,' she wrote. All such organizations must be prohibited, not only the Azerbaijani diaspora, the human rights expert insisted. According to the results of a 2002 census, more than 621,040 people of Azerbaijani descent are currently living in Russia. On Monday, Azerbaijani police raided the offices of Sputnik Azerbaijan, with a court in Baku ordering a four-month pre-trial detention of two Russian journalists who hold senior positions in the news agency. The Azerbaijani authorities claimed that the outlet has been operating 'through illegal financing' – allegations which Sputnik has dismissed as 'absurd.' Baku has also arrested eight other Russian nationals, accusing them of being members of a group involved in cybercrime and the trafficking of drugs from Iran. Russian media, however, have identified two of the suspects as IT specialists, while describing another one as a tourist. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharov said on Wednesday that the Azerbaijani authorities have not yet provided Moscow's consular staff with access to the detained Russians. She advised Russian citizens who are planning trips to Azerbaijan to 'take the current situation into account.' Zakharova also noted that there is a 'strategic partnership' between Moscow and Baku, urging Azerbaijan to take steps aimed at returning bilateral ties to the proper level.
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump should ‘knock the f*** out' of EU disinfo law – ex-State Dept official
US President Donald Trump must urgently threaten to 'knock... the f out' of a new EU law on disinformation that obliges online platforms and search engines to restrict content deemed 'fake news' by the bloc, ex-State dept official Mike Benz has insisted. The formerly voluntary Code of Conduct on Disinformation, which was integrated into the Digital Services Act (DSA) by Brussels earlier this year, became mandatory as of July 1. Under the law, major online platforms and search engines, mostly owned by US tech firms, are obliged to follow EU content rules or face penalties. Benz, who worked on cybersecurity and internet policy at the State Department during Trump's first term, took to X on Wednesday to warn that the likes of YouTube, X, Facebook, and Google would 'now get whipped by huge EU fines.' The Code of Conduct on Disinformation, which he described as a 'Global Censorship Law,' had been the 'secret weapon' of Brussels for a long time, but is now 'fully unleashed,' the head of the self-described pro-free speech website Foundation For Freedom Online said. Trump must 'act urgently, top priority, to apply massive diplomatic, trade, aid and security muscle, every tool in the hardball diplomacy toolkit – up to and including our participation in NATO – to knock this law the f out,' he insisted. The ONLY way to stop it is for the Trump White House to ACT URGENTLY, TOP PRIORITY, to apply MASSIVE diplomatic, trade, aid & security muscle, every tool in the hardball diplomacy toolkit - up to and including our participation in NATO - to KNOCK THIS LAW THE F OUT. The disinformation code came into effect amid trade talks between Washington and Brussels, with Trump threatening to impose 50% tariffs on all imports from the EU if no deal is reached by the July 9 deadline. The European Commission's tech chief, Henna Virkkunen, said on Monday that content moderation and digital competition are 'not part of trade negotiations from our side' because they are 'based on our European values.'
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
Can Trump's Gazprombank gesture really change US-Russia relations?
Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto has announced that US President Donald Trump has lifted financial sanctions on Russia that had blocked Rosatom from continuing construction of the Paks Nuclear Power Plant 2 in Hungary. Although the Biden administration's sanctions late last year were formally directed at Moscow, Budapest arguably suffered the most, since the two new reactor units at Paks were viewed as vital for Hungary's long-term energy independence. (The first four units were built during the Soviet period.) A year ago, Hungary managed to have the Paks-2 project removed from the European Union's sanctions list, but at significant political cost. Nevertheless, the Democratic administration in Washington remained unyielding – which Budapest saw as a political vendetta for its outspoken support of Trump. Against this backdrop, the current US decision to ease sanctions on Gazprombank looks far more like a favor to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban than to Russian President Vladimir Putin. It also indirectly benefits French firms participating in the Paks-2 project. The move has rekindled a faint hope that Russian-US relations might see a thaw. Yet overall, there has been precious little positive news from Washington. The State Department recently postponed a scheduled meeting on removing 'irritants' from bilateral ties. Trump has shown no enthusiasm for Moscow's offer to mediate between Iran and Israel. And American officials continue to criticize Russia's 'hard' stance on a Ukrainian settlement. Could the Gazprombank decision signal a new phase of improvement in Russian-US relations? Might it foreshadow similar easing for other Russian financial institutions? Could there even be a revival of bilateral high-tech cooperation? One would like to answer these questions with optimism – but the evidence simply is not there. Moscow and Washington continue to have fundamentally different approaches to restoring normal relations, and that affects the entire nature of their dialogue. Russia's position could be described as systemic. In Moscow's view, great-power relations must be treated holistically, with progress across political, military, economic, diplomatic, and humanitarian areas all developing in parallel. The Kremlin believes that unless movement happens on all these fronts together, genuine normalization will remain out of reach, even if such an approach takes time and patience. For the 47th president of the United States, foreign policy appears more transactional: A series of short-term deals with everyone from NATO members to Mexico, Canada, Iran, or China. Each partner gets its own checklist – Iran is asked to abandon nuclear ambitions, China to accept trade tariffs, NATO Europeans to raise defense spending. Trump is not a man to wait. He does not want to tout a big deal years down the line, or even by the next midterm elections. He wants results today, or at the latest tomorrow. In Russia's case, Washington is eyeing a single, momentous deal: An agreement to end the armed confrontation with Ukraine. Trump seems to have little concept of what a lasting political settlement would involve, let alone how a future European security system might look. His overriding priority is to secure a temporary ceasefire at all costs, so he can declare victory where his predecessor, Joe Biden, fell short. In Trump's eyes, this historic Ukraine deal would overshadow any long-term, painstaking effort to rebuild a proper Russian-US dialogue. Meanwhile, in other areas, Moscow is simply not ready to engage in the one-sided give-and-take Washington expects. This was underscored by America's European NATO partners, who nearly unanimously agreed to boost their defense spending to an unprecedented 5% of GDP by 2035. Likewise, Kiev has shown willingness to meet US expectations by offering up its natural resources wholesale to American corporations. At the same time, it must be remembered that Trump is almost alone in his desire to reestablish a functional dialogue with Moscow. Most of his own administration views Russia with indifference or hostility, keeping it down on the priority list. Moreover, the deeply entrenched anti-Russian consensus that has dominated Washington for decades remains solidly in place. There is no powerful political or business lobby in the US today pushing for a new reset with Russia. Trump will continue to face pressure from the right. Even as the Gazprombank sanctions decision emerged, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told ABC News that Trump had already given the green light on Capitol Hill to launch a new package of anti-Russian measures – something Graham has been pushing for months. Whether the senator is speaking from fact or wishful thinking, it is far too soon for Moscow to relax. In short, the Russian-US relationship remains a rollercoaster. Occasional encouraging signals – like the easing of sanctions on a single bank – should not be misread as a sea change. One can hope for a broader normalization, but for now the outlook is uncertain. Moscow's systemic, steady approach still clashes with Washington's transactional, headline-driven instincts. Unless both sides find a way to bridge these philosophies, the hope of a truly stable Russian-US partnership will remain fragile at best. This article was first published by Izvestia newspaper, and was translated and edited by the RT team.
