
Streaming release date announced for 'The Accountant 2'
Show Caption
Hide Caption
'Bring Her Back' trailer: Sally Hawkins is a secretive foster mom
A foster mother (Sally Hawkins) takes in two siblings after the death of their father but also harbors a dark secret in horror movie "Bring Her Back."
"The Accountant 2" is coming to Prime Video very soon.
The sequel, starring Ben Affleck, is slated to hit the streaming service platform on June 5, Amazon announced.
The action thriller sequel follows Affleck's character, a highly skilled CPA with autism named Christian Wolff, as he "works" the murder case of a former associate. Wolff recruits his younger mercenary brother Braxton (Jon Bernthal) to help him find the killer.
"Christian Wolff has a talent for solving complex problems," according to a logline provided by Amazon MGM Studios. "When an old acquaintance is murdered, leaving behind a cryptic message to 'find the accountant,' Wolff is compelled to solve the case."
"The Accountant 2" garnered ★★½ out of four stars from USA TODAY movie reviewer Brian Truitt.
"Take Ben Affleck's original 'The Accountant,' subtract the math, add country line dancing and multiply it by two brothers. The result is a crime thriller sequel that's not as winning but still mostly satisfying," Truitt wrote.
Here's what to know about the highly anticipated sequel, including how to watch it.
How to watch 'The Accountant 2'
You can stream "The Accountant 2" on Prime Video starting Thursday, June 5. The first movie is also available on Prime Video.
Prime Video subscriptions are included with an Amazon Prime membership, which start at $14.99 a month, or $139 a year if you prefer to pay annually. (Discounted membership options for young adults and qualifying government-assistance recipients are available.) Customers can purchase or rent a selection of media titles from Prime Video without having an Amazon Prime or Prime Video account.
'The Accountant 2' review: Sequel subtracts the math, doubles down on bro love
Where does 'The Accountant' sequel pick up from?
"The Accountant 2," like most sequels, picks up where the original movie left off.
This sequel follows Christian Wolff as he attempts to solve the murder of a former associate, who left behind a cryptic message to 'find the accountant.' Christian gets his estranged brother Braxton Wolff to help him out.
The brothers, who work closely with U.S. Treasury Deputy Director Marybeth Medina (Cynthia Addai-Robinson) uncover a deadly conspiracy and become targets of a ruthless network of killers who will stop at nothing to keep their secrets buried, per to the film's official logline.
'The Accountant 2' cast
A handful of actors, including Affleck, reprise their original roles in "The Accountant 2." Characters include:
Ben Affleck as Christian "Chris" Wolff
Jon Bernthal as Braxton Wolff
J. K. Simmons as Raymond King
Cynthia Addai-Robinson as Marybeth Medina
Daniella Pineda, Allison Robertson, Andrew Howard, Robert Morgan and Grant Harvey also star in the film.
Watch 'The Accountant 2' trailer
We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn't influence our coverage.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Engadget
7 minutes ago
- Engadget
The HORI Piranha Plant camera for Switch 2 is on sale for only $40
Even though the Switch 2 basically just came out, we're already starting to see discounts on some of its accessories. One of the more charming peripherals, the HORI Piranha Plant camera, is on sale right now for only $40. That's $20 off and a record-low price. It's a good deal for anyone who wants to take advantage of the Switch 2's camera functionality in games like Mario Kart World and that recently-released campfire sim. This was designed specifically for Nintendo's new console, so it's a plug-and-play affair. It's actually cheaper than the official Switch 2 camera with this sale and it looks a whole lot cooler. It's a Piranha Plant from the Mario franchise. We called it a "work of art" upon encountering the device and that holds true today. This is 33 percent off and a record-low price. $40 at Amazon This thing is not only stylish, resembling an Amiibo more than a camera, but it's downright useful. The pot the Piranha Plant sits in functions as both a stand and USB extension for the device. The plant itself detaches from the pot, so the camera can be used in portable mode by popping it into the USB port at the top of the console. There's also a built-in privacy shutter. Just close the plant's mouth to obscure the lens. The actual camera specs here aren't going to win any awards, with a frame rate of 30FPS and a resolution of 640 x 480p. However, that's more than enough to capture footage of your floating head to accompany your kart as it races through the Mushroom Kingdom. Follow @EngadgetDeals on X for the latest tech deals and buying advice .


Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
Amazon Stock Falls 8%. Why, Jassy To-Dos, Why To Skip $AMZN Shares
Amazon stock fell 8.3% following a mixed second quarter report, according to CNBC. Why? Although Amazon's retail business performed well, investors expressed disappointment with the growth pace of Amazon Web Services – which grew more slowly than Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud. In a conference call, analysts expressed frustration with CEO Andy Jassy's explanations for AWS's relatively slow growth. Amazon's fundamental problem is its failure to adapt to the competitive imperatives of the generative AI age, as I described in my book Brain Rush. This age has been propelled by two companies – OpenAI which supplied the fast-growing ChatGPT and Nvidia, the designer of AI chips for speeding the training and operation of AI chatbots. Amazon seems to be applying the strategy it used to create the cloud services industry to one where it seems struggling to catch up. More specifically, unlike Microsoft and Google – which have access to proprietary integrated AI chatbots (ChatGPT and Gemini, respectively) – AWS's strategy of handing off to developers the task of choosing and integrating individual computing services requires more technical expertise – thereby slowing adoption. To grow faster, Jassey ought to consider three possible strategies: Since Jassy helped build AWS and has yet to demonstrate a compelling vision for competing with faster growing rivals, I am skeptical of whether Amazon will be able to leapfrog these rivals. 'Our conviction that AI will change every customer experience is starting to play out," Jassy said in an earnings release. 'Our AI progress across the board continues to improve our customer experiences, speed of innovation, operational efficiency, and business growth, and I'm excited for what lies ahead,' he added. I have requested comment from Amazon and will update this post if I receive a response. Amazon's Mixed Second Quarter Results Amazon's second quarter results combined above expectations sales and earnings with a mixed forecast for the future combined with a shaky explanation for why AWS is growing more slowly in the age of AI. Here are the key numbers: Second quarter 2025 sales: $167.7 billion – up 13% and $5.5 billion above the FactSet consensus, according to Investor's Business Daily. Amazon and its hyperscaler rivals – such as Google and Meta – are increasing their capital expenditures. For example, Amazon is boosting capital expenditures 42% to $118 billion in 2025 – while Google estimates 2025 capex of $85 billion while Meta forecast $69 billion in 2025 capex, according to CNBC. While formal return on investment information is not available for these hefty capital expenditures, investors are using growth rates as a proxy for ROI. Since AWS is growing at roughly half the rate of Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud, investors see a problem with AWS's strategy. Jassy's responses to analyst questions about AWS' relatively slow growth. He said the faster-growing second ranked rival was '65%' the size of AWS, highlighted Microsoft's security woes – notably the hacking of SharePoint, and suggested it was 'early days' in AI, according to the Q2 earnings conference call transcript. These comments did not offer a compelling explanation of why Amazon – with 30% market share to Microsoft's Azure's 20%, according to Synergy Group -- is growing about half the rate of challengers. Why AWS Is Growing More Slowly Than Rival Cloud Services Since Jassy sidestepped the question, AWS is growing more slowly than rivals for two reasons: What Amazon Must Do To Surpass Cloud Services Rivals Here are three strategies Amazon must pursue to grow faster than its cloud services rivals: These recommendations may be difficult to implement and may not result in new services that deliver more value to customers than those from faster-growing rivals. For example, Amazon believes in inventing and improving its own solutions – as it did with AWS and Alexa. Therefore the recommended partnerships may be at odds with the company's culture. Moreover, as former CEO of AWS Jassy may have strategic blind spots. These could include viewing AI as primarily an infrastructure challenge that Amazon can solve with superior engineering and a tendency to see the more rapid growth of rivals as superficial – rather than a sign customers value AI cloud services from Microsoft and Google more highly. What Analysts Are Saying About Amazon's Stock Is Amazon stock – which has lost 2.4% of its value so far in 2025 – trading at a bargain price? Some analysts sound skeptical: The mixed views suggest some upside in Amazon stock. Of the 52 analysts who cover Amazon, the stock has 9.2% upside based on an average price target of $255.72, according to Zacks. Unless AWS' revenue growth accelerates, that modest gain could prove difficult to achieve.


USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
The housing market is changing. Is a low-fee real estate agent the way to go?
When Jonny Ballesteros and his fiancée, Jen, began house-hunting, they weren't sure what to expect. It was the first purchase for the couple, who are both 29, and in the competitive San Diego-area market where they lived, they needed some hands-on guidance. But the real estate agents they contacted were no help. They appeared to be too busy to offer the kind of service the couple wanted. They decided instead to work with a new company that offers flat-fee brokerage services for buyers. While the cost savings was helpful, Ballesteros also felt he and Jen got the support they needed: suggested homes that matched their criteria, viewing appointments, and online chats about everything from scheduling to questions about process. "We truly needed that hand-holding because it was our first property,' Ballesteros told USA TODAY. In an age when Americans do everything from writing their wills to ordering their groceries online and without a middleman, the residential real estate industry remains stubbornly entrenched in tradition. But one year after a landmark lawsuit changed the way commissions are negotiated, some upstarts think the time is finally right. "The settlements haven't actually changed the transaction much yet," said Ben Bear, co-founder and CEO of TurboHome, the company that helped the Ballesteros. "But what it has done is educated buyers that hey, high commissions don't really make sense." At the same time, Bear said, new technology makes it possible for companies "to deliver a high level of service that does have a lot of personal touch, at a lower price point." TurboHome, which has been around since 2022, is currently only available in California and Texas. Other companies offering similar services for buyers include ShopProp and Arrivva. The longstanding approach to real estate transactions in America had a commission of roughly 5% to 6% paid by the seller and divided between the agents for the buyer and the seller – a hefty surcharge that some observers believe inflated home sale prices. For the home that Johnny and Jen bought, which cost $679,000, the buyer's agent's commission traditionally could have been $20,000 or more. TurboHome's fee was less than half that – $7,500. And the seller agreed to pay it, so the couple paid nothing and was able to apply the money to their loan. How the real estate commission lawsuits changed consumer attitudes A report released in June by the left-leaning think tank Consumer Policy Center explained how the commission lawsuits have helped erode traditional arrangements. 'By focusing public attention on 5-6 percent commissions through news coverage, the changes persuaded some consumers to question traditional real estate brokerage services,' wrote Stephen Brobeck and Wendy Gilch. More recently, they added, the industry jockeying between Zillow and other listings portals and brokerages has helped focus attention on how real estate information is displayed, which may persuade homeowners to sell their properties in non-traditional ways. Douglas Miller is a long-time attorney and real estate industry gadfly who instigated the first of the commission lawsuits filed starting in 2019 against big brokerages and the National Association of Realtors, one of the largest professional lobby groups in the country. A recent analysis shows that commissions paid to real estate agents have barely budged over the past few years. The new upstarts are not "discount brokers," he said. 'They are 'fair fee brokers,' I think is a better way to put it," Miller said in an interview. "The traditional agents want to label them as, 'You are using somebody who's charging less, you're going to get what you pay for.' I would say no, what you're going to get is an overpaid agent if you use a traditional agent.' One of Miller's biggest bugaboos is that the vast majority of real estate agents do almost no deals on a regular basis. According to a 2024 analysis from Brobeck, half of all agents reported no or only one sale the previous year, while 70% did five or fewer. 'In terms of personnel, the residential real estate industry is clearly a part-time industry,' the report concluded. As Miller sees it, the lower-cost companies that focus on transactions probably have more experience than many agents do. The National Association of Realtors did not respond to a USA TODAY request for comment. When does it make sense to work with a traditional real estate agent? Lisa Gill, an analyst with Consumer Reports, thinks that there are advantages to working with traditional agents. "Real estate is still very much a relationship business," she said. "Particularly in very competitive markets, it can benefit both buyers and sellers to have a representative who's tapped into a network of agents." TurboHome's Bear agrees. There are plenty of types of transactions where a buyer or seller may want the kind of high-touch experience Gill describes. But there are also other advantages to companies like TurboHome, which doesn't require that clients be exclusive to them. That means that if another real estate agent is able to find a property, there's no penalty for walking away and choosing to be represented by that agent. Gill also notes that experienced professionals can bring wisdom and context that go beyond the checklist of transactions involved in a sale. Working without a traditional agent might be akin to 'building a house without hiring a general contractor,' she said. It's likely that many sales can be done without that expertise, but on the rare occasion that things do go wrong it may wind up costing more in time and money to fix. Still, evidence is mounting that for many Americans, the 'bare-bones' approach works perfectly well. Miller, a practicing lawyer, is also a licensed Realtor who facilitates dozens of sales every year, making him one of the Realtor Association's top producers in Minnesota, he says. He charges half the amount a traditional agent would – 1.5% of the transaction or less – on the home's sale price or list price, whichever is cheaper, to avoid the perceived conflict of interest that comes from a sale price being bid up. The 2025 Consumer Policy Center report, meanwhile, focuses on the seller experience, evaluating companies Ideal Agent, Houwzer, Trelora, Simple Showing, and 1% Lists, with a special nod for one called Clever, which had more –and more-experienced – agents on its staff. While consumers using those companies need to do a little extra research, the report says, including being absolutely sure which specific services are offered and evaluating the individual agent that will be involved in the transaction, they conclude that 'low fee brokers do represent a viable alternative for home sellers.' Read next: Should you sell your own home? Why a FSBO may look more tempting