USNS Harvey Milk is renamed after a WWII sailor in the latest Pentagon diversity purge
WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Friday that the USNS Harvey Milk will be renamed after a World War II sailor who received the Medal of Honor, stripping the ship of the name of a slain gay rights activist who served during the Korean War.
In a video posted to social media, Hegseth said he was 'taking the politics out of ship naming.'
The ship's new name will honor Navy Chief Petty Officer Oscar V. Peterson, who was awarded the highest military decoration posthumously for his actions during the 1942 Battle of the Coral Sea in the Pacific.
The decision is the latest move by Hegseth to wipe away names of ships and military bases that were given by President Joe Biden's Democratic administration, which in many cases chose to honor service members who were women, minorities, from the LBGTQ community and more.
It follows earlier actions by Hegseth and President Donald Trump, a Republican, to purge all programs, policies, books and social media mentions of references to diversity, equity and inclusion in the military and elsewhere.
Hegseth's announcement comes during Pride Month — the same timing as the Pentagon's campaign to force transgender troops out of the U.S. military.
'We're not renaming the ship to anything political. This is not about political activists,' said Hegseth, who earlier this month ordered Navy Secretary John Phelan to put together a small team to rename the USNS Harvey Milk replenishment oiler.
He said Peterson's 'spirit of self-sacrifice and concern for his crewmates was in keeping with the finest traditions of the Navy.'
When Hegseth announced the decision to rename the ship, officials defended it as an effort to align with Trump and Hegseth's objectives to 're-establish the warrior culture.'
Peterson served on the USS Neosho, which also was an oiler. The ship was damaged during the Battle of the Coral Sea, and even though Peterson was injured, he managed to close the bulkhead stop valves to keep the ship operational. He died of his wounds.
The Navy in 1943 named an escort ship after Peterson. The USS Peterson served for more than two decades and was decommissioned in June 1965.
The USNS Harvey Milk was named in 2016 by then-Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, who said at the time that the John Lewis-class of oilers would be named after leaders who fought for civil and human rights.
Harvey Milk, who was portrayed by Sean Penn in an Oscar-winning 2008 movie, served for four years in the Navy before he was forced out for being gay. He later became one of the first openly gay candidates elected to public office, in San Francisco. He was assassinated in 1978 by a disgruntled former city supervisor.
Baldor writes for the Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Old bogeymen reunite MAGA after explosive Iran divide
A MAGA movement facing a historic rift over President Trump's Iran strikes is quickly stitching itself back together by turning its rage toward familiar enemies at home. Why it matters: Trump's decision to strike three Iranian nuclear facilities last week — paired with fleeting talk of " regime change" — ignited some of the fiercest infighting within the "America First" base since the movement's inception a decade ago. After Trump touted the success of the U.S. operation, some MAGA figures called for retribution against those who had criticized him — whether for not going far enough or for launching the strikes at all. By mid-week, the divisions were fading. Driving the news: A cascade of political flashpoints — each touching a MAGA "third rail" — quickly redirected the movement's fury away from its Iran fissures and toward longtime enemies. Media coverage of a leaked Pentagon assessment, which suggested the U.S. strikes only delayed Iran's nuclear program by only a few, triggered new MAGA attacks on the press for undermining Trump. Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani's victory in the primary for New York City mayor gave MAGA influencers a potent new foil: a Muslim, immigrant, left-wing candidate who they claim embodies the dangers of multiculturalism. Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough became a lightning rod after ruling that key GOP priorities had to be stripped from Trump's "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" — feeding MAGA's long-running resentment of "unelected bureaucrats." The Supreme Court issued three rulings that exhilarated MAGA: one clearing the way for states to strip funding for Planned Parenthood, a second allowing parents to opt their children out of LGBTQ-themed lessons at school, and a third limiting lower courts' ability to block Trump's policies nationwide. The bottom line: The deep ideological fault lines over Iran remain unresolved, and could rear their head if tensions in the Middle East force Trump to again consider military intervention. But for now, a perfect blend of red meat is helping to distract, unify and re-energize a base that had briefly turned on itself.
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Trump Should Have Never Ditched the Iran Nuclear Deal
Questions remain over the true damage to Iran's nuclear program. But as conflicting comments and reports come in from the Trump Administration and Pentagon intelligence estimates, one thing is certain: Trump's failed diplomacy got us in this mess. I should know. Ten years ago, I was in Vienna as part of the U.S. team negotiating a deal to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. Those negotiations culminated in the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). It was Trump's decision in 2018 to withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal that ultimately led to the perilous situation in the Middle East today. The JCPOA was the result of a sustained campaign of principled, effective U.S. diplomacy. President Obama began laying groundwork for this nuclear deal as soon as he came to office in 2009. His view—shared then and now across the U.S. political spectrum—was that the U.S. cannot accept a nuclear-armed Iran. At the time, Iran claimed that its nuclear energy program was for exclusively peaceful uses. Yet given evidence of Iran's past interest in possessing a nuclear bomb prior to 2003, the U.S. could not take this claim at face value. To get the nuclear deal, Obama and his national security team rallied the world to increase pressure on Tehran. The U.S., E.U., and other allies put in place punishing sanctions. The U.N. Security Council followed suit with a fresh round of sanctions in June 2010 that were wide-ranging and targeted the nuclear program. These sanctions worked: they convinced Iran to come to the negotiating table. To iron out the technical provisions of a deal, the U.S. then put together a team of top career diplomats, nuclear scientists, lawyers, and sanctions experts. It was a remarkable lineup of American patriots and professionals. It was my great honor to serve on that team. Our goal was to offer Iran phased and reversible sanctions relief in exchange for far-reaching limits on Iran's nuclear activities. To maximize leverage, we coordinated with other countries, including not just European allies but also Russia and China. It was difficult, exacting, high-stakes work—for months on end. The effort paid off. Iran agreed to substantial limits on its nuclear activities, including to export out of the country around 98% of its enriched uranium stockpile. Iran's commitments were then subject to intrusive and permanent international monitoring. By the end of the Obama Administration, the deal was working, with all sides implementing their commitments. Trump's abrupt withdrawal from the JCPOA in 2018 led to the predictable result: Iran's nuclear program surged ahead, breaking free of the deal's constraints. When Trump returned to office in January, he launched a hasty effort to negotiate a new deal. But it bore a striking resemblance to the deal negotiated by Obama, with one nuclear expert calling the Trump framework a 'dollar store JCPOA.' Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu tanked these talks with airstrikes on June 12. The U.S. launched its own strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities on June 22. Trump seems convinced the matter is now resolved. But what will be the fate of the tons of enriched uranium that Iran stockpiled after Trump withdrew from the JCPOA? How much Iranian nuclear infrastructure remains intact? Will Iran ever welcome back intrusive international monitoring of its nuclear activities, such as specified in the JCPOA? To resolve these questions, the Trump Administration will need to do the tedious, difficult work of pursuing complex negotiations. Talks look set to resume next week. But it will require a high level of technical expertise and diplomatic capacity. And the timing couldn't be worse, as Trump and Elon Musk's culture war on the so-called 'Deep State' has hollowed out and demoralized the ranks of government experts whose support was critical to achieving the JCPOA in the first place. This sad saga has reminded me of what we've lost in the Trump era. The JCPOA was a product of effective and principled American diplomacy, undertaken in close coordination with our closest allies. It was a team effort by countless government professionals and specialists, all motivated by patriotism and a sense of mission, and operating in an era where they were celebrated not denigrated. It was a victory of dialogue and diplomacy over bluster and bombs. Ten years ago that approach delivered results for the American people and the world. I worry about what comes next.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's Iran strike certainty meets stiff resistance: ‘We don't know'
The Trump administration is struggling to convince skeptics of its claims that U.S. strikes on Iran have toppled the country's nuclear program and wiped out ambitions to rebuild it. In the past two days, a fiery Pentagon press conference and two classified congressional briefings have left one key question unanswered: How far was Iran's nuclear program set back? Speaking to reporters at the White House on Friday, Trump said his claims about Iran's nuclear sites had been 'proven.' 'It's been obliterated. It would be years before they could ever get going,' he said, adding that the Iranians are 'exhausted, the last thing they're thinking about is nuclear.' But over on Capitol Hill, lawmakers were not convinced. CIA Director John Ratcliffe and other top intelligence officials briefed the Senate on Thursday and the House on Friday about the June 21 strikes on the Fordow Fuel Enrichment plant, Natanz Enrichment Complex and Isfahan nuclear site. Democrats said the meetings – which also included Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth – failed to answer key questions about how much enriched uranium Iran still possessed and how long it would take for Tehran to resume its battered nuclear program. While no one questioned that the bombing inflicted significant damage to the Iranian infrastructure required to enrich uranium, lawmakers said they were presented little evidence that the attacks would prevent Tehran from producing nuclear weapons in the future. It's 'premature' for anyone to be claiming that Iran will not try to continue its nuclear program, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said Friday on ABC News Live, saying 'there are just too many unknowns.' Rep. Katherine Clark (Mass.), the Democratic whip, said Friday's House briefing 'left me with more concerns and a true lack of clarity on how we are defining the mission and the success of it.' And Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.), a former nuclear physicist, said there's no evidence that the attacks destroyed Iran's existing stockpiles of enriched uranium. If those are intact, he warned, Iran could still produce weapons with the strength of a Hiroshima bomb in 'a very small breakout time.' Top Trump administration officials since earlier this week have been rankled by a leaked Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) preliminary summary that assessed the U.S. attacks had only set Iran's nuclear program back several months, not by years as Trump has claimed. The DIA found the 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs dropped on Fordow and Natanz failed to collapse the two sites' underground buildings and that much of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium was still intact as it was moved before the bombing. Following reports on the finding from The New York Times and CNN, Trump has taken on a combative tone, suggesting those in the U.S. intelligence world are only guessing as to how much Iran's nuclear program has been damaged. He has also called for the reporters who obtained the report to be fired. The DIA assessment and media reports on it also prompted Hegseth to call a rare Pentagon press conference on Thursday, during which he lambasted the media's coverage of 'the most secret and most complex military strike in history.' But he and Caine pointedly did not offer new assessments of the true damage to Tehran's nuclear program, instead highlighting the technical aspects of the military mission. 'You want to call it destroyed, you want to call it defeated, you want to call it obliterated, choose your word,' Hegseth said. He also deflected questions as to whether Iran moved enriched uranium out of the Fordo site before the strike, saying that he was 'not aware' of intelligence suggesting anything was 'out of place.' Satellite imagery shows trucks were present at Fordow a few days before the bombing, which experts have suggested means some of Iran's enriched uranium was moved ahead of time. Following the Senate's classified briefing on Thursday, several Democrats said the intelligence presented contradicted the White House's sweeping claims of success. 'The point is: We don't know,' said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). 'Anybody who says we know with certainty is making it up because we have no final battle damage assessment.' Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) accused Trump of 'lying to the American when he said that we had destroyed the program.' 'I have now seen a lot of the underlying intelligence. Nothing I have seen or heard has changed my belief that we have likely only set back this program by months. . . . it is probable that if Iran wants to re-establish what it had that they could do it rather quickly,' Murphy said in a video posted to X. Even staunch Trump supporter Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) was hesitant to tout the president's message that the Iranians had given up on their nuclear program. 'The program was obliterated at those three sites, but they still have ambitions,' he told reporters. 'They're obliterated today but you can reconstitute.' He also questioned whether hundreds of pounds of highly enriched uranium which appeared to have been moved in the days ahead of the strike was destroyed, saying 'it wasn't part of the target set.' Sen. Tom Cotton also acknowledged that eliminating Iran's uranium stockpile was not the mission's focus. 'It was not part of the mission to destroy all their enriched uranium or to cease it or anything else,' he said. Foster said that's exactly where America's attention should be focused. 'The goal of this mission, from the start, was to secure or destroy that material,' Foster said after the House briefing. 'That's where they're hiding the ball. And that's what we have to keep our eyes on.'
