
ScotRail alcohol ban to end, Scottish Government says
The current rules, first introduced in 2020 as a measure to reduce the spread of Covid-19, are in effect 24 hours every day on all ScotRail trains and stations in Scotland.
In the 48-page PfG document, the Scottish Government pledged to "remove the ban on alcohol on trains", which it described as "a last legacy of Covid restrictions".
The ban on alcohol will be replaced with new regulations which "focus restrictions more effectively on particular times and locations".
Before the "temporary" ban on alcohol began on November 2020, alcohol was banned on ScotRail services between 9pm and 10am.
Addressing Holyrood on Tuesday afternoon, First Minister John Swinney also announced peak railway fares will be scrapped "for good" in Scotland from September 1.
Swinney said the decision would "put more money in people's pockets and mean less CO2 is pumped into our skies".
The peak fares pilot scheme was brought to an end on September 27 last year, after ministers had judged it to have failed given it not increased passenger numbers sufficiently.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
It is not my job to dictate what you can create, says Swinney on eve of festival
He addressed invited guests at the headquarters of the Edinburgh International Festival as the capital's festival season is set to begin. Mr Swinney told the audience on Thursday he would be a protector of freedom of speech in his time in the top job. 'I also know that freedom of expressing is under greater and greater attack, both at home and abroad,' he said. 'I want to ensure that Scotland, the birthplace of the Enlightenment, remains a country of robust debate and inquiry. 'I firmly believe that art and culture must be able to challenge us, to ask us tough questions, and to force us to look at things from different perspectives. 'And, yes, it must, at times, be allowed to shock and offend us, but it can also heal us. 'Let me be absolutely clear – as First Minister, I will always protect freedom of speech in our country. 'It's not the First Minister's job to tell you what to create, nor would I ever seek to do so.' Mr Swinney added that his and his Government's role is to assist artists in any way they can. The First Minister went on to make a plea to the crowd and to wider society – with a particular nod to tech firms – to look at how the arts can be better supported financially as the Government looks to boost funding to £100 million annually in the coming years. 'I'm asking that from crowdfunding to patronage, to philanthropy to local authority support and much more, we all ask ourselves how can we do more to support the arts from the grassroots up?' he said. 'How can we better support emerging artists that don't necessarily fit the current mould? 'And how, in particular, can Scotland's emerging businesses in new sectors become the new generation of patrons of the arts and culture in Scotland? 'How do we incentivise a new guard of custodians and investors in Scotland's creative economy?' Speaking to journalists after his speech, Mr Swinney said he is open to discussions about new legislation to support the cultural sector. He said there is a sense that local authorities 'might not have a particularly explicit statutory duty to support artistic and cultural activity', suggesting this area 'might need to be strengthened'.


Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
JONATHAN BROCKLEBANK: Trump's assessment resonates not just with me but with much of Scotland. Sturgeon really WAS terrible
The post on former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon 's Instagram account assumed a certain knowledge on the part of the reader. 'Feeling was mutual, Donnie,' it read. 'Forever proud to represent all the things that offend your view of the world.' The first assumption is that we know that 'Donnie' refers to the President of the United States Donald Trump and that the intention behind the use of the diminutive is to demean him. The second assumption is that we are au fait with President Trump's position on Ms Sturgeon. As he flew back to Washington on Air Force One on Tuesday, he let slip to reporters that, while he had 'a lot of respect' for John Swinney he thought 'the woman who preceded him' was 'terrible as First Minister of Scotland'. Mr Swinney was actually preceded by Humza Yousaf but we shouldn't quibble if he is not on the leader of the free world's radar. He is hardly on Scotland's either. There is one more key assumption of understanding in Ms Sturgeon's riposte to the President. To get her meaning, it must be understood that her words flow down to their readers like consecrated crystal streams from the moral uplands in which she dwells. She has always lived there atop the highest peak in the kingdom of the righteous and if we don't know this about her then her Instagram post could not possibly hit its mark. It would read like some bitter has-been sassing back to power. 'When they go low, we go high,' Ms Sturgeon, in her pomp, once told her party. She was quoting Michelle Obama. In the same speech she name-checked Nelson Mandela as she groped ludicrously for common ground between Scotland's struggle for 'freedom' and the oppression of South Africa's black population under apartheid. Virtue must reside in every Sturgeon utterance and that's a given. We cannot see the person without first seeing that. Unless of course it is Ms Sturgeon who cannot see herself. Her autobiography, Frankly, which is due out this month, may shed more light on the extent to which the former First Minister is self-aware. But the evidence of her political lifetime suggests to me the penny has still to drop and, indeed, may never do so: her high moral ground is a land of make believe. I hear what Mr Trump said about Ms Sturgeon and what she said in response and cannot manage to see past two not particularly pleasant people engaging in trash talk. If anything, I'm rather more offended by her remarks and those offered on her behalf. 'Trump's lack of respect for women is hardly news,' a source close to Ms Sturgeon sniped. Really? We're playing the misogyny card? Can it be conceived of that a male politician might find fault with a female one because of what she stands for or must the attack on all womankind come baked in? And to what extent, do you think, is Ms Sturgeon's intemperate response in keeping with the ethos of going high when your opponent goes low? The truth is when they go low, she gets down in the mud with them. Oftentimes she has dragged others down there with her. In her mind she is the polar opposite of Donald Trump – dissimilar in every respect imaginable. In my mind she is fooling herself and, rather less successfully, us. Fake news? The two are co-authors of that book. During their respective times in office, both have used social media to peddle myths. Remember when Scotland was 'dragged out of Europe against her will' and how broken up Brussels was about it? On the day of our parting, the EU Commission building was bathed in a light show featuring the words 'Scotland' and 'Europe' linked with a love heart. 'If you look carefully, you'll see that they do appear to have left a light on for us,' cooed Ms Sturgeon beneath the picture purporting to portray mutual devotion. Those of us who looked even more carefully found her party had paid an Edinburgh firm to project the message on to the building. It was a cheap SNP stunt, an attempt to skew voters' perception of reality through a lie. It is what happens to politicians so confident in the indisputability of their position that they no longer care to be confused by anything as frivolous as the facts. You think Mr Trump surrounds himself with stooges and sycophants drunk on his Kool-Aid? Ms Sturgeon beat him to the punch. And I'm not just talking about her cabinet. More than two years after she left office, you cannot get moving in the public sector for the cult of Nicola – prissy, sanctimonious, overweeningly woke finger-waggers whose starting position in any conversation is the unshakeable conviction that they represent the enlightenment. I've had issues in the past with Mr Trump's inappropriate use of language. Certainly, he calls things as he sees them. So does Ms Sturgeon. As First Minister she was happy to go on record as someone who detests the Tories. That is a whopping great chunk of society to hate. Most of us down here in the glens she overlooks from Mount Righteous seem to muddle through our lives showing civility, even affection, towards those we disagree with on politics. My life would be poorer without the Nationalists I know and love in it. And another thing about the US commander in chief – his unfortunate habit of dismissing awkward questions by attacking the reporter or the news organisation asking them. Ms Sturgeon, surely, can claw back a few points on the moral scoreboard there. You think? During the pandemic I lost count of the number of times Ms Sturgeon ruled on the 'legitimacy' of questions rather than answering them. Was it my imagination or did they become less legitimate as they became more probing? I recall a thoroughly unpleasant response to our own political editor Michael Blackley who wanted to know whether self-isolation requirements for hospitality staff could be reduced to ease pressure on the industry. 'Yeah, that would really help …' snapped the First Minister. 'I don't know if you have listened to a word I have said, Michael.' A barb followed about the intelligence of the newspaper he writes for. It took 19 days before Ms Sturgeon cut the self-isolation requirements our journalist was asking about. I've made no secret of the fact Mr Trump was never my cup of tea. But his frank assessment of our longest serving First Minister resonates not just with me but with much of Scotland. She really was terrible. It is a blessed relief she's on the festival circuit now. And while she may wear his antipathy towards her as a badge of honour, the baleful truth which she will never accept is that she and he are not so very different. He went low and she went low. That is fact, not politics.


Glasgow Times
9 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
It is not my job to dictate what you can create, says Swinney on eve of festival
He addressed invited guests at the headquarters of the Edinburgh International Festival as the capital's festival season is set to begin. Mr Swinney told the audience on Thursday he would be a protector of freedom of speech in his time in the top job. 'I also know that freedom of expressing is under greater and greater attack, both at home and abroad,' he said. 'I want to ensure that Scotland, the birthplace of the Enlightenment, remains a country of robust debate and inquiry. John Swinney spoke at the Edinburgh International Festival Hub (Jane Barlow/PA) 'I firmly believe that art and culture must be able to challenge us, to ask us tough questions, and to force us to look at things from different perspectives. 'And, yes, it must, at times, be allowed to shock and offend us, but it can also heal us. 'Let me be absolutely clear – as First Minister, I will always protect freedom of speech in our country. 'It's not the First Minister's job to tell you what to create, nor would I ever seek to do so.' Mr Swinney added that his and his Government's role is to assist artists in any way they can. The First Minister went on to make a plea to the crowd and to wider society – with a particular nod to tech firms – to look at how the arts can be better supported financially as the Government looks to boost funding to £100 million annually in the coming years. The First Minister attended an event on the eve of the start of Edinburgh's festival season (Jane Barlow/PA) 'I'm asking that from crowdfunding to patronage, to philanthropy to local authority support and much more, we all ask ourselves how can we do more to support the arts from the grassroots up?' he said. 'How can we better support emerging artists that don't necessarily fit the current mould? 'And how, in particular, can Scotland's emerging businesses in new sectors become the new generation of patrons of the arts and culture in Scotland? 'How do we incentivise a new guard of custodians and investors in Scotland's creative economy?' Speaking to journalists after his speech, Mr Swinney said he is open to discussions about new legislation to support the cultural sector. He said there is a sense that local authorities 'might not have a particularly explicit statutory duty to support artistic and cultural activity', suggesting this area 'might need to be strengthened'.