Russia says Moscow now occupies all of Ukraine's Luhansk region, illegally annexed in 2022
If confirmed, that would make Luhansk the first Ukrainian region fully occupied by Russia after more than three years of war and as recent U.S.-led international peace efforts have failed to make progress on halting the fighting.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has effectively rejected a ceasefire and hasn't budged from his demands, which include Moscow's control over the four illegally annexed regions.
There was no immediate comment from Kyiv on the claim made by the Moscow-installed leader of the occupied region, Leonid Pasechnik. In remarks to Russia's state TV Channel One that aired Monday evening, Mr. Pasechnik said he received a report 'literally two days ago' saying that '100%' of the region was now under the control of Russian forces.
The development came just hours after the top German diplomat said that Germany aims to help Ukraine manufacture more weapons more quickly as Kyiv looks to strengthen its negotiating position in peace talks with Russia.
'We see our task as helping Ukraine so that it can negotiate more strongly,' Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said during a visit to the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, accompanied by German defense industry representatives.
'When Putin speaks of peace today, it is pure mockery," Mr. Wadephul told a news conference with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha. "His apparent readiness to negotiate is only a facade so far.'
Russia's invasion shows no sign of letting up. Its grinding war of attrition along the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line and long-range strikes on civilian areas of Ukraine have killed thousands of troops and civilians.
Ukraine is outgunned and shorthanded on the front line and international aid has been vital for Ukraine's resistance against its neighbor's bigger army and economy. Germany has been Ukraine's second-largest military backer after the United States, whose continuing support is in doubt.
'We want to build new joint ventures so that Ukraine itself can produce faster and more for its own defense, because your needs are enormous,' Wadephul said while standing next to Sybiha.
'Our arms cooperation is a real trump card — it is a logical continuation of our delivery of material,' Wadephul said. 'And we can even benefit mutually from it — with your wealth of ideas and your experience, we will become better.'
Mr. Wadephul was also due to meet with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
The top German diplomat's trip to Kyiv came less than 48 hours after Russia launched its biggest combined aerial attack against Ukraine over the weekend, Ukrainian officials said, in an escalating bombing campaign that has further dashed hopes for a breakthrough in peace efforts.
Ukraine's air force said Monday it detected 107 Russian Shahed and decoy drones in the country's air space overnight.
Strikes in Ukraine's northeastern Kharkiv region left two civilians dead and eight injured, including a 6-year-old child, regional Gov. Oleh Syniehubov said Monday.
The aerial onslaughts are calculated by Russia to squeeze Ukraine into submission, according to the Institute for the Study of War.
'Russia is continuing to use increasingly large numbers of drones in its overnight strike packages in order to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses and enable subsequent cruise and ballistic missile strikes,' the Washington-based think tank said late Sunday.
'The increases in Russia's strike packages in recent weeks are largely due to Russia's efforts to scale up its defense industrial production, particularly of Shahed and decoy drones and ballistic missiles,' the institute added.
Sybiha thanked Germany for its contribution to Ukraine's air defense and urged Berlin to send more antimissile systems.
The Russians 'are attacking civilian targets in order to create panic, to influence the mood of our population,' he said. 'The key is the air defense system.'
Berlin has balked at granting Zelenskyy's request to provide Ukraine with powerful German- and Swedish-made Taurus long-range missiles, which could potentially hit targets inside Russia. That is due to fears such a move could enrage the Kremlin and draw NATO into Europe's biggest conflict since World War II.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz pledged in May to help Ukraine develop its own long-range missile systems that would be free of any Western-imposed limitations on their use and targets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
32 minutes ago
- First Post
Are ground robots becoming the new soldiers of war?
Ukraine and Russia are increasingly deploying ground robots for resupply, combat and casualty evacuation. With AI-driven systems like Murakha, THeMIS and Volchanin in action, these robotic platforms are transforming modern warfare. As both countries innovate on the battlefield, are ground robots becoming the frontline fighters of the future? read more The Gereon RCS Robot, an unmanned ground vehicle for the defence sector, from ARX Robotic, in action in Oberding near Munich, Germany, March 27, 2025. File Image/Reuters Both Moscow and Kyiv are putting their focus on unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) — robots designed to support logistics, firepower and casualty evacuation. These systems, once peripheral to military strategy, are now playing a growing role in direct battlefield engagement, as seen in Russia's war in Ukraine. How Ukraine is expanding its robotic arsenal Ukraine has steadily increased its investment in robotic warfare since 2024, aiming to reduce soldier exposure by relying on autonomous or remotely operated ground vehicles. One of the key additions to its defense inventory is the Murakha, a tracked robotic platform designed for front-line operations, particularly under artillery fire or in heavily mined environments. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Murakha, developed for utility in difficult battlefield conditions, stands out due to its size and capacity. It can transport loads exceeding 500 kilogrammes over considerable distances, crossing challenging landscapes and even shallow water. Ukraine's Defence Ministry has stated that its control systems allow it to remain functional in areas affected by Russian electronic warfare measures. In April, another vehicle — the D-21-12R — was unveiled. This UGV comes equipped with a machine gun and joins a growing family of military robots intended to undertake a range of critical operations, including direct assault, defensive action, rescue missions, demining and logistical support. Recently, Ukraine also approved the Targan robotic logistics system, created by domestic engineers under the Brave1 initiative. The Targan, approved for field use in late 2024, is electrically powered and fitted with large rubber wheels, capable of carrying up to 200 kilogrammes of material across rugged terrain. It comes in multiple variants, with its standard version offering a range of 20 kilometers. Other Ukrainian systems, such as the Sirko-S1 and Volia-E, which entered service in mid-2024, have payload capacities of 150–200 kilogrammes and are also used to evacuate injured personnel. Additionally, Ukraine has received foreign-supplied ground robots like the German Gereon RCS, Estonian THeMIS and Czech Trail-Blazer, expanding the technological diversity of its robotic fleet. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How ground robots are being used on the frontline Ukrainian forces have proven adept at reimagining the use of both imported and locally made equipment. Kuldar Väärsi, founder and CEO of Milrem Robotics, a company based in Estonia, noted that Ukrainian troops are finding creative ways to utilize their ground robots more effectively. 'Ukrainian troops are really creative, and they really find very simple ways how to get even more out of the equipment,' he told Business Insider. Milrem's flagship UGV, the THeMIS, can be customised with various payloads including weapons and demining gear. It can transport nearly 1,200 kilogrammes and travel up to 19 kilometers per hour. Väärsi explained that the motivation is straightforward: 'If you give a tool to a soldier, then he will use it as it seems most appropriate… It is literally a question of life and death.' The Da Vinci Wolves Battalion in Ukraine uses these systems for high-risk operations such as laying mines, collecting fallen soldiers, and carrying explosives close to Russian targets. Oleksandr Yabchanka, who leads the battalion's robotic systems, likens their flexibility to childhood construction toys: 'The ground robotised systems are Lego sets… We all remember Lego. We were growing up together with those kits.' His unit adapts a single robot design for multiple purposes due to limited availability of specialized models, reported Business Insider. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This approach aligns with broader Ukrainian innovation during the war, which has seen Soviet and Western hardware reconfigured for entirely new purposes — such as mounting outdated weapons on trucks, repurposing cruise missiles and integrating commercial drone parts into military platforms. How Russia is deploying robots Russia, too, has responded to Ukraine's technological adaptation by increasing its own use of ground-based robots. Facing similar challenges on a 600-mile front — particularly vulnerable supply lines frequently targeted by drones — Russia has introduced platforms like the Volchanin, developed by the Volsk Military Logistics Institute, for resupply and casualty evacuation. Combat engineers of pro-Russian troops operate an Uran-6 mine-clearing robotic system during an operation to demine anti-personnel landmines in a street in the course of Ukraine-Russia conflict in Donetsk, Ukraine, July 31, 2022. File Image/Reuters It has also deployed the Courier, a multifunctional UGV with a large payload capacity designed for both logistics and combat. Russian forces have been observed conducting training sessions with these systems. In one video posted in late 2023, troops are seen using a wheeled robot to transport supplies and wounded soldiers across the battlefield. 🇷🇺Russian forces use homemade transport bot to move supplies around in Avdeevka without coming under fire: — SIMPLICIUS Ѱ (@simpatico771) December 3, 2023 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Another post featured a tracked vehicle moving across a combat zone in Donetsk before being destroyed by Ukrainian drone strikes. More recently, Russian media footage from Chasiv Yar displayed larger and faster robots — some equipped with anti-drone cages — suggesting that Russia is improving the size, speed, and resilience of its ground robotic fleet. Despite their technological differences, both countries are united by a strategic need: minimising human casualties while maintaining the flow of supplies and firepower. Robotic resupply offers a cost-effective, safer alternative to manned convoys, especially in contested zones where aerial surveillance and attacks are constant. Why these battle ground robots are crucial now The use of ground robots for logistical operations is not just about saving lives but about operational sustainability. With manpower constraints on both sides, unmanned systems free up soldiers for direct combat duties. Furthermore, losing a robot to enemy action is far less costly than losing a soldier, both strategically and emotionally. These platforms leverage robotics expertise initially developed in aerial drone warfare. Ground-based autonomy is comparatively less complex; UGVs navigate two-dimensional terrain and can follow preprogrammed routes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Some models operate using onboard sensors and basic navigation systems without relying on external communications that can be jammed — a critical feature on today's electronic warfare-heavy battlefield. Robots are also being increasingly deployed in urban settings where traditional resupply is logistically difficult. A Ukrainian post from the 93rd Mechanized Brigade shows robots being loaded with supplies near Pokrovsk. Conversely, captured two Ukrainian UGVs moving swiftly through Chasiv Yar, demonstrating their operational reach even in contested areas. As Ukraine and Russia deploy more robotic systems for more missions on the frontlines, the question of whether ground robots could one day replace human soldiers is no longer theoretical. With inputs from agencies
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Russia-Ukraine war: Big setback for Ukraine's Zelenskyy as US stops military aid, Patriot air defense and missiles will now be...
Donald Trump and Zelenskyy- File image Russia-Ukraine war: In a significant move amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, the United States administration, led by US President Donald Trump has halted part of military aid to Ukraine following a review of US own stockpiles. The move comes as multiple US media outlets reported that US military stockpiles are falling below normal levels and as a consequence, the United States has taken the decision, the White House and Pentagon confirmed. Notably, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memo ordering a review of the US stockpile of munitions last month after US helped Ukraine with military aid. 'This decision was made to put America's interests first following a review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe,' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. What's the US military stock review? According to media reports, the much-talked review of the US military determined that stocks were too low on some weapons previously pledged. Elbridge Colby, the Defense Department undersecretary for policy, said the Pentagon will continue 'to provide the president with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end.' 'At the same time, the department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach to achieving this objective while also preserving US forces' readiness for Administration defense priorities,' Colby said in a statement. As per a report carried by news agency IANS, some analysts suggest it is a signal that the Trump administration may further reduce aid to Ukraine. Hegseth skipped a meeting last month of an international group to coordinate military aid to Ukraine. It is the first time the US defence secretary was not in attendance. Readers should note that the United States has provided Ukraine with more than $66 billion worth of weapons and military assistance since the Russia-Ukraine conflict broke out in February 2022, according to a report. (With inputs from agencies)
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Is Trump gambling with America's future?
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel From Iran to Capitol Hill, President Trump is governing as if he believes all the constraints that limited him during his first term have may be right in that assessment. But if he is, both he and his party could ultimately regret his decision last week to bomb Iran. The problem of Iran's quest for a nuclear weapon has vexed presidents for decades. Yet Vice President JD Vance, reflecting the courtier mindset that has come to dominate Trump's White House,insisted that other presidents hadn't bombed Iran only because they were 'dumb.'Actually, as I was told in conversations last week with several former senior national security officials from the Joe Biden and Barack Obama administrations, those presidents also seriously considered bombing Iran. But both concluded that military action might only slow, not stop, Iran's nuclear effort — and could ultimately increase its determination to secretly build a bomb for deterrence. They recognized that even an attack that initially met its military goals could trigger unintended consequences and ultimately hurt America's long-term because Trump has spent a lifetime dodging accountability in the legal system, the idea that his actions could have unintended consequences seems foreign to him. He has especially good reason to feel unbound now. The institutions that might have restrained him — and usually did restrain other presidents — are buckling under his relentless drive to centralize more presidential events over just the past week have captured the breadth of this capitulation. The six Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices signaled again that they see themselves less as hindrances than handmaidens to Trump's accumulation of power when they voted to essentially bar lower courts from imposing nationwide injunctions against his policies. Two of the tiny handful of Congressional Republicans who have maintained a degree of independence — Representative Don Bacon of Nebraska and Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina — announced that they would not seek reelection, showing the president's success at eradicating dissent within his party. Congressional Republican leaders again demonstrated that they will not defend the institution's authority when they justified Trump's refusal to consult Congress (or even inform Democrats) before he bombed Iran. The decision by the University of Virginia's president to resign under pressure from the administration underscored how many institutions in civil society are surrendering to Trump's unprecedented incursions on their was just one is nothing if not a student of human weakness. And he has clearly taken note of how many institutions are splintering under his assaults. In response, Trump is indulging his most aggressive instincts and taking political and policy gambles that might have seemed too reckless during his first term. On issue after issue, he is treating an extremely confrontational position as merely his opening ante — before immediately doubling down with even more extreme tendency was evident from his first day back in office when he pardoned not only the Jan. 6 defendants who broke into the Capitol, but also those who violently assaulted police officers. He's not only dropped federal investigations against political allies, but has directed his administration to launch investigations of individuals he considers adversaries — most recently saying he would consider deporting friend-turned-foe Elon Musk. In Los Angeles, Trump went beyond federalizing the state National Guard over the objection of California Governor Gavin Newsom and also deployed active-duty Marines into the city. Then, he not only used troops to defend federal buildings in LA, but also to provide security for federal immigration and drug enforcement agents on raids. The 'one big beautiful bill' staggering through Congress not only extends the tax cuts he passed in 2017, but would cause nearly as many people to lose health insurance as his failed first-term attempt to repeal the Affordable Care has been equally unconstrained in international affairs. He hasn't applied punishing tariffs only to China, but to close allies including Canada and Mexico. He has moved from America-first isolationism to threatening to seize territory from friendly nations. And as noted above, he not only acquiesced as Israel attacked Iran's nuclear facilities, but joined the attack with the biggest non-nuclear bombs in America's arsenal. The former senior Biden and Obama national security officials told me any administration would have considered a military strike after Israel opened a window of opportunity by degrading Iran's air defenses and disabling its key regional proxies. But the officials also said that the continuing uncertainty over how much the attack actually set back Iran's nuclear program validated the conclusion in those prior administrations that a diplomatic agreement offered a better chance of lasting common thread linking Trump's second-term choices is that he appears to view himself as both infallible and invulnerable. ('I run the country and the world,' he has declared.) He partially retreated when bond markets rebelled against his tariffs, but no other external force has cowed him. And unlike his first term, he's filled his government with loyalists more prone to flatter than challenge him. Business executives and international leaders have followed suit, sacrificing their independence (and in some cases self-respect).That lack of pushback appears to be encouraging him to take yet more gambles. None have entirely blown up on him yet. But he is rushing onto so many ledges that any could crumble beneath him. Iran eventually could respond to his attack with a destabilizing act of terrorism or a sprint toward a bomb; his National Guard deployments into blue cities could trigger a Kent State moment when civilians are killed; trade wars could derail the economy; voters could recoil from a budget bill that cuts taxes for the top 0.1% by over $230,000 annually while revoking health insurance from more people than any previous University political scientist Corey Brettschneider points out that when other presidents have sought to aggrandize their power and undermine Constitutional freedoms, the system's supposed checks from Congress and the Supreme Court have usually failed. According to Brettschneider, who explored that history in his powerful recent book The Presidents and The People, what has slowed those presidents (from John Adams through Woodrow Wilson) is 'citizens pushing back' and building 'a coalition in opposition' when rights and liberties are history points to the real danger of Trump's towering overconfidence. It has emboldened him to take serial risks that may ultimately hurt the American people and provoke a public backlash, particularly among the swing voters that he — and more immediately his party in 2026 —need to retain is repeatedly raising his bets as if he believes he can draw only aces from the deck. He might do well to remember that back in Atlantic City, his ventures into the casino business more than once ended in bankruptcy.(The article is an opinion piece by Bloomberg's Ronald Brownstein.)
