NYPD cop close to tears after vile bullying by woke lawmaker's ex-aide
Hadeeqa Malik, 21, was caught on camera bulling an NYPD officer during an apparent pro-Palestine protest in a clip shared on social media in February.
'Let's read the badges of the pigs,' Malik said while leading the chant. 'So to the Rahmans and the Muhammads, to the Alis and the Abdullahs.
'To the Rafids,' she shouted while singling out one officer who appeared uncomfortable.
'To the pigs who can call themselves by the name of Islam — put some respect on their names.'
She repeatedly screamed in the cops face until his fellow officers relieved him and allowed him to step back and escape her abuse.
Malik, a student at The City College of New York (CCNY), was the president of the school's chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) organization at the time, according to her LinkedIn.
Her profile states that she interned for Mamdani in his capacity as a state assemblyman during the summer of 2024.
She repeatedly screamed in the cops face until his fellow officers relieved him and allowed him to step back and escape her abuse
Malik shared several photos, including a smiling selfie with the now mayoral candidate, from his district office in Astoria, Queens.
According to her LinkedIn, she has also been an outreach coordinator at Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) since the start of this year.
Another surfaced video showed Malik calling activism 'all jihad' while encouraging protesters to get suspended and arrested.
'This is all jihad, this is all ibadah, and this is all counted for by Allah,' she said during a webinar she shared on LinkedIn in September.
Jihad is an Arabic word that has been traditionally used justify terrorism as a holy war, but there have been recent attempts to euphemistically re-frame the term as meaning 'struggle'. Ibadah, meanwhile, refers to worshiping Allah.
'How gangster are you?... How committed am I to this?... What am I willing to sacrifice for this noble cause? If you get suspended, if you get doxed… it will never, ever be in vain.'
DailyMail.com contact Mamdani's office, The City College of New York and CAIR for comment.
Malik has faced harsh criticisms for the resurfaced videos, with many slamming her behavior towards the officer.
'Who is the pig here? The policeman with stoic restraint or the unhinged lunatic hurling personal insults,' one person said.
'Good job on the sergeant by stepping in and removing that officer from her incessant verbal abuse,' said another.
Some commenters have used her connection to Mamdani to call out the mayoral candidate.
'Truly terrifying.. it's like the college encampments not only taking over New York, but running it. Is this really what people want for their city? I really hope the message gets through that this is not the way forward. Find the light, avoid the darkness,' one person said.
'We tried to warn you. This will be ignored and they will elect him anyway on false promises of sugar candy mountain,' a second person said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Police face ban from marching in Pride parades after High Court ruling
The judgement, handed down on Wednesday, ruled that officers were wrong to have taken part in Newcastle's Pride parade last year. The case was brought by Linzi Smith, who describes herself in court documents as a 'lesbian who is 'gender critical',' who 'believes that a person's sex is an immutable characteristic'. She argued that police breached their impartiality obligations for taking part in the event and appearing under a banner supporting transgender people's rights. The judge, Mr Justice Linden, agreed with her and ruled the Chief Constable of Northumbria Police acted unlawfully when she allowed uniformed officers to take part in the event last year. The ruling is likely to have wide-reaching implications for how police are able to participate in community events across the country. Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, chair of the National Police Chiefs' Council, said the organisation as 'working through the detail' of the judgement and is working to create broader guidance to help local forces 'make decisions around participation in events to maintain their impartiality.' 'Having police officers and staff who know their communities, are visible in those communities and play an active part in their local area has been shown time and time again to build trust and confidence in our service,' he said. 'Every week police officers and staff will as part of their duties take part in thousands of events up and down the country, from community events at village halls through to large scale events like carnivals, parades and festivals. 'However, we recognise that policing must also maintain its impartiality, including in the types of events it supports and plays an active part in.' In a witness statement, Harry Miller, a former officer and founder of group Fair Cop, said the chief constable marched next to participants 'carrying the flags and emblems clearly associated with the gender ideologists' cause' such as banners saying 'Trans women are women' and 'Trans rights are human rights'. He argued this signalled a political association. Reaching his decision, the judge said the chief constable's participation was likely to be seen as 'expressing the support of the head of the force for the views and the cause which the march sought to promote' and 'therefore as indicating the position or perspective of the force as an organisation'. Jo Maugham KC, executive director of the Good Law Project said the 'incredibly important' judgement could have practical implications for all people subject to impartiality obligations participating in such events. 'The impartiality duties that police have are substantially no different from the impartiality duties that all sorts of other public servants have,' he said. 'It doesn't mean police can't police these parades - they can. But it does mean they can't march in them. 'But it also could mean civil servants can't march in them or BBC journalists.' He warned this could extend to parades or protests relating to other causes such as anti-racism or anti-misogyny as Trans people are also a legally protected group under the Equality Act. Mr Maugham added there was a 'lack of clarity at the heart of the judgement' which he said does not define the phrase 'gender ideology' itself. '[The judge's ruling] seems to think the reality or legitimacy of trans existence is up for debate,' he told The Independent. 'The difficulty of that is Parliament has said it is not up for debate. 'The Equality Act recognises that trans people - like women and disabled people - are a group whose existence is not up for debate, it is to be protected.' He said: 'This is yet another decision made by our courts which has a very profound affect on LGBT rights where a court has not thought it appropriate to hear from anyone from that community.' Responding to the ruling, Northumbria Police said it has an 'important role to play in a variety of events, including parades and festivals' throughout the year. It said while their primary aim is to keep people safe, these events also provide police with 'an opportunity to engage with people including those who may have less confidence in policing.' these events provides the force 'with an opportunity to engage with people including those who may have less confidence in policing' 'It is vitally important they feel supported and we continue to build their trust in us,' a spokesperson said. 'That is why we felt it important to challenge the case which was brought against us and which has implications for wider policing. 'We will work through the ruling to understand the implications, while staying true to our values of fairness, visibility, and support for all.'
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Natasha Lyonne left red-faced after lobbying attempt with Trump
Anti-Trump actress and AI film studio boss Natasha Lyonne (pictured) is taking on what might be her most challenging role yet - lobbying the Trump administration. The Hollywood darling is passionate about outlawing sinister uses of artificial intelligence in the glamorous industry. And she's willing to put aside her open hatred of the administration to accomplish her goals. 'My primary interest is that people get paid for their life's work,' Lyonne, 46, recently told the Wall Street Journal. The 'Poker Face' and 'Russian Doll' actress worked earlier this year to secure signatures for a letter to the White House advocating against policies allowing AI to take over the media. Securing over 400 signatures from icons like Paul McCartney, Ben Stiller and Ron Howard, the memo called on the White House to protect Hollywood's intellectual property from being gobbled up by AI companies without proper compensation. 'We firmly believe that America's global AI leadership must not come at the expense of our essential creative industries,' the March letter stated. But Lyonne is facing a problem she couldn't have anticipated. No one knows who she is on Capitol Hill, or in the White House, for that matter. Multiple top aides on Capitol Hill working on AI issues with the White House told the Daily Mail they had not heard of Lyonne - or her lobbying efforts. She 'seems like an insane person,' one Republican staffer joked after learning of her advocacy. A Democratic aide similarly shared they were unaware of the A-lister's AI push, but added 'omg I love her.' Lyonne is an unusual choice to lead Hollywood's AI lobbying push given her history of anti-Trump rhetoric. 'When I think of the kids, like the 12 year old girl that can't get an what really rips me apart,' Lyonne told the Hollywood Reporter of the Trump administration in February. She later clarified she was referring to abortions for those who were [sexual assault] victims. 'It's very weird to have, like, a showbiz guy in charge is surreal. I mean, because, well, I'm actually pretty horrified by how strategic and effective this whole thing has been,' she continued. 'It's nothing we didn't know but always a horror to see upfront.' In a post from 2020 she fundraised for Democrats, posting on X: 'There's no debate: If we #TurnTexasBlue, Trump is through.' 'What's timeline on trump's exit,' she wrote on X in October 2017. The actress even publicly endorsed Kamala Harris for president last year ahead of the election. A representative for the actress did not return the Daily Mail's request for comment. Lyonne is also a partner in a new AI film and TV venture called Asteria, an application that trains exclusively on content with permission from creators - a practice she is trying to make the industry standard. Her history of attacking the 79-year-old president is resurfacing as she tries to sway a forthcoming AI policy plan being crafted by the White House's office of Technology. The WSJ reported the plan 'could influence how U.S. copyright rules are applied to training large language models,' and a lobbying effort on both sides of the issue has begun. Large firms like OpenAI and Google have argued that if the copyright restrictions Lyonne is pushing for are adopted, American companies could lose the AI race to China. Currently, multiple lawsuits have resulted in rulings favorable to both sides of the debate. Disney and Comcast's Universal both sued the firm Midjourney for allegedly using their copyrighted works to train its AI image generator.
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man killed in crash with lorry on A22 in Nutley, Sussex
A man died when a car he was driving crashed with a lorry in East Sussex, police say. The 21-year-old driver of a Ford Fiesta died at the scene of the crash which happened on the A22 in Nutley at about 20:40 BST on Tuesday. His next of kin have been told, Sussex Police said. One of the two passengers in the Fiesta, a 22-year-old man, sustained serious injuries and the other, a 24-year-old man, was also injured. They were taken to are investigating the possible involvement of a Vauxhall Corsa in the crash. Two women both aged 21 connected to the Corsa, were arrested on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving, a police spokesperson said. One of the women has been released on bail, and the other released without further action. Anyone who witnessed the crash, or has CCTV or dashcam footage of the three vehicles is asked to contact Sussex Police.
