
Serge Fiori's national funeral celebrates his life, his music and his dream for Quebec
By
The national funeral for Serge Fiori Tuesday afternoon at Salle Wilfrid-Pelletier of Place des Arts was much more than a funeral. It was actually a full-scale tribute concert in honour of the iconic Québécois singer-songwriter and co-founder of the much-loved progressive-rock band Harmonium.
But it wasn't just a concert, either. It was a heartfelt homage to the man and the musician from a slew of homegrown stars, almost all of whom had either worked with him or were good friends of his. In the end, this magical, nearly two-hour event was a nostalgic love letter to a time — Harmonium's heyday in the mid-1970s — when Fiori and millions of other Quebecers dreamed of someday creating their own country.
Fiori, a Montrealer with Italian roots, never wavered in his support of the independence movement and for fighting for the French language ici, even though his songs never explicitly referenced such matters. He died on June 24, Quebec's Fête nationale, at the age of 73.
Many on stage Tuesday underlined his commitment to Quebec, starting with Premier François Legault, who was one of the first speakers. He said he wore out his copy of the first Harmonium album as a teenager in 1974.
'He made us more proud to be Québécois,' said Legault.
Former Quebec City mayor Régis Labeaume, a friend of Fiori, said the two agreed on everything except hockey. Labeaume was a Quebec Nordiques fan, Fiori a fervent fan of les Canadiens.
'You would never accept us saying 'no,'' said Labeaume, clearly referring to Fiori's position on the two referendum campaigns. 'And that, we're going to remember.'
Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon — who, at 48, is much younger than Harmonium's original boomer fans — said before Tuesday's event that Fiori spoke for a generation, and that it was always about much more than music with the singer-songwriter.
'The generation before mine, the people who lived through the golden era of Harmonium, it's almost like a cult,' said St-Pierre Plamondon. 'So it's the celebration of a genius. But it's also recognizing someone who was the opening act for René Lévesque.'
That's a reference to Harmonium's trip with the first Parti Québécois premier to California in 1978 to promote Quebec and the band.
'They went to California to talk about Quebec and independence,' said St-Pierre Plamondon. 'In one of (Fiori's) last interviews, he said that if we don't deliver this project (of independence), Quebec culture has no future.'
Fiori famously turned down a million-dollar offer from CBS Records for Harmonium to re-record its songs in English, but even though he only ever sang in the language of Charlebois, the band was popular right across Canada, selling out 3,000-seat theatres from coast to coast at the height of its fame in the 1970s.
Montreal's CHOM was the first radio station to play Harmonium, oddly enough before any French-language stations here, and turned on a whole generation of anglophones to the band.
Former CHOM morning man Terry DiMonte, who was at the funeral, became friends later in life with Fiori. DiMonte wasn't working at CHOM when they started playing Harmonium, but hearing their folky, melodic progressive rock opened his ears to a whole other world of music.
'When I was a kid and was beginning to get into music and first heard Harmonium, I thought: 'Wow, there's bands of the calibre of the bands I'm listening to from Britain and the United States right here in our backyard,'' said DiMonte. 'That in turn introduced me to, 'Oh, wait a minute, there's a whole Quebec culture, television, radio, actors, musicians… .' And I think for my generation, he was at the forefront of that and had a massive impact not just in Quebec, but across the country. It was his personality, his passion and his ability to write music that spoke to people.
'At a time when progressive rock was at its peak in Quebec with Supertramp; Yes; Emerson, Lake and Palmer and Genesis, he stuck his hand up and said: 'Hey, wait a minute, I can do this, too, from a Quebec point of view.' The songs are very powerful and the melodies are McCartney-like. Language wasn't a barrier. People bought into the music because the music's so good.'
There was a lot of talk about Fiori's dream of a Quebec nation during Tuesday's funeral/concert, but of course it was also about music and celebrating the life of a man who elicited so much love.
The event began with a poetic monologue from actor Luc Picard, then seven acoustic guitarists — including Michel Rivard and Richard Séguin — came on strumming. Then members of Harmonium appeared on stage, minus Michel Normandeau, who is in Paris. They performed a moving rendition of Histoires sans paroles. Séguin sang Ça fait du bien, from the 1978 album Deux cents nuits à l'heure, made by Séguin and Fiori.
Radio and TV host Normand Brathwaite talked of how he and Fiori both suffered from serious anxiety, a problem that stopped Fiori from performing for the last 40 years of his life.
The finale had author and rapper Sébastien Fréchette, a.k.a. Biz, taking the stage to announce that Fiori's last project was a new version of the Harmonium classic Un musicien parmi tant d'autres, a work in progress with 11 Indigenous artists from Quebec. Then Indigenous singer-songwriter Mathieu McKenzie led everyone on stage in an inspiring rendition of the song, which appeared to end the show.
All on stage turned their backs to the audience and looked up at a giant photo of Fiori, and they were startled when suddenly the thousands in the crowd began singing an a cappella version of the Harmonium anthem. It was perfect. It was as if le peuple took possession of Fiori's music.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
3 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Letters: Canada-U.S. relationship will never be the same
Re: ' American writer shocked by how furious Canadians are with the United States ' (NP Montreal, July 25) In his New York magazine article, the writer suggests the Canadian chill toward the United States will eventually 'thaw,' especially if the next president is a Democrat. Maybe. But I doubt Canadians will soon forget how America turned against us after being the closest of allies and partners for decades. The anger will probably subside, but I believe the relationship will never be the same — never as trusting or as deep. America has shown us who they are. Jerry Trudeau, N.D.G. Rich get richer under Trump The U.S. is projected to receive $300 billion from tariffs collected internationally, while the so-called 'one big, beautiful bill' proposes cuts to government and social services. No plan seems to exist to share tariff revenue with Americans who have the greatest need. Instead, it seems destined to underwrite a tax cut that will benefit the wealthiest citizens. It's expected consumers will bear the biggest brunt of these tariffs. This might be acceptable if the money was being used to help those who are the most impacted by inflation and struggling to make ends meet. But it seems Trump takes from the poor and gives to the rich. Natalie Turko-Slack, Pierrefonds Santé Québec progress report? Re: ' Over 900,000 Quebecers on wait-lists for specialists ' (The Gazette, July 17) More than six months have passed since the CAQ government launched Santé Québec, the bureaucratic adjunct to the Health Ministry. It was supposed to operate with much improved efficiency to deliver better health care to more Quebecers, many of whom now lack either primary care doctors or timely services. As we wait to see concrete results form Santé Québec, I believe it is incumbent upon that organization to present a 'progress report' of what exactly has been accomplished so far and what plans are in the making so that we can have some reassurance that the huge cost for this major bureaucratic organization is not a colossal waste of the taxpayers money. Goldie Olszynko, Mile End Ozzy's Crazy Train late on arrival Re: ' Birmingham, the 'home of metal,' gives emotional farewell to Ozzy Osbourne ' (NP Montreal, July 31) I clearly remember in 1980 when Crazy Train was released as a single and never made it to the Billboard Hot 100 pop chart. Seems it was too intense, too heavy metal. This week's Hot 100 has it at No. 46, and it is likely to rise. Turns out this classic has a new life, even if the artist's life had to end. Edmund Gleason, Pincourt Submitting a letter to the editor Letters should be sent by email to letters@ We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette. If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one. Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication. Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation. We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument. Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties. Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published. We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.


Canada News.Net
5 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
The recognition of Palestine: Western unity is collapsing
The recent declarations by US allies are not merely symbolic and represent the first steps toward a new international reality The ongoing armed conflict in Gaza, along with the intensification of Israeli military operations against Palestinians - including in the West Bank - has provoked growing concern and condemnation from the international community. The deepening humanitarian catastrophe, marked by destroyed infrastructure, acute shortages of food, water, and medical aid, has pushed millions to the brink of survival. The increasing scale of destruction, the mass displacement of civilians, and violations of fundamental norms of international humanitarian law are increasingly being interpreted as elements of ethnic cleansing against Palestinians. Numerous international organizations, human rights groups, and independent observers have expressed alarm over the disproportionate use of force and the systematic pressure exerted on the civilian population. In the face of inaction by leading international institutions - which continue to call for an immediate ceasefire and unfettered humanitarian access - criticism of double standards has intensified, and public trust in the global community's ability to stop the violence and uphold the rights of conflict victims is rapidly eroding. Even among Israel's Western allies, discontent with the actions of the Israeli authorities is becoming more pronounced. Large-scale military operations resulting in widespread destruction and civilian casualties have triggered sharp reactions not only from international organizations but also within Western societies themselves. Regular mass protests in major cities across Europe and North America are increasing pressure on political leaders, compelling them to reassess their stance and respond to the demands of their citizens. Under the influence of mounting public pressure, some countries have already taken concrete diplomatic steps. On May 28, 2024, Norway, Spain, and Ireland formally recognized Palestine as an independent state - an act that resonated widely and set a precedent for other nations in the region. At this juncture, calls are growing louder for similar steps to be taken by two key European powers: France and the United Kingdom. Both countries are facing escalating domestic and international pressure, which may hasten the process of Palestinian recognition and shift the balance on the diplomatic front of the Middle East conflict. French President Emmanuel Macron has already announced his intention to formally recognize the State of Palestine on behalf of France during his address to the United Nations General Assembly this September. He made the announcement via X, emphasizing that the decision reflects France's unwavering commitment to justice and the pursuit of a lasting peace in the Middle East. The French leader underscored the urgent need for an immediate cessation of hostilities in Gaza and the swift delivery of humanitarian aid to the affected civilian population. To further demonstrate the seriousness of his intentions, he also released a letter addressed to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, reaffirming France's support for the Palestinian people's right to self-determination. If France follows through with this step, it will become the largest and most influential member state of the European Union to recognize Palestine as an independent state. According to the Associated Press, the State of Palestine has already been recognized by more than 140 UN member countries, including major powers such as Russia, China, India, Brazil, Turkey, Sweden, and Poland. Macron's announcement marks a potential turning point in European diplomacy and may serve as a catalyst for similar moves by other major states. Indeed, calls for the recognition of Palestine have also gained momentum in London. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer stated that his country is prepared to recognize the State of Palestine during the upcoming session of the United Nations General Assembly in September 2025, should Israel fail to take concrete and meaningful steps to end the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip. This statement came amid mounting international pressure and growing criticism of the IDF's actions. Starmer emphasized that the decision to recognize Palestinian statehood would be a response to the Israeli government's inaction, should it fail to demonstrate a clear political will to de-escalate the conflict. In particular, the Prime Minister called on Israel to implement an immediate and comprehensive ceasefire and to revive efforts toward a sustainable peace process based on the principle of "two states for two peoples." He noted that only a return to a credible prospect of two sovereign states coexisting peacefully could bring an end to the ongoing violence and suffering of the civilian population. Among the additional conditions set forth by the British side are: the provision of humanitarian access to Gaza under UN auspices and a halt to Israeli annexation efforts in the West Bank. According to Starmer, adherence to these conditions would signal Israel's readiness for a political resolution, while disregarding them would indicate that the international community must act independently in the interest of peace and justice. At the same time, the British prime minister also criticized Hamas, stressing that recognition of a Palestinian state does not imply overlooking the role the group has played in escalating the conflict. Starmer demanded the immediate release of all remaining hostages, the laying down of arms, and an official renunciation by Hamas of any claim to governance in the Gaza Strip. He underlined that the United Kingdom does not recognize any legitimate role for Hamas in the future political structure of Palestinian governance. Following the announcements from France and the United Kingdom, several other countries have also declared their intention to formally recognize the State of Palestine, further strengthening international support for the two-state solution as the foundation for a peaceful settlement in the Middle East. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that Ottawa will recognize Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly. According to him, Canada has long supported a resolution based on the peaceful coexistence of two states - Israeli and Palestinian - within a framework of security and mutual recognition. Carney stressed that the actions of the Israeli government, which have led to a humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip, are met with deep condemnation by Canadian authorities. He also noted that Mahmoud Abbas has provided assurances that elections will be held in the Palestinian territories in 2026, in which the Hamas movement will not participate. Furthermore, Abbas has pledged that the future Palestinian state will not be militarized - a key condition for ensuring stability and fostering trust from the international community. Malta has also joined the move to recognize Palestine. On the evening of July 30, Maltese Prime Minister Robert Abela confirmed that his government intends to make a formal statement at the upcoming UN General Assembly session. He emphasized that this step is part of Malta's broader diplomatic strategy, aimed at achieving lasting peace in the Middle East. Abela had initially announced similar plans back in May, stating his intention to recognize Palestine at the UN conference in June, although the event was later postponed. Israel's response to these international initiatives has been sharply negative. The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the decisions of Canada and other countries, calling them "a reward for Hamas" and "a blow to efforts to establish a ceasefire." Nonetheless, the growing list of nations willing to recognize Palestinian statehood points to a significant shift in global diplomacy and to the increasing isolation of Israel's position amid the ongoing conflict. What makes the current situation around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict particularly unique is that the decisions by France, the UK, and Canada to recognize the State of Palestine are not occurring in a vacuum - they are unfolding against the backdrop of profound shifts in global politics, most notably the deepening rift within the so-called "collective West." The return of Donald Trump to the White House has heightened tensions between Washington and its traditional European allies, directly impacting the foreign policy priorities of those countries. Thus, the actions taken by Paris, London, and Ottawa should be seen not only as a response to mounting domestic pressure and public discontent over the situation in Gaza, but also as part of a broader struggle to shape an independent and sovereign position on the international stage. It is increasingly clear that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has long ceased to be merely a regional issue - it has historically served as a stage for wider geopolitical rivalry, and the current developments only reaffirm this reality. Since its inception, the conflict between Israel and Palestine has been accompanied by global competition among great powers. Today, amid the collapse of the old world order and the emergence of new centers of power, it once again stands as a symbol of global division. Judging by recent statements, the national governments of Europe are now attempting to articulate an independent stance on the Palestinian question, signaling a clear distancing from the Trump administration's policies. Despite occasional disagreements with the government of Benjamin Netanyahu, the US under Trump remains a staunch ally of Israel. In his trademark style, Trump has already expressed skepticism regarding the statements made by European leaders. In particular, he claimed that Emmanuel Macron's initiative to recognize Palestine "changes nothing" and "means nothing." Moreover, he sharply criticized Canada, warning of potential complications in trade relations with Ottawa should it proceed with the recognition of Palestinian statehood. "It will make it much harder for us to reach a trade deal with them," Trump wrote on his social network, Truth Social. As for the UK, Trump has distanced himself from any prior agreements with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, stating that "the issue of recognizing Palestine" had never been discussed between them. The US Department of State also weighed in. Spokesperson Tammy Bruce declared that the UK's recognition of Palestine is "a slap in the face to the victims of October 7" and "a reward for Hamas." According to her, such a move "gives one side false hope" and undermines diplomatic efforts to achieve a lasting peace, ultimately playing into the hands of radical forces. Thus, the emerging bloc of countries willing to recognize Palestine stands in stark contrast to Washington's position, underscoring the growing fragmentation within the Western world. The initiatives by London, Paris, and Ottawa are not only political responses to the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza but also expressions of a desire to assert a new, more independent role for their nations amid tectonic shifts in international relations. The evolving international dynamic surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict signals a significant transformation in the global approach to this long-standing and tragic confrontation. An increasing number of countries - no longer limited to Palestine's traditional allies among BRICS members or the Islamic world, but now including key Western powers - are adopting more principled and active positions on the recognition of Palestinian statehood and the long-discussed "two states for two peoples" formula. France, the UK, Canada, and previously Spain, Ireland, and Norway, through their public statements and diplomatic actions, are clearly signaling that they are no longer willing to remain passive observers of the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the West Bank. Their stance increasingly clashes with Washington's, particularly in light of Trump's return to the White House. Despite occasional tactical differences with Benjamin Netanyahu's government, Trump continues to offer Israel unwavering support. This has not only contributed to Israel's growing international isolation but also reflects mounting frustration among the global majority toward the actions of the Israeli state and its principal ally. The intensification of diplomatic engagement from the Global South - especially from BRICS countries such as Brazil, China, India, South Africa, and Russia - is contributing to a new architecture of international pressure. These nations have consistently advocated for a just resolution to the conflict and have emphasized the need to uphold the Palestinian people's rights to self-determination and statehood. The Muslim world, particularly Arab states, has also played a pivotal role in this coalition. Despite varying relationships with Israel, these countries are increasingly speaking with one voice in defense of Palestinians, especially in response to the devastation in Gaza and the mounting civilian death toll. As a result, an unprecedented situation is taking shape: a growing consensus among countries representing the global majority is coming into direct conflict with the positions of Israel and the US, which are increasingly seen as stubbornly unilateral and outdated. This is not merely a diplomatic disagreement or a matter of regional instability - it is a fault line in the emerging world order, where the Palestinian issue is becoming a symbol of the broader struggle between a rising multipolar world and the waning era of Western hegemony. The danger of the current moment lies in the possibility that the Middle East may once again become the epicenter of global confrontation. At a time when international institutions are losing their effectiveness and the norms of international law are increasingly being ignored, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict risks escalating into a flashpoint between the US and Israel on one side, and the rest of the world on the other. This presents a threat not merely of regional escalation, but of the emergence of a new front in a broader global conflict. Israel, which now finds itself in the position of an isolated power steadfastly resisting an emerging global consensus, risks becoming a symbol of defiance against the very notion of a just international order. Support from the US - whose geopolitical hegemony is increasingly being questioned - may prove insufficient in a world where the majority of humanity, represented in the UN and other international forums, is demanding justice, respect for human rights, and the recognition of the Palestinian people. This is why the recent diplomatic moves and declarations by Western nations recognizing Palestine are not merely symbolic or moral gestures. They represent the first steps toward a new international reality - one in which the future of the Middle East conflict will be determined not by behind-the-scenes deals, but by the balance of power in a global struggle to redefine the meaning of international justice.


Global News
5 hours ago
- Global News
Quebec's Lacolle border sees surge in asylum seekers
The number of people seeking asylum at Quebec's Lacolle border crossing has surged dramatically this summer, reaching five times the volume seen at the start of the year. As of July 27, just over 3,000 asylum seekers had been processed at the Lacolle crossing, nearly triple the number recorded in June, according to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). The sharp increase is raising concerns among Montreal-based organizations that support refugee claimants, who say they're struggling to keep up with the growing demand for housing, legal assistance and social services. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'We used to have about 20 to 30 people coming in per month,' Woodmy Estimé from La Traverse shelter for new arrivals in Montreal North told Global News. 'Now it's like around 60 to 70.' La Traverse says most of the people who use its services are of Haitian origin who are fleeing the U.S. because of the immigration crackdown. Story continues below advertisement 'My concern is for my family to not get deported back because the situation in Haiti is very critical,' Haitian Montrealer Shara Deriscar told Global News. Advocates say many are scared and crossing at irregular border areas. The RCMP says that in recent weeks, they too have seen a significant rise in the number of people crossing illegally. The CBSA says Haitian nationals top the list of land border asylum claims as of July 27 this year. For the full story, watch Global's Phil Carpenter's report above.