Cuts to LADOT could hurt Olympics and safety goals, department warns
The mayor's budget proposed the reduction of more than $7 million in expenses and the elimination of nearly 24% of the Department of Transportation's workforce — making it one of the heaviest-hit departments. The cuts would affect parking enforcement, traffic signal updates, goals to improve traffic safety and support for major rail and bus lane projects ahead of the 2028 Olympics.
'Many of LADOT's core services are driven by safety — a singular goal to make our streets safer and provide Angelenos with safer options for travelling," General Manager Laura Rubio-Cornejo wrote in a memo Tuesday to Katy Yaroslavsky, the city's budget and finance committee chair. "The budget cuts and proposed layoffs threaten this fundamental goal."
Other departments that focus on transportation are also facing big cuts. The Bureau of Engineering is poised to lose 131 positions in its department, which focuses on street and bridge improvements and major infrastructure updates. StreetsLA, formerly the Bureau of Street Services, could face a reduction of more than 260 jobs. The cuts would affect the timing for pothole repairs, street sweeping, tree trimming and emergency response, and would prevent the bureau from investigating Americans With Disabilities Act violations, according to StreetsLA Executive Director and General Manager Keith Mozee, who wrote a letter to the committee.
The proposed cuts to departments come as residents press city officials to implement a decade-old mobility plan and improve traffic safety. The reductions could affect that voter mandate.
Mayor Karen Bass' proposed budget, released Monday, would eliminate a nearly $1-billion financial gap by cutting more than 2,700 city jobs.
The proposed transportation agency reduction of 271 filled positions and 152 vacant ones would limit the city's ability to monitor parking enforcement and traffic control at protests and special events and would create lags in investigating complaints of abandoned vehicles, Rubio-Cornejo wrote. The cuts would affect response times by the department to answer requests from the Fire and Police departments, and would result in roughly 700 unanswered daily calls from residents to the Transportation Department's communications center. They would slow down repairs to traffic signals and maintenance of signage and lane striping.
'Identifying system malfunctions and repairs to the signal system will be slow and may have direct impacts in emergency response,' Rubio-Cornejo wrote.
The cuts would affect the agency's ability to support some of Metro's "major rail and bus-only lane projects" ahead of the Olympic Games, according to the memo. A Metro spokesperson declined to comment.
Metro's plans ahead of the Olympics include an expansion of its transit network that would depend heavily on bus use, more bus priority lanes and faster speeds. Construction is underway to update Metro's G Line bus route in the San Fernando Valley — a project that relies on the city transportation agency to update traffic signals to favor Metro's electric buses for faster service.
The city is on the hook for $183 million to improve streets at stations for three Metro projects under Measure M. That money could go to the transportation agency or directly to Metro, but Rubio-Cornjeo warned that the loss of transportation agency staff would pose challenges to the projects.
The memo comes after a report was shared with the mayor detailing recommendations from the transit agency about how to improve the city's Vision Zero initiative to eliminate traffic deaths. The joint report from the chief administrative officer and the Department of Transportation focuses largely on the need for traffic enforcement — which has dropped over time amid staff cuts and priority shifts at LAPD — after findings of failures in the program.
The proposed transportation cuts would affect the department's ability to carry out its recommendations, Rubio-Cornejo wrote, which includes reevaluating data collection and developing public awareness campaigns around traffic safety. And it would lead to a drop in revenue from parking citations and in overall traffic compliance.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Colleges must speak up for their Chinese students
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said all the right things last week after Hong Kong issued arrest warrants for 19 pro-democracy activists in other countries, including in the U.S. 'The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational oppression,' Rubio declared in a statement. 'We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on U.S. soil.' But we already tolerate the transnational oppression of one large group on our soil: Chinese students. And for the most part, our universities have kept silent about that. That's because of the billions of dollars that Chinese students bring to American colleges, of course. We're already facing an expected decline in Chinese enrollment because of the Trump administration's threats against international students, which higher-education leaders have rightly condemned. But if we really cared about those students — and not just their tuition fees — we would also speak out against the Chinese government's extraterritorial targeting of their fundamental freedoms. Anything less makes us look petty, scared and small. In a report issued last year — titled 'On my campus, I am afraid' — Amnesty International showed how Chinese and Hong Kong students in the U.S. and Europe faced surveillance and intimidation from Chinese authorities. Students reported being photographed and followed at protests, and that their families back home had been harassed. At Georgetown, for example, a Chinese law student who handed out pamphlets denouncing China's 'zero-COVID' policies was videotaped by members of the Chinese Students and Scholars Association, an organization sponsored by the Chinese government. They told him that the pictures would be sent to security officials in China. And soon after that, his family was interrogated and warned that they could face penalties if he continued to speak out. None of this is news, unfortunately. In 2021, ProPublica reported that Chinese intelligence agents were using local informants to threaten and harass students in America. Some Chinese students said they avoided taking courses with other students from their country, because they did not know who was working for the government — and who might report on them. And in 2020, when COVID forced universities to move online, the Wall Street Journal revealed that some professors had told Chinese students that they wouldn't be evaluated on class participation. The faculty didn't want their students to feel the need to speak up and risk getting on the wrong side of Chinese security officials, who were likely monitoring them on Zoom. 'There is no way I can say to my students, 'You can say whatever you want on the phone call and you are totally free and safe,'' one Harvard professor admitted. But most of our university leaders are keeping quiet about the matter. They don't want to take any risks, either, with so much money at stake. A welcome exception is Purdue University, which denounced Chinese spying after ProPublica revealed that one of its students was harassed by security agents for posting a letter about the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. That's a taboo topic in China, which has prohibited public discussion and commemoration of the event. 'Any student found to have reported another student to any foreign entity for exercising their freedom of speech or belief will be subject to significant sanction,' declared Mitch Daniels, Purdue's president at the time. 'We regret that we were unaware at the time of these events and had to learn of them from national sources,' Daniels added, referring to the 2021 ProPublica report. The rest of us have no excuse, especially now. Everything we have learned over the last four years confirms the same fact: China is intimidating students at our institutions. And so is the Trump administration, of course. It has arrested and deported international students who made pro-Palestinian comments. And it has been screening the social media accounts of student visa applicants to find 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.' Nobody knows what that means, so applicants have been scrubbing their accounts of material about Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and anything else that might put them in the administration's crosshairs. To me, that sounds more like China than America. Our most important founding principle is freedom of expression. And we are flouting it by harassing our international students, even as we accuse them of being hostile to it. But we can't make a persuasive case against Trump's assault on freedom if we ignore the Chinese attacks on it. Anticipating that many international students won't be allowed to come here, some universities — including my own — are creating online courses and programs to serve them. That's a great gesture, but it also leaves the students even more vulnerable to harassment by internet snoops back home. And that's why we have to speak up for the students and make it clear that we won't tolerate intimidation of them, just as Rubio said. Thomas Jefferson — who knew something about America's founding principles — swore 'eternal hostility against every form of tyranny.' He didn't care where it came from. Neither should we.
Politico
9 hours ago
- Politico
Transgender Women Banned from Women's Olympic Sports
Good morning, it's Aug. 1. How are you surviving the East Coast rain? Reach out to us: ecordover@ and klong@ As of today, transgender women will no longer be allowed to compete in U.S. women's Olympic sport competitions. The United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee changed its policy Monday to comply with President Donald Trump's executive order, 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports.' The policy change, which goes into effect today, takes the decision to include trans women away from the national governing bodies of each sport. USOPC is the latest organization to change its policies this year in the wake of Trump's executive order. The Education Department changed its Title IX enforcement policy to exclude discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation in January, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association banned trans women from playing women's collegiate sports in February. The move has prompted both intense criticism and fervent support from women's rights groups. The news came as a 'relief' to Nancy Hogshead-Makar, a three-time Olympic gold medalist, lawyer, founder of Champion Women and co-founder of the Women's Sports Policy Working Group, nonprofit legal advocacy groups for women in sports. She tells Women Rule that 'as a longstanding Democrat, I am appalled at other women's organizations that don't' support this change. As Hogshead sees it, transgender women competing in women's sports is unfair and threatens important all-women spaces like 'women's changing spaces, bathrooms, rape crisis centers, homeless shelters, prison cells, because of male violence, which is literally 50 times that of female violence.' On the other hand, Shiwali Patel, senior director of safe and inclusive schools at the National Women's Law Center, says the development 'was very alarming and shameful.' 'The USOPC is capitulating to the Trump administration's unlawful demands,' Patel continues. 'We are a women's rights organization. … We know there are very real issues to address when it comes to protecting the rights of women and girls in sports, and that banning trans women from women's sports doesn't do that. In fact, it also leaves women vulnerable to humiliating and invasive sex testing practices.' Hogshead shares that she was sex-tested herself while qualifying for the Olympics and says the experience is invasive and uncomfortable — but one she ultimately welcomed. 'It is as invasive as you can imagine, and who wants it the most? Who wants that kind of invasive testing? Athletes. They're the ones that call for it, the administrators don't want it … But the athletes, they want clean competition.' 'Boys before puberty still have a significant advantage over girls,' Hogshead says, an advantage of up to 10 percent. 'To somehow imply that women working harder can close a 10 percent gap is just so insulting to women.' Patel disagrees. Trans women and girls, she says, have been competing in women's and girls' sports for years, with no evidence of them having an unfair advantage on the playing field. 'Trans women are not dominating women's sports,' Patel says. 'So all of this is just a false distraction. It's a false narrative.' Last year, the United Nations published a study that found that 'transgender athletes competing in women's athletic events have won nearly 900 medals over their competitors.' But another 2024 study by the British Journal of Sports Medicine found that transgender women athletes may actually have several disadvantages when competing with cisgender women, such as weaker lower-body strength and lung function. Given 'the educational benefits and emotional benefits, the academic benefits' from playing sports, Patel says, 'no students should be denied that opportunity just because of who they are.' USOPC responded to a request for comment by pointing to its online statement: 'Preserving and expanding opportunity across all sports is essential to maintaining our competitive edge and inspiring the next generation.' POLITICO Special Report 'She Had Reasonable Doubt': Why Kamala Harris Isn't Running for Governor by Melanie Mason for POLITICO: 'Six months ago, Kamala Harris took a break from packing up the vice president's residence to attend a quiet meeting on Capitol Hill with a group of Black congresswomen. She had advice for them on how to steel themselves for a second Trump administration. But since that meeting on the Hill, a Harris gubernatorial bid had become almost a foregone conclusion in California political circles. Her deliberations froze the 2026 contest to succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom in a state of paralysis. Public polling consistently showed Harris would start the race as the prohibitive favorite. Ultimately, however, Harris' heart wasn't in it.' Democrats Sue Over Efforts to Defund Planned Parenthood by Rachel Bluth for POLITICO: 'Attorney General Rob Bonta and 22 other Democratic attorneys general and governors are suing the Trump administration over a bid to strip federal funds from Planned Parenthood clinics. 'We need to just call it what it is: punishment for Planned Parenthood's constitutionally protected advocacy for abortion,' Bonta said at a press conference Tuesday morning. 'The hypocrisy is really hard to ignore: a party that claims to be defenders of free speech only seem to care about it when it aligns with their own agenda.'' McBride Blames Netanyahu for Gaza Famine by Cheyanne M. Daniels for POLITICO: 'Rep. Sarah McBride blamed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, saying his government has a responsibility for 'facilitating the conditions.' In an interview with POLITICO's Dasha Burns for 'The Conversation' podcast, McBride (D-Del.) condemned Israel's blockade policies as the driving force behind the famine unfolding in the Middle East.' Number of the Week Read more here. MUST READS South Asian Women Will Be Hurt by the Trade War by The Economist: 'The participation rate of women in the labour markets of South Asia is in general woefully low. The region's garment factories, however, are exceptions. In Bangladesh and Sri Lanka around two-thirds of those behind the sewing machines are women. The industry has pulled millions of them into the workforce while spearheading the countries' economic growth since the 1980s. But much hinges on selling cheap t-shirts and shoes to a country whose president's favourite word is tariffs.' Republican States Press Congress to Ban Abortion Shield Laws by Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech for The Hill: 'More than a dozen Republican-led states are urging Congress to ban abortion shield laws, pieces of legislation passed in states where abortion is legal that protect abortion providers from liability for violating anti-abortion laws in other states. A total of 15 GOP attorneys general signed and sent a letter to congressional leadership this week requesting federal action be taken to preempt abortion shield laws, arguing they interfere with states' ability to enforce criminal laws.' Virginia Giuffre's Family Responds to Trump's Claim That Epstein 'Stole' Her by Alan Feuer and Matthew Goldstein for the New York Times: 'The family of Virginia Giuffre, a woman who accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually abusing her as a teenager, released a statement on Wednesday night expressing outrage about President Trump's recent remarks about her, in which he confirmed an account that Mr. Epstein had hired her away from her job in the spa at Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump's private club in Florida. On Tuesday, while answering questions from reporters, Mr. Trump said that Mr. Epstein 'stole' Ms. Giuffre from Mar-a-Lago while she was working there as a spa attendant. Ms. Giuffre has long maintained that Ghislaine Maxwell, Mr. Epstein's longtime associate, met her at the club and recruited her to serve as a masseuse for Mr. Epstein, but Mr. Trump's comments on Air Force One appeared to be the first time he had personally confirmed her story.' QUOTE OF THE WEEK Read the full story here. on the move The Treasury Department is adding Alley Adcock as deputy assistant secretary for legislative affairs, appropriations and management. She most recently was a professional staff member on the House Appropriations Commerce-Justice-Science Subcommittee. (h/t POLITICO Playbook) Ellen Murray has joined Simon & Co. as of counsel. She was most recently Democratic staff director of the Senate Appropriations Financial Services Subcommittee. (h/t POLITICO Influence) Rachel Chiu is now a member of the government relations team at the LA28 Olympic & Paralympic Games. She previously was special assistant to the president and chief of staff of the Biden White House's Office of Political Strategy and Outreach and is a Kamala Harris presidential campaign alum. (h/t POLITICO Influence)
Digital Trends
18 hours ago
- Digital Trends
Metro by T-Mobile is the smartest switch you'll make this year
Let's cut right to it. Phone plans are getting complicated and expensive. Between hidden fees, activation charges, and plans that look like a great deal until you read the fine print, most people pay more than they should. But Metro by T-Mobile is doing things differently. And honestly? It's refreshing. Metro just dropped two great deals, and if you're tired of overpaying for your phone bill, now is the time to make the switch. The $40 Unlimited Plan — Free 5G Phone Included Yes, you read that right. Bring your number to Metro, pay just $40 a month, and you're getting unlimited 5G data and a free 5G phone. No promo code, no gimmicks, no activation fee. And here's the kicker: That $40 rate? It's locked in for five years. That's what Metro calls the '$40, PERIOD' plan. For once something where the price will not creep up every year (if not sooner). Metro's not only giving you a high-speed, unlimited data plan on the nation's best network, they're making sure your bill doesn't balloon six months from now. That kind of long-term value doesn't exist with other carriers. Did we mention the phone is free? Because that's worth repeating. You can choose from phones like the Samsung Galaxy A16 or Moto G Power and walk out with a 5G device on day one without spending a dime extra. The $25 BYOD Plan — Keep Your Phone, Cut Your Bill Already love your phone? Metro has something for you too. The $25 Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) plan is for customers who want to keep what they've got and save big while doing it. You'll get unlimited talk, text, and 5G data for just $25 a month. Taxes and fees included. The price? Locked in for five years! Let's go! And you don't need to jump through hoops to get it. No ID required. No credit check. No activation fee. Just bring your phone, sign up online, turn on AutoPay, and you're good to go. First month is $30, and after that it drops to $25/month with AutoPay. Both Plans, One Powerful Network Here's the part you don't want to miss: Metro runs on the T-Mobile network, the fastest, most reliable in the country. Watching videos, gaming, FaceTiming, or just making calls? You'll be doing it with serious speed and coverage. Plus, both plans include T-Mobile Tuesdays (hello, free perks), Scam Shield protection, and unlimited everything. The choice is yours: want a brand-new 5G phone or just want to stop overpaying for the one you already have, Metro by T-Mobile has a plan for you. No contracts. No surprises. Just unbeatable value and a network that delivers. Switching? Yeah, it's kind of a no-brainer.
