
America's growing copper crisis finds a promising solution in Arizona's backyard
President Donald Trump issued an executive order in March hoping to add copper to the critical minerals list, which would expedite permitting and offer tax incentives to mining companies. And on July 8, the president announced a 50% tariff on copper imports starting Aug. 1.
The U.S. only produces about half the copper it uses, ranking fifth in production behind Chile, Democratic Republic of Congo, Peru and China. Part of the reason is that it takes an average of 29 years for copper mines to begin production, due to a lengthy permitting and approval process.
But Ivanhoe Electric's Santa Cruz Project, about 40 miles south of Phoenix in Casa Grande, Arizona, aims to be up and running by 2028, only eight years since it started the project.
3 The U.S. only produces about half the copper it uses, ranking fifth in production behind Chile, Democratic Republic of Congo, Peru and China.
AFP via Getty Images
'It's like tomorrow in mining terms. It's incredibly, incredibly fast and incredibly efficient,' said Taylor Melvin, president and CEO of the Tempe-based company. 'One of our great advantages is being on private land here in Arizona. It allows us to have a much more streamlined permitting process, which allows us to have a more accelerated timetable to construction and production.'
The company has been collecting core samples all over its 6,000 acres of land, plotting the best spots to mine. The mine will be underground and there's enough copper to produce nearly 3 billion pounds of copper over the next 23 years. When completed, it would 'place us in the top five or six mines in the United States,' says Melvin.
Another advantage of the mine is how the copper is extracted. There are only two copper smelters in the U.S., meaning much of the copper that's mined gets shipped overseas to be processed. But Ivanhoe Electric will use leaching to extract the copper, due to the characteristics of the ore found at the Santa Cruz mine site.
3 The company has been collecting core samples all over its 6,000 acres of land, plotting the best spots to mine.
Ivanhoe Electric
'We'll be producing pure copper metal on this site ready for consumption by U.S. consumers,' said Melvin.
And Americans – and the rest of the world – are set to consume a lot more. According to the International Energy Agency, demand for copper was around 26 million tons in 2024. In 2050, that number is predicted to reach nearly 40 million tons.
But there's one major problem: many mines will be empty by then, meaning production is set to go down unless new mines are established.
'Copper is absolutely a critical metal. We need copper for every aspect of our economy. We need it to expand and improve our electric grid. We need to support technological advances like artificial intelligence and the data centers that are required to support AI. And we absolutely need copper for our defense industry,' said Melvin. 'So it's really hard to imagine a metal that is more critical and in higher volume than copper.'
3 But there's one major problem: many mines will be empty by then, meaning production is set to go down unless new mines are established.
Ivanhoe Electric
That leaves Ivanhoe Electric and other U.S. copper companies in a strong position. Construction of the Santa Cruz project will employ 900 full-time workers, falling to around 600 after completion and during the mining phase. Many of the positions will pay six figures, and the jobs are all but guaranteed for the next 25 years.
And with the backing of Trump and with hopes of officially moving copper onto the critical minerals list, mining companies have a positive outlook.
'In my 25 years in the natural resources in the copper mining industry, I've never seen a more supportive environment for domestic mining than we have right now,' said Melvin. 'We're in the perfect place at the perfect time with a project. To be a U.S. company with a product in the United States on private land that can produce copper metal to supply domestic demand is perfect at the time for Ivanhoe Electric, and it's a great environment in the United States for domestic mining right now.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Morning Joe': Trump's Handling of Weak Jobs Report Would Be ‘Unthinkable a Decade Ago'
The MSNBC anchors and commentators warn Trump's firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics data chief will lead to further distrust of U.S. job reports The 'Morning Joe' crew on Monday warned that Donald Trump's firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer will raise further scrutiny into the employment numbers released under the new leadership. The president fired McEntarfer on Friday after suggesting that weaker-than-expected jobs report was 'rigged.' More from TheWrap 'Morning Joe': Trump's Handling of Weak Jobs Report Would Be 'Unthinkable a Decade Ago' | Video Wondery CEO Jen Sargent to Exit as Amazon Restructures Podcasting Studio Jacob Soboroff to Join MSNBC as Senior Political Correspondent Ahead of Comcast Spinoff 'Scamanda' Creator Charlie Webster Returns With New Scammer Podcast, 'Unicorn Girl' | Exclusive 'When the numbers are good, he praises them,' Jonathan Lemire said on 'Morning Joe' Monday. 'When the numbers are bad, he gets angry, and he fires the person in charge.' Earlier this year, Trump praised the bureau's job reports – but after Friday's numbers were released he said they were rigged in favor of Democrats, noting that he is looking for 'an exceptional replacement' after he deemed the numbers subpar. 'This would have been unthinkable a decade ago before Trump came on the scene,' NYT Opinion writer Mara Gay told Lemire.'This is another example of American exceptionalism out the window.' She said that the implications of this decision will affect the credibility of the United States as a democracy. She pointed to other examples in modern history of Greece, Argentina and China, stating that their leaders fudged the numbers to appease their world leaders. Gay added that inflating publicly reported numbers will not affect the American economy – it will only cause more unrest internally. 'What Americans can expect is to see the United States lose its sense of confidence in facts and also just excellence … the political reality will catch up with him,' Gay said of Trump's refusal to accept that the economy is weakening because of his tariffs. Andrew Ross Sorkin warned that Trump's decision will stir greater distrust of facts amongst world leaders. 'Invariably when those numbers [reported by the Chinese government] come out, there are conversations about what are the real numbers,' Sorkin said. 'Nobody believes the numbers that the Chinese government provides. That is the fear about what's about to happen here in the United States.' Senior writer at 'The Dispatch' David Drucker rebutted Trump's claim that the numbers are in favor of Democrats, pointing specifically to what he called a 'horrendous' job report from President Joe Biden's administration ahead of the 2024 election. 'When the president talks about rigged numbers and that it was rigged in favor of the Democrats right before the last election, it's just flatly untrue,' David Drucker said. He said the September report ahead of the election reported worse employment numbers than Friday's report that caused Trump to fire the data chief. 'Morning Joe' anchor Joe Scarborough added that there are several examples in modern history of the practical impacts of misconstruing numbers in favor of the individual in power. 'You don't have to go to the Soviet Union to just look at the practical impacts of when leaders start to fudge the numbers,' Scarborough said. The post 'Morning Joe': Trump's Handling of Weak Jobs Report Would Be 'Unthinkable a Decade Ago' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.


The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Why you're getting debanked, and how lawmakers can stop it happening
For two decades, I have worked with policymakers and law enforcement in North America and Europe to strengthen the financial safeguards that keep state sponsors of terrorism, violent extremist groups, weapons proliferators and criminal networks from exploiting the U.S. banking system. I have supported tough sanctions. I have pushed to close loopholes that hindered enforcement. And I have worked to hold those who enable illicit finance and trade, wittingly or not, to account. From the beginning, banks have been essential partners in these efforts. Through 'Know Your Customer' procedures and the anti-money laundering laws that followed the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, financial institutions have supplied the data and intelligence that help law enforcement uncover illegal activities such as human-trafficking rings, fentanyl supply chains and terror-financing networks. These frameworks played a critical role in safeguarding the country. Unfortunately, some of the tools intended to identity and stop criminal activity are now targeting and unjustly driving lawful customers lawful customers out of the financial system — a phenomenon widely known as 'debanking.' Most Americans are unaware that any cash transaction over $10,000 triggers the creation of a Currency Transaction Report that is filed with the federal government. That dollar amount threshold was set when Lyndon Johnson was in the White House and, incredibly, has never been updated to account for inflation. In today's economy, $10,000 might barely cover the cost of a used car. Yet banks are still required to flag such transactions, regardless of context, producing millions of reports every year that offer little value to law enforcement. Suspicious Activity Reports are yet another layer of government scrutiny. Banks filed more than 4 million Suspicious Activity Reports just last year, according to the Treasury Department. Former officials concede this avalanche of paperwork does little to improve public safety. In fact, it can create a burden for investigators seeking to identify and separate the truly suspicious activity from the mundane. When enforcement cannot separate the signal from the noise, it becomes dangerous. Meanwhile, regulators continue to pressure banks to apply broad risk labels to entire industries simply because they involve cash-heavy businesses, serve overseas clients or operate in unfavored sectors — all in the name of keeping our financial system 'safe and sound.' This isn't theoretical. Religious charities, international aid organizations and countless immigrant-owned businesses have all faced the threat of debanking. They are not terrorists or criminals. They are fellow Americans being pushed to the financial margins by a system that confuses bureaucracy with vigilance. Congress is beginning to address the problem through the Financial Institution Regulatory Modernization Act. This legislation would increase transparency and accountability in how agencies issue guidance and conduct examinations of financial institutions and their customers. It would help ensure that banks are not penalized for serving lawful customers in politically sensitive sectors. It's an encouraging start, but it will not be enough by itself. The single most effective step policymakers could take today to address the unintended debanking of lawful citizens is to modernize the anti-money laundering framework. Modernization should ensure banks provide relevant and actionable information that truly helps investigators and allows financial institutions to replace box-ticking alerts and reporting with data analysis that spots real patterns of abuse. Banks would still verify identities, monitor accounts and file reports the moment they see suspicious activity. These reforms would sharpen these responsibilities and make our country and the banking industry safer. Further, clear standards would let financial institutions maintain relationships with lawful customers while giving authorities faster access to data when real dangers emerge. The U.S. led the world in building a financial system hostile to terrorist financing and illicit finance. That leadership depends on a financial system that is both secure, credible and widely accessible. When honest actors are pushed out incorrectly, arbitrarily, and without transparency, and financial access is treated as a privilege rather than a right, the foundation of that leadership begins to erode. Policymakers do not need to choose between security and fairness. A modernized anti-money laundering regime would strengthen both. It would allow regulators and institutions to focus attention on those posing a real risk and reduce the burden on both law-abiding financial institutions and their customers I have spent much of my life trying to make America safer by making our financial system harder to exploit. That mission still matters. But the tools we built decades ago are not suited to today's challenges. Without reform, the anti-money laundering regime will continue to fail in its most basic duty: distinguishing between friend and foe. Congress and the administration should act now. The stakes are too high to allow inertia to carry the day. regulations.

USA Today
4 minutes ago
- USA Today
As Trump pushes tariffs, sons back firm aimed at 'revitalizing' US manufacturing
President Donald Trump's eldest sons are involved in a new business venture aimed partly at 'revitalizing American manufacturing' as their father pursues protectionist economic policies with the same goal. New America Acquisition I Corp, a blank-check firm backed by Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., on Aug. 4 filed for an initial public offering of up to $300 million. The special purpose acquisition company, a vehicle previously used by the family to launch firearms retailers and media firms, aims to merge with businesses headquartered or primarily operating in the U.S., it said in a filing. The filing declares the firm is pursing mergers with one or more companies valued at $700 million or more "that play a meaningful role in revitalizing domestic manufacturing, expanding innovation ecosystems and strengthening critical supply chains.' 'Our objective is to target businesses that are not only well-positioned for long-term, sustainable growth, but also deeply aligned with the advancement of U.S. industrial capacity, technological leadership and innovation, and economic resilience," according to the filing. The Trump administration is pursuing an aggressive tariff program on goods coming into the United States, and there are levies on many manufactured products. Trump has encouraged companies to move their manufacturing to the United States. The new SPAC, incorporated in Florida, is the latest Trump family business in a sector the president is seeking to boost. The family is involved in crypto ventures, including a 60% stake in crypto platform World Liberty Financial, working to profit on crypto while the Trump administration pursues favorable policies for the industry. Eric and Trump Jr. will both serve on the advisory board for New America, receiving a combined 5 million shares in the company. Media veteran Kevin McGurn will lead the company. SPACs are shell companies that use their IPO proceeds to merge with a private company, thereby taking it public while avoiding the regulatory scrutiny of a traditional listing. New America said it would offer 30 million units in its IPO priced at $10 each, aiming to list on the New York Stock Exchange. Contributing: Reuters