Trump calls Musk's formation of new party 'ridiculous' and confusing
A day after Musk escalated his feud with Trump and announced the formation of a new US political party, the Republican president was asked about it before boarding Air Force One in Morristown, New Jersey, as he returned to Washington upon visiting his nearby golf club.
'I think it's ridiculous to start a third party. We have a tremendous success with the Republican Party. The Democrats have lost their way, but it's always been a two-party system, and I think starting a third party just adds to confusion,' Trump told reporters. 'It really seems to have been developed for two parties. Third parties have never worked, so he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous.'
Musk announced on Saturday that he is establishing the 'America Party' in response to Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, which Musk said would bankrupt the country.
In response, investment firm Azoria Partners, which had planned to launch a fund tied to Musk's electric automaker Tesla , said it was delaying the venture because the party's creation posed 'a conflict with his full-time responsibilities as CEO.'
Musk, who served as a top adviser to Trump on downsizing and reshaping the federal government during the first few months of his presidency, said his new party would in next year's midterm elections look to unseat Republican lawmakers in Congress who backed the sweeping measure known as the 'big, beautiful bill.'
Speaking on the CNN program 'State of the Union' on Sunday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the boards of directors at Musk's companies — Tesla and rocket firm SpaceX — probably would prefer him to stay out of politics.
'I imagine that those boards of directors did not like this announcement yesterday (Saturday) and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities,' Bessent said.
Musk spent millions of dollars underwriting Trump's 2024 re-election effort and, for a time, regularly showed up at the president's side in the White House Oval Office and elsewhere. Their disagreement over the spending bill led to a falling out that Musk briefly tried unsuccessfully to repair.
The bill, which cuts taxes and ramps up spending on defense and border security, passed last week on party-line votes in both chambers of Congress. Critics have said it will damage the US economy by significantly adding to the federal budget deficit.
Trump has said Musk is unhappy because the measure, which Trump signed into law on Friday, takes away green-energy credits for Tesla's electric vehicles. The president has threatened to pull billions of dollars Tesla and SpaceX receive in government contracts and subsidies in response to Musk's criticism.
INVESTOR REBUKE
Musk's announcement of a new party immediately brought a rebuke from Azoria Partners, which said on Saturday it will postpone the listing of its Azoria Tesla Convexity exchange-traded fund. Azoria was set to launch the Tesla ETF this week.
Azoria CEO James Fishback posted on X several critical comments about the new party and reiterated his support for Trump.
'I encourage the Board to meet immediately and ask Elon to clarify his political ambitions and evaluate whether they are compatible with his full-time obligations to Tesla as CEO,' Fishback said.
On Sunday, Fishback added on X, 'Elon left us with no other choice.'
The Democratic Party appeared to welcome the rift between Trump and Musk.
'Trump's MAGA party is splitting at the seams in the wake of his nightmare budget bill,' said Abhi Rahman, a spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee. 'Republicans are waking up and facing the reality that they just signed their own pink slips, and are desperate for someone else to blame.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
36 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Pastors Who Endorse Political Candidates Shouldn't Lose Tax-Exempt Status, IRS Says in Filing
The IRS says pastors who endorse political candidates from the pulpit should not have to risk losing their tax-exempt status. The move effectively calls for a carve-out for religious organizations from the rarely used IRS rule called the Johnson Amendment, put in place in 1954 and named after then-Sen. Lyndon Johnson. In a joint court filing intended to end an ongoing case against the IRS, the tax collection agency and the National Religious Broadcasters Association–an Evangelical media consortium–and other plaintiffs have asked a federal court in Texas to stop the government from enforcing the Johnson Amendment against the plaintiffs. The Johnson Amendment is a 1954 amendment to the US tax code that prohibits tax-exempt organizations, including churches, from endorsing or opposing political candidates. The Christian media group and others filed suit against the IRS last August, stating that the amendment violates their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and free exercise of religion, among other legal protections. On Monday, the IRS and plaintiffs wrote that the Johnson Amendment should be interpreted so that it 'does not reach communications from a house of worship to its congregation in connection with religious services through its usual channels of communication on matters of faith.' The New York Times was first to report the news of the court filing. The IRS has generally not enforced the Johnson Amendment against houses of worship for speech related to electoral politics. President Donald Trump has said he wanted to get rid of the Johnson Amendment and signed an executive order in 2017 directing Treasury to disregard the rule. 'I will get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment and allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear of retribution,' Trump said at a National Prayer Breakfast in 2017, which is a high-profile event bringing together faith leaders, politicians, and dignitaries. Representatives from the IRS and the National Religious Broadcasters Association did not respond to an Associated Press request for comment. Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers introduced legislation to remove the Johnson Amendment.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Even without wins, Elon Musk's party may be threat to Trump: Analysts
Donald Trump has shrugged off Elon Musk's plans for a new political party as 'ridiculous,' but the announcement underscored the threat the disaffected former ally poses to US Republicans defending paper-thin congressional majorities. Musk's weekend launch of the 'America Party' came in the wake of Trump signing into law a sprawling domestic policy bill that the tech mogul has slammed over estimates that it will balloon the deficit. Musk has been light on policy detail, but is expected to target a handful of House and Senate seats in next year's midterm elections where the sitting Republican voted for Trump's bill after preaching fiscal responsibility. 'Elon Musk's America Party is a wild card that could upend the midterms in 2026, particularly for Republicans,' said political analyst Matt Shoemaker, a former Republican congressional candidate and an ex-intelligence officer. 'With bare majorities in Congress, the Republicans should be worried.' Musk, the world's richest person, had teased the idea of a new party for weeks, running an informal social media poll in June that showed 80 percent support among 5.6 million respondents. Unlike previous third parties, his would have almost limitless resources, and a talisman with a large constituency of young American men who see him as a maverick genius and a superstar. 'Musk's brand appeals to disaffected independents and younger, tech-savvy voters who might otherwise break for Republicans in swing districts,' Shoemaker told AFP. With a personal wealth estimated at 405 billion dollars, Musk has already demonstrated that he is willing to spend big on politics, lavishing 277 million dollars on Trump's 2024 campaign. Yet a more recent foray into Wisconsin politics – he spent 20 million dollars only to see his candidate for the state supreme court lose handily – has underlined the limits of wealth and celebrity in politics. And then there is the political difficulty of building support in the American heartland, among voters who are not part of Musk's Silicon Valley 'tech bro' bubble. Time magazine's 2021 Person of the Year was once liked by a broad cross-section of Americans, but he saw his numbers plunge after joining the Trump administration as the president's costcutter-in-chief. Musk's net favorability in the most recent rating published by Nate Silver, one of the most respected US pollsters, is underwater at minus 18.1, compared with a slightly less subaquatic minus 6.6 for Trump. 'While you don't want to paint with too broad a brush, the Republican base and MAGA movement are fairly inseparable in today's political climate,' said Flavio Hickel, associate professor of political science at Washington College in Maryland. 'And their support for Trump has been unwavering despite recent controversies. It's hard to imagine any political project associated with Musk siphoning off votes from individuals who approve of Donald Trump.' While multiple Republicans and Democrats have switched to independent, wins for third parties have been rare in modern US history. The Conservative Party of New York State in the 1970s and the Farmer–Labor Party in the 1930s are the only minor parties to win Senate seats in the last century. Smaller parties saw more success in the House in the early 20th century but have only won one seat since the 1950s. AFP spoke to multiple analysts who pointed to the many hurdles thrown in front of third-party candidates trying to get onto the ballot in a system designed to favor the status quo. These include minimum signature requirements, filing fees and other onerous state-specific regulations on age, residency and citizenship. 'Remember in early 2024 the so-called 'No Labels' party that was going to chart a middle course for the 2024 elections?' said veteran political strategist Matt Klink. 'They fizzled out in epic fashion.' Analysts agree that winning seats in Congress may be a stretch, but say Musk can inflict pain on Trump by siphoning votes from vulnerable sitting Republicans or throwing cash at primary opponents of the president's preferred candidates. 'Elon's party won't win seats, but it could cost Republicans plenty,' said Evan Nierman, the founder and CEO of global crisis PR firm Red Banyan. 'In tight districts, even a few points siphoned off from the right could flip control.'
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump says new tariff deadline ‘not 100 percent firm'
US President Donald Trump reignited his trade war by threatening more than a dozen countries with higher tariffs Monday, but then said he may be flexible on his new August deadline to reach deals. Trump sent letters to trading partners including key US allies Japan and South Korea, announcing that duties he had suspended in April would snap back even more steeply in three weeks. Tokyo and Seoul would be hit with 25 percent tariffs on their goods, he wrote. Countries including Indonesia, Bangladesh, Thailand, South Africa and Malaysia were slapped with duties ranging from 25 percent to 40 percent. But in a move that will cause fresh uncertainty in a global economy already unsettled by his tariffs, the 79-year-old once again left the countries room to negotiate a deal. 'I would say firm, but not 100 percent firm,' Trump told reporters at a dinner with visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when asked if the August 1 deadline was firm. Pressed on whether the letters were his final offer, Trump replied: 'I would say final – but if they call with a different offer, and I like it, then we'll do it.' The US president had unveiled sweeping tariffs on imports on what he called 'Liberation Day' on April 2, including a baseline 10 percent tariff on all countries. But he quickly suspended all tariffs above 10 percent for 90 days following turmoil in the markets. They were due to kick back in on Wednesday and Trump sent the letters in advance of that deadline. Trump's near-identically worded letters to Japanese and South Korean leaders said he would impose 25 percent tariffs as their trading relationships with Washington were 'unfortunately, far from reciprocal.' He warned of further escalation if there was retaliation against the levies. But Trump on Monday also signed an order formally extending the Wednesday deadline, postponing it to August 1. 'President's prerogative' The new August date effectively marks a further delay – and Trump's latest comments threaten to compound the uncertainty over when the deadline really is. According to letters posted to Trump's Truth Social platform, products from Indonesia will face a 32 percent tariff, while the level for Bangladesh is 35 percent and Thailand, 36 percent. Most countries receiving letters so far had duties similar or unchanged from rates threatened in April, although some like Laos and Cambodia saw notably lower levels. The Trump administration is under pressure to show results after promising '90 deals in 90 days.' So far only two firm deals have emerged, with Britain and Vietnam, plus an agreement to dial back super-high tit-for-tat tariffs with China. Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Sunday that he 'won't easily compromise' in trade talks with Washington. Asked why Trump opted to start with Japan and South Korea, Leavitt said: 'It's the president's prerogative, and those are the countries he chose.' 'This announcement will send a chilling message to others,' said Asia Society Policy Institute Vice President Wendy Cutler, referring to Trump's initial letters to Tokyo and Seoul. 'Both have been close partners on economic security matters,' she said, adding that companies from Japan and South Korea have made 'significant manufacturing investments in the US in recent years.' US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Monday that there would be more deals coming up: 'We are going to have several announcements in the next 48 hours.' Major US stock indexes fell from records Monday on Trump's fresh threats. The Nasdaq tumbled 0.9 percent and the S&P 500 lost 0.8 percent. Trump has also threatened an extra 10 percent tariff on countries aligning themselves with the emerging BRICS nations, accusing them of 'anti-American policies' after they slammed his duties at a summit. But partners are still rushing to avert Trump's tariffs altogether. The European Commission said EU chief Ursula von der Leyen had a 'good exchange' with Trump on trade when the pair spoke Sunday.
