
More walkers hit by cyclists than cars in royal parks
Nine pedestrians were struck by cyclists in the capital's Royal Parks, which include Hyde Park, Regent's Park and Richmond Park, between January 2024 and April 2025. There were a reported 18 similar near misses across the eight outdoor spaces.
In contrast, no pedestrians were struck by cars and there were only two reported near misses involving vehicles, accident logs held by the Royal Parks show.
The data was obtained after the London Cycling Campaign (LCC) responded to a parks campaign encouraging cyclists to obey 20mph speed limits by insisting: 'The biggest cause of road danger to anyone inside a Royal Park remains drivers.'
The only motorised vehicle to hit and injure someone over the 16-month period was a motorbike, according to accident logs released through a Freedom of Information response.
Meanwhile, nine cyclists collided with other cyclists and two cars collided with other cars.
On eight occasions, cyclists rode into moving or parked cars, including one who hit a vehicle after ignoring a red light.
In total, seven cars hit cyclists in incidents where the motorist appeared to be at fault. There were a further three near misses between cars and bikes.
Cars also struck trees, walls and lampposts on seven occasions. And cyclists were logged as running over and killing a squirrel, and hitting two dogs and a deer.
In April, the Royal Parks charity launched a 'considerate cycling' campaign after Hilda Griffiths, 81, died after being hit in Regent's Park by Brian Fitzgerald, a Credit Suisse director who admitted he was travelling at 29mph in the park's 20mph zone in a 'pace line' formation with other club cyclists.
An inquest heard he could not be prosecuted because speed limits do not apply to bikes. Mrs Griffiths died from her injuries two months after the collision in 2022.
Tom Fyans, the LCC chief executive, responded to the campaign by saying: 'While cyclists riding too fast are annoying and can undeniably be dangerous, the biggest cause of road danger to anyone inside a Royal Park remains drivers.'
Gerard Griffiths, the son of Mrs Griffiths, who has campaigned for a review of cycling laws, said the latest data show bikes put people at greatest risk in parks.
'The attitude of some cyclists – whose need for speed and bragging rights on GPS fitness apps like Strava – needs to change,' he said, referring to YouTube films of cyclists in Regent's Park exceeding 30mph.
'It's about time that sections of the cycling community realise that riding at excessive speed is dangerous.'
An LCC spokesman said 'historically' through roads in the Royal Parks have had 'significant issues' with speeding and dangerous driving.
He added: 'Many of the Royal Parks have no or few motor vehicles but lots of people cycling. That is likely to explain some of the data presented here.
'Regardless of that, no one should be injured walking or crossing the road in a park, and as we've hopefully been clear on, every single park user – cyclist or driver – should behave sensibly, legally and pay close regard to others, their surroundings and their speed.'
A spokesman for the Royal Parks said it welcomed considerate cyclists, adding: 'Unfortunately, we have seen too many collisions and near misses between speeding cyclists and pedestrians or wildlife, which is why we recently launched a 'considerate cycling' campaign, asking cyclists to slow down, stay within the maximum 20mph vehicle speed limit in the parks and respect others.'
The parks' new code has already been mocked on social media by some cyclists, who suggest that it unfairly targets them.
The Royal Parks spokesman added: 'We believe that reminding cyclists to watch their speed will improve safety in the parks for everyone and will give cyclists more time to react in the event of a possible collision.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rotherham abuse prisoner found guilty of raping another teenager
A man who was jailed for 19 years in 2016 for subjecting a girl to a 'campaign of violent rape' in Rotherham has been found guilty of raping another vulnerable teenager in the town. Sageer Hussain, 39, was one of three men found guilty of rape at Sheffield Crown Court on Wednesday following a trial which heard how he targeted his victim 25 years ago, the National Crime Agency (NCA) confirmed. Hussain is already serving a lengthy sentence after he was jailed for 19 years in 2016 for raping a 13-year-old girl in the South Yorkshire town. He will be sentenced again in November after was found guilty on Wednesday of raping a girl alongside two other men – Kessur Ajaib and Mohammed Makhmood – who were convicted of raping a second teenager. The convictions are the latest to arise out of the NCA's Operation Stovewood, which is the huge investigation into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013. A jury heard how the girl Hussain raped was about 14 at the time and is now in her 30s. Hussain, who was about the same age, led her down an alleyway in Rotherham town centre and said he would not let her back out unless she had sex with him. Prosecutors told the jury how Hussain raped her with two other people present, one female and one male. They said she cried throughout the ordeal as her exit was blocked. The second girl was also about 14 when Ajaib and Makhmood raped her, the court heard. Prosecutor Andrew Bailey told the jury how Ajaib was about 18 when he raped her in an alleyway. Mr Bailey said Makhmood, who was about 18 or 19 at the time, raped the same girl in an old graveyard in Rotherham as she fought against him. He said that he called her a 'slag' and a 'dirty b****' before spitting at her and laughing. Mr Bailey said she 'did not dare tell anyone'. The offending took place between 1999 and 2002, the court heard. Hussain is due to be sentenced again on November 7, the NCA confirmed. Ajaib and Makhmood are due to be sentenced on November 21. All three were remanded in custody by Judge Charles Thomas. NCA senior investigating officer Alan Hastings said: 'Ajaib, Hussain and Makhmood subjected two young girls to devastating acts of sexual abuse, the consequences of which the victims have lived with for almost 25 years. 'Those victims have now, at last, had their voices heard and their accounts believed. 'While this could never eradicate the suffering caused by their attackers, I hope it will pave the way for the women to move forward with their lives.' Liz Fell, specialist prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service 's organised child sexual abuse unit, said: 'These men deliberately exploited the victims' youth and vulnerability to manipulate and control them. 'They sexually abused the victims, who were children, in the most horrendous way. 'The treatment these young girls endured was appalling – they were attacked in isolated locations and subjected to humiliation and verbal abuse.' The NCA says Operation Stovewood is the single largest law enforcement operation of its kind in the UK and has identified more than 1,100 children involved in the exploitation. The agency said 46 people have now been convicted. Ajaib, 43, of Walter Street, Rotherham, was found guilty of one count of rape and one of indecent assault. He was found not guilty of a further count of rape. Makhmood, 43, of Falding Street, Rotherham, was found guilty of one count of rape. Hussain, 39, formerly of Rotherham and currently a serving prisoner, was found guilty of one count of rape. He was acquitted of two counts of raping the girl who was raped by the other two defendants. Hussain was jailed in 2016 alongside seven other men by the same judge who had previously sentenced his brothers Arshid, Basharat and Bannaras to 35, 25, and 19 years in prison respectively. The judge in 2016 heard how Hussain's victim, who was abused by all eight of the co-defendants, had complained to police in 2003 but the inquiry was dropped, partly because she was so terrified of her abusers. Judge Sarah Wright told the eight men: 'She was targeted, sexualised and subjected to acts of a degrading and violent nature.'


The Sun
18 minutes ago
- The Sun
Family of Rachel Booth, 38, reveal cash from fundraiser will go to her sons and charity ‘close to their hearts'
THE family of Rachel Booth have set up a fund raiser to help support her three boys and a charity "close to their hearts". Police tragically recovered Rachel's body from a lake in Oakmere, Cheshire, on Monday. 6 6 Police had deployed sniffer dogs and diving squads to find the mum-of-three after she disappeared in the early hours of Saturday morning. Rachel, 38, was last seen at Sandiway Garage in Northwich, Cheshire, where she bought wine and milk after a 45-minute run. She had entered the Shell petrol station on the A556 shortly before vanishing at around 3.50am. A spokeswoman for Cheshire Police confirmed the body had been formally identified as Rachel on Tuesday. Her heartbroken family released a statement after the tragic discovery. The moving tribute read: "As a family we would also like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to all the services and business that supported Cheshire Police and their officers during the search for Rachel. "Rachel, who was known to us as Helena, was a cherished member of our family. "She was a guiding light whose strengths love, and devotion touched us all. "Her kindness was constant and her presence a strength to everyone she knew, a loving mother, wife, daughter and sister who can never be replaced but always present in our hearts." A GoFundMe has now been set up to help support Rachel's husband Carl, and their three sons Alfie, Archie and Ronnie. Woman who died after 'falling from UK city building' is pictured as tributes paid to 'widely-respected' charity worker The post, written by friend Mike Jones, reads: "Rachel tragically leaves behind her loving husband, Carl, and their three beloved sons — Alfie, Archie, and Ronnie. In this time of deep sorrow, we are reaching out to ask for your support in helping her family. "Any funds will be placed into a trust fund for her three young boys. "In addition, the family has expressed their wish to donate a portion of the proceeds to a charity close to their hearts — one that supports individuals and families affected by ADHD. "Your generosity, no matter how big or small, will make a lasting difference and is deeply appreciated. "Thank you for helping us give Rachel the beautiful farewell she deserves and for supporting her family during this heartbreaking time." The GoFundMe has a £7,500 target and has so far raised £5,168. Timeline of Rachel Booth's disappearance J uly 19 Rachel's family reported her missing in the early hours of Saturday morning when she failed to return home from a jog. 3.50am Rachel is seen on CCTV at a Shell petrol station on the A556. This is nearly seven miles away from her home. She was wearing black leggings and a black top. Staff said she came in from a 45 minute jog to buy wine and milk, and nothing seemed amiss. 3.55am A local family believe they saw Rachel walk past their house after leaving the petrol station, where she bought wine and milk. July 20 Police begin searching by a holiday park as they believe Rachel may have travelled there. They have deployed sniffer dogs to help with the desperate search. Underwater search teams were recruited to help scour the waters for Rachel. July 21 A body is found by Cheshire Police. Cops said that formal identification is yet to take place but the body is believed to be that of Rachel. July 22 Cheshire Police confirm that the body found is Rachel Booth following formal identification. Cops said Rachel's family continue to be supported by specialist officers from Cheshire Police. Cheshire Police added: "We are liaising with the family to see if they wish to issue a tribute and any update will be supplied in due course." This comes after police confirmed there are not believed to be any suspicious circumstances regarding Rachel's death. A file will be prepared for the coroner in due course. People in Barnton, where Rachel lived, were rocked by the tragedy. In the Premier store on the main road, Raj Kaur, 30, exclusively told The Sun: "We have all been praying for her. "She is in everyone's thoughts here and we all wanted her to be found safe and well. "It's so very, very sad. She had three children - it's such a sad time now." A member of staff at Sandiway Garage told The Sun that Rachel had bought milk and wine before disappearing. Issac Carolan, 19, said: "I spoke to my colleague who had served her on Saturday morning. "She bought milk and wine and jogged 45 minutes away. Isaac added: "But it didn't seem weird, she didn't seem disturbed or flustered." During the search, Cheshire cops had been spotted at the Wild Shore Delamere water sports park in Northwich. The force closed the local holiday attraction as part of their investigation. Police had also deployed sniffer dogs in a bid to find the missing 38-year-old. Divers and specialist underwater search teams were also seen at the holiday park. 6 6 6


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Iraqi who argued he cannot be deported because he is divorced, wins appeal after legal error
An Iraqi who entered the UK illegally has won an appeal after arguing he cannot be deported because he is divorced. In claims disputed by the Home Office, he said he divorced a 'prominent' politician's daughter and brought 'dishonour' upon their family. The Iraqi said it would breach his human rights to send him back to Iraq because he was at risk of an 'honour feud'. The Iraqi, who was granted anonymity, has won an appeal at an upper immigration tribunal for his case to be reheard after it was initially rejected by the Home Office and lower court. The Iraqi entered Britain 'clandestinely' in 2020 after travelling through Turkey and across Europe before arriving by boat in the UK. He submitted his application for asylum the following day. The court was told that his 'claim for asylum is based upon a claimed risk of being a victim of an honour-based crime'. 'He alleges that he fled Iraq due to threats from his former father-in-law, a prominent and influential politician affiliated with the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan. 'According to the [Iraqi], he was accused of bringing dishonour upon [his ex-father-in-law's] family by divorcing his daughter,' the court was told. It was accepted that he was married and went through a divorce, but the Home Office 'did not accept that he had experienced problems from his ex-father-in-law'. The Home Office issued a deportation order but the Iraqi, who had a child with his ex-wife, appealed the decision. His challenge was dismissed by a lower tribunal as the judge questioned 'the credibility of the marriage itself'. The First-tier Tribunal said there was a 'disparity in social status' between his ex-wife – the daughter of a powerful politician – and him, a 'minimally educated taxi driver from a marginalised tribe'. A claim by the Iraqi that he had also been the victim of a 'violent' attack linked to the honour feud and stabbed 17 times was dismissed as implausible by the judge, partly because it was 'unsubstantiated' by any medical evidence. The judge said the asylum claim appeared a 'complete fabrication'. The Iraqi appealed to the upper tribunal where the judge Sara Anzani said the lower court was wrong to question the marriage and divorce certificates and said the Iraqi was not given a chance to respond to their doubts. Judge Anzani said: 'These concerns about the reliability and authenticity of the marriage and divorce certificates were not previously raised by the [Home Office], nor were they put to the [Iraqi] during the hearing. 'I find that the Judge's failure to raise his concerns about the authenticity and reliability of the marriage and divorce certificates, concerns not previously identified by the [Home Office], deprived the [Iraqi] of a fair opportunity to address the Judge's doubts. 'The Judge's findings on the marriage and divorce certificates contribute to his overall assessment of the [Iraqi's] credibility, and the ultimate finding that [his] claim was fabricated. 'Consequently, this procedural error is material and permeates the entirety of the Judge's decision'. Judge Anzani concluded that the case must be heard afresh at the First-tier Tribunal again, but not by the previous judge.