
A list of US states where seniors are most vulnerable to social security cuts
Live Events
Which is the most vulnerable state?
Top 10 States Where Seniors Rely Most on Social Security
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Recent attacks on the Social Security Administration (SSA) by tech billionaire Elon Musk's DOGE team and certain members of the Trump administration are threatening the stability of this vital agency. These actions put at risk the financial security of millions of retired, disabled, and low-income Americans, while also disrupting the state and local economies that rely heavily on this income.Social Security's 'Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance' (OASDI) benefits represent about 5% of the nation's GDP, but they make up nearly 10% of the income that U.S. consumers can actually spend—unlike non-cash benefits or income allocated to businesses, governments, and nonprofits, which are also factored into GDP.Seniors in states such as Vermont, Oregon, and New Hampshire are among the most vulnerable to potential cuts in Social Security benefits, according to a new report from Retirement Living, reports Newsweek. The analysis highlights the states where retirees are most dependent on Social Security for basic living expenses in the US.The report comes at a time of major restructuring within the Social Security Administration (SSA), driven by policy shifts under the Trump administration. Earlier this year, the SSA announced plans to eliminate 7,000 positions as part of a broader effort by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to reduce federal spending.Critics argue that these cuts could delay or disrupt access to benefits for millions of vulnerable Americans. The closure of field offices and internal departments is already making it harder for seniors and people with disabilities to get the support they need. For over 40 percent of Americans aged 65 and older, Social Security is their only source of retirement income—making the stability of those benefits crucial for survival.Certain states pose especially high risks to retirees, not only due to their heavy reliance on Social Security but also because of elevated living costs and limited local support services.A spokesperson for RetirementLiving told Newsweek: "Our research shows that many retirees rely on Social Security as their financial lifeline, not just a supplement. That's why older adults in some states are more at risk than others. In places with higher economic vulnerability, a large portion of the senior population simply can't afford to lose any part of their benefit."Vermont ranks as the most vulnerable state, according to the report. It has the eighth-highest cost of living in the US, a senior poverty rate of 9.6 percent, and a high incidence of Social Security fraud.Massachusetts ranks third on the list. Retirees there struggle to stretch an average monthly benefit of $1,979.84 in a state with the second-highest cost of living and the 20th-highest senior poverty rate.The rankings are based on multiple factors, including the percentage of seniors who depend on Social Security, the cost of living, senior poverty rates , and the prevalence of fraud related to benefits.Vermont: 90.9 percent of seniors receive Social Security; the average check is $1,949.07; the cost-of-living index is 114.4.New Hampshire: 91.6 percent of seniors; $2,087.54 average check; cost-of-living 112.6.Massachusetts: 82.8 percent of seniors; $1,979.84 average check; cost-of-living 145.9.Washington: 90 percent of seniors; $2,003.81 average check; cost-of-living 114.2.New York: 83.1 percent of seniors; $1,922.40 average check; cost-of-living 123.3.Delaware: 90.1 percent of seniors; $2,085.16 average check; cost-of-living 112.6.New Jersey: 85 percent of seniors; $2,087.95 average check; cost-of-living 114.6.Rhode Island: 88.4 percent of seniors; $1,963.73 average check; cost-of-living 112.2.Oregon: 92.7 percent of seniors; $1,909.85 average check; cost-of-living 112.Hawaii: 83.9 percent of seniors; $1,895.23 average check; cost-of-living 186.9.Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, warned last month that the DOGE-led cuts to the SSA have already made it harder for seniors, people with disabilities, and their families to access the benefits they've earned.A recent survey echoes those concerns, revealing that 59 percent of working-age Americans fear Social Security may not be available by the time they retire.The prospect of further cuts at the SSA remains unclear, and several advocacy groups have launched legal actions seeking to reverse DOGE-ordered changes."When Social Security spending disappears from these communities, it's not just individual families that suffer," Ryan said. "Think of the 'trickle down.' Grocery stores, pharmacies, the small businesses that survive on that steady monthly flow of federal dollars."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump Targets Nigerians in Visa Crackdown on Birthright Citizenship Firstpost Africa
Trump Targets Nigerians in Visa Crackdown on Birthright Citizenship | Firstpost Africa | N18G In a renewed immigration crackdown, the Trump administration has issued a warning to Nigerians against traveling to the U.S. with the primary intent of giving birth — a practice aimed at securing automatic citizenship for their children under the U.S. Constitution. Nigeria remains among the top countries involved in so-called 'birth tourism.' The U.S. Embassy in Nigeria has also introduced tougher visa rules, including issuing mostly single-entry, short-validity visas. This move is part of broader restrictions targeting African nations, including higher visa fees, tighter interview rules, and increased digital screening — all under Washington's push to curb immigration loopholes. See More


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Newsom may call special California election to decide on new Congressional maps - here's what redistricting means
Gavin Newsom pushes for special California election to redraw congressional maps as Trump's GOP reshapes Texas districts- In a bold and controversial move, California Governor Gavin Newsom is preparing to call a special statewide election in November 2025 to allow voters to approve new congressional maps. This high-stakes maneuver is aimed at countering the Republican redistricting strategy led by President Donald Trump in Texas, which could shift the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives. Newsom's proposal is drawing national attention, stirring political debates, and raising legal questions about the future of fair redistricting in America. Newsom wants voters to decide on new congressional maps this November Gavin Newsom is considering a November 2025 special election to put the power of redrawing California's congressional districts directly into the hands of voters. If approved, this would temporarily bypass the state's independent Citizens Redistricting Commission, a voter-approved body responsible for creating fair and nonpartisan political maps since 2010. Instead, new maps would be crafted by the Democratic-majority California Legislature, then submitted to voters for approval. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category healthcare Others Management Design Thinking Technology Data Science Digital Marketing Product Management Public Policy Project Management Operations Management Healthcare Data Analytics Data Science Finance Cybersecurity CXO Artificial Intelligence MCA others Leadership Degree PGDM MBA Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIM Lucknow CERT-IIML Healthcare Management India Starts on undefined Get Details The maps would apply to the 2026, 2028, and 2030 U.S. House elections. After 2030, the current redistricting commission system would be restored, according to Newsom's plan. The governor emphasized that this is a temporary strategic response, not a permanent change to the system. Trump-backed Texas redistricting plan prompts California's counter move This proposal comes in direct response to President Trump's Republican allies in Texas, who are currently pushing for mid-decade redistricting to add up to five new GOP-leaning congressional districts. Texas had already redrawn its districts after the 2020 Census, but now Republicans are aggressively pursuing a second redistricting effort before the 2026 elections to strengthen their hold in the House. Newsom described California's plan as a "counterattack" against what he sees as a deeply unfair and partisan move by Texas Republicans. In a statement to reporters, he said, 'We can't let them play by a different set of rules while we tie our own hands. Democracy can't be one-sided.' Live Events Democrats argue they must fight fire with fire to protect the House With control of the U.S. House at stake in 2026, Democratic leaders are warning that if red states like Texas manipulate congressional maps to favor the GOP, blue states must respond in kind to protect representative balance. Newsom and other Democratic governors have been under pressure to retaliate strategically and prevent a Republican supermajority engineered through redistricting alone. The governor's plan would allow California to potentially gain Democratic-friendly districts to offset GOP gains in Texas. If successful, it could have a major impact on the outcome of the 2026 midterms and help Democrats maintain—or even retake—control of Congress. A special election in California could cost over $200 million The idea of a statewide special election in an off-year like 2025 is not without precedent. California held a high-profile gubernatorial recall election in 2021, which cost taxpayers around $208 million. Newsom acknowledged the high price tag but insisted that protecting democracy is worth the investment. 'This isn't just about California,' Newsom said. 'This is about ensuring every voter in this country is represented fairly and not silenced by gerrymandering power plays in other states.' State officials estimate that a November 2025 special election could cost upwards of $200 million, especially if held alongside already scheduled local elections in various counties. Critics slam the plan as a dangerous attack on nonpartisan redistricting Despite support from national Democrats, Newsom's proposal is facing strong criticism from voting rights advocates and good government groups who argue that tampering with the independent redistricting process, even temporarily, sets a dangerous precedent. The California Citizens Redistricting Commission, created through two voter-approved ballot measures in 2008 and 2010, was hailed as a model for nonpartisan mapmaking. Critics warn that overriding it—no matter the reason—undermines public trust in fair elections and could erode California's reputation for political integrity. 'This is a slippery slope,' said Kathay Feng, a prominent voting rights attorney. 'If we gut the commission every time it's politically convenient, what's to stop future governors from doing the same?' Legal experts warn of constitutional and court challenges ahead To implement this plan, Newsom may need a constitutional amendment or legislative referral, which would require voter approval. Legal experts warn that any attempt to bypass the redistricting commission will face swift legal challenges, potentially delaying or even blocking the new maps from being used in 2026. Election law scholars say California's state constitution provides strong protections for the redistricting commission. Altering that structure, even temporarily, may spark lengthy court battles that could leave congressional races in limbo. Still, Newsom seems ready for the fight. 'Texas isn't following the rules,' he said. 'If we don't stand up now, they will redraw democracy on their terms.' Newsom's 2028 ambitions may hinge on the success of this plan This high-stakes redistricting gamble could have serious consequences for Gavin Newsom's political future. The California governor is widely seen as a potential Democratic presidential contender in 2028, especially if President Trump seeks a second term. If Newsom succeeds in mobilizing voters, winning legal battles, and helping Democrats secure additional House seats, it could position him as a national Democratic hero. But if the plan backfires—either legally, politically, or financially—it may damage his credibility and embolden critics who see the move as partisan overreach. 'This is risky,' said a longtime Democratic strategist. 'But boldness is sometimes what defines leadership. Newsom is betting big on the idea that voters will see this as defending democracy, not undermining it.' Timeline: What happens next in California The California State Legislature is expected to reconvene on August 18, 2025 . Lawmakers will debate the proposal and decide whether to place the redistricting measure on the November ballot. If the plan advances, here's what to expect: Late August 2025 : Final legislative approval of the ballot proposition September 2025 : Draft maps released by the Legislature and public campaign begins November 4, 2025 : Statewide special election held alongside local contests 2026 : If approved, new maps go into effect for congressional elections Meanwhile, advocacy groups on both sides are already preparing media campaigns, legal briefs, and voter outreach as the battle over the future of congressional redistricting heats up in the Golden State. A defining moment for redistricting fairness and national politics Gavin Newsom's move to redraw California's House districts in response to Trump's Republican redistricting playbook in Texas is more than a state political drama—it's a national test of how Democrats plan to respond to partisan gerrymandering. With the balance of power in Congress hanging by a thread, both parties are now openly embracing political map warfare. The big question is whether voters in California, a state long known for championing electoral fairness, are ready to join the fight—and whether doing so will help or hurt the cause of democracy in the long run. As the November 2025 special election approaches, all eyes will be on California—not just as the largest blue state, but as the new front line in America's redistricting battle. FAQs: Q1: Why is Gavin Newsom planning a special election in California in 2025? To let voters decide if lawmakers should redraw congressional maps in response to GOP redistricting. Q2: What happens if California overrides its redistricting commission in 2025? It could allow Democrats to create new districts for 2026–2030 to counter GOP gains.


Economic Times
43 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Grok Imagine goes live on Elon Musk's X platform
Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI has officially rolled out Grok Imagine, a text-to-video generation tool integrated within the X platform (formerly Twitter).The feature, which was previously being tested with a limited group of users, is now more widely accessible. According to Musk, users can update their X app and request access to the waitlist by navigating to the 'Grok' section in settings and selecting 'Imagine.' 'Grok Imagine is still in early beta, so will improve almost every day,' Musk wrote in a post on X, adding that real-time improvements are expected as the model scales. Grok Imagine allows users to generate videos and still images from text prompts, with videos of up to six minutes in duration. In addition, it can animate static images into moving visuals with synchronized sound, offering creators a more seamless workflow without needing external tools or software. Early users have compared the feature to Twitter's Vine, the once-popular short-form video app that was discontinued in 2017. However, Grok Imagine appears to be aimed at much broader use cases—including entertainment, education, and meme culture—leveraging generative AI for creative expression. The feature is available both via the standalone Grok app and within the main X platform. According to a post by the official Grok handle, full public rollout is expected in phases beginning October 2025. The launch follows xAI's recent disclosure that it is also working on a kid-friendly version of its Grok chatbot, suggesting the company is eyeing wider demographic adoption as it refines its AI capabilities. Meanwhile, xAI is in the process of preparing a fresh funding round, which could value the company between $170 billion and $200 billion, according to a July 12 Reuters report. The company expects to generate over $13 billion in annual earnings by 2029, as per financial projections shared by Morgan Stanley and reported by Bloomberg in June. With Grok Imagine now live, Musk appears to be positioning X as not just a social media platform but an AI-powered content engine, blending user-generated media with proprietary infrastructure and models built by xAI.