Major takeaways from Supreme Court curbing federal judges' power, handing Trump major victory on executive authority
The Supreme Court delivered a major victory to President Donald Trump on Friday, sharply limiting federal judges' authority to block presidential policies through nationwide injunctions. In a 6-3 ruling split along ideological lines, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that such sweeping orders 'likely exceed the equitable authority' granted to courts, calling them a 'conspicuously nonexistent' practice for most of US history.
While the case stemmed from challenges to Trump's executive order denying citizenship to babies of undocumented or temporary residents, the Court deliberately avoided ruling on the order's constitutionality. Instead, Barrett emphasized that courts cannot exercise 'general oversight of the Executive Branch,' effectively dismantling a key check on presidential power that had blocked dozens of Trump's policies.
The immediate impact creates legal limbo for birthright citizenship: The policy could take effect in 28 non-challenging states after a 30-day window, potentially creating a 'patchwork' system where citizenship rules differ by state. Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent, read aloud in a rare display of protest, blasted the majority for enabling 'gamesmanship' and issuing 'an open invitation for the Government to bypass the Constitution'.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson similarly warned the ruling permits the executive to 'violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued,' concluding her dissent without the traditional 'respectfully' as a pointed rebuke. The Court suggested challengers pivot to class-action lawsuits, a path immigration advocates immediately pursued in Maryland and New Hampshire filings.
Trump celebrated the decision as a 'monumental victory' against 'radical left judges,' while Attorney General Pam Bondi denounced 'rogue judges' who had issued 35 injunctions against Trump policies from just five districts. Legally, the ruling empowers Trump to revive stalled policies like transgender healthcare and refugee resettlement.
However, constitutional scholars warn it risks 'chaotic' outcomes, including potential statelessness for newborns and conflicting state-level citizenship standards.
With the Supreme Court likely to hear the birthright citizenship merits in October, the decision marks Trump's 10th emergency docket win this term, solidifying a broader pattern of judicial deference to his executive authority.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Not talking, not paying': Trump rejects Iran deal, blasts Democrats
In a blistering Truth Social post, US President Donald Trump on Monday tore into Democrat Senator Chris Coons, insisting he's made no offers to Iran and certainly no payments, unlike former President Barack Obama. He also said that his administration is not in talks with Iran and categorically denied any proposal to support Tehran's nuclear programme. 'We're not speaking to Iran,' Trump wrote, adding, 'We're not offering them anything.' Trump's comments come amid ongoing debate over the state of Iran's nuclear programme following US and Israeli military strikes earlier this month. The president repeated his previous assertion that the US had 'totally OBLITERATED' Tehran's nuclear facilities, calling media reports about ongoing negotiations a 'hoax'. In an interview with Fox News on Sunday, Trump elaborated on the nature of the strikes, specifically at Iran's Fordo nuclear site. 'They questioned whether the sites were 'obliterated' or just terrible, and it turned out that they were in fact obliterated,' he said, adding that the bombs 'penetrated like absolute butter.' Independent satellite imagery and Israeli intelligence assessments cited in multiple media outlets have supported claims of extensive structural damage at several nuclear facilities. Trump also took aim at reports suggesting his administration had considered offering Iran up to $30 billion in aid to build a civilian nuclear energy programme. He strongly denied the existence of any such deal. The president has often criticised the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)—commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal—brokered under Barack Obama, which lifted sanctions on Iran in exchange for limits on its nuclear activities. Trump withdrew the US from the JCPOA in 2018, calling it a 'disaster.' The post also targeted Senator Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware and vocal critic of Trump's Iran policy. Coons has publicly raised concerns about the lack of congressional oversight in Trump's recent military actions against Iran and has urged diplomatic engagement. In his post, Trump labeled Coons 'phony' and rejected any notion of behind-the-scenes talks.
Hans India
43 minutes ago
- Hans India
Letter petition urges SC to take suo motu cognizance of Kolkata law college gang-rape case
A letter petition has been addressed to the Chief Justice of India, B.R. Gavai, urging the Supreme Court to take suo motu cognizance of the heinous gang-rape of a law student within her college premises at Kasba in South Kolkata. On June 25, a first-year female law student was allegedly raped on the premises of South Calcutta Law College by three accused, all linked to the Trinamool Congress' student wing, Trinamool Chhatra Parishad (TMCP). The plea urged the top court to take suo motu cognizance of the incident and sought directions for an immediate and impartial investigation into the matter. It prayed for immediate transfer of the investigation of the rape case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) with a direction for time-bound conclusion of probe. Further, the plea filed by advocate Satyam Singh sought directions to the West Bengal government to pay interim compensation of Rs 50 lakh to the victim for medical treatment, rehabilitation, and legal expenses. Apart from seeking directions to provide immediate and comprehensive protection to the victim, her family members and all witnesses related to the case, the letter petition demanded for framing of comprehensive directions for women's safety in educational institutions. The plea urged the apex court to direct appropriate action against Trinamool Congress leaders, including Kalyan Banerjee and Madan Mitra, and other public representatives who engaged in victim-shaming and made derogatory remarks. Trinamool legislator Madan Mitra, infamous for his frequent loose comments, made a controversial statement claiming that the rape incident had sent a message to all girls that they should not go the college when it is closed. Following Mitra's controversial comments, the Trinamool Congress issued a statement claiming that the remarks were made in his individual capacity and hence the party had unequivocally disassociated itself from his statements and strongly condemned them. The party later served a show-cause notice to Mitra.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
SC refuses to entertain plea challenging Bodh Gaya Temple Act; asks petitioner to move HC
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea challenging the vires of the Bodh Gaya Temple Act , 1949, and asked the petitioner to approach the concerned high court. The Mahabodhi temple complex in Bihar's Bodh Gaya, a UNESCO World Heritage site , is one of the four holy areas related to the life of Lord Gautam Buddha . Bodh Gaya is a place where Lord Buddha is believed to have attained enlightenment. A plea challenging the vires of the 1949 Act came up for hearing before a bench of Justices M M Sundresh and K Vinod Chandran. The bench asked the petitioner's counsel about the prayer sought in the plea. "I (petitioner) have prayed that the Bodh Gaya Temple Act should be annulled as ultra vires," the counsel said. Live Events The bench said the petitioner should approach the concerned high court. "Why don't you do it before the high court?" the bench asked. "We are not inclined to entertain the petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the high court," the bench said. The 1949 Act pertains to the better management of the temple. The Mahabodhi temple complex comprises a 50-metre high grand temple, the Vajrasana, the sacred Bodhi tree and six other sacred sites of Buddha's enlightenment, surrounded by numerous ancient votive stupas, well maintained and protected by inner, middle and outer circular boundaries. A seventh sacred place, the Lotus Pond, is located outside the enclosure to the south. Both the temple area and the Lotus Pond are surrounded by circulating passages at two or three levels, and the area of the ensemble is 5 metres below the level of the surrounding land. In April this year, Rashtriya Lok Morcha supremo and former Union minister Upendra Kushwaha demanded an amendment in the provisions of the Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949, so that the management of the Mahabodhi Mahavihara Temple can be handed over to the Buddhists.
