Boycott China: You won't believe these 50 Chinese products are found in every Indian household, they are...
India and China have been engaged in a territorial face-off since 2020 after the Chinese Army transgressed into multiple areas from the Galwan valley to the Finger area along the Pangong lake. This incident sparked a widespread call to boycott Chinese products across the country. Over the past four years, the movement has gained some ground, with many people gradually shifting towards locally made goods. However, it's still a concern that a significant portion of products—like kitchen items, electronic gadgets, and even religious supplies—continue to be imported from China. In 2020, India lost 20 soldiers, including a commanding officer, during a violent clash with Chinese troops in the Galwan Valley.
China hasn't stopped its political activities quietly. When tensions rose between India and Pakistan along the border, it became clear that China was quietly supporting Pakistan. In such times, if China plans against India but still wants to benefit from our large market, many people in India have started boycotting 'Made in China' products to reduce their presence in the market. As demand decreases, imports will go down, which will eventually affect China economically.
In recent years, there has been significant opposition to imports from China, especially items like toys and figurines, because these are culturally and economically sensitive. Below is a list of such Chinese products that are directly imported from China and bear the label 'Made in China' or 'Made in PRC.'
According to an Aaj Tak report, China holds a 75% share in the import of toys. While purchasing toys, it is advisable to check the brand carefully and avoid generic Chinese brands. The government has taken several positive steps to promote the indigenous toy industry, which has resulted in a 52% reduction in imports since 2020. Despite this progress, Chinese toys are still commonly found in the Indian market.
According to an Aaj Tak report, the import of Chinese figurines has faced widespread opposition due to their strong connection with religious sentiments. The Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) led boycott campaigns against these imports in 2016 and 2020. It is claimed that the Chinese share in figurines has dropped significantly from 70-80% to around 10%. This reduction is attributed to the increased promotion of indigenous figurines, which has helped curb imports. However, Chinese figurines are still sold during festivals.
During Diwali and other festivals, Chinese decorative garlands sell a lot because they are cheap. But their quality is very low. According to the AajTak report, the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has added these items to its boycott list of more than 500 Chinese products. The rule to make BIS certification mandatory has reduced the import of Chinese decorations, but they can still be found in local markets.
Here's a concise list of common Chinese-imported products in India (directly from China, labeled 'Made in China/PRC'): Smartphones: Xiaomi (Mi, Redmi), Oppo, Vivo, Realme (Made in China)
Power Banks: Xiaomi, Anker (Made in China)
Earphones/Headphones: OnePlus, Realme, Xiaomi (Made in China)
Mobile Chargers: Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo (Made in China)
Electric Trimmers: Xiaomi, Philips (some models) (Made in China)
Hair Dryers: Xiaomi, Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Electric Shavers: Xiaomi, Kemei (Made in China)
Portable Fans: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Decorative Garlands (Diwali/Christmas): Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Lakshmi-Ganesh Figurines (Plastic/Ceramic): Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Holi Water Guns (Pichkaris): Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Holi Colors (Powder/Liquid): Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Plastic Toys: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Battery-operated Toys: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Remote Control Cars/Drones: DJI (drones), Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Solar Cells/Panels: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Tempered Glass (Screen Protectors): Spigen, Baseus (Made in China)
USB Cables: Anker, Baseus (Made in China)
Smartwatches: Amazfit, Xiaomi (Made in China)
Bluetooth Speakers: JBL (some models), Xiaomi (Made in China)
LED Bulbs: Syska (some models), Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
LED Strip Lights: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Electric Kettles: Xiaomi, Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Electronic Display Boards: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Memory Cards (SD Cards): SanDisk (some models), Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Pen Drives: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Wireless Communication Devices: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Sound Recorders: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Badminton Rackets: Yonex (some models), Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Footballs: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Footwear: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
School Bags: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Umbrellas: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Artificial Jewelry: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Electric Massagers: Xiaomi, Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Heating Pads: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
CCTV Cameras: Hikvision, Dahua (Made in China)
Furniture (Cheap desks, chairs): Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Bedsheets: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Plastic Containers: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Non-stick Pans/Tawas: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
China Clay Cups and Plates: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Cheap Glasses (Frames): Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Digital Thermometers: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
BP Monitors: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Electric Toothbrushes: Xiaomi, Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Insect Repellent Devices: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Coffee Makers: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Electric Can Openers: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Outdoor Barbecues: Generic Chinese brands (Made in China)
Chinese companies currently hold about 70% of the smartphone market share. The 'Boycott China' campaign has influenced buying habits to some extent, but many consumers still choose Chinese mobiles due to their affordable prices. Popular Chinese brands include Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, and Realme. If these products are manufactured in India, they can be considered for purchase. However, it's advisable to avoid products labeled 'Made in China.' Similarly, when purchasing power banks, speakers, or headphones, it's helpful to check their country of manufacture.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
31 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Taiwanese, Vietnamese firms keen to invest in footwear sector in India: CLE
Companies from Taiwan and Vietnam are keen to invest in India's non-leather footwear sector, and the government support is crucial to facilitate these investments, Council for Leather Exports (CLE) Chairman RK Jalan said on Sunday. Jalan said these Taiwanese and Vietnamese firms import products like shoe soles, moulds, machinery, and fabrics from countries like China. "Vietnamese and Taiwanese firms are keen to invest in India. We need to support them so that they can import these goods smoothly into the country for their manufacturing facilities," he said. The country's exports are growing at a healthy rate, and the council is aiming for $7 billion worth of shipments in 2025-26, he added. The exports stood at $5.75 billion in 2024-25. The US was the top destination for Indian exporters with shipments worth $957 million (about 20 per cent share). It was followed by the UK (11 per cent) and Germany. "We are expecting about 18 per cent growth this year. Promotion of manufacturing in the country will help further boost exports and job creation," Jalan added. He said that a trade pact with the US will help increase the share in the American market. At present, this labour-intensive sector attracts 18.5 per cent duty in the US. The two countries are major players in the global footwear sector. Vietnam is a major global hub for manufacturing and exporting footwear, while Taiwan plays a key role in the design, development, and production of footwear for leading international brands. He also urged the government to roll out the focused product scheme for the footwear and leather sectors announced in the Budget to enhance productivity, competitiveness and exports. The scheme will support design capacity, component manufacturing, and machinery required for the production of non-leather quality footwear. Sharing similar views, Kanpur-based Growmore International Ltd MD Yadvendra Singh Sachan said Taiwanese companies have already invested in firms in Tamil Nadu. "They have the best technologies in the non-leather footwear sector. Their entry will help domestic firms in increasing quality production," Sachan said, adding huge opportunities are there for investments in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar because of the availability of affordable labour in these states. He said that Growmore International is also looking for collaborations with foreign firms to enhance the productivity of leather articles. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
India and China were the world's richest nations — rice grew their wealth: Francesca Bray, University of Edinburgh
Francesca Bray is Professor Emerita of Social Anthropology at the University of Edinburgh. Speaking to Srijana Mitra Das at Times Evoke , she outlines the history of rice — and its workers: What is the core of your research? Over my career, I've looked at multiple aspects stemming from my original research, which was on the history of agriculture in China . From that came an interest in agrarian networks and social systems linked with these. Gender, with its associated crops, was one such topic — this is when I grew particularly interested in rice. Does rice represent global commodity networks? Rice is rather special in today's world — wheat and corn are global commodities, bought and sold between countries in greater quantities than usually consumed in their home economies. Rice is an exception — although it has world markets, most rice produced is actually consumed within the societies that grow it. Rice has resisted the large-scale industrial monoculture model and rice fields are still smaller than wheat, soybean or industrial maize. Rice encourages smaller farmers and more diversity of crops and occupations. IT'S AT SO MANY LEVELS: Rice, grown in a variety of ways by small farmers, from flat paddies to layered terraces, evolved its own technological development and sparked entrepreneurship — Live Events Did rice cultivation shape pre-colonial societies? With the ability of its farms to remain small, rice did away with feudal relations — the management of farms by small agriculturalists meant their labour was not directly controlled by a landlord. As long as they paid their rent, they were fine. Secondly, it encouraged small farmers to become entrepreneurs, working at household scale or with local manufacturers and often buying land of their own. In southern China, the notion of wealth growing within generations was strong because people could change their status. In Malaysia, peasants contributed taxes to a king's coffers but they weren't feudal labour — they were independent farmers. How do you view the characterisation of ricebased economies being slower and less technological than wheat-eating nations? The historian Roy Bin Wong's book 'China Transformed' suggests the principle of symmetrical comparison — instead of saying 'Europe went this way and China and India didn't, so what did they do wrong?', we should ask what people wanted there and whether they were successful at managing it. The south Chinese rice-centred economy actually grew enormously over the centuries, becoming a global powerhouse. It didn't give rise to an Industrial Revolution like England's and mechanisation wasn't big but many systems for raising capital, making it available at a distance, etc., developed there. The 19 th century onwards, interactions in the Indian Ocean-Pacific world between Western capitalism and what was supposed to not be capitalism in Asia had several financial systems which came from South India, East Asia and Islamic nations. WERE YOU ALWAYS PEARLY? Rice includes harsh realities like colonialism and forced labour India and China were actually the richest economies on Earth — rice was a significant factor in this wealth and the social organisation of businesses around it helped produce capitalism. So, it's not helpful to say, 'They were slow and got overtaken', because if you look in detail at the interactions, there was mutual influence — of course, since the people writing such books were English or Dutch, they preferred to say they were the ones bringing progress. How did colonialism then impact rice? Rice was an essential product in the rise and expansion of colonialism and the emergence of a global industrial economy — during the colonial era, rice became a cheap staple food for poor workforces around the world. By 1700, rice was the main provision of the slave trade between West Africa and the Americas — it then became the staple of colonial labour across the tropical zone. In the 18 th century, rice plantations in Brazil and South Carolina harnessed African skills to grow the crop for export to Europe and the Caribbean. Through the 19 th century, as they expanded colonies in Asia, British, French and Dutch powers carved out export-based rice zones in Indochina and Indonesia — they also priced the rice industries of America out of the market. Independent kingdoms in Southeast Asia like Siam (Thailand) also entered the fray and opened new rice frontiers to feed miners, plantation workers and growing urban populations. A latecomer colonial power, Meiji Japan , met its expanding resource needs by annexing Taiwan and Korea and taking control of their rice production. Chinese merchants controlled most of the rice trade across Southeast Asia. FROM STAPLE TO SPECIAL: Rice is many- splendoured The area under rice increased as colonial workforces expanded — by the mid-19 th century, new technologies for draining, pumping and levelling meant swampy deltas and flood plains could now be turned into paddy fields. In Indochina, rice industries were set up to feed migrant workers in mines and plantations — in Punjab and Bengal, the British intensified rice systems developed by the Mughals to expand commercial cropping of indigo, cotton and sugarcane. Colonial policies drove the emergence of what the historian Peter Boomgaard calls 'monotonous rice bowls', monocrop zones depending on intensive labour by workers who had little opportunity to diversify or increase their incomes. Typically, they were tied down by debt — colonial governments introduced taxes that had to be paid in cash while moneylenders charged high rates of interest. It was in this fertile soil that the Green Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s was planted. What role has gender played in rice? IT'S NOT JUST HIS-STORY: The chronicles of women rice farmers are often wilfully erased Even between China and Japan, which were very close in many respects, the gender coding of rice cultivation was different. China was a particularly intense example of a gender coding where men were supposed to be in the fields growing grain and women in the house, weaving cloth. This view dated back to the early imperial period in China and outlived the eventual switch to monetary payment. The notion that men should be out in the fields and women at home remained fundamental in Chinese political economy and concepts of identity, gender and morality. It seemed to fit with Chinese circumstances since many rice regions in China were textile producers, which did start with women producing the textiles. As the economy commercialised though, more and more men came into the textile industry which began to expand to workshops outside the home. Meanwhile, in many regions, women were out working in the rice fields — but since this wasn't regarded as 'proper' or 'ideal' women's activity, their hard work was often erased from the history books.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
IPL valuation jumps nearly 13% to $18.5 billion on strong media deals, fan growth
The Indian Premier League ( IPL ) has seen its business valuation surge to $18.5 billion (₹1.56 lakh crore), marking a 12.9% year-on-year increase, according to a new report from global investment bank Houlihan Lokey . The analysis hihglights IPL's growing dominance as one of the world's most valuable sporting properties. The league's brand value alone rose 13.8% in 2025 to $3.9 billion (₹32,721 crore), a 16.1% jump in Indian rupee terms, highlighting its increasing global pull, robust sponsorship ecosystem, and explosive digital engagement. "For institutional investors, this makes the IPL not just a sports league but a high-growth compounder in the entertainment space, catering to a fast-growing fan base with rising disposable income and a strong appetite for premium digital experiences," the study stated. Houlihan Lokey noted that brand value, distinct from total business valuation, reflects the monetary worth of intangible assets like trademarks, trade names, and goodwill. It's only one part of a broader calculation that also includes tangible assets, revenues, and operational factors. Since its launch in 2008, the IPL has evolved into a multibillion-dollar platform that not only dominates Indian sports but also shapes global standards in broadcasting, sponsorship strategy, and franchise operations. The 2025 season, despite facing a temporary pause due to geopolitical tensions in early May, bounced back swiftly with strong contingency planning and coordination among stakeholders. Live Events The report called this year's IPL a textbook example of 'resilience and operational agility.' Franchise performance remains central to the league's commercial success. Top teams reported annual revenues ranging from ₹650 crore to ₹700 crore, with as much as 80% of revenue visibility secured before the tournament even began. A league-wide salary cap of ₹120 crore per team acts as a built-in safeguard, limiting wage inflation and preserving competitive balance. IPL franchises also benefit from a capital-light model, thanks to existing BCCI-created stadium infrastructure and minimal fixed asset exposure. Compared to global peers like English Premier League or NBA teams—which face large transfer fees, variable wages, and stadium debt—IPL teams enjoy a revenue-guaranteed, asset-light structure that enhances upside and protects against risk. The valuation report also pointed to the IPL's growing global audience, noting that the 2025 final between Royal Challengers Bengaluru and Punjab Kings smashed viewership records. The title clash drew more than 600 million views on JioCinema, cementing the IPL's status as one of the most-watched sporting events worldwide. The report concluded that with a potent mix of fan loyalty, commercial scalability, and digital reach, the IPL is continuing to redefine what's possible in sports business . With inputs from ANI
