Mother of Manchester Arena victim welcomes royal assent for Martyn's Law
Martyn's Law, officially the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025, requires UK venues hosting 200 or more people to prepare for a terror attack, after receiving royal assent on Thursday.
Larger venues expecting 800 or more must also take steps such as using CCTV, bag checks or vehicle inspections.
Figen Murray, who campaigned for the law change in memory of her 29-year-old son Martyn Hett, met Sir Keir Starmer at Downing Street and said she is 'absolutely over the moon'.
Ms Murray told the BBC's North West Tonight: 'Somebody earlier was saying, 'is it eight years? It feels like yesterday'.
'And to me, it always feels like yesterday. I remember everything so vividly, of course, and it will stay with me forever.
'But having the campaign come to this kind of end is really massive.'
She later said: 'We lost our child and I can't bring Martyn back, but to know that people's lives will be saved is a big thing.'
Mr Hett and 21 other people were killed in the bombing at the end of an Ariana Grande concert in May 2017.
Ms Murray completed a 200-mile walk from Manchester Arena to Downing Street and delivered a letter to then-prime minister Rishi Sunak in May last year as part of her campaign.
The Bill was laid before Parliament in September.
Sir Keir told the BBC: 'I would like to think I had the wherewithal to do what Figen has done.
'I'm not sure in my heart of hearts I would be able to pick myself up as she has done after the most awful of circumstances, to then campaign and to bring that change on behalf of other people, to make sure they never go through what she has been through and what her family has been through.
'I find that incredible.'
The Prime Minister labelled Martyn's Law a 'landmark moment' in improving safety at public events across the UK.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Martyn's Law will significantly strengthen public safety across our country. I'd like to thank Figen Murray for her tireless work to make this law a reality.
'This Government is securing Britain's future through the plan for change and, as the eighth anniversary of the attack approaches, this new law delivers upon the lessons from the Manchester Arena Inquiry to keep people safe.'
The Security Industry Authority (SIA) will take on the role of regulator for the legislation, the Home Office said.
The Act will not come into force for at least two years to allow the SIA's new function to be established and give those responsible sufficient time to understand their new obligations and plan ahead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Magic Grandpa is back — and Labour will laugh him off at its peril
It's not altogether clear how seriously you're meant to take a political party that can fit inside a single pantomime horse costume, especially when it's riding about with no name. But still, it looked like it felt good for Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana to be out in the rain. The launch event, if it can be called that, of Corbyn and Sultana's new party took Westminster by surprise, but the party's brand new leader denied it had been done on the spur of the moment. Launching a nameless political party was, he said, 'totally coherent', while standing in some very light drizzle in central London. For now, it is called 'Your Party' and its leader explained that he couldn't possibly name it until he'd read through all the suggestions, which can still be submitted at Suggestions, he said, had been coming in at 'more than 500 a minute', which does raise the possibility that some of them may not be altogether serious. When he was asked by a TV news reporter why it didn't have a name, Corbyn cracked a little smile and said: 'Well we're open to suggestions for names so if you've got a suggestion for a name, bring it on. Any ideas out there, I'm ready to receive them.' He explained that the name would be chosen 'by a final assembly later in the year', which might sound hilarious, but don't forget that was also his big idea, back in 2019, for his own party's policy on Brexit. Well, not his big idea, his shadow Brexit secretary's big idea in fact. Whatever happened to him. Things like, you know, just choosing the name yourself, is not for them. That's the sort of thing, according to the two-page letter the pair of them published on X, that the 'top-down control freaks' in the Labour Party do. His former party is doing its best to pretend not to be worried. 'The electorate has twice given its verdict on a Jeremy Corbyn-led party', was how one anonymous Labour Party figure put it to the BBC. But that cheery little smile on the face of magic grandpa is a little bit of an earthquake. One of the verdicts of the electorate on Corbyn wasn't all that damning, in the sense that he received 12.9 million votes, which is about three million more than Starmer managed last year. Corbyn came within a whisper of victory, which we must believe would definitely have horrified the prime minister and half his cabinet, all of whom campaigned for him. Even in the middle of a Labour landslide, people out there who share Corbyn's worldview cost Starmer Jonathan Ashworth and Thangam Debbonaire, who would both have been in the cabinet, and very nearly cost him Wes Streeting and Jess Phillips too. If smiley, twinkly, albeit still-wrong-about-everything Corbyn has got four years in him then he might even be, in a crowded field, straight in at number one as his former party's worst enemy. It's easy to laugh at Corbyn. In fact I would strongly encourage it. It's the only viable psychological coping mechanism. But if they're laughing in Downing Street, then they might live to regret it.
Glasgow Times
2 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Zelensky announces new anti-corruption Bill after public outcry and EU criticism
Opponents of the contentious law passed by politicians and approved by Mr Zelensky earlier this week said that it stripped Ukraine's anti-corruption watchdogs of their independence by granting the government more oversight of their work. Mr Zelensky said it was needed to speed up investigations, ensure more convictions and remove 'Russian influence' from the fight against corruption, though he did not provide examples of Russian meddling. In an abrupt change of course on Thursday, Mr Zelensky unexpectedly said that he had drawn up a new draft Bill on corruption that 'guarantees the real strengthening of the law and order system in Ukraine'. 'The most important thing is real tools, no Russian connections, and the independence of the (watchdogs),' he said in a Telegram post. The declaration appeared to bow to recent pressure that threatened to undermine public trust in Ukraine's leaders after more than three years of fighting Russia's full-scale invasion. The protests have not called for Mr Zelensky ousting, but they are the first major anti-government demonstrations since the war began. 'It is important that we maintain unity,' Mr Zelensky said in his post. The announcement also left some questions unanswered. Volodymyr Zelensky attending the parliament session in Kyiv on Thursday (Vadym Sarakhan/AP) Mr Zelensky had said on Wednesday that he met the heads of Ukraine's key anti-corruption and security agencies and gave them two weeks to make recommendations on how the graft law could be improved before he presented another Bill to Parliament. It is unclear what becomes of that effort to seek their input. Despite that assurance of new legislation, further street protests were scheduled for Thursday evening. The new pronouncement also left unclear whether Mr Zelensky intended to revoke the law that he approved earlier in the week after Parliament had passed it. He did not publicise details about the proposed new law. The unrest has come at a difficult time in the all-out war, which began on February 24 2022. Russia's bigger army is accelerating its efforts to pierce Ukraine's frontline defences and is escalating its bombardment of Ukrainian cities. Ukraine is also facing a question mark over whether the United States will provide more military aid and whether European commitments can take up the slack, with no end in sight to the war. Delegations from Russia and Ukraine met in Istanbul for a third round of talks in as many months on Wednesday. But once again, the talks were brief and delivered no major breakthrough. Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's aspirations to join the EU and maintain access to billions of dollars in Western aid in the war. It is also an effort that enjoys broad public support. EU enlargement commissioner Marta Kos expressed concern on Wednesday over the new law, calling it 'a serious step back'. The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticizsed parliament's decision, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014 and damages trust with international partners. People look at a ruined city market following Russia's drone attack in Odesa on Thursday (Michael Shtekel/AP) Meanwhile, two women aged 48 and 59 were killed and 14 other people were injured when Russian forces dropped four powerful glide bombs on Kostiantynivka, an industrial city in eastern Ukraine, and shelled it with artillery, Donetsk regional governor Vadym Filashkin said. Russian planes also dropped two glide bombs on the centre of Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city, on Thursday morning, regional governor Oleh Syniehubov said. At least 42 people were wounded, including two babies, a 10-year-old girl and two 17 year olds, authorities said. The southern city of Odesa, and Cherkasy in central Ukraine, were also hit overnight, authorities said. The drone and missile strikes on the cities wounded 11 people, including a nine-year-old, and damaged historic landmarks and residential buildings, officials said. Ukraine has sought to step up its own long-range drone attacks on Russia, using domestic technology and manufacturing. An overnight Ukrainian drone attack on the Russian Black Sea resort of Sochi killed two women and wounded 11 other people, local authorities said Thursday. An oil depot was hit, officials said, without offering details.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Stop your nonsense! Dithering BBC told to agree deal to televise Glasgow 2026 or else it will have damaging ramifications for the Commonwealth Games and beyond
The BBC have been warned to 'stop their nonsense' - and secure a deal to televise the 2026 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow. Every Games since 1954 has been screened for UK viewers by the national broadcaster, but the corporation's role in next year's event is in doubt following news that a deal has not yet been struck. Mail Sport understands that, although talks are ongoing with different parties, the BBC are reluctant to proceed despite their long history with the Games. Former Scottish track star Brian Whittle, now a Conservative MSP, says if the BBC don't show the Games it will be 'another nail in the coffin' for sport in Scotland - and he is urging the UK Government to step in should the broadcaster not agree terms. 'They absolutely should be showing the Games,' he said. 'If I was to hazard a guess, I'd say this was the curse of the 'dancing around the handbags to do a deal'. 'The driving force behind this is probably the logistics and the money side of things and the amount of money it costs to host one of these things.' Whittle fears the future of the Games will be in jeopardy if the BBC are not involved. 'As we currently stand, the reason the Games are in Scotland is because the Games are struggling, and were struggling to become financially viable in Australia. So it's really important, even if it is a reduced (event), that this is successful and is seen by as many people and validated by as many organisatons as possible. 'If the host nation's broadcaster decided it wasn't big enough, how on earth can (other) countries be persuaded to host the Games? 'It's crucial that the BBC stop this nonsense.' Whittle competed in three Games during his athletics' career, winning silver in the 4x400m in 1990. He said it was 'massively important' as an athlete for the Games to be shown on television, and to obtain exposure to a much bigger audience. 'The 1986 Commonwealth Games (in Edinburgh) was my first major outdoor Games,' he said. 'It brought me to the homes of people across the country, and then two weeks later I won the European championship. 'As a home nation, you get to wear the Scotland vest, and it's a stepping stone to a much bigger arena. 'I was a fledgling UK athlete at the time, but it was about being able to compete alongside contemporaries and be seen. The Commonwealth Games is unbelievably important to our home athletes.' Asked if he felt there should be cross-party support for the BBC to remain the host broadcaster, Whittle said: 'Yes, definitely'. 'I think there would be cross-party support for this and, if there's political pressure to be put on the BBC, it should be done. 'I will be doing exactly that and speaking to the BBC and asking what they're playing at. 'I know outside broadcasters have already been subcontracted, so I just don't believe it. I do think it's a dancing around the handbags thing. 'It's vital that they keep the association with the Games. More and more key sports are not hosted on the BBC any more. It's really important, especially in a home Games, that the BBC are the host broadcaster. 'The ramifications - if it didn't happen - would be a massive blow to sport in this country, because these major Games are a shop window for physical activity and sport. If a big swathe of the population doesn't have access to that, the inevitability is that less people will see world class sport at that level, less kids will be enthused by that. 'My worry is that there is this continual decline in participation, in physical education, fitness, health, in sport, and that would just be another nail in the coffin.' The Department for Media, Sport and Culture told Mail Sport that the BBC's failure to commit so far is a matter for 'Commonwealth Sport and Glasgow 2026'. But a spokesperson added: 'The Commonwealth Games is an amazing sporting event, and the Government is keen that Glasgow 2026 provides another great opportunity to inspire millions by bringing elite sport into our living rooms.' Glasgow stepped in to save the day with a 'revamped' Games after Australia pulled out of the event in 2023, due to a significant rise in costs. The Games' future was immediately put in doubt, but a decision was agreed for Glasgow to host the competition on a scaled-down basis, with financial help from Commonwealth Games Australian, and the Commonwealth Games Federation. Organisers have made clear that no public money will be used to host the Games in Scotland, although the UK government will provide financial support should there be an increased security threat. The revised edition will feature ten sports and six para-sports, across four different venues - after securing £100m from the Australians to host. Though massively reduced in size, it's a model that organisers hope can be used in further iterations, so that a long-term future is secured.
