Mother of Manchester Arena victim welcomes royal assent for Martyn's Law
Martyn's Law, officially the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025, requires UK venues hosting 200 or more people to prepare for a terror attack, after receiving royal assent on Thursday.
Larger venues expecting 800 or more must also take steps such as using CCTV, bag checks or vehicle inspections.
Figen Murray, who campaigned for the law change in memory of her 29-year-old son Martyn Hett, met Sir Keir Starmer at Downing Street and said she is 'absolutely over the moon'.
Ms Murray told the BBC's North West Tonight: 'Somebody earlier was saying, 'is it eight years? It feels like yesterday'.
'And to me, it always feels like yesterday. I remember everything so vividly, of course, and it will stay with me forever.
'But having the campaign come to this kind of end is really massive.'
She later said: 'We lost our child and I can't bring Martyn back, but to know that people's lives will be saved is a big thing.'
Mr Hett and 21 other people were killed in the bombing at the end of an Ariana Grande concert in May 2017.
Ms Murray completed a 200-mile walk from Manchester Arena to Downing Street and delivered a letter to then-prime minister Rishi Sunak in May last year as part of her campaign.
The Bill was laid before Parliament in September.
Sir Keir told the BBC: 'I would like to think I had the wherewithal to do what Figen has done.
'I'm not sure in my heart of hearts I would be able to pick myself up as she has done after the most awful of circumstances, to then campaign and to bring that change on behalf of other people, to make sure they never go through what she has been through and what her family has been through.
'I find that incredible.'
The Prime Minister labelled Martyn's Law a 'landmark moment' in improving safety at public events across the UK.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Martyn's Law will significantly strengthen public safety across our country. I'd like to thank Figen Murray for her tireless work to make this law a reality.
'This Government is securing Britain's future through the plan for change and, as the eighth anniversary of the attack approaches, this new law delivers upon the lessons from the Manchester Arena Inquiry to keep people safe.'
The Security Industry Authority (SIA) will take on the role of regulator for the legislation, the Home Office said.
The Act will not come into force for at least two years to allow the SIA's new function to be established and give those responsible sufficient time to understand their new obligations and plan ahead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Former MP Mhairi Black announces she has left the SNP
Former SNP MP Mhairi Black has left the party - predominantly over its stance on trans rights and Palestine, the BBC who was formerly the SNP's deputy leader at Westminster, said there had been "too many times" when she did not agree with decisions made by the to The Herald newspaper, she said the SNP had "capitulated" on issues important to her"Basically, for a long time, I've not agreed with quite a few decisions that have been made," she said. Black was catapulted into the political limelight when she was elected to Westminster at the age of 20 and became the youngest MP since stood down ahead of the general election last year, citing safety concerns, social media abuse and unsociable was elected as the MP for Paisley and Renfrewshire South, ousting the former Labour cabinet secretary Douglas Alexander, with her victory there coming as the SNP captured all but three of the seats in Scotland in the 2015 general was first national election since the Scottish independence referendum in announced her departure from the SNP ahead of her show "Work in Progress" at the Edinburgh Fringe. "There have just been too many times when I've thought, 'I don't agree with what you've done there' or the decision or strategy that has been arrived at," she said in the Herald interview. Black said she was "still just as pro-independence," but claimed the party's "capitulation on LGBT rights, trans rights in particular" had been an issue for added: "I thought the party could be doing better about Palestine as well."The former MP said: "If anything, I'm probably a bit more left wing than I have been. I don't think I have changed all that much. I feel like the party needs to change a lot more."Black was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during her time at Westminster, saying previously that the condition was picked up after she became unwell with "burn-out" during her time as an SNP spokesperson said the party was "united under John Swinney's vision of creating a better, fairer Scotland".
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
It's time for the UK to recognise Palestine
Time and again, the UK's actions in relation to the Israel-Palestine conflict have come too little, too late. Keir Starmer has an opportunity to act now. Britain must follow France and recognise a state of Palestine while there is still a Palestine to recognise. The position of the United Kingdom has long been that the only acceptable settlement is the two-state solution. Yet we only recognise one of those states. The recognition of Palestine has been Labour policy since I was shadow foreign secretary. It was in the manifesto on which we were elected last year. And immediate recognition is supported by the majority of the Foreign Affairs Committee, which I chair, and which publishes a report into the Israel-Palestine conflict today. When I ask the government when it will happen, they tell me they will recognise at the moment of maximum impact. But we cannot wait forever for a perfect moment that may never come. I can think of many opportunities when recognition might have had a significant effect, had we taken that step. We cannot let another opportunity pass us by. On Monday, the long-awaited French-Saudi conference on the two-state solution will take place in New York. Ahead of it, President Macron has announced that he will recognise a Palestinian state in September. It is no secret that Macron has been pushing the UK government to recognise Palestine alongside the French. He told Parliament as much when he addressed us last week. He is right. A unified move by the signatories to the secret Sykes-Picot agreement which carved up the Middle East more than a century ago would demonstrate our sincere commitment to a two-state solution. The leaders' meeting at the UN in September offers that opportunity. Of course, the most urgent need is for an immediate ceasefire and for UN-administered aid to flood into Gaza. Recognition does not secure peace on its own. But it should be the start of a renewed commitment by Britain to engage with our allies, particularly Gulf and Arab states, to build a plan for a sustainable peace. It would signal that our engagement is sustained and sincere. And it would show the Israeli government that the UK is prepared to take the kind of decisive action promised in the Foreign Secretary's statement alongside 27 allies on Monday. That must include tough and direct action on violent extremist settlers and the companies who facilitate settlements. Their behaviour imperils the two-state solution by taking over the very land which should be Palestinian. My committee's report argues that the UK must extend sanctions against them and prevent the import of settlement goods. The natural reaction of the British public to the scenes of starvation and death in Gaza is to call on their politicians to do something. The challenge for politicians is to ensure that what they do makes a real difference. The recognition of Palestine as part of a renewed commitment by the UK to work with others to build a peace process would be just that. Britain has said it wants to work with France when it comes to the recognition of Palestine. Now that France has said it will recognise in September, is it not fair to expect the government to join them? I, my committee, and the British public will be watching with anticipation. Emily Thornberry is Labour MP for Islington South and Finsbury and chair of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Welsh government should sell Cathays Park complex, insider says
The Welsh government should sell its Cardiff headquarters, according to a former senior civil Clifford, former head of the first minister's office in Cathays Park, said a smaller office should be set up in Cardiff Bay near the Senedd comments come after new figures show that on average just 19% of staff based in Cathays Park worked in the office each day in Minister Eluned Morgan has previously said the government won't be able to "justify" keeping its offices open if staff continue to stay away. Before Covid struck, around 2,500 people worked at Cathays Park every since the pandemic most have continued to work from most recent attendance figures, for March, show that on average the number of people attending the Cathays Park office each day was 576 (19%).The highest daily attendance was 799 (26%).Speaking to BBC-produced Newyddion S4C, Des Clifford said the days of staff working in the office five days a week were over and the time had come to sell Cathays Park."It's an ugly and unfriendly building," he said."I would close it down and perhaps sell it to the university or somebody else and set up a new office in the Bay so that the government and the Senedd are side by side."This would provide "a greater opportunity for mixing between civil servants and government and the Senedd, which might, in certain ways, create a certain kind of coherence," he added. What is Cathays Park used for? The Cathays Park complex consists of two buildings joined by a older building, dating from the 1930s and Grade II listed, originally housed the UK government's Welsh Board of the position of secretary of state for Wales was created in the 1960s, it became home to the Welsh newer building, completed in 1979, provided additional office space for a Welsh Office that had acquired an increasing range of two-building complex became the home of Wales' fledgling devolved government 20 years later, in 1999. 'Awkward questions' The Welsh government has a total of 20 sites across Wales including 15 so-called "core offices".The costs of running these offices in 2023-24 was £ the Welsh government's estate in March the average daily attendance was 16%.Asked what should happen to those offices, Mr Clifford said there were "all sorts of awkward questions that arise if you have an office in Llandudno Junction and you have another one in Caernarfon"."Are the two justifiable in the circumstances that we're describing when you've got two buildings 30 miles (48km) apart?"The same set of questions arise between Penllergaer in Swansea and Carmarthen, which I think again, is about 30 miles distance between the two."The Welsh government expects its staff to spend 40% of the week - the equivalent of two days - in the week First Minister Eluned Morgan told the Senedd: "Clearly, there will come a point where you have to say 'if you don't turn up, we cannot justify keeping this particular office open'."A review of the government's Powys offices - in Llandrindod Wells and Newtown - is already underway.
