LJP-RV President Chirag Paswan declares to contest upcoming Bihar Assembly polls
He said, 'Today, from this sacred land of Saran, I am declaring before all of you that yes, I will contest the election. I will contest the election for the people of Bihar, for my brothers, for my mothers, for my sisters, and we will create a system in Bihar, we will build a Bihar that will truly take the state forward on the path of development.'
Earlier today, Paswan had carried out the 'Nav-Sankalp Mahasabha' from Chhapra to Nav Bihar, starting at the Rajendra Stadium in Chhapra.
While hitting out at the Congress and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) over comprising the development of the state, he added, 'In the coming days, regarding the inheritance tax, the way Congress, RJD, and all their allies think about taxing the property that belongs to you generation after generation. The people who talk about development in Bihar today are the same opposition leaders who had ruined Bihar in the 90.'
However, the Union Minister, while reacting over the murder of businessman Gopal Khema, expressed worry over the 'rising crime' and the 'collapse of law and order' in the state, and urged for putting pressure on the state government to bring the perpetrators to justice.
'It is a matter of worry the way crime has risen and law and order has collapsed in Bihar. If such an incident has happened in a posh locality of Patna, then we can only imagine what is happening in villages. It is worrying to see such incidents occur under a government that was known for good governance; then the opposition will have a chance to speak up. Strict action needs to be taken to set a precedent so that such a thing is not repeated,' Paswan told mediapersons here.
On July 4, businessman Gopal Khemka was allegedly shot dead near his residence in the south area of the Gandhi Maidan in Patna. Following the incident, Bihar Police has formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the murder case. The murder has evoked sharp political reactions from the opposition parties and put the spotlight back on the law and order situation in the state.
LJP (Ram Vilas) is part of the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA), with Janata Dal (United) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). LJP is expected to keep on allying with the NDA for the upcoming Bihar polls, however Paswan has not yet confirmed his stance on it. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
‘Never thought of proving citizenship after years'
PATNA: Ram Sevak Paswan is a worried man. A resident of Malti Bedaulia village under Ujiarpur assembly constituency in Samastipur district, Paswan has no document to prove his citizenship. He only has the voter ID, MNREGA job card, Aadhaar card, and Ayushman health card issued by the authorities. Paswan has no land of his own to claim for the Pradhanmantri Awas Yojna to build a pucca house. He owns a 'jhopdi' (hut) erected on the land provided by his 'malik' (landowner) for whom he works as a daily wager. 'I never thought the day would come when I would have to prove my citizenship, decades after my birth,' he told this reporter. His wife, Shanti Devi, engaged in household work, intervenes: 'We, both husband and wife, don't know how to read and write. We are illiterate and don't have birth certificates. How will we prove that we are citizens of this country? It's the government's job to provide us with documents.' Paswan has a query: 'When Aadhar card is required for opening a bank account, why is it not a valid document to prove citizenship? After all, we got the Aadhar card after running from pillar to post. It is required for admission to government schools. Why is it not a valid document for citizenship?' None of the IDs he has figure in the list of 11 documents required for the Special Intensive Review (SIR) of the electoral roll in poll-bound Bihar.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
What MNS-Shiv Sena protests don't see: The Hindi in Hindutva
After weeks of twists and turns, the Maharashtra government has suspended its proposed policy of introducing Hindi as a compulsory language from the first standard in state schools. This may appear to be merely a state-level issue. Opposition to it may seem like a seasonal bout of opportunistic politics. It is neither. The pro-Hindi policy of the state government has been in line with the BJP's longstanding ambition to have Hindi (shuddh Hindi, not Hindustani) as the national language — a policy that dovetails with its penchant for enforcing uniformity in every respect and implementing a one nation, one language policy. The recent troubles over education policy in Maharashtra, therefore, need to be understood in a larger context, beyond pedagogic wisdom, state-level party politics and Marathi pride. These troubles amplify the debate over what we mean by the Indian nation, and in turn, the deeper, routine practices of majoritarianism. When the Maharashtra government kept insisting on introducing Hindi in the first standard, only two responses against it seem to have mobilised public opinion in the state. One somewhat apolitical response has been about the wisdom of introducing three languages when a child begins her education. This argument is confined to the child's capacity to grasp multiple languages at an early age and the question of burden. The other response, predictably, was triggered by the pro-Marathi sentiment. This helped the estranged Thackeray cousins to share the same ideological ground after a long time. Sections of the media, and intellectuals who have always romanticised the idea that a strong pro-Marathi lobby would help the language, have naturally been excited over this second development concerning Marathi pride, so quick on the heels of Marathi being declared a classical language by the Narendra Modi government. But there is not much awareness of the larger ideological implications of the pro-Hindi policy. This is not restricted to Maharashtra alone. Many administrators and policymakers have always remained somewhat narrow in their approach to the language question — looking at it only in terms of convenience, and therefore, reducing it to the question of official language or link language. For many of us, diversity is always a clumsy inconvenience. The question of language, however, has always spilled over beyond administrative convenience to the realm of unity and nationhood. Thus, even within Congress, there always was a strong Hindi lobby that believed a common language was necessary for a nation and that Hindi could naturally claim that status. There were even some from the south in this lobby, and though they were not necessarily inclined to surrender their own linguistic traditions, they supported the idea of a national language — rashtrabhasha. That is why we had rashtrabhasha samitis pushing for Hindi education through voluntary efforts. This idea that Hindi would gradually evolve to become a national language often overlapped with the imagination that a nation requires one common language. Among north India's Hindi lobby, this overlap was more pronounced. But that overlap was not exclusive to Hindi-speaking pro-Hindi activists. Where does this craving for a national language come from? During much of the time when India's national struggle was shaping up in the early 20th century, the more prominent model of nationalism in Europe often privileged uniformity over anything else. This had a deep influence on many Indian social and political activists and thinkers. But the Hindutva nationalism of V D Savarkar and the RSS most enthusiastically adopted the idea of uniformity. Many in Congress were attracted to it, but believed that such uniformity was either culturally inherent in India's practices or that it would evolve over time through persuasion and practice. Thus, two different models of uniformity operated in actual politics as India became independent. The more predominant one was uniformity through mutual exchange, give-and-take, and historical sharing, while the Hindutva vision believed in the primacy and urgency of uniformity over anything else. This applied to the language question, too. Debates over Hindutva have often remained confined to the question of religion. But Hindutva as an ideology and politics should be understood not merely in terms of the Hindu-Muslim question. True, the practical politics of Hindutva obsessively revolves around, and is based on, deep Islamophobia, coupled with anti-minority sentiments and Hindu supremacy. But at the root of it is a more general imagination that democracy means a free play for the majority community. In the case of the language question, too, it would be a mistake to ignore this foundational belief that has shaped Hindutva. It is often argued that a certain percentage of people in India speak Hindi. It is another matter that this 'number' is derived historically through amalgamating speakers of many other languages and claiming those languages as variants of Hindi — that is exactly how 'majorities' are constructed, whether based on religion, language or culture. In the majoritarian project, some traits of one section of society are posited as common to most. It is then argued that all those who manifest those traits constitute one community, enjoying large numbers. More recently, the systematic push in favour of making Hindi the official language unofficially has been evident. While sometimes, the majoritarians hope for assimilation (samrasata), they don't have the political patience to wait for that to happen. Majoritarian projects, when out of power, speak of assimilation in order to save themselves from state action, but when in power, exercise the same state power to enforce uniformity. Since the BJP knows that its coalition partners have nowhere to go, it nudges them to support the idea of uniformity on the question of language. A large electoral majority in Maharashtra has encouraged the BJP-led government to adopt the policy of enforcing Hindi while its domesticated allies in Andhra Pradesh talk of willingly adopting Hindi. In withdrawing its controversial decision in Maharashtra, the BJP may have accepted a tactical retreat temporarily, but it knows that the Shiv Sena (UBT) and the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena neither comprehend nor want to counter the majoritarian project. With a soon-to-be-formed 'expert committee', the state government will subsequently find ways of continuing with a majoritarian politics of enforced uniformity. Just like in Maharashtra, the BJP's pro-Hindi policy will receive only limited opposition elsewhere, be it in West Bengal or Tamil Nadu. That response will be in terms of regional identity, language protectionism and an anti-Hindi stance. Recent history shows that Hindutva has the capacity to absorb such regionalist tendencies at state level. Thus, Maharashtra's protests against Hindi imposition will only produce a Marathi pride that is oblivious of the larger majoritarian project. That project will mostly go unchallenged as anti-Hindi politics will neither protect our linguistic diversity nor sensitise the public about the dangers of imposing uniformity. The day when votaries of regional languages appreciate the link between making one language 'national' and making one culture national, we shall have a better handle to understand the politics of nationalism masquerading as the politics of a national language. The writer, based in Pune, taught Political Science
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
60 women to get party ticket in next Assembly polls: Revanth
Hyderabad: The Congress party will lead by example, while earmarking around 60 tickets to women in the next Assembly elections. This categorical assurance came from Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy after launching 'Vana Mahotsavam'2025 at the PJT Agriculture University here on Monday. He would personally take up this responsibility and ensure that the allotment goes beyond the quota for women. The Chief Minister indicated that approximately 50 seats would be reserved for women after delimitation of Assembly seats and passage of the women's reservation Bill. In addition, the party would pick women nominees in at least 10 more seats to ensure a larger women representation in the state Assembly. Reiterating that the government has set a target of making one crore woman millionaires, Revanth Reddy maintained that women SHGs would also be formed in urban areas in their bid to empower women across fields. Revanth Reddy listed out the women empowerment schemes formulated by his government, including the responsibility of setting up solar plants, focussing on government schools for girls and encouraging women to rent out around 1,000 buses to TGSRTC. Women's groups are now able to market their products in Hitec City, where some of the biggest MNCs and corporate houses are located. Meanwhile, urging people to join "Vana Mahotsavam" by planting at least two saplings in their homes, he called upon mothers to take the responsibility of planting saplings in the name of their children. The popular saying propounded by the older generations "the forest ecosystem and our living are integral" is eternally relevant, he pointed out. The Chief Minister said that Telangana will be transformed into a complete 'green' zone if everyone cultivates and nurtures trees like children.
