MACC seizes assets, freezes Tan Sri's bank accounts worth RM85.6 million
MACC Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki said among the seized items were 14 personal accounts containing RM4.5 million, eight company accounts containing RM33 million, and RM7.65 million of luxury vehicles.
He added that other seized items included RM3 million worth of handbags, luxury watches worth RM7 million, and properties valued at RM24.5 million.
"We suspect that sukuk funds amounting to hundreds of millions of ringgit channelled to a company owned by the Tan Sri were misused for personal gain and were not used for the intended financing of the related highway projects.
"The money was then distributed to certain companies and individuals, including into the Tan Sri's account, who acted as the 'main mover'," he said.
Azam said the funds were then believed to have been transferred to several other entities, including proxy companies and accounts owned by the Tan Sri's wife.
"The money is believed to have been used to purchase various assets such as properties, luxury vehicles, jewellery, and handbags, as well as for gambling activities.
"It is also believed to have been channelled for personal expenses such as the purchase of properties both domestically and abroad, as well as investments, through multiple layered financial transactions intended to obscure the original source of the funds," he said.
Azam said the MACC has yet to record a statement from the Tan Sri involved, as he is still receiving treatment at the hospital.
"The investigation is ongoing, and with the asset seizures, we will examine the acquisition of properties, including obtaining financial documents from banks and from the individual himself for analysis to assist the investigation.
"All those involved in assisting the investigation will be called to give statements. I do not rule out that some of his family members will be summoned to assist the investigation," he said.
So far, Azam said 45 people have been called and their statements recorded to facilitate the MACC's investigation into the case.
He added that between 30 and 50 witnesses are expected to be called to complete the investigation.
It was reported on Thursday that the MACC seized various assets, including handbags, jewellery, luxury vehicles, watches, cash, and luxury residences, with a total estimated value of about RM32 million belonging to the individual involved in yhe case.
During the operation, the MACC also discovered a storage room containing various types of luxury alcoholic beverages at a residence valued at approximately RM3 million, believed to be linked to money laundering activities.
The MACC's Strategic Communications Division reportedly said the seized items and assets are held for further investigation under the MACC Act 2009 and the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLA) 2001.
Last month, it was reported that four people, including a Datuk Seri, were detained on suspicion of submitting false claims amounting to about RM360 million.
All suspects, comprising three men and one woman aged between their 50s and 70s, were detained while giving statements at the MACC office.
The four suspects are believed to have submitted false claims amounting to about RM360 million using sukuk funds in a highway construction project in the Klang Valley valued at about RM1.3 billion between 2016 and 2017.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Syndicates use quiet Kelantan border to sneak in foreign workers
KOTA BARU: The "flying passport" ruse persists in Kelantan, but on a smaller scale, an Immigration source said. Despite being separated from Thailand by the shallow Sungai Golok, the source said the ruse was detected only at one of the three checkpoints in the state. Kelantan has three entry points along the Thai border: Rantau Panjang, Pengkalan Kubor in Tumpat and Bukit Bunga in Tanah Merah. "However, two of these checkpoints, Rantau Panjang and Pengkalan Kubor, are always busy with cross-border trade and travel. "They are less likely to be used by syndicate members due to the high traffic volume and enforcement presence. "Instead, syndicate members opt for the Bukit Bunga Immigration, Customs, Quarantine, and Security Complex, which is located in a quieter area and receives less scrutiny." The source said local agents were usually the facilitators of the syndicate, working with Thais employed in Malaysia, particularly in eateries and restaurants. "Thais working in Malaysia engage local agents. "These agents deliver the workers' passports to Immigration officers and have them stamped without the passport holders being present. "Some of these officers are believed to have been cooperating with the agents for years." While the scale of the "flying passport" ruse in Kelantan may not rival that of Johor or other border states, enforcement sources said it remained a serious breach of Immigration protocols and national security. Kelantan Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) director Azmin Yusoff said no reports had been received about border enforcement officers' involvement in the ruse. "We, however, urge members of the public to come forward with information." Azmin, however, said three Immigration officers were detained by the state MACC in the first six months of this year, including those assigned to the Kelantan-Thailand border. He said the three were among the 21 enforcement officers arrested since 2022 for soliciting and receiving bribes.
Focus Malaysia
14 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Is KLIA 'counter setting' a symptom of deeper migrant exploitation?
THE recent detention of an enforcement officer at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) Terminal 1 has renewed public scrutiny over a clandestine practice known as 'counter setting'. This tactic, where individuals are allowed to bypass formal immigration procedures, raises serious concerns not only regarding border security and official corruption but also about structural vulnerabilities in Malaysia's migration management, labour demands and institutional accountability. Last November, nearly 50 immigration officers were reassigned following investigations by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) into a similar syndicate operating at KLIA. A senior immigration officer, believed to be the mastermind behind the network, is expected to face charges over a human trafficking ring that allegedly facilitated the unlawful entry of foreign nationals without immigration clearance. The act of 'counter-setting' which involves corruption at borders is a well-recognised enabler of both human trafficking and migrant smuggling. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) identifies bribery and abuse of power as systemic 'pull factors' that facilitate transnational crime. In this context, 'counter setting' is not just negligence, it is an institutional gateway for illicit entry under the guise of administrative authority. However, criminalising rogue officers should not automatically lead to the assumption that all individuals who passed through these compromised checkpoints are victims of trafficking or knowingly complicit in smuggling. Trafficking vs. smuggling Public discourse frequently conflates 'migration', 'trafficking' and 'smuggling' as either criminal or victimhood, obscuring nuanced legal distinctions. Under both the UN Trafficking Protocol (Palermo Protocol) and Malaysia's Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 (ATIPSOM), human trafficking consists of three essential elements: Act (e.g., recruitment, transportation), Means (e.g., coercion, fraud, abuse of power), and Purpose (e.g., exploitation such as forced labour or sexual servitude). However, ATIPSOM does not clearly criminalise attempts to traffic nor does it automatically recognise someone as a trafficked person simply because they entered the country irregularly. As studies have established, most trafficking victims enter Malaysia legally which means that they are in possession of valid passport and are even given a 30-day visa free entry if they are from Southeast Asian countries. Therefore, it is nearly impossible to establish the key component of 'exploitation' unless it is evidently demonstrated at the border entry. Mere facilitation without evidence of exploitation does not constitute trafficking. By contrast, migrant smuggling involves consensual facilitation of unlawful entry in exchange for financial gain. Once the border is crossed, the smuggling transaction ends. In such cases, the migrant is typically treated as an offender who have breached immigration laws. An individual's status only becomes 'irregular' if immigration officers on arrival fail to stamp or process their entry. This administrative omission does not by itself amount to criminal conduct or evidence of trafficking. This brings us to a critical question: how can authorities establish that the individuals who entered via 'counter setting' were trafficked, smuggled, or simply irregular migrants? Without evidence of coercion or exploitation, these individuals remain at best suspects or irregular entrants. As many of us has experienced, it is extremely difficult for individuals to board international flights to Malaysia without valid travel documents. Multiple layers of checks include immigration clearance at the point of departure, airline document verification, and pre-boarding checks by flight crew. This may not necessarily be the case when entering Malaysia through land. For example, Malaysia's land borders especially in areas such as Rantau Panjang, Sungai Golok and Wang Kelian are far more porous. In Wang Kelian, a one-kilometre 'no man's land' separates Thai and Malaysian posts, making unsupervised crossings possible. Arrests involving undocumented Myanmar nationals and the unregulated movement of Malaysians into Thailand highlight systemic gaps in surveillance and border management. Labour agents and recruitment networks Malaysia's fluctuating labour policies such as the temporary freeze (and subsequent lifting) on the intake of Bangladeshi workers, for example, have created a market of desperation. To fulfil recruitment contracts or avoid refunding fees, unscrupulous agents may resort to corrupt arrangements with enforcement personnel to smuggle workers into the country. One major concern is the licensing regime. In Malaysia, work agents are not required to possess individual licences. Licences are tied to agencies, creating a regulatory blind spot. Some agents operate without registration; others exploit legal platforms while engaging in parallel black-market operations. Disturbingly, many such agents are foreign nationals already residing in Malaysia, which helps them gain the trust of vulnerable migrant communities. Upon arrival, many of these migrants are placed in overcrowded accommodation and squalid conditions. They are also subjected to long hours of work, meagre pay, and minimal legal protection. While exploitative, these conditions do not always rise to the legal threshold of trafficking unless all the trafficking elements are clearly present. Malaysia must move beyond reactive enforcement and address the systemic factors that enable counter setting and migration-related abuse. A rights-based and reform-oriented strategy should include stricter employer vetting procedures and meaningful penalties for labour exploitation as well as crackdowns on unlicensed and unscrupulous agents, including those operating under legal facades, among others. Conclusively, it is evident that the KLIA 'counter setting' scandal is not just about corrupt officers, it exposes systemic cracks in Malaysia's migration governance, labour recruitment processes, and institutional safeguards. While prosecuting offenders is necessary, structural reforms must follow to protect migrants' rights and preserve the integrity of our borders. To strike a balance between national security and human dignity, Malaysia must clearly distinguish between 'victims', 'offenders', and 'irregular migrants' and, above all, recognise the human realities behind each case. ‒ July 28, 2025 Dr Haezreena Begum Abdul Hamid is a Criminologist and Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Malaya. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Malaysiakini
The Star
15 hours ago
- The Star
Malaysia hosts global anti-corruption course to strengthen international cooperation
PETALING JAYA: Malaysia has intensified its efforts to become a global leader in the fight against corruption by hosting an anti-corruption course for senior anti-corruption and law enforcement officers from around the world. Organised by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Academy (MACA) in collaboration with the Foreign Affairs Ministry, the course brought together 17 senior officers from Southeast Asia, Central Asia, South Asia, and Africa. Held from July 13 to 25, the course aimed to strengthen institutional capacity, expand strategic cooperation networks, and reinforce Malaysia's commitment to promoting integrity and good governance at the international level. The course focused on strategic management methods to combat corruption, addressing contemporary issues such as intelligence-based investigations, digital forensics, cross-border asset recovery, cryptocurrency-related crimes, and strategic crisis communication management. "The modules were delivered by a panel of experts and seasoned practitioners within Malaysia's anti-corruption ecosystem. "They were also designed to provide participants with practical approaches applicable within their respective national contexts. "The organisation of this programme underscores Malaysia's role as a leader in development diplomacy and anti-corruption education globally," MACA said in a press statement on Monday (July 28). Held under the Malaysian Technical Cooperation Programme (MTCP), the course was named the Executive Certificate Course for Strategic Management of Anti-Corruption Programme 2025. Among the participants was Zambia Police Service senior superintendent and assistant public relations officer Godfrey Chilabi, who praised the programme for its specialised organisational structure and use of scientific techniques such as forensic tools. "This programme was both enlightening and impactful, with the module on asset recovery and the role of the media in corruption prevention being highly valuable. "I would strongly encourage my colleagues to join this training, as corruption today is a transnational crime that requires modern tools and strategies," he said in the press statement. Also participating in the course was Bangladesh Anti-Corruption Commission deputy director of operations Silvia Ferdous, among others.
