Dollar stumbles as optimism from fragile Israel-Iran truce lingers
Markets were jubilant and an index of global shares hit a record high overnight as a shaky ceasefire brokered by US President Donald Trump took hold between Iran and Israel.
The two nations signalled that the air war between them had ended, at least for now, after Trump publicly scolded them for violating a ceasefire he announced.
Investors heavily sold the dollar in the wake of the news, after pouring into the safe-haven currency during the 12 days of war between Israel and Iran that also saw the US attack Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities.
Currency moves were more subdued in early Asia trade on Wednesday though the euro remained perched near its highest since October 2021 at $1.1621, having hit that milestone in the previous session.
Sterling eased 0.02% to $1.3615 but was similarly not far from Tuesday's peak of $1.3648, which marked its strongest level since January 2022.
The risk-sensitive Australian dollar, which rallied sharply in the previous session, last traded 0.02% higher at $0.6492.
While the truce between Israel and Iran appeared fragile, investors for now seemed to welcome any reprieve.
'The market is complacent about some of the downside risks,' said Joseph Capurso, head of international and sustainable economics at Commonwealth Bank of Australia.
'The thing I get is this issue is not over, which means it could come back to be a driver of commodity prices and currency markets again.'
In other currencies, the New Zealand dollar rose 0.13% to $0.6015, while the yen steadied at 144.96 per dollar.
Some Bank of Japan policymakers called for keeping interest rates steady for the time being due to uncertainty over the impact of US tariffs on Japan's economy, a summary of opinions at the bank's June policy meeting showed on Wednesday.
The Swiss franc, which scaled a 10-1/2-year high on Tuesday, steadied at 0.8049 per dollar.
Against a basket of currencies, the dollar eased slightly to 97.91.
While Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell stuck to his cautious approach and reiterated that the central bank was in no rush to ease rates at his semi-annual testimony to Congress on Tuesday, markets continue to price in a roughly 18% chance that the Fed could cut in July, according to the CME FedWatch tool.
'We think economic growth is slowing and the improvement in services and shelter inflation will push back against tariff rises, allowing cuts to resume in September,' ANZ analysts said in a note.
A raft of weaker-than-expected US economic data in recent weeks have bolstered expectations of Fed cuts this year, with futures pointing to nearly 60 basis points worth of easing by December.
Data on Tuesday showed US consumer confidence unexpectedly deteriorated in June as households grew increasingly worried about job availability, another indication that labour market conditions were softening.
The two-year US Treasury yield, which typically reflects near-term rate expectations, fell to a 1-1/2-month low of 3.7870% on Wednesday.
The benchmark 10-year yield was little changed at 4.3043%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Europe hopes for 'no surprises' as US weighs force withdrawals
BRUSSELS - After keeping Donald Trump happy with a pledge to up defence spending at NATO's summit, Europe is now bracing for a key decision from the US president on the future of American forces on the continent. Washington is currently conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide -- set to be unveiled in coming months -- and the expectation is it will lead to drawdowns in Europe. That prospect is fraying the nerves of US allies, especially as fears swirl that Russia could look to attack a NATO country within the next few years if the war in Ukraine dies down. However, the alliance is basking in Trump's newfound goodwill following its June summit in The Hague, and his officials are making encouraging noises that Europe will not be left in the lurch. "We've agreed to no surprises and no gaps in the strategic framework of Europe," said Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO, adding he expected the review to come out in "late summer, early fall". "I have daily conversations with our allies about the process," he said. While successive US governments have mulled scaling back in Europe to focus more on China, Trump has insisted more forcefully than his predecessors that the continent should handle its own defence. "There's every reason to expect a withdrawal from Europe," said Marta Mucznik from the International Crisis Group. "The question is not whether it's going to happen, but how fast." When Trump returned to office in January many felt he was about to blow a hole in the seven-decade-old alliance. But the vibe in NATO circles is now far more upbeat than those desperate days. "There's a sanguine mood, a lot of guesswork, but the early signals are quite positive," one senior European diplomat told AFP, talking as others on condition of anonymity. "Certainly no panic or doom and gloom." 'INEVITABLE' The Pentagon says there are nearly 85,000 US military personnel in Europe -- a number that has fluctuated between 75,000 and 105,000 since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. "I think it is inevitable that they pull out some of their forces," a second European diplomat told AFP. "But I don't expect this to be like a dramatic overhaul. I think it's going to be gradual. I think it's going to be based on consultations." Trump's first target is likely to be the troops left over from a surge ordered by his predecessor Joe Biden after Moscow's tanks rolled into Ukraine. Officials say relocating the rump of that 20,000-strong deployment would not hurt NATO's deterrence too much -- but alarm bells would ring if Trump looked to cut too deep into personnel numbers or close key bases. The issue is not just troop numbers -- the US has capabilities such as air defences, long-range missiles and satellite surveillance that allies would struggle to replace in the short-term. "The kinds of defence investments by Europe that are being made coming out of The Hague summit may only be felt in real capability terms over many years," said Ian Lesser from the German Marshall Fund think tank. "So the question of timing really does matter." 'INOPPORTUNE MOMENT' Washington's desire to pull back from Europe may be tempered by Trump now taking a tougher line with Russia -- and Moscow's reluctance to bow to his demands to end the Ukraine war. "It seems an inopportune moment to send signals of weakness and reductions in the American security presence in Europe," Lesser said. He also pointed to Trump's struggles during his first term to pull troops out of Germany -- the potential bill for relocating them along with political resistance in Washington scuppering the plan. While European diplomats are feeling more confident than before about the troop review, they admit nothing can be certain with the mercurial US president. Other issues such as Washington's trade negotiations with the EU could rock transatlantic ties in the meantime and upend the good vibes. "It seems positive for now," said a third European diplomat. "But what if we are all wrong and a force decrease will start in 2026. To be honest, there isn't much to go on at this stage."
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Market keeps eye on MPC rate decision this week
All eyes on the Reserve Bank's rate decision this week. Image: Bloomberg It was an interesting week with the JSE All Share index hitting 100 000 points on Wednesday morning and the gold price breaking through $3 400 an ounce again. Internationally, US President Donald Trump announced trade deals with Japan and with the Philippines, and there are reports that the EU and US are nearing a deal. In local news the Government of National Unity held together once more as the DA agreed to support the Appropriation Bill after President Cyril Ramaphosa dismissed Higher Education and Training Minister Nobuhle Nkabane. On Thursday, Trade, Industry, and Competition Minister Parks Tau said that a 'condition precedent document' has been signed as a precursor to finalisation of the trade negotiations with the US, but little details were available. It was reported that the Framework Deal aims to resolve long-standing market access issues that both sides are interested in and to promote bilateral investments in a mutually beneficial manner. It is unlikely that South Africa and the US will reach an agreement by the 1 of August, when 30% tariffs kicks-in. The key local indicator was the June Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation figure released on Wednesday. The inflation rate rose from 2.8% to 3%. The main driver was higher food prices, while lower year-on-year fuel prices helped to counter the increase. The inflation rate remains safely below the midpoint of the Reserve Bank's target band, and markets are still expecting one more 25 basis point cut to the repo rate this year. But will it happen at Thursday's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting? Based on the June inflation number and the outlook for inflation there is a strong case for a cut. Almost all models suggest that inflation will increase slowly during the rest of this year, but remain below the midpoint of the target band for the next year or two. The MPC has often argued that international uncertainty poses an upside risk and is an argument for keeping the repo, and our interest rate differential with the US, unchanged. The concern is that if we cut the repo rate while the Americans keep their policy rate unchanged, the rand-dollar exchange rate will weaken, increasing the cost of imported goods. This week the Federal Reserve meets the day before our MPC and their decision will play a role. They are waiting to see the inflationary impact of their tariffs and will probably keep their policy rate unchanged. Yet, from the South African point of view the dollar is relatively weaker, and the interest rate differential is less of a concern. Keeping the repo unchanged runs the risk of applying contractionary monetary policy in an economy that is barely growing. Another view is that repo rate decisions are no longer about the midpoint of the target band, but rather about the proposed new target of 3%. With a lower target in mind, it may not make sense to cut the repo rate just yet. I think the Reserve Bank has already made a strong case for the benefits of a lower target. Their models show that because inflation is already low, the cost of moving to a lower target is minimal. They don't believe interest rates will need to stay high for long, nor that much economic growth will be sacrificed in the process. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading However, their whole story rests on several assumptions, and recent research by Codera Analytics shows that there are many factors to consider. One question is how quickly inflation expectations can be anchored to the lower target. It's no use having a lower target if unions continue to base wage demands on historically higher inflation rates. Another question is whether fiscal policy can support the lower target. If public finances deteriorate, long-term interest rates on government debt will rise, and stimulatory fiscal policy could increase inflation. A lower target requires fiscal discipline. Lastly, the government as a price setter must also buy into the lower target. More than 30% of the CPI basket consists of administered prices, which in recent years have increased at rates far above the headline inflation rate. To achieve a lower average inflation rate while, for example, electricity tariffs, rates and taxes are rising steeply, those parts of the economy where prices are flexible will take interest rate strain at a high cost for the private sector. I don't think the MPC's decision will be driven by the idea of a new lower target. They need political buy-in and the inflation targets set for the next Budget cycle are at the 4.5% mid-point. But I also think that the decision about the target cannot be delayed much longer. Uncertainty does nothing to help manage expectations. Waldo Krugell is a Professor of Economics, North-West University, Potchefstroom. Image: Supplied Waldo Krugell is a Professor of Economics, North-West University, Potchefstroom. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL BUSINESS REPORT
eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
US Fed poised to hold off on rate cuts
WASHINGTON - The US central bank is widely expected to hold off slashing interest rates again at its upcoming meeting, as officials gather under the cloud of an intensifying pressure campaign by President Donald Trump. Policymakers at the independent Federal Reserve have kept the benchmark lending rate steady since the start of the year as they monitor how Trump's sweeping tariffs are impacting the world's biggest economy. With Trump's on-again, off-again tariff approach -- and the levies' lagged effects on inflation -- Fed officials want to see economic data from this summer to gauge how prices are being affected. When mulling changes to interest rates, the central bank -- which meets on Tuesday and Wednesday -- seeks a balance between reining in inflation and the health of the jobs market. But the bank's data-dependent approach has enraged the Republican president, who has repeatedly criticised Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not slashing rates further, calling him a "numbskull" and "moron." Most recently, Trump signalled he could use the Fed's $2.5-billion renovation project as an avenue to oust Powell, before backing off and saying that would be unlikely. Trump visited the Fed construction site on Thursday, making a tense appearance with Powell in which the Fed chair disputed Trump's characterisation of the total cost of the refurbishment in front of the cameras.
