logo
‘HMRC is fining me £190k for abusing millionaire pension rules'

‘HMRC is fining me £190k for abusing millionaire pension rules'

Telegraph04-04-2025
Has a company treated you unfairly? Our Consumer Champion is available to help. For how to contact her click here.
Dear Katie,
I retired from my role as a financial adviser in 2016, handing over all my clients to someone else. It was an incredibly busy year, and I was very much focussed on visiting them all at home to ensure they were looked after.
Nine years on, after I took some tax-free cash from my pension in October last year, I received a letter from HMRC. It was called a Section 36 request, and it asked me to provide more information about what I had done with my pension.
The letter claimed that back in 2016, I had put into place a newly introduced form of pension protection called fixed protection, which was designed for people with pensions who were near or over the pensions lifetime limit, which had just been reduced to £1m.
Once this protection is in place, your fund can grow to above the threshold without you paying penal tax, however, you lose it as soon as you contribute any more into your pension. If you apply for the protection and continue making pension contributions, you lose the protection, and if you haven't told HMRC, you could incur fines for trying to cheat the system.
HMRC says I applied for this protection and then lost it days later when I made a regular pension contribution. However. I can't have lost it, because I never applied for it in the first place. This is because my pension has never been big enough to worry about the lifetime limit.
I have absolutely no idea why the application is on HMRC's records. Since I retired in 2016, I've continued paying into my pension every month, as I'm still receiving at least £7,000 a year in commission from my former financial advice clients. HMRC wants me to declare when I lost the fixed protection, but since I never arranged to have it, I cannot give it an answer.
Therefore, HMRC seems to be accusing me of abusing its rules to protect my large pension fund from paying too much tax. As a professional adviser in full awareness of the pension contribution rules, this accusation seems totally illogical.
I've also been told to admit that it was me who applied for the protection, which I refuse to do. I understand the fine I could be looking at for losing my fixed protection all those years ago but not telling HMRC is £60-a-day. This would amount to around £190,000.
This is a devastating amount of money for a mistake which I never made, and I am not prepared to pay it. By phone I was told that this is not the first person this has happened to, but in writing I have been told that HMRC's own computers cannot be wrong. The only other option is that someone has logged into my account and done this to try to sabotage me.
I refer you to the scandal that has engulfed the Post Office and the sub-postmasters over their use of the Horizon accounting system. If it is true that HMRC has even a few situations such as this, then perhaps it is necessary for HMRC's website and internal computer systems to be forensically investigated.
– Anon
Dear Anon,
Since receiving this letter, you've been in a difficult back and forth with HMRC, yet the issue has remained unresolved. This has understandably caused you a huge amount of stress. It is adamant that you did apply for fixed protection in August 2016 not once, but twice, even though you firmly deny this.
HMRC said the first application failed, and a second one was filed that same day, which was accepted. When I asked HMRC how it could be sure it was you who actively applied for the protection, it said the person who did it logged in via your own 'government gateway' account. This means that whoever it was must have either hacked in, or known your passwords and all your details.
You have raised the possibility of someone having done this to deliberately sabotage you, however, you could not think who it might be. I also note that the person who logged in did not attempt to withdraw any money or tamper with your finances in any other way, which they could have done. And nor have you had any other suspicious activity on your account since, which makes me highly doubt this theory.
You also wonder whether you could have been a victim within a scandal similar to the Post Office/Horizon incident, since you claim that someone from HMRC intimated to you verbally that yours was not an isolated case.
However, when I asked HMRC, it could not have been clearer that this was not a wider issue. As I said to you, if it is a wider issue, we'll soon know once this piece is published. Other victims, if they exist, will have the chance to come forward. I'll be all ears if they do.
It also occurred to me that HMRC might have mixed up your records with someone of the same name, as I've seen this before. But as it turns out, your name is unique, with you being the only one in the UK.
All this aside, the main issue was whether you were going to have to pay this massive £190,000 fine or not, and when I asked HMRC about this aspect of your case, it came through with some good news.
As it turns out, you have misinterpreted what the £60-a-day 'schedule 36' penalties are, and when they apply. In fact, they are only charged where a customer fails to provide the information that HMRC has requested in an information notice.
And since you did provide the information upon receiving the letter, the penalty would not be applicable. And since your pension was never over the £1m (now £1.25m) lifetime limit, you will not be paying any penal tax either.
Following my involvement, HMRC has removed fixed protection 2016 from your records to avoid any further confusion.
You're incredibly relieved at this outcome, which you feel you would not have been able to achieve without my involvement. I note that you've got a lot on your plate at the moment as you're the main carer for your wife, who has advanced dementia. This can't be easy for you, so I've been very happy to assist you over this matter.
However, once all was said and done and you'd relaxed about the fine, I felt I had to ask: were you 100pc sure it wasn't you who applied for fixed protection back in 2016 in the hope that your pension might reach £1m?
After all, the rules had only just come in, and you were admittedly running around the country tending to clients. It occurred to me that you might have done this rashly and then forgotten about it? However, you replied that you were '110pc' sure it wasn't you, which of course, I accepted.
I've filed your case on my ever-growing pile of mysteries which may never be solved, but I wish you and your wife all the best.
An HMRC spokesman said: 'We have corrected the customer's records to remove fixed protection 2016. There is no wider issue.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Last remaining new car below $20,000 in U.S. to disappear by end of summer
Last remaining new car below $20,000 in U.S. to disappear by end of summer

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Last remaining new car below $20,000 in U.S. to disappear by end of summer

The last remaining car selling for less than $20,000 in the U.S. is expected to disappear from dealers' lots in the coming months. The Mitsubishi Mirage — a five-seat hatchback sedan — sells for an average of $18,484. The model was discontinued in June, and inventory is rapidly dwindling, with less than 1,700 vehicles available across the U.S., according to Kelley Blue Book, a vehicle valuation and research company. Now, the country's last sub-$20,000 vehicle will likely be gone by the end of the summer. As of April, the average new car sold in the U.S. for $48,422, while the average used car sold for $25,373, according to vehicle research site Edmunds. While car prices are negotiated between dealers and sellers, manufacturers give recommended prices, known as the 'manufacturers' suggested retail price,' or MSRP. The average MSRP in April was $50,408 for a new car, Edmunds reports. The average new car owner pays $742 monthly at an interest rate of 6.35 percent, with a loan term of five-and-a-half years, consumer credit company Experian reports. Car prices are expected to rise due to President Donald Trump 's tariffs, which tax imported cars and auto parts at 25 percent. While prices have remained in check since Trump issued his wide-reaching tariffs in April, experts say prices are expected to spike in the coming months, CNN reports. 'I still think we're still going to prices start to take off in two to three months,' Ivan Drury, director of insights at Edmunds, told CNN. Prices have largely stayed the same because car dealerships are still working through their pre-tariff inventory. Consumers have also stayed away from big purchases over tariff fears, and the demand for cars has fallen. Drury also told CNN that current steady car prices could encourage consumers to buy more cars soon, which would in turn drive prices up later this year. Adam Jonas, auto analyst at Bank of America, told CNN the biggest price hike will come as dealers start to announce their 2026 models. 'I think with the changeover to 2026 models, [that] will be the opportunity for companies to raise prices on new vehicles so they don't enrage certain folks that might come down on them for raising prices,' Jonas said.

Pokemon card fans could face £1,500 fines for not following HMRC rules
Pokemon card fans could face £1,500 fines for not following HMRC rules

Daily Mirror

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Pokemon card fans could face £1,500 fines for not following HMRC rules

The Pokemon trading card market is expected to grow to £43.3billion by 2034, but fans have been warned Fans of Pokémon cards have been cautioned that they could be slapped with fines up to £1,500 if they fail to adhere to HMRC rules. Experts in the card game industry are alerting anyone selling Pokémon cards that they risk hefty HMRC penalties for a simple oversight. The Pokémon trading card market is predicted to balloon to £43.3billion by 2034, as per Market Decipher. Moreover, there's been a staggering 5,000% surge in searches for 'how to sell my pokemon cards' over the past month. ‌ However, neglecting to file a self-assessment tax return after three months of trading can result in a £900 fine. ‌ Stuart Robb from Thistle Tavern Trading Cards, a card game specialist, warned: " Selling Pokémon cards can be a fun hobby or a lucrative side business, but it's important to know your tax obligations. If you're frequently buying and selling with the aim of turning a profit, HMRC may view you as a trader. In that case, you'll need to register as self-employed and pay income tax on your profits." He added: "You won't need to inform HMRC if your total trading income - before deducting expenses - is £1,000 or less in a tax year, as this falls under the trading allowance. But once you go over the £1,000 threshold, you're required to file a Self-Assessment tax return." ‌ He further explained: "Missing deadlines comes with automatic penalties. A £100 fine straight away, followed by daily £10 fines after three months, equating to £900. After six months, you'll face an extra charge of 5% of the tax owed or £300 - whichever is higher - and the same again after twelve months. "This means you could end up with at least £1,500 worth of penalties if you leave your Self Assessment unpaid for a year. To avoid this, make sure you file and pay on time. "For casual sellers, it's wise to keep records of all sales in case you exceed the trading or personal allowance. HMRC looks at several factors when deciding if you're trading, such as how often you sell, whether you're aiming for profit, and how organised your activities are. If your sales appear regular and business-like, you're more likely to be classed as trading." ‌ How to dodge hefty fines from selling Pokemon cards Keep Track of Your Sales: "Whether you're selling cards on TikTok, eBay, or elsewhere, keeping accurate records is essential. This includes documenting all sales, platform fees, and shipping costs to calculate your profits accurately. "Casual sellers can earn up to £1,000 tax-free under the trading allowance, but any earnings above this threshold require filing a Self-Assessment tax return". Trading card enthusiasts beware, you might be liable for Capital Gains Tax (CGT) if you cash in on your collection, reports Plymouth Live. "If you sell a rare card or collection for a substantial amount, you may need to pay Capital Gains Tax. ‌ "For the 2024/25 tax year, any profits over £6,000 are taxable, with rates of 10% or 20%, depending on your income. Keeping detailed records of your purchases and costs means you can calculate your gains correctly." For those in the trading card business turning over more than £90,000 annually, it's time to get VAT-ready. "Sellers generating over £90,000 in annual sales must register for VAT, which involves charging VAT on sales and filing regular returns. While this adds administrative work, it also allows you to reclaim VAT on business-related expenses." Don't overlook the importance of documenting your deductibles to keep your taxes in check. "Deductible expenses like the cost of purchasing cards, shipping fees, and storage costs can reduce your taxable income or VAT liability. "Proper documentation of these expenses is key to minimising your tax bill." And remember, HMRC needs to know about any extra income from selling cards that isn't included in your payslip. "Extra earnings from selling cards aren't included on your payslip, so it's up to you to let HMRC know about them. If you don't, you could face fines, starting at £100 for missing the Self Assessment deadline."

HMRC warning for Brits who receive state pension as they could owe money
HMRC warning for Brits who receive state pension as they could owe money

Daily Mirror

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

HMRC warning for Brits who receive state pension as they could owe money

The full rate of the new State Pension is now £230.25 per week or £11,973 a year, meaning some pensioners who receive this amount may need to consider their tax position State pensioners may need to keep an eye on their coffers as earnings over £597 a year could lead to owing money to HMRC. Owing to April's 4.1 per cent increase under the Triple Lock - which adjusts payments according to inflation, wage growth, or a minimum of 2.5 per cent, whichever is higher - the state pension saw a bump. Now, the full new State Pension stands at £230.25 weekly, totalling £11,973 annually, leaving recipients just £597 below the Personal Allowance threshold of £12,570. Any income over this allowance will be subject to a 20 per cent tax, climbing to 40 per cent beyond £50,270. ‌ The Low Incomes Tax Reform Group is calling upon the DWP and HMRC to flag potential tax liabilities to pensioners nearing the threshold. ‌ They've urged: "We think that DWP and HMRC should work together to ensure that pensioners are warned about possibly needing to pay tax on their State Pension in future. This should include setting out how the tax will be collected and the likely tax liability." Suggestions have been made to incorporate these warnings within the annual State Pension notification letters dispatched by the DWP each spring before the April pension increases take effect, reports Birmingham Live. BBC and ITV star Martin Lewis was questioned on his recent Sounds podcast: "Explain to me why any pensioner would want to increase their pension? ‌ "You will be taxed 20 per cent over £12,570, which means you'll be worse off and you'll be asked to pay more in, you'd then have your benefits stopped if you're below the limit and that takes you below the limit and that takes you over the limit even by 10p." Martin said: "Let me split that into two. Without being rude, on the first bit you're talking nonsense. Okay, look, tax in this country is marginal. You only pay 20 per cent on the amount above the threshold. "The State Pension has always been taxable if you have other income, it counts as taxable income. So look, let's say you add £1,000 a year to what you earn and that £1,000 is above the threshold. "Yes it's taxed so you only get £800 of it. But you still get £800 more. Tax is marginal, you always want to earn more, you always receive more if you earn more. "You might not get every pound more that you're being given but you're still, the more you earn the more you get, so the tax thing, that's a red herring." He added: "The other one isn't - for those on very low incomes if you may be eligible for Pension Credit and you don't have any other income, the Pension Credit effectively tops you up to the full State Pension anyway so if you're gonna buy years to top you up to the full State Pension a it is possible that you would have simply got it via pension credit anyway."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store