Outdated environment laws may hinder Australia's dreams
Ken Henry - a former Treasury secretary, NAB chairman and prime ministerial adviser - has urged Australia to overhaul its main environment act as the Labor government pursues a litany of economic reforms.
Its plans to build 1.2 million houses by 2029, boost renewable energy, and develop the critical minerals industry have taken attention away from the languishing Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.
But Dr Henry says Labor's ambitious proposals cannot be achieved without major reform.
"If we can't achieve environmental law reform, then we should stop dreaming about more challenging options," the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation chair will tell the National Press Club on Wednesday.
"To put it bluntly, there is no chance of Australia meeting stated targets for net zero, renewable energy, critical minerals development, housing and transport infrastructure without very high quality national laws."
These goals are also an answer to Australia's flagging productivity which the government has been determined to address in its second term.
"Economics has, for the most part, ignored the most important constraints on human choices," Dr Henry will say.
"Our failure to recognise that the laws of nature affect the set of feasible choices available to us is now having a discernible impact on productivity - and things are getting worse with accelerating speed.
"We need to break the deadlock."
Reforms to main environment laws would need to ensure Commonwealth, state and territory governments can co-operate for a shared purpose, finalise effective national standards and establish an expert, independent decision maker in the form of a national environmental protection agency.
Labor came into office with a promise to fix the laws, but its proposals have stalled following staunch criticism from scientists, environmentalists and mining industry groups.
Australia will miss many of its most important goals unless its environment laws undergo a long-overdue transformation, an economic heavyweight has warned.
Ken Henry - a former Treasury secretary, NAB chairman and prime ministerial adviser - has urged Australia to overhaul its main environment act as the Labor government pursues a litany of economic reforms.
Its plans to build 1.2 million houses by 2029, boost renewable energy, and develop the critical minerals industry have taken attention away from the languishing Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.
But Dr Henry says Labor's ambitious proposals cannot be achieved without major reform.
"If we can't achieve environmental law reform, then we should stop dreaming about more challenging options," the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation chair will tell the National Press Club on Wednesday.
"To put it bluntly, there is no chance of Australia meeting stated targets for net zero, renewable energy, critical minerals development, housing and transport infrastructure without very high quality national laws."
These goals are also an answer to Australia's flagging productivity which the government has been determined to address in its second term.
"Economics has, for the most part, ignored the most important constraints on human choices," Dr Henry will say.
"Our failure to recognise that the laws of nature affect the set of feasible choices available to us is now having a discernible impact on productivity - and things are getting worse with accelerating speed.
"We need to break the deadlock."
Reforms to main environment laws would need to ensure Commonwealth, state and territory governments can co-operate for a shared purpose, finalise effective national standards and establish an expert, independent decision maker in the form of a national environmental protection agency.
Labor came into office with a promise to fix the laws, but its proposals have stalled following staunch criticism from scientists, environmentalists and mining industry groups.
Australia will miss many of its most important goals unless its environment laws undergo a long-overdue transformation, an economic heavyweight has warned.
Ken Henry - a former Treasury secretary, NAB chairman and prime ministerial adviser - has urged Australia to overhaul its main environment act as the Labor government pursues a litany of economic reforms.
Its plans to build 1.2 million houses by 2029, boost renewable energy, and develop the critical minerals industry have taken attention away from the languishing Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.
But Dr Henry says Labor's ambitious proposals cannot be achieved without major reform.
"If we can't achieve environmental law reform, then we should stop dreaming about more challenging options," the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation chair will tell the National Press Club on Wednesday.
"To put it bluntly, there is no chance of Australia meeting stated targets for net zero, renewable energy, critical minerals development, housing and transport infrastructure without very high quality national laws."
These goals are also an answer to Australia's flagging productivity which the government has been determined to address in its second term.
"Economics has, for the most part, ignored the most important constraints on human choices," Dr Henry will say.
"Our failure to recognise that the laws of nature affect the set of feasible choices available to us is now having a discernible impact on productivity - and things are getting worse with accelerating speed.
"We need to break the deadlock."
Reforms to main environment laws would need to ensure Commonwealth, state and territory governments can co-operate for a shared purpose, finalise effective national standards and establish an expert, independent decision maker in the form of a national environmental protection agency.
Labor came into office with a promise to fix the laws, but its proposals have stalled following staunch criticism from scientists, environmentalists and mining industry groups.
Australia will miss many of its most important goals unless its environment laws undergo a long-overdue transformation, an economic heavyweight has warned.
Ken Henry - a former Treasury secretary, NAB chairman and prime ministerial adviser - has urged Australia to overhaul its main environment act as the Labor government pursues a litany of economic reforms.
Its plans to build 1.2 million houses by 2029, boost renewable energy, and develop the critical minerals industry have taken attention away from the languishing Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.
But Dr Henry says Labor's ambitious proposals cannot be achieved without major reform.
"If we can't achieve environmental law reform, then we should stop dreaming about more challenging options," the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation chair will tell the National Press Club on Wednesday.
"To put it bluntly, there is no chance of Australia meeting stated targets for net zero, renewable energy, critical minerals development, housing and transport infrastructure without very high quality national laws."
These goals are also an answer to Australia's flagging productivity which the government has been determined to address in its second term.
"Economics has, for the most part, ignored the most important constraints on human choices," Dr Henry will say.
"Our failure to recognise that the laws of nature affect the set of feasible choices available to us is now having a discernible impact on productivity - and things are getting worse with accelerating speed.
"We need to break the deadlock."
Reforms to main environment laws would need to ensure Commonwealth, state and territory governments can co-operate for a shared purpose, finalise effective national standards and establish an expert, independent decision maker in the form of a national environmental protection agency.
Labor came into office with a promise to fix the laws, but its proposals have stalled following staunch criticism from scientists, environmentalists and mining industry groups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Meta warns Labor changes to privacy laws could hurt AI
Meta is warning the Labor government any proposed changes to privacy laws could restrict its ability to train AI tools. Mark Zuckerberg says data from platforms such as Facebook and Instagram is essential for building AI that mimics real human communication. Meta claims Australia risks falling behind other countries if innovation isn't prioritised. Google has also raised concerns, arguing Australia's copyright laws could deter AI investment.
AU Financial Review
2 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
ASX to rise, Wall St higher after Trump denies plan to fire Powell
Australian shares are set to rebound after Wednesday's retreat. Shares were higher in New York, recovering from an earlier swoon, after President Donald Trump denied he was poised to fire Jerome Powell. The S&P 500 slumped early on reports the president was likely to seek the Fed chairman's ouster soon. Trump told reporters attending a White House event that he is 'not planning on doing anything' to remove Powell. 'Powell's removal is viewed by markets as a low-probability but high-impact event,' TD Securities said in a note. 'We would expect markets to price in higher long-run inflation, higher term premium, more near-term Fed rate cuts (and hence lower front-end rates), increased market volatility, and a steeper yield curve.' TD also said a shadow Fed chairman could be the next big worry for the US dollar, especially given the financing risks of the widening fiscal deficit. Market highlights ASX futures are pointing up 53 points or 0.6 per cent to 8588. All US prices as of 4.20pm New York time. Today's agenda The key focus is the June labour force report at 11.30am AEST. NAB said it expects employment growth of +20k and for the unemployment rate to remain at 4.1 per cent. TD Securities said a negative May jobs report didn't faze the RBA much as the bank chose to surprise with an on-hold decision as the Board placed more emphasis on inflation. 'However, another weak jobs report should nudge the bank to go ahead with a cut in August. We expect jobs to print at +15k which should push the unemployment rate to 4.2 per cent, assuming the participation rate remain at 67 per cent. Quarterly reports are expected on Thursday from Santos, Yancoal Australia as well as Alcoa, Gold Road Resources and Genesis Minerals. Later in the day, at 10.30pm, the US will release weekly initial jobless claims and June retail sales. Top stories Chanticleer: Why there's so much at stake for NAB and its CEO Andrew Irvine | Institutional investors are overweight NAB and nervous about what they're seeing in four key areas: leadership, competition, asset quality and costs. The 10 wealthiest executives in the ASX 300 revealed | Healthcare and tech company bosses, including the co-founders of the ASX's newest $30 billion company Pro Medicus, dominate the Rich Bosses list. From farmer to miner, Rio's new CEO is a breath of fresh air | When Simon Trott's parents installed air conditioning in their shearing sheds, their son learnt how to get the best out of staff. Now he has 60,000 of them. Will equity analysts be replaced by AI? That's a billion-dollar question | With disruption upon them, fund managers and investment banks, including Macquarie, are trying to get ahead of the trend, writes Joyce Moullakis. Is that 1 or 7? What the judge will have to decide in Bradfield | Liberal Gisele Kapterian alleges 'illegal practices' in her 26-vote loss in the election, and wants a judge to rule on the squiggles on 151 questionable ballots.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese is being pressured to choose Trump or Xi. Why not both?
Change can be hard to accept. Nowhere is that more evident than in what passes for much of the debate, discussion, analysis – call it what you like – relating to Australia's national security stance since Donald Trump won the US presidency eight months ago. It wasn't just America that changed when 49.8 per cent of the Americans who voted gave Trump a second turn in the White House – it was the world. A lot changed, because he promised it would, and he is in charge of the richest, most powerful country on the planet, so he can make it happen. His governing style is to treat everything like his plaything. One day he thinks this, a few days later he thinks that. Like most of his followers, he is guided by his emotions and suspicions. That is his unbreakable point of connection with them. On Tuesday, in a one-on-one phone call, the BBC's Gary O'Donoghue asked Trump if he trusted Vladimir Putin. Trump took a long pause and replied: 'I trust almost nobody, to be honest with you.' What is going on in America is not some entertaining distraction or minor diversion after which past verities will be naturally reinstated. The international order is being remade. Nowhere is this more obvious to Australians than with Anthony Albanese's visit to China, which crystallises in the Australian mind our new reality. On the one hand, we have China, an authoritarian state with whom we have few shared values, that is in our region and is our most important economic partner. We have a trade-exposed economy and one-third of our export income comes from China. On the other hand, there's America, our friend and ally for more than 80 years, which is moving quickly away from what we previously believed were a comprehensive set of shared values. Increasingly, its new administration reveals an intention to render Australia a form of vassal state via the AUKUS agreement. AUKUS has not yet reached its fourth birthday but the original signatories to the pact, Joe Biden, Boris Johnson and Scott Morrison, are all gone from their posts, exiting either in disgrace or embarrassment. AUKUS was an exercise in Anglosphere hubris. Biden believed he had figuratively speared Trump and the MAGA movement through the heart at the 2020 election and that America was back on its previous post-war multilateralist path. Johnson was riding high after his Brexit victory and his smashing of British Labour's so-called Red Wall in 2019. Morrison was polling well and believed he was on a winner with his China-bashing stance. He was not concerned in the slightest that he was walking out of a deal with France to build our next fleet of submarines. Loading Crucially, he saw political advantage with AUKUS, expecting that Labor might baulk at its inclusion of nuclear subs. That would have given him the opportunity to portray Labor under Albanese as disloyal to our greatest friend, America, and in the thrall of Beijing on the way to the 2022 election. But Albanese and his senior colleagues, nervous about their election prospects, saw that coming and immediately gave AUKUS the nod. As it turned out, Morrison accused Labor of being China's puppet anyway, to little avail. More importantly, however, Labor had, by embracing AUKUS, saddled itself in office with an unworkable, decades-long security pact. If AUKUS was ever fit for purpose, it isn't now, because our relationship with America, while remaining strong, cannot go back to what it was. Much of the Australian defence establishment cannot see it that way. Many analysts, former bureaucrats, academics and the Coalition parties won't readjust their view of the Australia-US relationship as one in which our interests and America's blur into a whole. They're obsessed with the fact that Albanese has met with China's president before he's met with Trump. Somehow, the lack of a face-to-face with Trump is all Albanese's fault. What does it say about Trump that he hasn't made it happen? The large number of holdouts in the defence and security establishment who insist that the America of 2025 is the friendly and predictable America of past decades with just a few Trumpian characteristics refuse to accept the obvious. America is no longer what it used to be, via a democratic decision of its own people. It's shocking to consider that as awful as the Chinese government is, at least we know what we are dealing with. Can we really say the same about America? It is now reviewing AUKUS, although the signs are that it actually wants to renegotiate it. Last week, the Trump administration briefed out its demands on Australia to the media, chiefly that it wants reassurances that the submarines it delivers to Australia under AUKUS would be deployed to assist the US in the event of a conflict with China. This was a bit of interference with Albanese's imminent meeting with President Xi.
