I hated Google Photos' AI search feature, but after the latest update, I love it
Joe Maring / Android Authority
At Google I/O 2024, Google introduced the world to 'Ask Photos.' It was a new Gemini-powered search experience for Google Photos that would enable you to use natural language to easily find pictures in your library. The pitch sounded great and like a legitimately good use of AI.
Unfortunately, Ask Photos' implementation fell short. I've been using Ask Photos for the last several months, and in almost every scenario, it's been significantly worse than the old search experience. Between slow loading times and a really unintuitive UI, Ask Photos has made searching for things in Google Photos horribly frustrating.
Given that, you can imagine my excitement when Google started rolling out a new and improved Ask Photos this past week. I wasn't entirely sure what to expect, but having now used it, I think it's brilliant.
The new Ask Photos search vs. the old version
Joe Maring / Android Authority
Old Ask Photos (left) and the new Ask Photos
Previously, the Google Photos search experience was essentially split into two versions. If you used Ask Photos, you'd get a reply to your search or question with a handful of photo results in a bizarre, horizontally scrolling list. You could tap the 'View more' button below to see more results in a vertical list, or tap 'Use classic search' at the top of the page to perform the same search using Google Photos' standard search tool.
The initial results in that horizontal list were often far too limited, while the 'View more' option displayed a lengthy list of additional pictures in a seemingly random order with no organization. The classic search still worked well, but there was no way to switch it as the default option over Ask Photos, making it far more complicated to access than it should have been.
Old Ask Photos
Old Ask Photos
Old Ask Photos
With this new version of Ask Photos, Google has essentially taken the old version of the feature and combined it with the classic Google Photos search to create one, much more intuitive search experience.
In the old Ask Photos screenshots above, there's a Gemini-written reply and a horizontal list of about a dozen images below it. Tapping 'View more' displays additional pictures of my dog, but they're in a randomized order that I have no control over. If I want a structured list of results, I have to tap 'Use classic search,' which takes me to a separate page to view my photos that way.
New Ask Photos
New Ask Photos
New Ask Photos
The new Ask Photos, by comparison, highlights 'Best match' photos at the top of the screen, accompanied by the same Gemini reply below. You can tap to see more of those 'Best match' photos, or simply start scrolling to see a reverse chronological list of photos matching your search term — just like the classic search did. There's also a checkmark button to select all photos from a given date, as well as a dropdown arrow that displays other photos from that day.
Now, instead of having two distinctly separate pages of search results, the new Ask Photos displays both Gemini AI results and classic search results on the same page. It's so much cleaner and so much more convenient.
While that's the biggest and best change, there are other tweaks that I love, too.
Joe Maring / Android Authority
When you search for something in the new Ask Photos, it initially displays that reverse chronological list of pictures and then shows a 'Writing reply' loading bar before it spits out the best match results and the AI summary. If you don't care about those things, you can tap the stop button next to 'Writing reply' to keep the Gemini stuff out of your search results. Further, simple search queries (such as searching the name of a person or pet) don't come with an AI-written summary at all.
And if you want to go a step further, you can even altogether disable Gemini from ever showing up in your searches. To do so, tap your profile icon in the top-right and then Photo settings -> Preferences -> Gemini features in Photos.
Do you prefer the new or old Ask Photos?
0 votes
Old
NaN %
New
NaN %
This is what Ask Photos should have always been
Joe Maring / Android Authority
Having now spent a day with this new version of Ask Photos, I'm seriously impressed with how well it works and equally confused as to why this isn't what Google shipped in the first place.
Where the old Ask Photos felt like a bad experiment that only made searching in Google Photos worse, this improved version feels like a legitimate upgrade, not only over the old Ask Photos but over the classic search, too.
I'm seriously impressed with the new Ask Photos.
Now, is it perfect? I'm not sure if I would go that far. Loading times can sometimes be a bit slower than I'd like, and some of the suggested search queries (namely, the 'Write a poem about me' one) are just silly. But compared to what we had before, this is unquestionably better.
Google says the new Ask Photos is 'starting to roll out to more eligible users in the U.S.', so it may still be a little bit before it's live on your phone. But I hope you get it soon, because it's taken one of the worst aspects of modern Google Photos and turned it into one of the best.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
5 minutes ago
- Associated Press
AOFAR Officially Launches GX6: The Top Budget Rechargeable Golf Rangefinder for 2025
NEW YORK, June 28, 2025 /CNW/ -- AOFAR today announced the release of the GX6 Golf Rangefinder, a leading choice for golfers seeking the best rechargeable golf rangefinder. The GX6 offers slope-adjusted distance, ultra-fast 0.02-second flag lock, a powerful magnetic cart mount, and modern USB-C rechargeable power, bringing high-end features to budget-conscious players. Weighing only 162g, the GX6 is one of the lightest golf rangefinders in its class, providing a comfortable and intuitive experience on the course. Its advanced optics deliver crisp visuals at 7× magnification with slope mode that can be toggled for tournament play. The built-in N52-grade magnetic mount allows golfers to securely attach the device to carts or clubs for fast, convenient access. The GX6's USB-C rechargeable battery delivers up to 12,000 distance measurements on a single charge, offering superior convenience and cost-efficiency compared to traditional battery-powered rangefinders. It's a 0.02-second flag lock with vibration feedback that ensures quick, accurate yardages, a must-have for faster-paced rounds. 'The GX6 delivers exceptional value for golfers looking to upgrade their gear in 2025,' said an AOFAR CEO, Mr Ding. 'It combines speed, lightweight design, rechargeable convenience, and tournament-ready accuracy — all for under $70. It's ideal for casual golfers, beginners, or anyone moving up from older battery-powered models.' Priced at just $69, the AOFAR GX6 Rechargeable Golf Rangefinder is now available on Amazon US and About AOFAR AOFAR is a global brand specializing in laser rangefinders and precision optics. From golfers to hunters and outdoor explorers, AOFAR delivers pro-grade performance at an accessible price. Learn more at Media Contact: Marketing director: Kris Ding Email: [email protected] View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE AOFAR
Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
Delete Every App That's On This List—‘Risks Are Too Great'
You should never use these apps on your phone. Republished on June 28 with new national security warnings over use of these apps. Tens of millions of Android and iPhone users are being warned they have installed free apps that leave them at serious risk. Those users could now be sending their sensitive data to companies under the control of the Chinese government. Earlier this week, I reported on the list of iPhone and Android apps issued by the Tech Transparency Project (TTP). These are all VPNs — virtual private networks. Apps which are meant to make users safer and more secure but are doing the very opposite. 'Millions of Americans have downloaded apps that secretly route their internet traffic through Chinese companies,' TTP says. It last reported on this threat in April, and now says 'Apple and Google app stores continue to offer private browsing apps that are surreptitiously owned by Chinese companies… six weeks after they were identified.' A raft of warnings now have followed that report, urging users to delete the apps. 'The risks are too great' to keep them on your phone, warns Top10VPNs Simon Migliano. 'In light of these findings, I strongly urge users to avoid Chinese-owned VPNs altogether." For its part, Google says it is "committed to compliance with applicable sanctions and trade compliance laws. When we locate accounts that may violate these laws, our related policies or Terms of Service, we take appropriate action.' While Apple makes similar assurances, and says it enforces App Store rules but does not differentiate its handling of apps by the location of their developers. It does say where VPNs are concerned that data sharing with third parties is prohibited. vpnMentor's Lisa Taylor says this is 'no surprise,' that "China usually uses different methods to gain other countries' citizen's personal information, most of which are often covered behind a legal front.' And that 'free VPNs are perfect cover up to these kind of operations,' often recording user activity even when they say they don't. BeyondTrust's James Maude agrees. 'If you aren't paying for a product, you are the product. These VPN services are a perfect example of the hidden costs of free apps where users seeking more privacy online are potentially unknowingly feeding data to a foreign nation state out of fear their local coffee shop Wi-Fi is spying on them.' While Black Duck's Vijay Dilwale calls TTP's report 'a sobering wake-up call that VPNs, which claim to protect privacy, can pose very serious security risks, especially when their true ownership is hidden. These apps have access to all user traffic, and when handled by Chinese-based entities, the implications are well beyond individual privacy.' TTP reports that all of the VPNs it has identified "are listed as free in the app stores. But during TTP's May spot check, researchers observed that some of the VPNs offered in-app purchases on top of whatever users get with the 'free' app.' This lack of transparency, Taylor told me, 'is one of the main reasons why we do not recommend free VPNs and we are concerned that with all the content restrictions throughout the world, people are flocking to free VPNs.' Migliano says "true internet freedom and privacy depend on transparency and trust. Yet despite being made aware of glaring privacy failures and opaque corporate structures, Google and Apple continue to permit these high-risk apps on their platforms.' There are also some more serious national security concerns that have been raised. The nature of these apps on devices with obscure geographical locations and ownership is a major issue when it comes to those handling sensitive data or making their locations. Cequence Security's Randolph Barr warns 'there's no question Apple and Google can and should do more to mitigate the national security and privacy risks posed by VPN apps with undisclosed foreign ownership, particularly those tied to hostile nation-states.' Which raises a question around an added layer of app store security. 'While they have frameworks in place for data protection and transparency,' Barr told me, 'enforcement is often inconsistent or delayed, especially when developers obscure their true ownership through complex corporate structures. Conducting deeper vetting requires significant legal, technical, and geopolitical effort, something these platforms have been slow to scale.' This leaves a vacuum others may need to fill. Barr suggests the following mitigating actions, and says if they can't be handled at app store level, they must be done by organizations needing to control such risks: Deepwatch's Chad Cragle has issued the same warning. 'When owned by Chinese companies and hidden behind layers of shell companies, it becomes a serious concern. Apple advocates for protecting our privacy, yet these apps are still accessible. Google?' Cragle says 'they often allow nearly any app on their store. It's time for the platforms to take responsibility and set the example. You can't claim to prioritize privacy if you're letting other parties control the playbook. If they don't properly scrutinize these apps, they're not just passively allowing it—they're helping to create the problem. And let's be honest, this isn't just about privacy; it's about national security, too.' Here is the list of apps from TTP's report: Apple App Store: Google Play Store: The Android app vpnify is also in TTP's report, but has now relocated outside China and has contacted TTP to update its information and to be removed from the report.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Generation Z employees say they rely on AI for emotional intelligence
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. Generation Z employees are increasingly using artificial intelligence tools for emotional intelligence concerns in the workplace, such as understanding a manager's tone in an email and drafting an appropriate reply, according to a June report from In a survey, 76% of Gen Z workers said they use AI chatbots. Among those, 94% said they've used AI to navigate workplace issues. Nearly 3 in 10 said they do so 'all the time,' while 40% do it often. 'Gen Z workers often feel more validated and confident after consulting AI because these tools offer immediate, judgment-free feedback in a format that feels safe and familiar to this generation raised in a digital world,' said Kara Dennison, head of career advising at In the survey of more than 1,000 full-time U.S. Gen Z workers, nearly half said they change how they communicate with others after using AI; a third respond more assertively than usual, and 26% apologize or take responsibility. Gen Z workers said they most commonly use AI chatbots to interpret tone, with 75% saying they've asked a chatbot to analyze an email, Slack message or other digital communication. They've also used AI for emotionally charged, sensitive situations that involve miscommunication or direct conflicts with managers or co-workers. Although many Gen Z workers say AI chatbots help them process workplace conflicts, it isn't always positive. Forty-three percent said AI reinforced their biased reaction or beliefs, and 17% said AI has made them less likely to take personal responsibility. 'One of the biggest risks is the elimination of personal responsibility,' Dennison explains. 'If an AI tool consistently validates a user's perspective without challenging it, it can reinforce a fixed mindset, enabling blame-shifting rather than self-reflection.' Dennison noted the potential upsides of AI use but emphasized that chatbots can't address the nuances or empathy needed in sensitive situations. For instance, AI can't interpret body language, understand power imbalances or navigate organizational context, she said, adding that AI users may miss out on professional development or real-world feedback from workplace conflicts. 'Healthy workplace communication depends on empathy, active listening and accountability,' Dennison said. 'AI can complement that process, but it cannot replace it.' More than half of Gen Z workers see AI tools as a co-worker or even a friend, and nearly half said they'd rather ask a chatbot a question than consult their boss, according to another report from Workers said they use AI to complete tasks, make tough decisions, seek advice and find mental health support. In the midst of AI use and workplace conflicts, HR pros can help create an emotionally healthy culture, according to a report from McLean & Co. Instead of avoiding emotions at work, employers can be 'proactive about how emotions and work can coexist to enable workplaces where everyone can thrive,' McLean advised. Recommended Reading AI job postings are on the rise, notably in software development, Indeed says
